From the Start [ Laufey & Frank Sinatra ] 

NO BCS MY GRANDMA WAS THE REASON I GOT INTO JAZZ IN THE FIRST PLACE

@@Alonzz0 Naww that sounds soo sweett🥲

THISSS

no cuz i wish

yessir

for the algorithm o7

o7

o7

o>

ITS GENIUS

SO SMART

Frank takes the lower bass frequency while laufey's voice takes the higher highs and treble

Exodus 20:7 and Deuteronomy 5:11 read: Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

Tell her bro trust me you’ll regret not telling her even if you don’t get rejected Because there could always be a chance

@@MazeStillAnimates it's already late, she got another guy now, I hope she's happy with him, but I would never forget about the first girl I fall with

@@sadgeajime👑 you dropped this

ok

you'll find someone soon bro, we're all pulling for you

what does it mean?

​@@rheraprobably with a headphone, you can hear only Frank singing on the left, and only Laufey singing from the right.

@@ffeph oh thank you!

Fly me to the moon would be amazing with laufey's voice, it matches her style too

She’s covered his songs a few times, I think she did one of his Christmas songs

I think it’s just an illusion of quality, cause the only effect I added was reverb and spatial audio, it also helps that their both singing at the same time masking the quality

Its one of those things where its 50% bad for the community and 50% good for the community, its really hard to exactly pinpoint the morals of using ai

By that logic it would be considered disrespectful to remake or copy famous artists works or styles like Van Gough?

@@TrickyTri educate yourself on the copyright laws and how this affects artists. I cannot say for painting, but in music, a piece of work becomes public domain and is free of any copyright only after the artist has passed for 70 years. Frank Sinatra died 25 years ago, and Laufey is very much alive. But you're using not just Laufey's creation, but both of their voice, especially Frank Sinatra's fed through an AI model to imitate him, without their consent. Yes, it's absolutely disgusting and disrespectful af.

@@iamai_iggs We can agree to disagree, this isn’t harming anyone inherently, either way the world goes around and it’s just preserving Frank’s legacy through the preservation of his voice, in a few hundred years we, along with him are gonna be forgotten anyway

how are they stealing from him..?

@@TrickyTri it's not a matter of agreement. it's morality. and you're deadass naive if you think this isn't harming anyone. artists are not protected against the the illegal use of voice imitation like this. they are not paid a cent for their voices to be used as training data that feed into AI models like the one you used to generate this song. nor does the labels who own the copyrights, nor do the staffs that work there, their family, Frank's family. It's called residuals in a trickle-down economy. You might be gone and forgotten in a few hundred years but there are people still living now depending on this as parts of their incomes. Why the fuck do you think Hollywood is having a strike right now? It also dilutes the market value of the song. Why would anyone care to listen to the copyright authentic recordings of any songs anymore when they can just get a free version generated by AI. Preserving legacy is a weakass excuse. If you want to preserve the artist legacy, then you preserve the real thing, not this imitation that was made without his permission.