Funicolare Zecca-Righi 

no, I shot with Sony RX100IV

@@fabiodidonna really? I have the original rx100...fun little stills but for video? meh. but looks good. never liked the AF on the rx100. the new ones, the V and VII i hear are pretty good, but it's a sony...money money money.

@@martysender5539 The RX100M4 is a good compromise for shooting good videos and photos. I almost always use manual focus

@@fabiodidonna to me its a point and shoot, on that tiny camera, my fat fingers are too wide to mess with manual focus. its made cheap. falling apart now. and besides only 1080 p video and on the original rx100, video ain't all that great...noisy. BUT, I salute your patience. got some great stills from it though I blew up on the wall, fits in your pocket. for convenient stills, family stuff, it's ok. I shoot Olympus for stills. I like 4/3. glad you like your rx4. I'd get the V or the VII if I had the money to blow. Have you tried the SonyZV1? THAT is a camera I'd like to get.....for some reason Sony color science IMO suxx...but for some reason on that little camera, they did something right with color. If only Sony could get stabilization right, it would be perfect. only $800 US> too. but I blew my Xmas money on the Pocket, and not sorry I did. When Sony comes out with a ZV2 and fixes stabilization? I'll get one. I'm not a big Sony fan, not even their high end cameras. I just don't like color science, especially skin tones. except skin tones on ZV1 are, for some strange reason, very good. thnx