I've watched hundreds of Bernie Sanders speeches and I think this may have been the first time I've heard him use the word "Chutzpah"....brought a smile to my face
Except if you are white and rich. Because if you are white you can't be poor as Bernie said. And we must discriminate against the rich because they all have too much money according to Bernie.
Maybe because he's not a socialist but a democratic socialist, which is vastly different from socialism, Marxist socialism and communism? All democratic socialism is, is regulated capitalism added to a fair and just democracy. Stop acting like you hear a dog whistle whenever the word socialist befalls you and actually research for once. I mean, seriously.
Stephanie Diaz Haha there's more of a chance you'll be attending his funeral than his inauguration speech in 2020 haha. Nice try though Lib. Y'all should really think about getting new canidates. Trump 2020!
Tamby theGiant are you okay? You are loved okay! Stephanie is right, please get the hatred out of your heart. I don't care who you vote for, so stop degrading people that have a different opinion than you. No one is perfect Tamby! Anyways you are loved and I forgive you. Have a bless day!
When you have so much wealth that life becomes meaningless and people realize that society is just a complicated game of make believe because you can print unlimited amounts of money.
The topic I want to discuss here is why every true progressive mind should support President Trump and has no reason not to do so. (1) The definition of a “true progressive mind”: who sees the injustice in the disparity of financial power, namely 1% vs 99%. (2) Two solutions to this issue: (a) the overall political and economic situation of USA improves dramatically resulting in a decent level of earning for the low-end of the social ladder and comfortable financial conditions for the middle-class, (b) otherwise the only alternative is the redistribution of wealth by means of taxing the rich (e.g. 50% on the 2nd million of income and 90% on the 3rd million, etc.) and by the justification of citing unfairness in the initial distribution of the wealth. (3) The key is the consensus of the population for solution (b) to happen when solution (a) does not exist. (4) The major obstacles to reach that consensus are the following big problems that have persisted for so long (if not forever), and have CLOUDED THE ISSUE OF 1% VS 99%: (a) Global terrorism; (b) The federal deficit; (c) Illegal immigration and open southern boarder; (d) Drug epidemic. Any of these CLOUDING ISSUES can be used against the urgency and consideration of 1% vs 99%. How can 1% vs 99% be important when the life of an average citizen is not secure? How can you justify more money for helping the poor when the government is facing bankruptcy ? How can you justify more money for helping the poor when the number of the poor may increase infinitely by the constant flow of illegal immigrants ? How can you justify more money for helping the poor when the drug epidemic adds tremendous burden on the welfare system ? On the other hand, after these problems are either completely solved or dramatically reduced, the 1% vs 99% issue will STAND OUT, and the portion of the population who want to see the current situation of 1% vs 99% persist forever will have few excuses for their arguments! If you do not believe that Trump has the true intention to solve these problems despite his display of true willingness to do so, GIVE HIM A FAIR CHANCE ! The Obama administration showed no intention to solve these problems and have greatly exacerbated these problems instead. If you can tolerate Obama administration’s policies toward these problem, WHAT RIGHT DO YOU HAVE TO TRY TO DESTROY TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND TO IMPEDE ITS EFFORTS IN SOLVING THESE PROBLEMS ? (5) Paris Treaty for climate change: Paris Treaty is extremely important for the health of the Earth. However, because I believe that the future of this country depends on the success of Trump administration (as far as solving the above problems goes), if its success depends on the required economic growth and the economic growth depends on the TEMPORARY WITHDRAW from the Paris treaty, I support it ! (6) What Trump administration is facing is the coalition of leftists by face/mask/way of making a living (career politicians), and fascists by heart, the latter of which acts on behalf of the force that considers the four major problems listed above as vital tools/leverages for control over the population and considers anyone who dare to make serious efforts to solve them as the same kind of threat as JFK (so he must be destroyed). (7) Trump 2020. (8) Tulsi Gabbard for President 2024 !
"Give him a fair chance"?! He's on his 10th 11th and 12th chance. He has failed in every respect, which we knew was coming anyway. Your supposed "clouding issues" are far right talking points and are complete bullshit, classist, racist dogwhistles.
(1) "He's on his 10th 11th and 12th chance. He has failed in every respect" Please elaborate. Give me one example first. It's only 100+ days in, isn't it ? (2) "Your supposed "clouding issues" are far right talking points" That's exactly what I mean ! When these four clouding problems get solved or dramatically reduced, you can shut them up ! But the people who are trying to destroy Trump administration are "wittingly or unwittingly" preventing these problems from getting solved, and so "wittingly or unwittingly" help prolong the status quo of 1% vs 99%. The bottom line is that your baby can run only after the baby has leaned to walk !
The topic I want to discuss here is why every true progressive mind should support President Trump and has no reason not to do so. (REVISED VERSION)(SEE (6)) (1) The definition of a “true progressive mind”: who sees the injustice in the disparity of financial power, namely 1% vs 99%. (2) Two solutions to this issue: (a) the overall political and economic situation of USA improves dramatically resulting in a decent level of earning for the low-end of the social ladder and comfortable financial conditions for the middle-class, (b) otherwise the only alternative is the redistribution of wealth by means of taxing the rich (e.g. 50% on the 2nd million of income and 90% on the 3rd million, etc.) and by the justification of citing unfairness in the initial distribution of the wealth. (3) The key is the consensus of the population for solution (b) to happen when solution (a) does not exist. (4) The major obstacles to reach that consensus are the following big problems that have persisted for so long (if not forever), and have CLOUDED THE ISSUE OF 1% VS 99%: (a) Global terrorism; (b) The federal deficit; (c) Illegal immigration and open southern boarder; (d) Drug epidemic. Any of these CLOUDING ISSUES can be used against the urgency and consideration of 1% vs 99%. How can 1% vs 99% be important when the life of an average citizen is not secure? How can you justify more money for helping the poor when the government is facing bankruptcy ? How can you justify more money for helping the poor when the number of the poor may increase infinitely by the constant flow of illegal immigrants ? How can you justify more money for helping the poor when the drug epidemic adds tremendous burden on the welfare system ? On the other hand, after these problems are either completely solved or dramatically reduced, the 1% vs 99% issue will STAND OUT, and the portion of the population who want to see the current situation of 1% vs 99% persist forever will have few excuses for their arguments! If you do not believe that Trump has the true intention to solve these problems (not including “inequality issue”, which I do not expect to be of Trump administration’s concern), despite his display of true willingness to do so, GIVE HIM A FAIR CHANCE ! The Obama administration showed no intention to solve these problems and have greatly exacerbated these problems instead. If you can tolerate Obama administration’s policies toward these problem, WHAT RIGHT DO YOU HAVE TO TRY TO DESTROY TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND TO IMPEDE ITS EFFORTS IN SOLVING THESE PROBLEMS ? (5) Paris Treaty for climate change: Paris Treaty is extremely important for the health of the Earth. However, because I believe that the future of this country depends on the success of Trump administration (as far as solving the above problems goes), if its success depends on the required economic growth and the economic growth depends on the TEMPORARY WITHDRAW from the Paris treaty, I support it ! (6) What Trump administration is facing is the coalition of leftists by face/mask/way of making a living (career politicians), and fascists by heart, the latter of which acts on behalf of the force that considers the four major problems listed above as vital tools/leverages for control over the population and considers anyone who dare to make serious efforts to solve them as the same kind of threat as JFK (so he must be destroyed). (Year 2000, good outlook of federal financial future despite the burst of “dot com bubble” => 2001, 9/11 terrorist attack => Iraqi war => huge federal deficit) (7) Trump 2020. (Your baby walks first before the baby can learn to run.) (8) Tulsi Gabbard for President 2024 ! (Your baby runs after the baby has learned how to walk.)
