FULL FLIGHT! SpaceX Starship IFT-3 

That is what we call a "noun phrase". 114 of you and counting somehow missed the fact that there's no predicate to go with that subject.

@@rdbchase nerd

@@concept7804 A sentence is a complete thought; consider having one.

and also with its destruction even during the climb

Thank you! It was difficult but the hours spent at the gym paid off 💪

SpaceX will never penertrate the firmament..thats the main goal of rockets but its being covered up by lies yall are a bunch of devil worshipers

I remember showing people who hadn't followed the progress of the falcon the video of its first launch pad landing, they could not believe it was real

Every few seconds I kept thinking this is the best shot I’ve ever seen there was another. It was fantastic

I agree...I don't think the novelty will ever wear off, I have a feeling I'm going to be watching these launches with just as much excitement when they're sending multiple up per day.

Этой технологии 60 лет😂

😂😂😂 and when did all this happen on Starship champ? Last time I looked, one hit the ocean at faster than the speed of sound & the other exploded during re-entry after failing every test

@@mervstash3692 most (if not all) SpaceX rockets multi-stage and then both are separately controlled, with the first stage coming back under control while the main stage works its magic in orbit. Sure Starship hasn’t had all the bugs ironed out yet, that’s why they are test flights, but the cleverness of how SpaceX routinely stages and then controls what amounts to 2 rockets simultaneously is still a valid point IMHO but if you can’t see that for the technical marvel it is, then that’s ok.

@@richardmattocks dude STFU. They have a contract for the moon. They are years behind schedule. Don't try spin it with the "oh they are just testing" line. The goal submitted in the missing plan was to catch the booster & to soft splash the 2nd stage in the ocean. Didn't come close to achieving either of those. Stage 2 didn't make orbit velocity, Stage 2 failed the door test, it failed the fuel transfer. Everything was a fail. By all means geek out over the potential, but don't be a delusional sickafant.

@@richardmattocks a miracle appears when a physics textbook is put aside

What was cool about it? The first stage crashed back in to the ocean.

@@plica06 do you not know what the definition of a test is

​@@plica06 near uninterrupted, high quality, live footage of re-entry heating. Hands down the coolest thing ever.

​@@plica06 what's cool about you? Oh right absolutely nothing.

Ignore him. He's a thunderfoot follower​@@GipsyDanger41

Yep, if it had some more of them then it might've been able to control itself better in the extremely fast re-entry conditions

I think they're sufficient. Seemed more like overcorrecting.

Lattice rudders do not work in a rarefied atmosphere - but the audience trustingly awaits success. Fin rudders do not work in a rarefied atmosphere - but the audience trustingly awaits success. There is no gas steering system - but the audience trustingly awaits success. Thermal protective panels on the glue fall off even when gaining altitude - but the spectators trustingly await success. There is no life-saving system in place, but the audience trustingly awaits success. Elon Musk is a great marketer who sells a silo tower under the guise of a rocket to people who have not even mastered a school physics course🤣🤣🤣

@@user-xl4xp5bx8m why don't you make your own rocket comany then? get a loan? Get some employees? Do it yoursef 🤣🤣

@@nrbeast6000 because there is no market for launching payloads into orbit. It is completely monopolized.

Yay, failure!!!

What's your tiktok

What's your tiktok name

❤

Nasaspaceflight was absolutely the worst commentary I have ever seen.

​@@TheMoneypresident nsf has good video quality, but yeah i usually put them on mute.

@@TheMoneypresidentCan't forgive them for cutting out hotsage footage with their own crappy tracking camera

@shouryabose5943 there was some tool and a foreign fem. They were talking like teenagers. Then main event and no talking and explaining. Just a little jibber jabber.

I usually prefer NSF and as much as I really enjoyed Marcus House and Scott Manley being on, the rest of their stream was just infuriating

If only 🤣

Flat earther stays true to his convictions until he flatline.

@@Vogas2 The brain's already flatlined

@@R1PPA-Conly if there was any to start with

@@Vogas2 now that is the million dollar question 🤣

Let fly!

Well said 🤌🏻

@@R1PPA-Cwell said

The West: shoots rockets into space The Muslim world: shoots rockets into Isreal

@@GameboyAdvance6969 the west also shoots rockets into the rest of the world. Nobody cares for your political BS, op made a nice comment, you just managed to lower the tone for no reason.

@@GameboyAdvance6969 The West: shoots rockets into space The Muslim world: shoots rockets into Isreal Israel: shoots rockets into children and women…….

I’m not sure Commercial Space Flight as in point-to-point flights with Starship will happen but I’m confident they will do some kind of tourism thing where you can spend a day in space on Starship. It’s big and can fit around 100 people comfortably and the pressurised cargo is bigger than a Boeing 747’s pressurised cargo so it can probably do more than 100.

@@archierush868wow! The size alone is impressive! Have I heard correctly, it’s the largest and most powerful rocket mankind has made to date? Absolutely insane if so. As far as my comment on commercial space travel, what I meant was using the upper atmosphere for commercial flights to and from locations here on Earth. I guess “space flight” is the wrong term for this. Regardless I’m blown away by the advancements in my lifetime alone. From landlines and VHS to augmented reality and this! Im only 30 I can’t imagine what my son will see and experience as an adult.

@@YoWhoDatCorrect, it is the tallest, most powerful rocket ever made and launched into space in human history… and it’s designed to be fully reusable meaning the ship and booster can land itself back at the launch site by being caught on the giant black arms called chopsticks. Only one time in history i believe a rocket has ever been caught mid flight and that was recent in 2022 or 23 with RocketLabs Electron rocket which is tiny compared to this, was caught by a helicopter but was cut after the pilot said it was too hard to control so it was dropped. The booster is 70M or 210FT tall which is an extra 60FT taller than the Statue of Liberty from torch to toe. Include the ships extra hight of 50M or 150FT and it’s taller than the Statue of Liberty from torch to Ground with room for around 2 starships to be stacked onto of the statue sideways. It’s literally a flying Skyscraper which is insane! I’m young and have never seen any true rocket launch in person since I’m British and any possible rocket launch here would be scrubbed due to weather, but I dream of one day maybe there will be an offshore Starship launch pad close to the UK for space tourism.

Ksp moment

Methane Vs kerosene

@@nefaristo I didn’t realise that! Thanks for the info 😎

The Apollo program had an escape system and the thermal protection panels did not fall off at launch

@@user-xl4xp5bx8m Troll-bot account

Robots have been on Mars for like 20yrs now

They didn't step there 😁​@@francom6230

“bUt It’s a FIsh eYE leNs!” Yeah, and it’s so they can see more of the ROCKET and not the earth. If they wanted to, and i think they have a few times, they can launch a rocket with a perfectly normal lens which doesn’t show any distortion and you’ll get basically the exact same footage. I remember a picture decades ago of the Concord at a high altitude being taken from another plane which showed the curvature of the earth. If it was a fisheye lens, the concord would look very distorted, but it doesn’t because we know how they look. The picture of the concord from a high altitude proves the earth is round because you can literally see its round there.

You can tell that this is all fake, because there aren't any stars. 🤣

@@sdrc92126do you think a company like SpaceX would be smart enough to create a rocket this powerful, but forget to add stars?

@@archierush868 You would think

@@sdrc92126If you took the time to think, you would know you wouldn’t see stars during the day, even in space because theres this other star quite close to us called “The Sun” which is soo bright, cameras which are exposed to see the dim stars would be blown out from the brightness of the sun. It’s like trying to look at a candle from a mile away with a spotlight in your face, you just won’t be able to see anything.

MuskCult

@@David-wc5zl Anti-Musk cult:

It was the 21st century and Elon Musk was learning what falling thermal protection panels are and the inability to correct elevators in a rarefied atmosphere🤣🤣🤣

​@@user-xl4xp5bx8m You can critique once you fly a rocket to orbit. Like I said to you in another message, there is plenty of funding and desire for another capable company. So you go make a rocket (nevermind the largest and most powerful rocket to have ever existed) and we'll see what else you forget about

This is the third failure. 3 billion in taxes.

@@David-wc5zl ok? Well that’s your opinion.

@@David-wc5zlNot for the launch

​@David-wc5zl You're confusing the HLS contract with the Starship program as a whole. These flights are footed by SpaceX, and aren't related to HLS development. And the money SpaceX has gotten from NASA, $1.9 billion, not 3, wasn't wasted (since it's milestone based, so they only get paid when they complete said milestones).

@@David-wc5zl Also if you wanna pay less taxes, I'll give you a hint. Lockheed Martin scalps our govt. with exclusive contracts that cost us like 400 billion a year. If we didn't get rid of competition in the military sector post-WW2, we would have better military tech for way less money, but now 3 Companies have a stranglehold on the sector and can charge whatever they want with no alternatives or competition... SpaceX is advancing our species massively

I think they have to star the engines before, and control its power,

Yes.. inertia is everything

​@@renelnieves9999It's about fuel delivery. Liquid is very dynamic. I think a piston might be worthwhile. 🤔

I heard that the ship was slightly out of control and ignition would have worsened the situation. Bad stabilization during re-entry may have been one factor for RUD

@@archershillnurseryS28 had a roll on it, and SpaceX didn’t kill that roll

The engines burn methane and oxygen creating CO2 and H2O as by products. It won’t hurt the ozone. 😁

@@snake1557 Cool. Thanks for tuning me in. I was thinking too they could have the rockets powered by solar. As they gain altitude they get closer to the sun! This has to mean way more energy than at sea level, surely 👍 Mickey in 🇦🇺

@@snake1557 Provided they're launched during the day, that is. If they're launched at night the rockets could travel all the way to the sun & never get the chance to recharge their solar cells 😁

Great now I'm drunk 😂

Dammit Jim! Are you out of your corn fed mind?

Well, it technically didn’t it was about to being orbit, SpaceX wasn’t planning it since you don’t want that object in space just floating around.

It was a perbolic orbit.@@clipseobastian1433