Tu kdg2 org salah faham kata Mongol ni bermusuh dgn Islam. Pada awalnya tak sebab Mongol ni pun sebenarnya suka berdagang mcm saudara2 Turki diorang ni. Sampai Sultan Alauddin ni pergi pandang rendah terhadap tentera2 Mongol dan isytihar perang. Dan adat org Mongol ni bila diorang perang, diorang warning dlu, mcm Islam jugak. Tunduk kpd kuasa Mongol atau mati. Dan kebanyakan kerajaan Islam pandang rendah dgn org2 gasar Mongol ni dan mati. Di sini kita boleh belajar apabila org2 Islam mula egois terhadap kekuasaan mereka, Allah SWT seperti mana yg dijanjikanNya akan menghapus sesuatu kaum itu dan menggantikan dgn kaum lain kerana tidak mengamalkan syariah Islam
yup, lagipun ada baca gak orang2 bawah genghis khan ni ada jah yang islam & penganut2 agama lain & dia pun biarkan setiap orang orang kebebasan beragama. serangan mongol tidak berfaktorkan agama sangat pun. dah cari pasal memang dapat la balasan
Aku ingt dulu kt sekolah agama betapa mongol ni digambarkan manusia kejam yg dtng berperang ikut suka hati, dh lama lepas tu baru tahu kerajaan islam sendiri yg cari masalah
@@mahsiseua OK, beperang dengan saudara Islam sendiri hek? Dh la bunuh. OK la beperang kan tapi yg dia susun kepala org Islam sampai jadi piramid tu. Kalau aku ada dlm tu. Aku cau luh! Tk sanggup boss.
@@firdausfarid6862 yang masa serangan tu tak pasti la ada tak orang İslam dalam kalangan tentera Mongol tu. Kalau ada pun boleh jadi. Masa tu empayar islam banyak & bukan bernaung bawah satu. Mamluk pun pernah perang dengan uthmaniyah walaupun dua2 islam. Tapi dari segi apa yang tentera mongol tu dah buat nak kata takda orang islam boleh jadi. Kalau ada pun takleh kata yang tentera islam mongol terlibat pembunuhan orang yang tak bersalah, nak kata tak buat langsung pun tak juga sebab rekod sejarah tak bagi 100% maklumat yang jelas. Ye bagitau secara umum jah, tentera mongol yang dipimpin sendiri oleh Genghis khan dalam serangan tu, tak pernah aku baca dalam kalangan tentera tu berapa peratus orang agama sekian2. Lagipun dalam sejarah islam berlaku jah kekejaman. Pernah baca apa abbasiyah buat kepada umaiyyah? Uthmaniyah pun ada juga sejarah gelap sendiri. Aku baca sejarah dinasti timurid pun boleh tahan kekejaman yang berlaku. Tau sejarah hitam dalam sejarah islam tak bermaksud nak memburukkan tapi untuk amik iktibar. Kerajaan islam, bukan islam semua ada masalah sendiri
Kerajaan uthmaniah tu pun asal dari dia jugak last2 nya.Hujung2 keturunan genghis ni Allah beri hidayah.kalau tak tak lah ada nama Sultan Suleiman Khan.
"While you were sharpening your sword , do you wanna know how i prepare for today?" "I learned". "I know your language , your traditions , your belief , which village to tame and which village to burn . " Khotun Khan
tentera monggol telah memusnahkan peradaban tamadun Islam di kota baghdad. di bawah pimpinan jeneral Hulagu khan. kota baghdad pada masa tersebut adalah pusat keilmuaan islam. segala bentuk keilmuan dan buku2 telah di hancurkan oleh tentera monggol dan membenam buku2 ilmu kedalam sungai tigris... sehingga air sungai bertukar menjadi warna hitam akibat dari dakwat2 buku. lenyaplah tamadun keilmuan islam
Siapa sangka, disebabkan sikap Sultan tu pandang rendah pada bangsa Mongol dia telah mengorbankan nyawa satu negaranya. Bukan sekali je Mongol tu hantar utusan, dua kali pulak tu.
BTW side note noyan is a real person. He is born in Iran. Dia cam cerita ertugrul tu dia ni power gila. Dia boleh tidor sambil menungang kuda. Dia byk bunuh org islam dan cristian. Dia start gi perang masa umur 16 tahun. Tapi cara dia mati still tak sure. Ada dua faktor la antara dia dibunuh atau dia mati sakit
Sedaghe-sedaghe klau nk layan lagi detail .. bleh ushaa youtube The Ibnu Rijal .. ustaz yg cukup steady .. bahasa yg d gunakan amat mudah d fahami .. szaluteee 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Pengajaran kepada kita semua ialah janganlah kita pandang rendah terhadap paras rupa sesebuah kaum itu, kerana kita tidak tahu apa kelebihan yang mereka ada di sebalik paras rupa mereka itu
hebat empayar mongol dulu . memang kagum kalau dengar cerita empayar mongol bawah pemerintahan Genghis Khan . sehebat hebat empayar china pun mongol berjaya patahkan . tak sama dengan mongol sekarang , sunyi je . tapi masing masing berdarah pahlawan & sampai sekarang mereka masih memanah dan menunggang kuda . terbaik !
ada 4 lagi negara yg mengalahkan mongol selain kerajaan mamluk... iaitu kamakura shogunate (jepun), majapahit, dai viet (vietnam) dan kesultanan delhi (india).
Seperkara lagi... Bangsa dia sendiri, Berke Khan... Lepas tentera Monggol tewas kat ain jalut, Hulagu pimpin sendiri tentera dia... But dia Berke Khan berjaya halang dan tewaskan Hulagu Khan
Tapi barat claim mongol jatuh sendiri. Sebab dalam zaman kejatuhan dia, ekonomi x menentu, pemerintah selalu mabuk dan x sihat, lepastu pemberontak kan. Tapi biasalah barat, mana boleh tengok orang timur claim macam2
I know Genghis khan from kdrama Empress Ki. Telling a story about a Goryo women (nowadays is Korea) who want to become Empress to the Yuan Dynasty Emperor. She is a wise and smart women, from zero to hero. Everyone should watch this series I totally recommend
Boleh tgk ceramah/kuliah ustaz ibnu rijal utk lebih mendalam tentang cerita mongol ni . Mmg sadis gila mcmna mereka mmbunuh umat islam d baghdad . Cerita psal sultan membalas surat mongol adalah satu sebab mngapa tentera mongol mengamuk kpda mutasim. Dan akhir nya hulagu khan masuk islam . Temtera mongul juga telah berjaya meranapkan kumpulan hasyasyin/assasin yg hdup di zaman sultan salehudin al-ayub .
Mongol tu rumpun turkic... Asal usul dorng dlu sama tmpt.... Dkt asia tgh selatan siberia dgn utara china dkt kawasan steppe.... Dorang hidup berpindah randah.... sbb tu mongol xlh mng masa perang ain jalut... Mongol lwn dgn rumpun dorng jgk tu baibar dgn al qutuz tu berdarah turkic... Org2 turkic mmg kuat dlm berperang
Betul ke bahasa Jepun dgn Korea termasuk dlm rumpun bahasa Altaic(Mongol, turkish, uzbek, altay, Uighur dan Kazakh)? Sbb aku ade baca buku pasal jenis2 bahasa.
Terbaik bang...Aku pun Masih keliru pada masa yg Sama betul ii nk tahu kisah ni Edit: kalau X salah tentera Mongol mempunyai fizikal yg Sama dengan yajuj & majuj ....( Kalau X silap la)
Ape benda yg kalau kau tak silap nya.. nak cakap biar benda betul jangan memandai kemukakan fakta dan sumber .. baru la betul ikut protokol dan disiplin ilmu. Tak tahu diam sahaja, jangan sebar benda yg kau tak tahu. Ingat ni bro, tak pasti jangan kongsi
Org Mongol pun manusia biasa mcm kita cuma mentaliti diaorg tak sama.Kalau tengok petarung Mix Martial Art.Ada 1 org Kazakstan wajah org Mongol. Mat salleh dgn Negro pun lunyai mat
Dulu dalam kota baghad tu ada konflik perebutan kuasa tulah dorang kalah kalau x silaplh ada yg berkhianat sebab nak kuasa pastu dia sendiri dibunuh Aku dapat dari novel hulagu khan -Abdul latib talib kalau x silap
ML's studios: Don't mess with tatar-mongolians Me: Ertugrul Bey Takashah! Ertugrul Bey Takashah! Ertugrul Bey Takashah! Also me: Haydar Allah! (whilst passionately chopping chicken's meat with my kitchen knife) Comments: Eyvallah Bey!
Saya nk cadangkan kalau cerita psl sejarah atau geografi, lebih baik kalau ada peta utk lebih menarik dan senang utk pendengar2 yg kurang minat sejaran
Mamluk tu salah satu kerajaan dari keturunan Mongol yang masuk islam tapi bukan tar tar. (Kalau Tak silap diorang Ada buat perdagangan haiwan dengan utmaniyyah)
@@danishalfarabiariefrinaldi5699 Bukan. Cucu dia. Genghis Khan ni ada ramai anak ramai cucu. Hulagu Khan ni antara cucu dia yg hampir sama cita2 dan kejam macam atok dia.
@@jayd3083 Beliau merupakan panglima tentera kerajaan mana saya lupa.......tapi mmg dia seorg yg bijaksana dlm atur strategi dan menang dlm pertempuran
@@jayd3083 Beliau merupakan panglima tentera kerajaan mana saya lupa.......tapi mmg dia seorg yg bijaksana dlm atur strategi dan menang dlm pertempuran
@@iskandar8064 kerajaan mamluk. Dan dia digelar sebagai baibar. Komando zaman kerajaan ayubbi. Kalau tak silap. Dan dia antara penghancur kali pertama mongol
The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians: First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists. However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples. About the true faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): "It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)." Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us. It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture'). But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh. There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’. And here's another interesting thing: We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3WqB71gs5bc.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Bole tau source? Sbab kisah yang dicerita sedikit berbeza dengan buku2 sejarah peninggalan islam. Contoh.. pembunuhan pendagang. Kematian sultan. Mcm lain. Hahaha.. bole tengok video “the ibnu rijal”
Kerajaan Mongol hancur kerana badai di tengah laut, ketika ingin menawan tanah jepun ia itu tsushima.. Pelajaran jangan meremeh lawan mu, dan hormatinya sebagai pahlawan. ..
3:20,kehairanan aku bila tgk mongol ni pakai lambang templar kt shield seorg tartarian..ade persamaan x mcm lambang armada Lopez de Sequiera dtg melaka dulu..Templar yg menyamar portugis utk kempen mohammadein...
Selain dari sultan qutuz dari mesir yg halang kemajuan tentera mongol, ertugul khan juga banyak bantu sultan alaudin, dan jgn lupa contribution berke khan, cucu kepada hulagu khan, mongol pertama memeluk islam yg memerangi saudara mereka demi islam. Kalau mongol tak ada konflik dari dalam mcm yg dicetuskan berke khan sbb marah hulagu khan hancurkan org islam di baghdad. Dh lama mongol tembus konstatinople pergi jarah eropah
salam nak tanya, keluar topik sikit. sy memang main gym, hari2 time main gym tu sy pakai earphone dengar ayat quran time main tu. so takpe ke? ") tq kalau sudi jawab! :)
Tolong betulkan balik fakta kejatuhan baghdad.baghdad ditawan kita pemerintahan mongol diterajui möngke khan,cucu genghis khan.möngke khan menghantar hulagu khan untuk menakluk wilayah² di parsi,baghdad,syam,anatolia,hijaz(mekah-madinah),dan menakluk kesultanan mamluk
