I've been crunching the numbers. Since prizepicks doesn't allow you bet on a single player or game (you must pick 2 to 6 props) they are intentionally setting some lines off slightly from what the other lines makes say. Why? It increases the entries/wager placed because we see value. But we have to win 58% of bets just to break even. So as long as the prizepick line only has a positive EV of a few percentage (say a 53% chance of hitting versus 50%) they are cleaning up. How did I determine we have to pick 58% winners? Well a 2 pick power play pays 3x. So we'd have to win 1 of every 3 entries to breakeven. 58% x 58% = 33%. It's actually pretty genius of them. We think it's a bad line but it's actually bait. We need to educate the community. I wont be placing any more bets unless they are free squares or protected plays..
Having to play apps games to build up money for prizpick because of my situation ihas been truly raugh on me to say the lest but this video on free tools to help me on this journey is truly a blessing may the universe return the blessing to you
hey! i just watched this video & i have a question regarding using the On/Off Court Stats. i’m looking at the Per 36 - Basic Stats - PTS for players & they don’t match the AVG for the specific player on ESPN. for example, im looking at Brandon Ingram. under Basic Stats in the PTS category, they have him at 24.5 PTS, but when i go to ESPN, his AVG PTS for this season is 23.2. there isn’t too big of a discrepancy between these numbers, but players who don’t see as much playing time, such as Austin Reaves, have a massive discrepancy of like 7 PTS or so. anyways, am i interpreting this data incorrectly? thanks for any feedback! & happy new year!
Yo you cooked yesterday I hit a 4 man from your locks, you got a discord somewhere I can chop it up with u about locks I’m pretty profitable myself nice to have a team
