Тёмный

Friendshoring the Lithium-Ion Battery Supply Chain 

Center for Strategic & International Studies
Подписаться 313 тыс.
Просмотров 4 тыс.
50% 1

Lithium-ion battery supply chains encapsulate the profound shift in trade, economic, and climate policy currently underway in the United States and abroad. Policymakers seek to create paths towards an effective green transition, but they also must contend with the national security and economic risks posed by U.S. reliance on foreign nations for critical minerals and other necessary materials. The lithium-ion battery supply chain spans the globe, but crucial inputs and processing capabilities are centralized in a handful of countries. This dual dynamic of dispersion and concentration renders the global supply chain susceptible to geopolitical disruptions and shifts in trade relationships. Exacerbating this issue is China’s dominance in lithium-ion manufacturing, including in the processing of most mineral inputs and key end-uses such as EVs-as well as its position as economic competitor and long-term strategic threat to U.S. interests.
Senator James Lankford (R-OK) will join the CSIS Scholl Chair in International Business for the launch of its report on Friendshoring the Lithium-Ion Battery Supply Chain on June 11. He will offer keynote remarks on the importance of reducing dependence on China for critical minerals, followed by a fireside chat with CSIS's William Reinsch. This discussion will be followed by a panel of experts from industry and government which will dive deeper into the report's findings. Further panelists to be announced.
This event is made possible through the support of the Cobalt Institute, the American Chemistry Council, Autos Drive America, the American Clean Power Association, and the Consumer Technology Association.
---------------------------------------------
A nonpartisan institution, CSIS is the top national security think tank in the world.
Visit www.csis.org to find more of our work as we bring bipartisan solutions to the world's greatest challenges.
Want to see more videos and virtual events? Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: cs.is/2dCfTve
Follow CSIS on:
• Twitter: csis
• Facebook: CSIS.org
• Instagram: csis

Опубликовано:

 

15 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 16   
@Gnosticware
@Gnosticware 4 месяца назад
Lankford is a straight up guy that can speak to both his own party, the other party and independents like me. If Republicans had more like him I'd actually consider voting conservative again.
@edwardr8826
@edwardr8826 4 месяца назад
Please don't give prc firms the 45x tax credits and don't let their critical minerals/battery component firms be eligible for the 30x tax credit as well.
@ycplum7062
@ycplum7062 2 месяца назад
The US needs a long term policy (and long term funding and support) and that is not possible in a highly partisan environment.
@rooseveltoggssr.9647
@rooseveltoggssr.9647 Месяц назад
Lankford is a great guy.
@roderickcampbell2105
@roderickcampbell2105 4 месяца назад
Considering CSIS I am always surprised at the technical issues. Those issues do affect viewers.
@ycplum7062
@ycplum7062 2 месяца назад
There is a massive shortage of blue collar workers and the demand is expected to grow. I am not referring to minimum wage labor. I am referring to higly skilled blue collar workers whose wages can exceed those of college graduates. Instead of four years of college, they many need several years of apprenticeship or technical schooling.
@roderickcampbell2105
@roderickcampbell2105 4 месяца назад
So lot's of US energy needs, but no nuclear energy from OK it seems.
@takunveritas
@takunveritas 4 месяца назад
I'll agree to that. Strictly speaking from a national security standpoint. Uranium cant be mined from US exclusively. I think we are at the sweet spot, using up all the Uranium we can comfortably get from allies. Any additional Uranium will have to come from Kazakhstan or Africa. ATM, that is slightly under 10% of US energy. Most energy still comes from Oil and nat gas. Following your point, for national security reasons, we should raise our intake of coal and hydro.
@Valiguss
@Valiguss 4 месяца назад
@@takunveritasI would push back on coal, it’s far more expensive per unit of energy than either solar or wind given the most recent ipcc report Also before someone jumps on it this is per unit produced, which means even taking into account downtime solar and wind are cheaper
@Overmeow_Overmeow
@Overmeow_Overmeow 4 месяца назад
Meow 😸
Далее
РЫБКА С ПИВОМ
00:39
Просмотров 1,1 млн
U.S.-India Clean Energy Partnership for 450 GW
2:52:11
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.
New Energy Jobs: A Midwestern Success Story
58:04
РЫБКА С ПИВОМ
00:39
Просмотров 1,1 млн