Generative AI in a Nutshell - how to survive and thrive in the age of AI 

Good things have always been more or less free. In libraries.

​Tell me what are those things​@@smoothmusicful

@@lucianozaffaina9853such as air, water

Well, as this tech evolve, h-sapiens must practice ANTINATALISM 🎯

Thank you very very much, could you please allow me to use it to teach the content in our native language, and if you don’t mind sending an editable version because I want to translate and teach it. THANKS AGAIN AND AGAIN THANKS.

Glad you enjoyed it!

​@@henrikkniberg Agreed! I love the presenation style, neat and crisp.

Yeah it is really high quality, it almost seems to be human-made! Great AI video!

Wow, I never thought I hear so much naivety. Just in case you think AI can only do good, do you understand what the Industrial Rev did? Humans adapted and had less freedom (Strick time schedule ...), also more mental ills :), and we started taking every thing we could from the earth. Now we have used up all the earth and more - humans currently need 1 and a half earths to continue. - ie human life has already gone past the survival equilibrium, we are stealing from future generations - destroying farmable land.... Are you thinking yet ! AI revolution - no need to keep Organic life going, except a few to mine the required minerals, so 100 more years before humans become unhelpful. If you still do not understand here is an example in real life - EU and other food producing places are slowly getting ride of medium lifestyle farmers, these people are being replaced by low-income workers and machines (Ahhh Industrial Rev). But when there are no more middle class, there is no need for farm work. In other words because of greed (getting more done for less work) no one stays to live. Unlike 200 years ago, the Earth is no longer boundless. So far I see zero creativity - eg ask AI what causes (how to cure) cancer and you will get what university graduates know - short term treatments! ha There has been no improvement in life time survival of cancer. Zero improvement just more time suffering pain from drugs and treatment.

Wow. Thats was an awesome video. Can you please share what tool you used in creating the visual storyboarding for this video? Thanks

Thanks, that's great to hear!

0:52

Fully agree. The graphics alone are next level. Just the graphics deserve an award not to mention the content.

Thanks!!! This is so good !

@@aviatorbja I wonder what program he used to create the majority of the notes that were written while he was speaking. I'm curious whether he used one that first created a transcript of what he said, and then created graphics to match the main points to create effective flow. as he stated in the video, the limitation is your imagination. but I still truly wonder

Definitely! He used AI to outline this !😂

That's what I was thinking while watching this. I already do a ton of his tips, but the "ok" instruction to not interrupt a thought is genius. It's so obvious, but it just saved me time! Thank you, you've got a follower. When and where did you come from? You said in the video that you came from a different industry and switched jobs. I'm curious about your story. I always say we learn a lot from reviewing the past, so reflect and share. If you can send me a DM, I would like to learn more about your channel and talk about building it in different languages. I speak Portuguese and English, and I haven't seen anything like this. I would like to suggest creating a brand for Brazil, the 5th most spoken language in the world.

Isn't that the point, right? It's a tool to enhance. People are getting stuck on the idea of replacing them. We need to see AI as an enhancer.​@@designmy743

100% nailed it.

Not that far of a stretch, just look up the generic definitions of the words Learn or Think. You could either use fairly accurate simple words, or 'well actually it's not learning it's instead [insert long sentence that could be replaced with one word]'

Humans can think and make decisions with very little data. Can AI do this?

​@@firstprib7742 LLMs like GPT cannot do this, but other AI in the future might be able to.

Thx! Glad you liked it!

Couldn't agree more. It's really accessible.

The drawings! I chuckled a bit when I saw at the end that the drawings were made using generative AI 😆

@@hemvshah94 I drew most of it myself actually

​@@ksoss10:19

I agree! Do you think AI helped with the making of this video?

Thanks!

That's great! Keep it up! I think learning to use the technology for day-to-day stuff is a good way to reduce fear.

That's a good business idea actually. Teaching AI for the public like elderly, schools, institutions or others, I haven't seen much around yet.

Could you share your general method? I believe we truly need to have more general baseline education in the same way we did for text email and other tools older people or inexperienced people have to learn. Would like to also start doing this but would love some advice from someone already using kindness to bring more people in to the future together.

What a content Henrik..wow wow..please let me know to connect with you to learn more from you.. absolutely wonderful ❤..

Glad it was helpful!

As if the AI won't be able to engineer its own prompts. Getting really tired of these "bros" who jump into every new thing pretending to be gurus.

@@B3Band not so sure if this comment was directed at me, but for what we know now the quality of output of any generative AI depends on the prompts input, which might be the first line of our interactions with this kind of AI. Since this is not a one size fits all, each one of us is required to tweak the shoe to our fit, that's where prompt engineering comes.

Forget prompt engineering, starve engineering is the next big thing

Prompt engineering hahahh

That's great to hear! I worked a lot on the pacing.

ArtRage

The tools are mentioned at the end of the video. ArtRage is the software name you are looking for; I googled around and found that it's more ideal for art. Someone on Henrik's team is just too comfortable with that software hence also used it to present, however it is not ideal for people like us.

Are u real?

I am wondering the same question

I would love to know the tools you have used

Look at the latest minutes of the video 17:49 you'll see the used tools.

5:57

Yeah, is that just for fun or a mistake?

@@RITOBANBHAT Someone watched too much Fight club ;)

My grandma got out the home again

5:57-5:58

I don't think it's going to get better. Blue-collar jobs, in particular, are at risk.

Bro is like in 2008 say, now I have a mobile phone but still I'm brokie. If everyone have the same access to something it doesn't give you value if you have it

​​​@@hdhdushsvsyshshshsthe opposite is the case. if you simply consume it, nothing will change. if you use it to your advantage, it can drastically change your life. simply because i am interested for 20+ years in this space i got asked to hold a speech for a law firm to prep them for what's coming. and inquiries are piling up. most of the text i am saying at these conferences is assisted by a.i. there are so many use cases where it is extremely useful. streamlining processes, creating new businesses. it's only going to accelerate. come up with creative ways of USING it.

What you're saying about Ai and rent seems very ambiguous. Is this a theoretical philosophical comment about the current state of your society? Or do you truly not understand why you can't afford rent and how best to interact with the reality you find yourself in to produce a meaningful enjoyable result?

@@carlanwray8718 not sure where the rent context is coming from.

What do humans do except advanced educated inference? Don't be obtuse about what is happening. The models may not be as "thoughtful" or "creative" as a human, but it's ignorant to deny that they demonstrate at least a rudimentary form of such.

@@_hadoken @_hadoken Humans do a lot more than that, so let me just provide two examples: - Humans are able to learn on their own. Narrow AI - this is the category current generative AI belongs to - can only learn using human controlled machine learning techniques, i. e. it has to be specifically trained to a domain of knowledge. - Humans (and future intelligent beings) are able to create a model of the world based on the experience and knowledge acquired and using that model capable of forecasting what kind of interactions would be possible between the objects of the model. ChatGPT can only answer questions requiring this kind of inference, if the answer to the same question was found in the data it was trained on (with enough significance to add it to the possible answers). The physicyst, Sean Carrol demonstrated it brilliantly in the GenAI episode of his podcast. There are 3 main categories of AI according to the current theory. Narrow AI (AKA weak AI), Artificial generative Intelligence (AKA AGI or strong AI), and Super AI. Currently only the first category exists, the other too are strictly theoretical. AGI would be able to train itself without human guidance and supervision, finally, Super AI would be the thing people think about when hearing the expression: AI, likely self-aware and doing everything a human intelligence can. Again, ChatGPT belongs to the narrow AI category. Extremely simplified, it does the same thing as the predictive text software of early mobile phones: based on the previous 2-3-x words, T9 is able to predict the most likely 1-2-3 candidates for the next word. Of course, ChatGPT uses way more than the previous 3 words and it predicts thousands of words organised in sentences, not one, but the mechanism is roughly the same: it builds tree like structures of words, expressions, etc. with weighs calculated in the training phase, then uses that statistical model to build the reply. It only looks like intelligence, but it definitely isn't yet,

Thx, will do!