Тёмный

Fukushima nuclear disaster re-created - Bang Goes The Theory - BBC 

BBC Studios
Подписаться 3,7 млн
Просмотров 143 тыс.
50% 1

Jem Stansfield, recreates a damaged nuclear reactor core, simulating the disaster at the Fukushima nuclear power station.
Bang Goes The Theory, investigating the science behind the headlines and making sense of the everyday issues that matter to us all.
Subscribe to the BBC Worldwide channel: bit.ly/yqBWhy
This is a channel from BBC Studios who help fund new BBC programmes. Service information and feedback: www.bbcstudios.com/contact/co...

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

27 июн 2013

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 104   
@lanceshelton5024
@lanceshelton5024 5 лет назад
YOU DIDN'T SEE STYROFOAM, BECAUSE ITS NOT THERE!
@peaveyst7
@peaveyst7 4 года назад
i think there is some styrofoam in the rubble
@siddharthrm6385
@siddharthrm6385 4 года назад
Well your eyes are not great but not terrible .
@joshualogan6655
@joshualogan6655 4 года назад
Just shut up.
@josephastier7421
@josephastier7421 2 года назад
Oh you funnyboi
@benson7600
@benson7600 5 лет назад
Fukushima engineers used Styrofoam as roof containment.
@krumplethemal8831
@krumplethemal8831 10 лет назад
Well I see the problem. You aren't suppose to create the cap of your reactor out of styrofoam.
@doright6461
@doright6461 8 лет назад
Hell No Reactor Dome...We won't Take Yer Styrofoam!!! . Don't by Walmart Reactor Domes!!!
@CarlosAM1
@CarlosAM1 3 года назад
You are, actually, if it was the same as all the rest the explosion could transfer its energy to the core and damage it. Fukushima had blast walls for a reason.
@dragonfireproductions790
@dragonfireproductions790 Год назад
It's used so that the thing won't become a huge ass pipe bomb
@PardonMyFrenchTV
@PardonMyFrenchTV Год назад
When that pressure is in there, it has to goes out, the more you contend it, the more it became powerful. Not even a science fan, i may be wrong but i wonder if the explosion could have been avoided if they have built the top of the reactor with the same containment mesures they used for the rest of the plant.
@fluffybunny510
@fluffybunny510 Год назад
"You didn't see graphite, because it is not there"
@jeanclaudejunior
@jeanclaudejunior 11 лет назад
Good job solving the mystery of the Fukushima thing
@cr84nthing
@cr84nthing 11 лет назад
Any idea which ep?
@Ryukachoo
@Ryukachoo 11 лет назад
hydrogen explosion blowing apart a concrete building. the concrete gets pulverized and tossed extremely high up, and the heat from the blast causes the "mushroom", which is really caused by an updraft within the plume. look, if you're going to claim one of the reactors actually went supercritical (nuclear detonation), at least read what that actually means, and realize it's fundamentally impossible to do this with a boiling water reactor. the density is nowhere NOWHERE near high enough
@aorusaki
@aorusaki 2 года назад
You can have a small supercritical event though
@bartoszmaciuszek9446
@bartoszmaciuszek9446 19 дней назад
@@aorusaki with proper mass, purity and reflector or neutron source. in reactor i think the fuel is not concentrated enough
@d13214
@d13214 11 лет назад
Well explained
@rkshrivastava9000
@rkshrivastava9000 9 месяцев назад
Description is good
@AliHSyed
@AliHSyed 11 лет назад
Awesome slowmo.
@fierodough
@fierodough 11 лет назад
American nuclear engineer Arnold Gundersen, noting the much greater power and vertical debris ejection compared to the Unit 1, has theorized that the Unit 3 explosion involved a prompt criticality in the spent fuel pool material, triggered by the mechanical disruption of an initial, smaller hydrogen gas explosion in the building. Low-dose radiation researcher Christopher Busby speculated that the explosion that destroyed the Reactor 3 building was a "nuclear explosion" in the spent fuel pool.
@tsjerkwicherink9245
@tsjerkwicherink9245 9 лет назад
what reactive metal was in there? it seemed like Na but it also could be Li
@piranha031091
@piranha031091 8 лет назад
I'd say good old aluminium. He added hydrochloric acid to it.
@adewaleboi
@adewaleboi 11 лет назад
and this is not radioactive??
@domenicopaone7754
@domenicopaone7754 4 года назад
What the dosimeter says? 3.6 Roentgen but... 3.6 not great not terrible
@kevingrandberry2424
@kevingrandberry2424 8 лет назад
Nice
@michaelbollanduk
@michaelbollanduk 11 лет назад
i was just thinking that
@me282uk
@me282uk 11 лет назад
The nuclear material did not leak out. It is the water that has been used in the cooling process that is causing the issue. They are extracting and storing it, but some has escaped into the ground water system. The nuclear material in the plant itself poses no threat at this time.
@doright6461
@doright6461 8 лет назад
The pacific IS boiling just not there. . just at the volcano. seafood gumbo. Got Butter!
@TheFerrariGuy4588
@TheFerrariGuy4588 8 лет назад
Wow
@AlMayer1100
@AlMayer1100 11 лет назад
The supercriticality didnt occur in the reactor. It occurred in the SFP of #4.
@arclight2011
@arclight2011 11 лет назад
hi ryukachoo why was there such a huge mile high mushroom cloud? the other hydrogen explosions were diffuse and much smaller, the dust was black and that reactor happened to be running on MOX fuel.. so the question NO ONE asks is.. did MOX cause an larger and more powerful explosion? "..(nuclear detonation) .." or mox indused mini nuke.. ?? the military use depleted uranium to help induce extra heat and blast potential.. does MOX fuel have something that does similar?? thx for the reply.
@FowlorTheRooster1990
@FowlorTheRooster1990 2 года назад
The reactor didn't explode, if you look at the containment buildings only the roof was destroyed which means the spent fuel pools ignited the hydrogen which seeped into the containment buildings, If the reactors exploded then the ENTIRE BUILDING would Be a burning wreck instead of the roof being a burning wreck.
@FowlorTheRooster1990
@FowlorTheRooster1990 2 года назад
If your stating that MOX fuel had something to do with the explosion being more powerful, then your wrong, The enrichment levels for the fuel used is not enough to make the fuel explode like a bomb, and an atomic bomb relies on a runaway reaction, A reactor Can not and Is unable to explode like an atomic bomb.
@arclight2011
@arclight2011 11 лет назад
recreates a damaged nuclear reactor core .. he actually shows what happened in daich 2 and maybe daichi 1 (no one can get near it) not 3 and not what happened afterwards..
@conorwhyte2053
@conorwhyte2053 10 лет назад
I completely agree with Alexander Alcyone's opinion and this can be backed up with some of the Gamma Spectroscopy kits given by open source groups online to farmers and those people around the area. Most of the contamination is in the form of Cs137, Cs134 and very short lived Radio-iodine (I-131) from reactor fuel. None of the heavier elements like Uranium or Plutonium in the MOX fuel escaped into the air like at Chernobyl, which was a totally complete containment failure. Yes, there was partial melting at 3 of the reactors and this has caused significant groundwater problems. It is NOT airborne!!! If any mox fuel was blasted into the air like some are suggesting here, we'd have seen traces of it in our rain water in N.A. which we haven't. Plutonium is very easily detectable with a low energy Gamma Scintillation detector. "over 20 tons of MOX was blasted into the air" comment below is utter nonsense and a worse situation than what occurred in Ukraine in 1986. Btw, the event at Chernobyl sent a massive cloud of fallout over Northern Europe and was even detectable in North America some weeks after the accident.
@arguescreamholler
@arguescreamholler 5 лет назад
If hundreds of times more radiation is released from an accident than a bomb does it matter if it has as much explosive power?
@bradfordpal
@bradfordpal 11 лет назад
Never ever ever! Ever?
@fishgil5476
@fishgil5476 8 лет назад
Actually, It can happen, what happens is that a neutron is shot with precision at an atoms nuclei center(Uranium Iso-238, 5-20% Iso-235) In a successful attempt, cause it to literally slit in half, releasing 2 elements, and also energy, and 2-3 neutrons. In an uncontrolled nuclear chain reaction, What happens is the chain reaction is going so fast that in a fraction of a sec. billions of atoms will split in half releasing energy, nuclear energy in the form of heat, light, and gamma rays. After exploding, anything in the radius will likely get vaporized at a temp. of 4000* C. or 7000* F. After that within a fraction of a sec. a shockwave at the speed of 716 nearly hitting mach 1. Thus releasing too game rays (Y) causing air and rain to be radioactive, considering the decaying speed of the radioactive particles. Now not having a fail safe is just plain stupid, if there had been a failsafe all control rods would have pushed home, thus taking away all the heat to the cooling plant. There going into a boiler, creating energy.
@AIRburst95
@AIRburst95 7 лет назад
Fish Gil four words. Positive Steam Void Coefficient
@oceanwong4906
@oceanwong4906 11 лет назад
Series 5 episode 8.
@nathandean1687
@nathandean1687 10 лет назад
wrong!! then exp;lain the 3 mile island accident then.
@FowlorTheRooster1990
@FowlorTheRooster1990 2 года назад
That was a partial meltdown, not an accident including four reactor meltdowns and 3 of the containment buildings being damaged from a hydrogen explosion in the spent fuel area above the reactors.
@primodernious
@primodernious 5 лет назад
its exactly that gas build up that happens when a volcanoe erupt. the gas build up intil the cavity explodes. the magma have no enough pressure to penetrate the ground so a cavity of gas builds up tanks to the decacy of particles resulting in light isotopes that create the gas build up that eventually explodes. without nuclear fission there would be no volcanoes. radon gas leaks out of both volcanoes and mountains. there is no reason why elements like uranium and plutonius chould be in 99 percent purity in any place on earth but such concentrations of radioactive matter would be needed to form volcanoes. is it not strange that so many volcanoes on earth are close to the ocean just like nuclear reactors? is it not strange as well that the volcanoes many times lines up with more or less even space apart?
@brendanwood1540
@brendanwood1540 10 лет назад
Yeah, well they could not have vented all of the steam or there would not be anything to keep the reactor cool. Also, the real problem not discussed in this video was the lack of power to the facility following the tsunami. The pumps to add and circulate additional water could not operate without power. There were two valves that should have been opened manually to allow the steam to travel into the emergency condenser. However, lack of proper training lead to a failure to do so. Instead technicians thought that they would open automatically. So the temperature inside the reactors rose and rose until even metal could be vaporized. This cause the material to burn through the concrete and metal below the reactor and form a molten mass of metal. This much like Chernobyl could be like a weak dirty bomb if anything fell on it with sufficient mass and kinetic energy. This is a total downplay of the disaster. Just look at recent news.
@krumplethemal8831
@krumplethemal8831 10 лет назад
Also let's not forget that had the back up generators been placed in a better location, such as on a higher floor other than a basement or first floor. Things could have been drastically different. The reason the back up generators were not available was because they had been installed in the basement of the building which was flooded by the tsunami.
@WoodymC
@WoodymC 5 лет назад
Location near "tsunaming" ocean + Electric stuff in a floodable basement = Extremely dumb idea = Broken by design. qed.
@arclight2011
@arclight2011 11 лет назад
30 children with thyroid cancer already.. (smoke and alcohol? average age 15 :( )
@user-gf6yl8jg6z
@user-gf6yl8jg6z 5 лет назад
JAPAN IS INTENTIONALLY HIDING AND PLAYING WITH THE REAL DATA CONCERNING CHILD THYROID CNCER INCIDENCE >2011 IN FACT , THEY ARE ROUTINELY REMOVING EVIDENCE (THYROID GLANDS) IN CHILDREN- NO INVESTIGATION-NO ULTEASOUND-NO BIOPSY. PURE EVIL ALL TO SPREAD GOOD NEWS PRIOR TO 2020 GAMES / PRESERVE RICE EXPORTS/ CAR EXPORTS/ PRESERVE NUCLEAR CRIME FAMILY. THEY ARE POISONING US ALL. DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY THINK THAT THIS ISN'T HAPPENING? HAS PHONE APPS REALLY BRAINWASHED US INTO BELIEVING EVERYTHING " THE APP " SAYS. WHY ARE PACIFIC ORCAS DISSAPEARING- FAST? ORCAS EAT CHINOOK SALMON? SALMON EAT SARDINES? SEA BIRDS EAT SEA CREATURES AND SMALL FISH... OH , ITS ONLY CLIMATE CHANGE= ANOTHER G7 MEETING IN AUSTRIAN ALPS- W/HOOKERS AND CAVIAR- YOU PAY(TAXES) THE FROGS HAVE BEEN BOILED NICELY. -ONTO TO FUSION REACOR TECHNOLGY NOW...... WHATTTTTT, WHAAAA. WHATS THE COSTS INVOLVED ?.....WHAAAAAAAT? NUCLEAR INDUSTRY HAS THE ANSWER! YOU PAY UP FRONT - FOR THE CONCEPT REALISATION ! YOU DONT BELIEVE ME? DO THE RESEARCH THEY WANT US TO PAY FOR THE FUNDING OF FUTURE REACTORS (YEARS IN ADVANCE) THIS GENERATION IS SO DUMBED DOWN , ITS NOT FUNNY. LETS LEGALISE CANNABIS (TO FURHTER ERADICATE CRITICAL THINKING ) YOUV'E BEEN BOILED NICELY. KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE PACIFIC ORCA SALMON NUMBERS .
@FowlorTheRooster1990
@FowlorTheRooster1990 2 года назад
@@user-gf6yl8jg6z Ok how many deaths has nuclear caused compared to fossil fuel deaths. There has been 1 direct death from the Fukushima nuclear accident. 800 deaths from stress in the elderly, the stress was caused by the evacuation. There has been 34 direct deaths from Chernobyl. 30,000+ people may die from cancer after Chernobyl No single death from Three Mile Island. The Windscale Fire had no direct deaths, and a few hundred to a thousand people may have died from cancers from before and after the Windscale Fire. SL-1 Nuclear Accident only 3 direct deaths caused by the reactor meltdown and no indirect deaths as the containment building was not destroyed. Fresh nuclear Fuel is barely radioactive so you can hold fresh uranium without protection. Uranium mining and Processing has caused few deaths in the range of 1000 deaths. Nuclear Fusion is not available yet, no not because of the costs, but because we haven't created a sustained Fusion reaction that actually produces more energy than we put in.
@legobuilds3219
@legobuilds3219 3 года назад
There's styrofoam on the ground
@tensevo
@tensevo 2 года назад
Excellent presentation. When you say, "can never become nuclear bombs" the proliferation of weapons grade uranium presents nice collectibles for potential terrorists.
@reddragonflyxx657
@reddragonflyxx657 Год назад
Reactor grade uranium isn't weapons grade (unless it's in a military vessel or headed to space), and fuel reprocessing to get plutonium is also difficult. Even if you have plutonium, it's difficult to make a nuclear bomb out of it (and a fizzle is pretty much a dirty bomb with more explosive force and less fallout). A dirty bomb made of the stuff we use for medical, industrial, and imaging purposes would be much easier to acquire, and has excellent optics for a terror group. If you have the resources to make a plutonium nuke, you can probably build a secret reactor to make the plutonium, and centrifuges to enrich uranium.
@arclight2011
@arclight2011 11 лет назад
umm? watch?v=9k3Ofs6R9cg A mile high, dark thick black smoke mushroom cloud the white "sticks" you see are 300 meters high!! what is in the black smoke and where are the coriums (old reactors) what happened to the number 4 explosion footage?.. questions questions?
@FowlorTheRooster1990
@FowlorTheRooster1990 2 года назад
It was a plume of smoke, then nothing NOT A MUSHROOM CLOUD
@kezenglish4111
@kezenglish4111 11 лет назад
Wow you dont say Einstein
@ouivalerie
@ouivalerie 10 лет назад
Where did the MOX fuel go under reactor 3??? Please don't steer me to reactor 4 fuel rods, as I believe it's a ground show to look like they are doing something. I am worried about the reverse volcano type of thing from that MOX they say is a million times more reactive power than reactors 1,2, and 4 had nothing in the reactor just a few hundred thousand rods some say now, not 1500 rods....there's a lot of figure out, but the worst I hear, is that true? Where did the MOX fuel go under reactor 3? Is it making a reverse volcano into the Pacific Ocean and killing the entire Ocean like some are claiming? The boiling water has already been observed in the Pacific at Japan.
@BudFieldsPPTS
@BudFieldsPPTS 10 лет назад
Short answer: Yes.
@kronek88
@kronek88 10 лет назад
Boiling? You mean, scientists have built a huge and complex reactor just able to power a turbine and with just a little debris of it the whole ocean boils? WTF where did leave logic?
@FictualKyle
@FictualKyle 7 лет назад
+DiaveD I don't think logic was ever in them.
@FowlorTheRooster1990
@FowlorTheRooster1990 2 года назад
The amount of fuel in Fukushima would dilute in the ocean, even then the Japanese Clean up teams are clearing up Fukushima as we speak and all the radioactive materials will be stored in a safe storage facility.
@Sparty-no1oe
@Sparty-no1oe Год назад
great now do Chernobyl
@zer0b0t
@zer0b0t 10 лет назад
Fukushima is just a slow Chernobyl.
@JackMaddock1
@JackMaddock1 7 лет назад
+ zerpBot, in Fukushima, they managed to avert the reactor exploding by venting the gases from the reactor into the atmosphere, carrying with them a large degree of radioactive pollutants. In Chernobyl, the reactor did explode, and the actual graphite and uranium was ejected both in large chunks (on the roof and Elephant's foot) and in small ones (the smoke from the fires). So while you can say that Fukushima was just a slow Chernobyl, the speed of the Chernobyl accident meant that a plethora of other problems occurred, and it was qualitatively different from Fukushima.
@zer0b0t
@zer0b0t 7 лет назад
Of course, they are two separate incidents but I believe I was thinking more about the amount of contamination when I made that comment. Yes, atmosphere vs sea contamination are very different.
@hansgruber788
@hansgruber788 5 лет назад
Nope they were slightly different. Chernobyl's reactor number 4 was not shut down and destroyed the control rods leading to a complete meltdown. Fukushima's reactors were shut down and the control rods were inserted. But due to the water pumps failing the fuel wasn't cooled causing a meltdown.
@deannelson9565
@deannelson9565 5 лет назад
@@zer0b0t Fukushima never exposed the core vs Chernobyl launching its core all over the goddamn place! There is a drastic drastic drastic difference between the two and one is far easier to control. Almost all the problems from Fukushima at this point originates with reactor three in the fact that the donut shape cooling pool below the reactor is what exploded not the roof like which happened in 1 2 and 4 and is demonstrated in this video. When they tried to vent the gas as he showed in this video that venting wasn't directly out of the core to the roof but in fact down into that cooling pool and it was from those cooling pools that they eventually vented the gas into the roof unfortunately reactor threes coolant pools valve did not open correctly and the cooling pool over pressurized and exploded launching not only radioactive gas but massive amounts of radioactive water directly from the core.
@Luka1180
@Luka1180 10 лет назад
The Pacific Ocean is not boiling.
@garrettwilson2626
@garrettwilson2626 3 года назад
So, this is basically how Chernobyl happened
@FowlorTheRooster1990
@FowlorTheRooster1990 2 года назад
Chernobyl was cased by a completely different chain of events, the operators at Chernobyl didn't know that the reactor was unstable until the power surged
@udaloy117
@udaloy117 2 года назад
No, the core and containment of Chernobyl exploded, Fukushima the core melted and is in the containment which is intact but there was a hydrogen explosion in the building
@Kalepherion
@Kalepherion 10 лет назад
so many will see this as gospel and never question anything further. The story is far more complex, and the truth far more deadly.
@bravescd14
@bravescd14 10 лет назад
Because that's totally what is happening... Learn to science please.
@rwerk66
@rwerk66 10 лет назад
Reassuring? Fanboys!
@nukeourplanet
@nukeourplanet 11 лет назад
Nice misleading video there by the BBC!
@WadcaWymiaru
@WadcaWymiaru 6 лет назад
This guy is really wrong!
@arguescreamholler
@arguescreamholler 3 года назад
Garbage lies. Why is there corium at the bottom of the building?
@Mucho-Taco
@Mucho-Taco 10 лет назад
Propaganda
@Mucho-Taco
@Mucho-Taco 9 лет назад
do you? don't answer that because we both know your going to go to google, search it up and copy and paste the answer. that's not knowing it.
@FowlorTheRooster1990
@FowlorTheRooster1990 2 года назад
This isn't Propaganda, its and abridged and easily understandable version of what happened when the spent fuel ignited the hydrogen in the Top part of the containment buildings.
@MrTommyboy68
@MrTommyboy68 Год назад
I guess you forgot about the MOLTEN NUCLEAR FUEL (Corium) that MELTED THROUGH AT LEAST one of the pressure vessels. They STILL can't get underneath to see if it is melting through the secondary containment vessel. Latest video showed it DESTROYED the concrete leaving only the rebar holding up the whole thing. Another good earthquake and the entire structure could easily collapse onto itself. Then what???????
Далее
SL-1: America's First Nuclear Disaster
24:54
Просмотров 4,1 млн
Why Is It So Hard to Stop Meltdowns?
13:37
Просмотров 772 тыс.
Камень, ножницы, нейронка
00:33
Просмотров 1,1 млн
2DROTS vs WYLSACOM! КУБОК ФИФЕРОВ 1 ТУР
07:25
An Earthquake and a Tsunami Hit Fukushima
20:35
Просмотров 285 тыс.
The Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment
20:32
Просмотров 1 млн
What Fukushima's Nuclear Exclusion Zone is Like Today
12:55
Is Fukushima's Radioactive Water Safe?
21:15
Просмотров 1,2 млн
Inside MIT's Nuclear Reactor
17:54
Просмотров 4,7 млн
The Fukushima Robots
15:58
Просмотров 499 тыс.
Inside Fukushima: Beyond the 'No Go' Zone
16:01
Просмотров 1,7 млн
Samsung laughing on iPhone #techbyakram
0:12
Просмотров 2 млн