The view from China: Exclusive interview with Ganfeng Lithium

Подписаться 2,1 тыс.

Просмотров 7 тыс.

50% 1

Join us in this exclusive interview with Wang Xiaoshen, president of Ganfeng Lithium, China's largest lithium producer. In this video, we explore the company's strategy to secure lithium resources around the world, and discuss the state of the lithium and electric vehicle markets.
🔋 What's Inside:
- Ganfeng's views on current lithium prices and its plans to secure future resources.
- US EV tariffs: How Ganfeng views President Joe Biden's tariffs against Chinese EVs.
- Solid-state batteries: A discussion on solid-state batteries.
- Sustainable Practices: The company's commitment to environmental responsibility and sustainable mining and processing practices.
- Future Forecast: Views on China's EV and energy storage markets
Don't miss this opportunity to hear directly from one of the giants of the lithium industry. This interview offers valuable insights into one of the most critical elements powering our world.
👉 Stay tuned and subscribe for more content on the movers and shakers of the clean energy revolution!
The video is part of Benchmark's new Power Players video series, where we'll be speaking to leaders in the global battery supply chain. Click subscribe to catch up with new episodes. Benchmark Source subscribers can access our full library of interviews, analyst presentations, and energy transition insights here: source.benchmarkminerals.com/. Not a subscriber? Request a free trial: source.benchmarkminerals.com/....
#electricvehicle #solidstatebattery #lithium #tariffs

Наука

Опубликовано:

6 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 34

@peterjohn5834 18 дней назад

My second review of this interview my assessment goes up from excellent. This CEO is superb. So open and honest, building a worldwide business. I am vey happy Pilbara has a good working relationship with Ganfen, a great business partner.

@donkeykong516 Месяц назад

China readiness for competition is amazing. America plays protectionism games.

@patrickshanghai2064 Месяц назад

good stuff. mr. Wang makes a lot of sense.

@raceyamates5435 Месяц назад

Great interview

@leozhao175 Месяц назад

Excellent interview! China's welcome of Telsa to help set up the Chinese EV market and supply is a good example. The US should do the same to welcome BYD to build in North America to build up supply instead of raising tariffs.

@thisiskevin1000 10 дней назад

The closest would by Geely-owned Volvo, Lynk and Company, Polestar and Zeekr brands, and even Faraday Future and Leapmotors with the backing of Stellantis.

@peterjohn5834 Месяц назад

Excellent interview on a range of issues. Thanks for the interview

@benlamprecht6414 Месяц назад

Thanks for yet another excellent video

@LunarGlow92 Месяц назад

Can you please get someone from china that has expertise in manufacturing at scale with automation. I gotta say i seen the xiaomi factory and it literally blew my mind. It was fascinating to watch. I would love to hear from some of those engineers and just hear how they think and what kind of planning, effort and what went into building something like that.

@allangraham970 24 дня назад

Munroe live might be a good place to start

@1dforbes Месяц назад

Gangfeng used to be considered a fair player and a good jv partner. But not now after their collaboration with the Mali government to take the Goulamina from Leo Lithium

@thisiskevin1000 10 дней назад

Diversification

@sharonjames2041 28 дней назад

😢Interesting Conversation 🤔 ❤

@daramy9507 Месяц назад

Quite an informative discussion. What some call overcapacity is actually market competition. Everyone is jumping into a lucrative market while others like BYD are aggressively building up an economy of scale in order to become more price competitive. Isn't that what we call capitalism? It is taken directly from the Western playbook.

@friedhelmschroter8124 25 дней назад

"Isn't that what we call capitalism? It is taken directly from the Western playbook." Yes, that is what we call capitalism. Yet there is one key difference from the Western playbook and that is that Chinese companies/production can rely on workers/engineers that ask a fraction of what Western workers/engineers demand while Western countries competed on a roughly similar salary level. You may accept this key difference or you may ask China to increase the value of their currency or you may modify free trade to a "controlled free trade", controlled in the sense that excessive bancruptcies of western companies will be avoided while still allowing competition.

@allangraham970 24 дня назад

Interesting that he thought Tesla comming to China is what made their elec vehickes so competitive. Yet USA feels it cannot compete with China and the usa federal goverment treats Teska as the enem and the elec market in usa is seen by the usa media as faultering 😂

@medielijah Месяц назад

'interesting'.

@lb9007 Месяц назад

Great questioning but is it only me that have the impression that the CEO wasn't offering much meat in his answers? Felt like he was limited in his scope of responses. Is he afraid of the CCP?

@HTeo-og1lg Месяц назад

Yea. But it's only you that is fearful of your shadow. Like the advertisement of Guinness Stout goes: "The evil mind is always fearful of a knock at the door of his home." 😂😂😂

@friedhelmschroter8124 25 дней назад

Can you give some clear examples? For me he could have represented an US company not willing to open all its targets, because competition and also hostile Western politicians do listen too. And yes, as a Chinese company you should be quite careful when commenting on Chinese policy. The same does apply to less extent to American companies and as example you can take S&P which dared to downgrade US from AAA to AA according their free speech judgement and got fined on this by 1 billion USD, because US had no intention to stop living a nice life on debt.

@allangraham970 24 дня назад

He is polite😂 watching RU-vid generally it is rare to humility

@localguide1611 Месяц назад

Great questions, crap answers. He pretty much gave no information.

@blee7650 Месяц назад

A 100% import tariff spells the end of China supplying lithium related supplies into the US market. If China wants access to the world's #1 consuming market in the world, then they will need to play by the same rules. They will need to setup factories and employ US labour on US soil, just as how they demanded Western companies that wanted in on the China market, could only do so by having foreign companies to setup plants in China. The tables have turned around. Also SE Asian markets don't have the disposable income as the typical American, not many places around the world do hold the wealth as western nations do so when this CEO said how the IRA and US geopolitical problems would affect their lithium business, saying that poorer, less wealthy nations would take up the slack is a nothing burger. Ganfeng trades on the OTC which a share price high in Aug 2021 of $15 to a low today of $2.72. Can't trust the CCP

@cariocaamigo542 Месяц назад

seems you are not fimilar with this industry or investment. Just for your information, ALB is No.1 lithiuth producer which US company, 2nd producer SQM Chile based, and another top 5 LTM Aussie company. All of them are public list company. There are many companies in North America e.g. PLL, LAC, IND, SYA... but their share price... Obviously the interview guy just does not answer that north america are not target market. It is different with EV or engergy battery.

@blee7650 Месяц назад

@@cariocaamigo542: yep and all those lithium stocks heading to 52 week lows. They've essentially missed valuable gains in the broad market. But that's a different issue. Boric has the ultimate power in Chile and since he took office, ALB has went on a downward trajectory from over $300 to $115. US lithium company or not, owning lithium stocks has been a very bad investment if you bought at the high. Why? Because the EV boom is over and countries around the world have rolled back Climate Change concerns. Demand for lithium fell off a cliff - end of story. SQM shareholders are getting screwed on the basis that Codelco will be taking over their operations after 2030. You know what happens when a gov't entity takes over? It reaps all the profits for themselves and leaves crumbs for the private shareholders. I can go on for about any lithium company. Joe Lowry was severely wrong trying to call the bottom on lithium prices.

@derschrecklichesven8368 Месяц назад

I also think LCE prices can easily go as low as 80-90k. Problem rn is, that the opportunity costs for a lot of miners to shut down and later boot up production are higher than to run on low or negative margin for some time. Im not too well informed on this, but I think chinese miners want the price to be where it is. I wouldnt be suprised if they dont care about the price at all and are just told by CCP to supply lithium for cheap chinese batteries. With low price, competition for new lithium projects also stays low so they can further extend their market share in global lithium production. If you look at graphite, they are already at over 90%. IMO the only way to invest in lithium stocks rn, is to bet on american companies that can endure the low prices and would potentially profit from tariffs on chinese miners.

@donkeykong516 Месяц назад

It’s not about politics or trust, it’s about economics, capitalism, & risk mitigation. If talk trust then you trust no one. Trust is a good way to get screwed.

@friedhelmschroter8124 25 дней назад

Some people corrected your obviously wrong impression about Ganfeng strength in the supply of lithium. Here are some additional corrections on your somehow weird view: 1) The largest global consumer market is today China (US is only 2nd) 2) China does play by the capitalist rule of free market. The US is obviously not any more willing to play by these capitalist rules it pushed for over many decades! 3) Which global rule does need a company to set up production in US? I am not aware by such rule at all (yet some americans would like to have such rules because it is not any more sufficient/convient for them to live on making debt only). 4) Yes, Asian people do not have the disposable income of Americans, yet by number there are 10x (15x?) more Asians than Americans and the progress on disposable income in Asia is higher than in US. Why do you think your government wants to pivot its policy to Asia instead of Europe etc? And this despite US not being an Asian country and having even rejected to establish a free Asian trade zone!