This case was from british era and the the British india was under british king that is why to address the emperor ( nowadays it is called state in India) the case name was cited like zzz -v- emperor
Sec 76 me toh basically govt servants jaise police officees,soldiers ko exception ka benefit milega......toh agar koi normal person apne kisi servant yaa agent ko kehta hai ki koi illegal kaam karo aur wo kr deta hai toh usko toh sec 76 ke under benefit nhi milega??wo yeh defence nhi rakh sakta hoga ki i was bound by law
Sir, in the case which you have mentioned is wrong Instead of MH George vs state of Maharashtra It is State of Maharashtra vs MH George AIR 1965 SC 722
Isme accident ke example mein iska jo baccha ko mar diya uska liability kya hoga... Culpable homicide not amounting to murder ya fir grevious hurt/hurt... Because in a fist fight the accused intetion wasn't to kill the father..???
As of now i havnt made any video on IoS. But i will keep that in mind and will make in future. That subject is not covered extensively by anyone on RU-vid. Thanks for the suggestion.
Sir sec 34 or 114 me diffrnce clear ni hua ? Abettor ki b intention to mani hi jaegi..tbi to wo abett kr ra h kisi ko.. or phr wha present b h.. nd sec 34 me b to h ye ki commn intention ho phr chahe apne wha jakr kch na kia ho.. to diffrnt kase hue.. ? 114 me b to common intention show ho ri h..
