Тёмный

Friendship forged in war endures between American and Vietnamese vet l ABCNL 

ABC News
Подписаться 17 млн
Просмотров 13 тыс.
50% 1

ABC News’ Martha Raddatz spoke with two veterans, one American and one South Vietnamese, who fought together in the Vietnam war, and have remained friends for a half century.
ABC News Live Prime, Weekdays at 7EST & 9EST
WATCH the ABC News Live Stream Here: • LIVE: Latest News Head...
SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: bit.ly/2vZb6yP
Watch More on abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK / abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: / abc
#ABCNLPrime #veterans #VietnamWar #friends #JohnDuffy #MedalofHonor #LeVanMe

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

 

6 июл 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 71   
@phill9238
@phill9238 Год назад
Jocko podcast 342 goes into details on how extreme this conflict was and how these two warriors stood there ground agents 2 battalion of VC insane.
@TheOgrande
@TheOgrande 2 года назад
Battle Buddies for life. Such amazing story. I served too in US Army.
@manhnguyen5
@manhnguyen5 Год назад
Wow, by accident I saw this video clip, hats off to two veterans . Such emotions, my father was in the military of VNCH sout vietnam. He passed away two years ago. Such heroism and bravery from the two men, can't say enough.........
@vitalion4135
@vitalion4135 Год назад
Sorry but it wasn’t heroic to invade/terrorise a country that wanted peace :/
@vitalion4135
@vitalion4135 Год назад
Fighting your own people, the south was under a dictatorship called Diem and you really think Vietnam would want a dictator?
@manhnguyen5
@manhnguyen5 Год назад
@@vitalion4135 only North VietNam invades SouthVietnam. You don’t know what you are talking about.
@manhnguyen5
@manhnguyen5 Год назад
@@vitalion4135 VietNam sure don’t want communist Ho Chi Minh.
@vitalion4135
@vitalion4135 Год назад
@@manhnguyen5 Uh no, the Americans wanted to assist the south to contain communism in the North. Would you want a dictator to lead your country? I suppose not. All of these dictators are bad and the south had a dictator supported by Americans. Even some of the south Vietnamese rebelled against the south dictator.
@ranjanbiswas3233
@ranjanbiswas3233 2 месяца назад
This is just so beautiful. I see not a single bit of animosity between them. Both looks like they were born friends.
@Dinerokid-rh5tu
@Dinerokid-rh5tu 2 года назад
All my grandfather's and my uncles served in the Vietnam War. And the Vietnam War was one of the most horrific wars imaginable. You still have Vietnam veterans that still have PTSD and nightmares still to this day.
@brentondudley3925
@brentondudley3925 2 года назад
Did you read about what these two men went through? A whole battalion down to 35 men. Duffy was the only advisor during the battle of Charlie Hill.
@Dinerokid-rh5tu
@Dinerokid-rh5tu 2 года назад
@@brentondudley3925 I'm aware of the entire Vietnam story so you don't have to educate me on it.
@vitalion4135
@vitalion4135 Год назад
Yea, I imagine how the Vietnamese felt especially when devastating chemical weapons were thrown at them.
@Chinacommunist
@Chinacommunist Год назад
@@vitalion4135 My grandfather was a vietnamese Viet cong, he witnessed chemical weapons dropped on his group, he has extreme disablites now because of the gas dropped on him. The kids were gone all around him. His friends were burned from the bombs dropped. He still has chemical burns on him, scars across his body. I really hate some entitled Americans telling Viet cong soldiers to k*ll themselves.
@vitalion4135
@vitalion4135 Год назад
@@Chinacommunist agreed, I hate some proud American veterans that fought there thinking they are heroes when they terrorised a country that never wanted to be invaded and ruled by a dictator.
@th-music
@th-music 2 года назад
Brother in arms forever! That is the way!
@baccamau80
@baccamau80 Год назад
Haha they are puppet of US and American people don't like them too
@user-td2jw9ze2c
@user-td2jw9ze2c 29 дней назад
​@@baccamau80Vietnam is not a US puppet
@user-jf7uc7dw7o
@user-jf7uc7dw7o 10 дней назад
Salute to the heroes.
@johndavis9432
@johndavis9432 10 дней назад
They are heroes,just like the other Vietnam veterans.
@TheLongLouis
@TheLongLouis 2 года назад
This is heartwarming.
@jamalbaguan8386
@jamalbaguan8386 12 дней назад
Thats is Buddy. We fight together we live together we die we survive together buddies!!!
@deadman123x
@deadman123x Год назад
The South Vietnamese remember the dead commander/Airborne enlisted in the song “Người Ở Lại Charlie” (Those who stayed behind at Charlie)
@brentondudley3925
@brentondudley3925 2 года назад
Col Reeder and Jocko podcast brought me here.
@DMU386
@DMU386 2 года назад
Yup. Amazing podcast
@brentondudley3925
@brentondudley3925 2 года назад
@@DMU386 Any idea what to search to listen to the radio calls they referenced in the podcast?
@kevincai6410
@kevincai6410 3 месяца назад
Clarification: Lt. Col Lê Văn Mế is a brave soldier and an outstanding Vietnamese military officer. But I disagree with the statement that he twice received the Republic of Vietnam equivalent of the US Medal of Honor! Please check with Wikipedia: the US Medal of Honor is the “single” highest award, and the highest Republic of Vietnam medal is the National Order (Bảo Quốc Huân Chương) but it has 5 levels. The highest award is 1st Level, and the only one ever received that is the General of the Army Lê Văn Ty (the only 5 star general in South Vietnam Arm Force) Lt. Col Lê Văn Mễ received the National Order award twice means he received 5th and 4th Level of that award. While I have high respect of Lt. Col Mễ, I think the aforementioned statement is wrong. - one should not proclaim his award is highest, while it is actually it is 4th highest - honor should not touted, honor should be worn and be recognized by others While I respect him, and recognize his dedication, the truth must be spoken. Respectfully
@phuclam3461
@phuclam3461 Месяц назад
🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇳❤❤❤
@no1reallycaresabout2
@no1reallycaresabout2 6 дней назад
Nice to see more mainstream media acknowledgement of South Vietnamese veterans. Often popular Vietnam War history depicts the war as us against "the Vietnamese" ignoring our antiCommunist South Vietnamese allies. Did Hanoi Jane and her ilk opposing aid to South Vietnam say anything when our South Vietnamese allies were put into "re-education camps"?
@angelofjustice913
@angelofjustice913 11 месяцев назад
read the book, Slices of Life behind Bars of Pham Thanh Nghien. To understand the brutal treatment of Vietnamese communist against the freedom activists
@daddy9925
@daddy9925 2 года назад
Why is this a story now?
@yvonneplant9434
@yvonneplant9434 2 года назад
If you were alive during the Vietnam war you'd understand why this is a big deal. Even now it's a big deal.
@daddy9925
@daddy9925 2 года назад
@@yvonneplant9434 but WHY now?
@andrewsong8683
@andrewsong8683 2 года назад
@@daddy9925 The person of interest in the video, MAJ Duffy, received a Medal of Honor last week from Joe Biden. Coinciding with July 4th, the video is timely.
@Bearsmith23
@Bearsmith23 2 года назад
@@daddy9925 His previous decoration was just upgraded to the MoH due to the persistence of his older commanding officer, and due to the deep research of Ret. Col. Bill Reeder during the course of writing a book about the battle of Charlie Hill.
@dogbounty1282
@dogbounty1282 Год назад
It’s a long story, But a book was just released about the battle. The author has spent the last 4 years fighting for this man’s medal to be upgraded to a moh
@Que532
@Que532 2 года назад
Never trust your enemies
@ZeroResurrected
@ZeroResurrected Год назад
They’re not enemies. They fought on the same side
@Que532
@Que532 Год назад
@@ZeroResurrected enemies to me
@dmcshk4166
@dmcshk4166 Год назад
@@Que532 idiots!
@timwinterhalter5233
@timwinterhalter5233 Год назад
@@Que532 good thing your retarded ass isn't a military commander then
@Que532
@Que532 Год назад
No im against you I hate Edomites… your going to slavery soon so get in shape exercise devil
@naburtdanndo661
@naburtdanndo661 2 года назад
It would be wise to appologize for killing so many innocent lives for the simple pleasure of a few persons ! So many children , women and men ! You were doing your Job ? I don’t think you can say that to the man in the mirror !
@johnd.2778
@johnd.2778 2 года назад
yep. sadly you're right.
@an.american
@an.american 2 года назад
Let's not forget that the Democrats were leading this war from Washington.
@johnd.2778
@johnd.2778 2 года назад
@@an.american they're all warmongers - to suggest the republicans are less is absurd. Remember Iraq? Remember Afghanistan? Remember every war in our history? The republicans have always been all for it and usually lead the charge.
@yvonneplant9434
@yvonneplant9434 2 года назад
@@an.american Not quite. Nixon expanded the war to Cambodia. Johnson did not run again in 1968 mostly because of the war.
@an.american
@an.american 2 года назад
For those wonderful Americans commenting on my post where I state that, "Democrats were running the Vietnam war from Washington". I hope you guys take the time to read this. It seems that I was vague in my comment. Some clarification. A summary of the Vietnam war compiled from different sources from Google search. Five U.S. Presidents have been, in varying degrees, involved with the Vietnam War: Harry Truman (D) becomes president in 1945 upon Roosevelt’s death. State Department officials warn him that French rule of Vietnam would lead to “bloodshed and unrest.” The French arrive in Vietnam. At first, the United States remained officially neutral, however, Truman asserted that U.S. foreign policy was to assist any country whose stability is threatened by communism. Then comes the Korean War in 1950. This prompts Truman to reexamine his administrations position on Vietnam. Fearing that Vietnam, too, would become a communist state, he sent over transport planes and jeeps, along with 35 military advisers, as part of a multimillion-dollar aid package to aid the French. U.S. involvement in the conflict would only deepen from there. Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) Though Eisenhower sent no U.S. troops to the region, he continues to authorize military aid to the French. In 1954, the French suffered a catastrophic defeat at Dien Bien Phu, bringing their colonial reign to an end. Eisenhower, who succeeded Truman, demurred, refusing to involve the United States in another major conflict so soon after the Korean War. “I am convinced that no military victory is possible in that kind of theater,” the president wrote in his diary. Vietnam partitioned itself in two, with Ho in control of the North and pro-Western leader Ngo Dinh Diem in control of the South. Eisenhower supplied Diem with money and weapons, sending nearly $2 billion in aid from 1955 to 1960. By the time Eisenhower left office, open fighting had broken out between Diem’s forces and the so-called Viet Cong, communist insurgents in the South who were backed by North Vietnam. Each side employed brutal tactics, including torture and political assassinations. John F. Kennedy (D) After visiting Vietnam as a congressman in 1951, John F. Kennedy publicly lambasted U.S. efforts to assist the French, saying that to act “in defiance of innately nationalistic aims spells foredoomed failure.” Three years later, he presciently declared, “I am frankly of the belief that no amount of American military assistance … can conquer an enemy which is everywhere and at the same time nowhere.” His tune changed, however, by the time he ran for president in 1960, in part over concerns he would be called soft on communism. Once in the White House, Kennedy provided South Vietnam with jet fighters, helicopters, armored personnel carriers, river patrol boats and other tools of war. He also authorized the use of napalm, as well as defoliants such as Agent Orange. Meanwhile, under his watch, the number of military advisers rose to about 16,000, some of whom began engaging in clandestine combat operations. Originally a supporter of Diem, Kennedy sanctioned a coup in 1963 that resulted in Diem’s death just weeks prior to his own assassination. Near the end of his life, JFK hinted to aides that he might withdraw from Vietnam following his re-election, but it’s unclear whether he would have actually done so. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) At the time of Kennedy’s assassination, U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War remained fairly limited. But that changed in August 1964, when the so-called Gulf of Tonkin incident prompted Congress to grant expansive war-making powers to newly installed President Lyndon B. Johnson. Recognizing that the South Vietnamese government and army were on the verge of collapse, Johnson sent the first U.S. combat troops into battle in early 1965. He simultaneously authorized a massive bombing campaign, codenamed Operation Rolling Thunder, that would continue unabated for years. Draft calls soon skyrocketed-along with draft resistance-and by 1967 there were around 500,000 U.S. troops in Vietnam. That same year, large anti-war demonstrations popped up in cities across America. U.S. officials kept insisting that victory was imminent. But, as the Pentagon Papers would later reveal, these comments were deeply misleading. In reality, the conflict had devolved into a quagmire. Vietnam became so polarizing, and Johnson’s name became so synonymous with the war effort, that he ultimately decided not to run for re-election in 1968. Richard Nixon (R) Richard Nixon campaigned for the White House promising to end the Vietnam War. As president, Nixon gradually withdrew American troops as part of his policy of “Vietnamization.” Yet he escalated the conflict in other ways, approving secret bombing raids of neighboring Cambodia in 1969, sending ground troops into Cambodia in 1970 and sanctioning a similar invasion of Laos in 1971, all in a largely futile attempt to disrupt North Vietnamese supply lines and destroy Viet Cong camps. In January 1973, just as the Watergate scandal was heating up, Nixon finally ended direct U.S. involvement in Vietnam, saying “peace with honor” had been achieved. As it turned out, though, fighting continued until 1975, when North Vietnamese troops marched into Saigon, South Vietnam’s capital, and reunified the nation under communist rule. May our future be brighter than it was when we were young faced with uncertainty. But our future really doesen't matter anymore as we have already lived our life. What matters now is our children's and grandchildren's future. But, it seems that theirs will be just as bleak. Nice sharing insights with you. An American
@an.american
@an.american 2 года назад
Let's not forget that the Democrats were leading this war from Washington.
@MrKogline
@MrKogline 2 года назад
As a retard, how have you overcome your obstacles in life?
@ejacob1994
@ejacob1994 Месяц назад
A failure of a war that caused the life of innocent souls. I have zero respect for those who fight for the wrong reasons.
Далее
An Iowa town goes to battle for Afghan immigrant
7:51
Просмотров 732 тыс.
Navy SEALs Give Back to Vietnam Combat Interpreter
2:30
Впервые дал другу машину…
0:57
Просмотров 942 тыс.