Thank you for the view and comment. That's really cool, some of those native American copper artifacts along the shore of Lake Superior date back many thousands of years. You need to make a video too! 🤠
You know I'm actually not sure about this question I would have to do some looking into this. I know that it is set up to use the proprietary Z link system which is actually awesome but I don't know that it will work with any Bluetooth headphones. I will look into it and come back here to let you know what I find out. Thanks for watching the video and for your question!
Those are like my two favorite areas of California! I spend most of my time in those two towns. I know all the areas in between as well. Great area loaded with early California Gold Rush history. Thanks for the view and comment!
Here in California in the gold fields the 22 bullets sound just like nuggets and typically give similar numbers of course every one of our gold patches is full of bullets for some reason. We like to hear 22s on all metal detectors in California because you know you're not going to miss a nugget however yeah it's kind of funny that I said that a 22 is a good Target! ... because most people would think that's crazy! Thank you for watching the video and for your view and comment!
Yes the camo is not for everyone! Back in the mid 90's everyone was trying to get camo or earth colors on their machines. Don't see it as much at today's big hunts. Thanks for the view and comment!
I've used garretts for 10 years, mostly an AT Max, Its been a good machine - although its way behind the times these days, and Garrett is a great company with great service. But buying a detector based on looks is insane. The camo is pointless. And the people from duck dynasty are horrible right wing trumper / fundamentalists who put on extra stupid caricatures for their shows. I wouldnt believe any finds that they dig up. Teaming up with them has really tainted my opinion of garrett.
One of the worst purchases/recommendations i have seen lately. I purchased an AT pro 5 years ago because that's what I could afford in a new hobby plus Garrett was a known brand name. But today, for $759 for an AT max, a way way better a recommendation to people would an Minelab equinox 700 for $699. It works on wet, saltwater beaches flawlessly, AT max and Pro, are useless in that scenario.
Actually even the $269 Minelab X-Terra Pro is a better option for some users. But keep in mind (as I said in the video) some buyers prefer to buy only "Made in America" and there is nothing wrong with that, to each his/her own. But the AT Pro head to head with even an X-Terra Pro might surprise folks. Thanks for the view and comment!
I agree, compared to other machines on the market today, this model can't compete with other machines in the same price range. Thank you for your view and comment!
