#highstakespoker #hustlercasino #pokerclips Watch the entire episode here: • SUPER HIGH STAKES $100... Subscribe if you enjoy the clips! Link to Hustler Casino Live's Channel: / @hustlercasinolive
I was dreading coming to the comments to see everyone slamming Stanley, so I'm happy this is the top comment 😂. If Stanley's daughter does watch Garrett with him a lot, she'd understand the all-in.
@@32roho bad thought process. You’d rather win a small pot every time than win a big pot 80% of the time if there’s a chance of losing a big pot, even though you’d win way more money over the long term if you were willing to risk losing big pots.
@@matta5749 Your opponent will not always fold, and when they call, you get max value, if your hand stands up. I mean even Gman went into the tank for 3 minutes.
Garrett has an amazingly consistent series of twitches when he is stressed. Watch it sometime, he does almost exactly the same combination of moves and expressions, its cool to watch.
I think it’s to gather information from his opponents. A lot of the time he’ll go from saying and looking like he’s definitely folding to the complete opposite end of the spectrum. It’s gotta be hard to not give anything away in Stanleys position here
When you know how good you are, you can play slightly weaker hands that have good properties, like suited aces, suited connectors, etc. because you have more ways to win the pot.
Usually if you play cash games with a weaker player that is also aggresive it can be profitable trying to hit a flop because they will pay you. Even if they give you a few pots you know they will commit all in eaiser. So you can have a wider range against a worse player
He played this hand pretty poorly. Turn shove was obviously not a protection bet. That sizing only gets called by sets or A5 suited, and maybe once in a great while AQ. He was losing all the value from any other weaker Aces.
I didn’t get to watch the whole stream but I did see Stanley make two really good folds against agressive opponenets in Garrett and Andy, and I think they were back to back. He definitely knows how to play On a side note, Garrett has a very disarming way of talking to people in these situations even when they know exactly what he is up to, and I’m sure a lot of weaker players would give up some kind of tell here
Garrett the consummate professional handing the time chips to Lauren the dealer so it doesn’t get misinterpreted as a call (which happens pretty often accidentally or as an angle).
You'd think they'd have some other way of adding time except throwing in a chip that looks very similar to a poker chip. I always thought that was a little strange.
If you consistently get sucked out on, fast playing is not a bad play. I slow play and they always get there. No more of that strategy. Screw the math.
That was an easy fold !! Garrett always tanks when He gets pushed all-in with weak hands…He gets 4-bet pre-flop…then, He hits his ace on the flop and gets check-raised…He calls to see if Poker God give him a 9 😂 He didn’t get the 9, Stanley goes all-in and He’s thinking. 🤦🏻♂️
Garret overdoes it a bit when he’s trying to gather info from his opponent. Its just friendly enough to have plausible deniability that he’s not an ass
He played the AK horribly here bro. Don't be so results oriented short term. In the long term, he is lighting money on fire with his line here. Not even close.
What’s Stanley’s last name?? I know the other Stanley is Stanley tang, but no idea who this guy is!!! Love that he plays to win even though a few hundred k is nothing to him
With an SPR of 1 ott, jam is the only thing that makes sense. I just don't get the flop check or the flop xr. If he just takes a bet, bet, bet line, he gives himself a better chance of doubling up and maintaining some semblance of balance in this particular spot which he needs to have. As played, he likely has zero bluffs, allowing Garrett to fold a hand probably as strong as AQ and only calls with AK+ himself. A9 is a trivial fold since he beats nothing facing a value heavy line.
Easy fold in the games I used to play in but I would assume these guys are better than the majority of the competition that I would typically play against.
Stanley bets $6-7000 post-flop, Garrett would raise him, setting up a smaller SPR on the turn, or even a bet-call on the turn to set up easy river shove. Check-raise on flop is too strong; down bets are better for value.
there is zero!!!! chance that Garrett is raising the flop dude if Stanley leads, lol why would he even raise, it doesnt even make any sense. SO you have a semi weak holding and your opponent shows a ton of strength as the 4 better but you are raising his C bet with a weak ace??? You need to sell me on that one because I am not going to put any more fucking dollars into that pot.
Sometimes you want to check/raise strong hands to balance the move. You can't only c/r bluffs or gutshots or either you'll be exploitable and vulnerable to 3bets
@@guesswhaaat8006 That's the hard part: balancing your range. A c/r there polarizes your range and gives Garrett a simpler choice between believing you or not. Keeping KK/QQ/JJ in your possible range lets Garrett both "hero-call" a shove and induce a shove by Garrett. Preface that with I prefer to establish a table image to play against it later.
A $100,000 pot for a Billionaire (let's just say a single Billion & not multiple Billionaire) is the equivalent of someone with a solid job paying $100,000 a year job playing a $10 pot. Not sure the money bothers them too much :) Your entire yearly salary is worth a $10 flip :D lol
“Good fold from Garrett”? How? It’s a 4-bet pot and the guy check raises an A high board then bombs the turn. What exactly can Garrett beat? JJ thru KK is NEVER taking this line. Garrett shouldn’t have even called the flop raise - much less consider that turn shove..
Poor commentary at the end. This dude at the end basically said: "These guys". Insulted them as scary little boys against Garrett. That was really unnecessary comment.
Garret is the monster the wrecks you in Diablo on hardcore mode after 8 hours of not dying even though you had heals full HP full mana feels like the game cheated and you start the game over .
@@andymoiser4611 I’ve never heard him commentate before this stream, or play. But he just said it multiple times in a short span, so I’m just being a smart-ass when asking that.
Better to 4 bet then call out of position because you could take the pot down preflop with a 4 bet. Also when your opponent calls your 4 bet you have a range advantage and can rep AA KK and strong aces.
I guess when you’re a pro, even when faced with 4-bet, you think “I am a god,got position therefore, I will call with A-9 suites which gives you 2.2% more then non)! I am folding this crap! Not Bcz I saw the outcome Bcz it’s crap when faced with re-raise
@@overratedgm5713 Just saying when u have Billions in the bank was so fun about winning 100k ? just saying when u have Billions money becomes irrelevant
Why do they have billionaires on the show? These guys are not good for the game. They don’t play next level poker & winning and losing especially losing means jack crap so if they have a 50/50 call even worse they will call so much harder if not impossible to bluff because the money makes zero difference
These commentators acting pro predicting the moves like Shad up and let the players think and play so we can watch peacefully. “ I think it’s under bluffed, garrets gonna fold,” ya cool story keep it to urself.
Garrett is honestly so cringe whenever he isn't winning. Dude just launches into a soliloquy whenever he has to talk himself into these types of folds.
Garretts eye rolls are funny he acts like nobodys allowed to win a pot against him. Also whats the point of time chips when they go around and hand you more?
A lot of Garrett's mannerisms strike me as nervous ticks. They come out when action is on him and he's trying to analyze hands. As far as time chips, they're probably alloted a certain number every hour or two.
