GEN Z GIRL REACTS TO THE BEATLES FOR THE FIRST TIME - OH DARLING REACTION 

Nevertheless, many young people, including musicians, yet don`t know them. Up to me, to get a copyright of any musical work, every composer should first pass a music history examination.

I would disagree. The Beatles are mankind's gift to the gods.

wow thats amazing the way youve put that. its actually insane!! peace bro

@@BelfastManUtdTherapyI saw him in Oz last year, he’s still rocking it

Congrats for your knowledge.

Great comment. I love Paul's singing on Hi, Hi, Hi. Early Beatles belters of his are She's a Woman and Long Tall Sally. Also Paul's "So Bad" 1983 demonstrates another type of singing voice.

@@user-tv2bz2ci6b I like his singing on “Monkberry Moon Delight”.

There are a ton of better live performances from the Beatles. The first Ed Sullivan show, as important and historic as the performance was, suffered from poor studio sound.

Diana Ankudinova - Oh, Darling ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-B-ppbdPxoSA.html

Right place at right time,stars were aligned for them

Helter Skelter even more hard rock than this was released in 1968.

Paul's voice AND BASS LINE, yes yes!

And steely dan

OK, agree. But songs like this one, don`t accept covers of any kind. Maybe the version of "With a Little Help from my Friends" by Joe Cocker at Woodstock, can be acceptable due to its originality. Also "Helter Skelter" by U2, or "Something" by Tonny Bennett.

@@AAK1954 - I think we can agree that one can like and enjoy a cover even though it may not be as good. The one I always think of is “Got To Get You Into My Life” by Earth, Wind & Fire - that’s about as good as you can get for a Beatles cover!

@@doplinger1 Thanks for reminding me, I had forgotten that version. I'll listen it again later (right now... barbecue). Best regards from Argentina.

Of course they defined themselves as a rock band. Maybe initially more as a rock'n'roll band, because that's their basis. Hard rock and uptempo tracks were always part of their discography.

The Beatles and Stones have said very clearly that it was pop, not 'rock'. Up to mid 1960s, it was classical, jazz, folk, pop. Rock 'n roll was a subgenre of pop. Keith Richards, especially, says how 'rock', as a distinct genre, was coined in later 1960s... while he preferred 'to roll'.

@@braudabo They didn't. They were pop of which rock ' roll was a subgenre. They were a rock 'n roll group through Hamburg and up to Brian Epstein advised them that leathers and rock 'n roll music would only get them so far. So they transformed and put on suits and wrote and performed the best pop music ever for teenage girls and the rest of the world bought into it. Rock as a word and genre didn't appear till the later 1960s to describe the later developments of blues into heavy blues. Of course, The Beatles went on to make some of the best rock as well as the best pop music since they had already been the toughest punky rock 'n roll group in the toughest performing environment of the Indra and Kaiserkeller clubs in Hamburg

Their songs in 1963/64, '65 and ''66 WERE called "Rock n' Roll" songs by other artists at the time that didn't always appeal to most teenagers and mostly loved by our parents, were "Pop" songs (which is actually just short for "POPULAR" anything you heard on the radio and which sold well on records were "Popular songs" SO even then you could also say they were a "pop/ rock n' roll group. Music in the '50s (when rock n' roll started creeping in) and '60s was a combination of genres, it wasn't so categorized as rigidly as it seems to be now. That's why the Beatles AND other groups in the '60s were each a mixture of styles. I know because I was a teenager during that period and the radio or our record player was ALWAYS on in our house when I was growing up. PLUS my Dad was a musician who played 4 instruments, so I was exposed to all sorts of music styles from the day I was born.

Listen to the original, then listen to the tribute version performed by Tom Petty, Prince, Dhani Harrison, Jeff Lynne, and Steve Winwood.

Literally

Let me add that there is a "video" for "Lady Madonna" showing the Beatles working in the studio (actually on a *_different_* song), while "Savoy Truffle" has no dedicated "video"; you'll just find a video showing the cover of the album the song appears on, the "White Album", so no visual accompaniment for it!

🤍🤍🤍

When they first became noticed in North Ameica, with their two big hits "She Loves You" and "I Want to Hold Your Hand", I didn't think that much of them. They sounded like noise to me; the Number 2 hit at the time, prevented from reaching Number 1 by these two, "You Don't Own Me" by Lesley Gore - that sounded like music to me instead. That's probably because I was a child, not a teenager with angst and all that, at the time. But later on, they recorded hits I was able to admit were real music - "Michelle" and "Yesterday", for example. As for Elvis Presley... people of my era are familiar with the story about how the Ed Sullivan Show wouldn't show his hips gyrating as he sang, as that was considered too risque. I was reminded of that story when I watched Alizee Jacotey singing "J'en ai marre"... rather more interesting to watch in my provincial view.

Yes, Paul is a knight. However, his name is Sir Paul McCartney - the title goes with the forename, not the surname. The rank of knight and the title ‘Sir’ predate the widespread use of surnames.

To not know the Beatles were a rock band blows my mind. Maybe the term has been redefined since their time but in their own era the Beatles, Chuck Berry, Buddy Holly, Beach Boys, etc are all rock.

I'm not sure it's fair to say this generation likes autotune. *Producers* like autotune because it fixed errors quickly. Nevermind that it takes all the humanity out of a performance. Grrr.

More like the industry likes Autotune so all they need is a face to pose and mouth and have some sort of sound come out of their mouths that the tech can convert into something resembling singing and playing. Twas ever thus but, in the old days, the pretty boys and girls who couldn't sing or play were fronts for professional session musicians. Even The Byrds, first records were played by the Wrecking Crew with Roger (Jim) McGuinn, who had been a very young session player, allowed to play and get very positive comments from The Crew. WC also played the Beach Boys records with Good Vibrations stitched together from scores of pieces of tape. Cinema did much the same with real singers voices mimed by the pretty star, unless Julie Andrews or Judy Garland. The really big thing The Beatles did was insist, as callow youths at their first session, that they did their own thing and were, effectively, prepared to knock their last chance on the head if they couldn't do their own thing.

Completely agree. There was a time when singers could really sing.

I have headphones