Georgia father, son arrested over Walmart's false accusation | FOX 5 News 

If you can avoid shopping at big corpo stores you should, because you are getting exactly what you pay for, low quality food which will give their big pharma buddies repeat business.

You just try and sue a large corporation like Walmart. They are worth billions of dollars 💵 for a reason !..

@@alancrisp1582 They will settle instead of going to court.

Sue of the pants of them

@@alancrisp1582 In this case where they have admitted fault they would most likely settle out of court because even their high priced lawyers couldn't get them out of this one.

hmmm now makes me wonder if these wal mart employees could be in cahouts with the victims .Like employee reports customer stole something and then the customer sues wal mart and the victim customer then gives the wal mart employee a cut of the finished law suit???? hmmm maybe ???possible??? curious

Nice 2.2 mil. After legal fees and taxes she’s left with what? 500K max? I mean, it’s 500k more than she had before I suppose.

Of course the government wants their cut, too 😂 The police don't give a hoot about making a false arrest, because they won't get in trouble

@@stormysyndrome7043 wow that some expensive legal fees. you need to find a better lawyer fast.

@@fernandogallardo3458 10 percent for the house plant.

Easy buddy, there was no brutality.

They already admitted guilt , easy lawsuit

I didn't see any marks on him or him say they were roughed up. There is no need to throw in lies. Its a good lawsuit. I can imagine after reimbursing the man walmart offers them a $25 gift card for their troubles. That seems to be their go-to thing to do.

@@drink15 the cops didn't let them show the receipt and arrested them...with out proof or cause, a nite in jail... sure is a nice date nite huh?

@@drink15 What do you call having men with guns show up at your house because a mega corporation ordered them to? People living in red states are slaves to the government and corporations.

(FREE AT PUBLIX AND PIEDMONT PARKS)

The cops refused to look at his receipt, too. It's a double pay day for both of the citizens!

Lawyers are amazingly feckless. Case is weird b/c prisoner's phone call was to the media instead of speaking to the judge later that day. Not really a story. If judge bonded him, them that is a crooked judge for not sending a detective out. Another hard to follow crime vid. ho hum.

Sue the sandbags off them.

They are already firing his son and defaming his reputation with a monopoly the size of a country. Inquisitions like this need heavy resistance.

Doing a half-arsed job is a CHOICE. It's done with Intent. Why? Because these uniformed cowards know that innocent people are far safer to handle than actual criminals. It's an easy way to fulfill arrest quotas. They KNEW he was innocent the very moment they REFUSED to see the receipt. Actually they knew he was innocent way before, because they CHOSE to not see all of the video and they CHOSE to not check the cashiers' records.

I have to fix one of those mistakes as florida sent me something that affects my right to carry where they got no details other than "we was told to do this take his right to carry" because when I asked them questions they were playing guessing games, could certain people be laughing in the background where they would either go silent or be like "we are just gonna repeat ourselves" got to go pay out of pocket for a lawyer plus have to pay for a plane just because they decided to out the blue send me these things like they being cute till someone audits them. None of the case numbers they sent I have access to and if I did they won't let me see the entire thing. Haven't got any letters from the state I reside in because either this is going to take time or some dummy down there needs to be fired. And one of their maybe were "maybe it was due to a background check" for what I don't know

​@furrysourcecode9809 Sometimes, the crap becomes comedy.. That's how ridiculous it gets.

@@kenrickeason like most jobs people get denied for they probably deny people because they would probably be too good for that job lol like the police looking for new recruites with their track record that's always gonna be a thing because instead of hiring people who have experience they hire based diversity where it's like talking to a robo call but it's a person "Did you try to unplug the security guard and plug him back in?"

When it comes to the police everything they do is a " mistake" and we've investigated it and found " no wrongdoing"

No body wants to do their job right these days, including cops.

They're cops. They enjoy arresting people.

Or bother looking at the surveillance himself. He trusted a Walmart employee's word.

Law enforcement is the sewage of America

This is what happens when there are no consequences for police misconduct.

It's like when y'all sit back and support the same type of treatment to happen to certain people and not to think it's not gonna become Law for ALL😂 it's called texting 1-2-3 GO

Because no decent or friendly people becomes a cop.

Tyrants that's why

Because the cops know the tax payers will foot the bill even if they are in the wrong

They didn't let him get his receipt because they are protected by qualified immunity. It created the infamous cop motto, "You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride".

Should also face charges of false imprisonment and kidnapping. Walmart should also be included they caused this whole situation at least the store staff.

yes because no ones ever tried to grab a gun while police are letting them look for something. dont get me wrong walmart screwed up and should be sued not the PD. the PD can only go off the information walmart gave them

all they care about is extorting money out of you. Your not free and its not your life. Once again cops thinking they are our Masters

@@kevinkerlin5603 and tin snips to his achilles tendons. Thats a predator, not a cop. Kidnapping a human being and putting them in a cage over bags of sand. It's inexcusable.

@@kevinkerlin5603 yes because they lied on the warrant that was signed by a judge...the ones responsible is walmart and they should be held accountable. trying to blame the cops for this, when they were given all the evidence they knew about and it did show them walking out without paying is crazy.

Major no...but civil ramifications...yes

Clearly a False arrest! The police never did an investigation. They just took on the word of a Wal-Mart employee. Sue both Wal-Mart and the police department. Especially since they spent the night in jail.

Cops are nothing but walmart's gestapo agents Why do you think walmart donates to cop shops all the time

Compensation?

He’s got a big payday coming from both of them.

Sand and dirt is literally so cheap that they just store it in the parking lot at our Walmart. Nobody is stealing that stuff 😂.

I've done AP for years for different companies, including Walmart. Often employees will believe something stupid like that, and AP/LP should be the grown ups who stop and say "Hold on, this doesn't sound right. Even if I have all 5 steps, I'm not making the approach/wasting LE time with that." The problem is Walmart pays less than market rates for AP, so the smart ones leave after a year or two. They spend tons of money on investigative tech, then hand it over to a dude making slightly less than a TSA agent and wonder why things aren't working out.

😂

I wouldn't take less then a million

@@SpaceRanger187 Yea you would; lets be real

No they figna get paid!

@@PCRyder Another woman got 3.5M just for being accused of shoplifting at a walmart and detained in the back room for several hours, not even arrested. So yes, they're going to get a big payout. Also need to sue the pd.

Think they'll settle with the police department, but try to go the distance with Walmart.

Yeah, the diversity hire.

Remember: if you screw over a company, it's a police matter, but if the company screws you over, it's a civil matter.

I didn’t think about that you’re right that is a felony!

​@@KirkHermaryyou're the diversity hire

Diversity hire?! Jeeez........ You need to loosen your hood!!!

i am sure he is in contact with good lawyers

The sheriff's office is not at fault. The blame is soley on Walmart 100% for giving police poor evidence. I work for loss prevention and wherever I have shopliftings that occur and need to give evidence to police I go from the time they came onto the property until the time they left property so thay nobody can scrutinize me.

@@miguelbermudez5426 the cop who arrested the guy refused to let the guy show his receipt...this makes them liable for quite a lot

Cops probobly just took their steroid shots and were feeling that testosterone and had to have some action!

@@miguelbermudez5426 THE PIGS HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE EVIDENCE!!!!!!

As well as their managers at Walmart, the sherrif's officers, and the judge who signed off on the warrant with shoddy evidence.

The folks inside of the CCTV room are Walmart employees. The security guards that you see outside of Walmart have nothing to do with viewing the CCTV. You don't have to be a DICK and disrespect security guards. I bet your the type of person that hate those on welfare. Yet you're degrading someone who's trying to make a living and not have to have their hand out.

I mean it's walmart. I wouldn't really hold them accountable for the accusation. I think the cops and judge are a lot more of an issue here.

@@sinappanisYou wouldn’t hold the entity that made the accusation accountable for the accusation? 😂 It’s almost like you young people have zero concept of what you’re saying and don’t listen to the words that come out of your mouth. It’s wild. Please stop talking

Asset protection specialist....

The Walmart people were incompetent. But when you hire minimum wage you get minimum wage worth of quality. The Cops on the other hand were outright criminal, because they CHOSE to not properly investigate. They CHOSE to not review the whole video or ask questions whether there are cashiers inbetween or check the cashiers' records, whether the same person who bought the other stuff also made a payment for the sand. And then they likely lied on the affidavit (which was necessary to obtain the warrant). You know they did this intentionally because it makes their job so much safer, when they go after people who they know to be innocent, rather than actual criminals... it's the same M/O that Uvalde's Finest employed.

@@bikkiikun 10000000% spot on. the blue line gang is extremely dangerous & corrupt!

Look to me police get paid bonus per arrest

They work for Walmart, not the citizens.

NOT ALL, but far too many cops nowadays are looking for an opportunity to get violent. It's disgusting! The departments who teach their officers that it's cops vs everyone else are to blame. We are not all bad guys.

@@eleanoraquitaine2966 and Walmart IS the Government, or at least part of it, They wouldn't even exist if it was not for their first Government agent, Hillery Clinton, Look it up, she was on their board just prior to being first lady................ where "SHE" (her own words during her 2008 run against Obama) Created NAFTA................ The Law that Turned Walmart into what is it now, AND empowered China to become the monsters they are today...............

They were bored.

That's because police are trained to escalate to violence. It's a reality that a lot of people don't realize. That's why they weren't interested in actually seeing a receipt.

The LP officer and the cops should have investigated enough to actually know the receipt existed on the day of the incident. No warrant would have been issued because they had the evidence no crime was committed. So the guy wouldn't ever have had to produce a receipt.

Typical nowadays policing . You are guilty till proven innocent.

Actually that could cost the city a lot of money... because the cops flat out admitted there, that they want to arrest an innocent person. After all, it's much safer way to fulfill your quotas than going after actual criminals.

He said they rolled their eyes.

This is what happens when your police department has the collective intelligence of a drunk possum.

Because it's cheaper for Walmart just to review the video, report the incident to the police and let the police be the security/manual labor. if the 'criminal' gets injured, the police is liable. Trust me someone plugged all this information into a spreadsheet and figured out this is the cheapest way.

​@@markdsm-5157no, not even police are truly liable. They followed "policy".

They just harrasing you for a receipt

Walmart uses local cops for security as they're too cheap. Walmart's all call cops more than anyone else for loss control.

@@markdsm-5157 Review PART of the video!!!!!

It's not a good idea to base an opinion on one report. You see case after case on RU-vid where the badge cam reveals a very different story.

@@presto709 Just because some cops do some good some of the time doesn't justify all cops preventing you from kicking a freeloading drug addicted squatter thief out of your house. You aren't about to rewrite the entire law book but you can rewrite their family tree.

@@AlphaOmegaSigma07 You lost me there. This story is about two people being arrested for shoplifting. I just pointed out that people don't always describe things accurately and sometimes the body cam shows a very different story.

​@@presto709 No, the story is about two people being arrested for allegedly shoplifting. The fact that charges were dropped and records expunged points to a serious mistake so five minutes to check out a legitimate answer to it would surely appear to make some sense.

Got to be more to this story if TWO were arrested.

AND MAKE IN EXPENSIVE ENOUGH HURT!!!! If they fine President Trump almost a Billion Dollars for a non-crime, Start this lawsuit at $500,000,000!!!!!!!!

​@@Capohanf1BUY AMERICAN CHEESE AGAIN

You know it's ironic that Walmart should have apologized to him right. Way

Accept Wal-Mart’s apology as you accept their $700,000 settlement check !

​​@@Capohanf1-- Private citizen Trump, defendant. And it was a crime, which they proved. I expect that judgment to be reduced, but it will still be over $100M. You aren't allowed to profit from criminal conduct, and he did. Thus the fine. Now we have the hush-money case. He could get jail time from New York state. We'll see if he has any defense, but I suspect he doesn't. In fact, I'd bet a dollar that he refuses to testify under oath, and then claims they _wouldn't let him_ testify.

With Walmart you wont get fired you would get a promotion.

They don't fire them folks. I would sue walmart

​@@GoatzombieBubbathats a lie

​@@PeggyRabbit32you are a moron who shouldn't open his mouth

Not if you're a member of the Blue Line Gang.

Walmart filed the charges. !!!

Rightly so, because a single false accusation against your shoppers could get them injured, fired from their job, render them forever unemployable, among a whole host of other things.

@@samsanderson224 With cops as diligent and understanding as these, it could easily get a person dead, too.

Plus nobody wants to shop at a store where paying customers are known for being falsely accused of crimes!!! False accusations are bad for business!

@@samsanderson224 🎯

They can afford it.

You can blame the sheriffs department on that. They didn’t do anything. That was 100% Walmarts fault. Those 2 cops knew the guy was guilty. They got told by a legitimate source what happened. So they were 100% convinced that he couldn’t get a receipt saying it. It was probably a few hours later until they even k anything.

​@@jakeg3126the sherrifs should have done better investigating.

They are both guilty...walmart for false reporting and the officers for not investigating fully ​@@jakeg3126

Highly disagree did you miss the part that said they would not let him produce a receipt. Over sand are you kidding me

@@jakeg3126 They should have verified that he didn't pay for it instead of going to arrest him after a seeing few snippets of video. It's common to pay before you pick up items like this at walmart. Also yeah he claimed he had a receipt and they refused to let him show it because it wasn't on his person.

Definitely.

​@@stumpel54Maybe not corrupt, but he's not a professional. There's no excuse for not doing proper due diligence when the opportunity to do the right thing was right in your face.

​@@stumpel54nope, your friends messed up big time and you are sticking up for them. You lack moral character.

@@stumpel54 When asked if he could produce the evidence, he told the cop he could, and then the cop denied him the time to go and get the evidence, so the cop intentially suppressed the evidence so that he could make the charges. The cop had already decided guilt, which is not his job. People don't do things just once. A theif doesn't rob just once, a killer doesn't just up an kill, and a cop doesn't file charges based on no or poor quality evidence just once. ALL of his arrests need to go to IA at a minimum, but preferably go to an independent audit, so at least folks can find out how many people he's put in jail that didn't do the crime.

​@stumpel54 Your argument makes no sense, the victim has been shown too be innocent and now we know all this could have been avoided if the cop had allowed him to produce the evidence he had in the house. Hell they could have probably have let him show a bank account bank account transaction on a phone app and see he spent money at Walmart at that designated time. Nice to show you back the blue no what matter when they are obviously in the wrong, one bad apple spoils the basket I guess.

"Money talks".

YOU HAVE TO GO RETRIEVE YOUR CAR 🚗 YOURSELF OR CALL & AS FOR AN OFFICER ON THE SCENE BECAUSE YOUR CALL HAS BEEN STOLEN & YOU SEE THE CAR. THEN YOU REQUEST FOR OFFICER 🚨 ASSISTANCE BECAUSE YOU WANT TO RETRIEVE YOUR PROPERTY BUT DON'T FEEL SAFE. I ASSUME THEY HAVE TO SEND OUT AN OFFICER. NOW THE PROBLEM WITH CALLING THEM TO YOUR HOUSE; YOU CAN'T FORCE THEM TO GOT TO A 2ND LOCATION. HOWEVER IT'S WAYS TO GET THEM TO THE LOCATION YOUR CAR IS. SIMPLY CALL & REQUEST OFFICER ASSISTANCE TO THE SAME LOCATION YOUR CAR IS. NOW IF YOU'RE NOT ON LOCATION THEY MAY SAY THEY DIDN'T SEE THE. CAR.

How about conducting a True investigation? In this law enforcement climate a phone call means you are guilty.

It’s higher than it’s ever been . Got to be Careful

That's the absolute funniest word I've seen in a long time 🤣😂🤣 I'm so gonna be using that word now. RU-vid overloads hate me already

I know right? They can immediately identify this man and his sons but they magically can't identify thieves that actually steal from their stores on a regular basis.

@@chorlesteajones6794 That was my first thought.. They stole stuff, but you know exactly who they are and where they live? So, did they pay with credit card and you are super stupid?

What happens at Walmart in Los Angeles has nothing to do with what goes on in Forsyth County.

Wal-Mart has too much influence

Not our fault you get all of news from facebook comments and daily wire videos.

It's the security guards at Walmart that falsely accused the man and son. Security Guards who aren't required to have an education or training to get the job.

They literally avoid hiring cops that are too smart, because they question orders too much.

​@@joeycurtis1872The cops should have asked for the receipt. It's one of the most basic pieces of evidence to prove or disprove a theft.

@@joeycurtis1872 The accused offered to get the receipt to show the pigs, but they refused to let him get it and arrested him anyway, so no, it's not just the security guards at walmart that are culpable.

Apparently, Walmart doesn’t hire for intelligence either. They’re the ones who swore out the complaint

They won't win a lawsuit against the PD...qualified immunity.

​@@rogersmith7808as long as you're convincing yourself that is all that matters

@@rogersmith7808 Qualified Immunity only protects an officer if it is the first time that 'incident' has been done by an officer. Failing to do your due diligence in an investigation is not covered at all by QI and this department will get sued successfully for it.

@@unitedstatian That's not what qualified immunity means at all.

​@@rogersmith7808you have no idea what qualified immunity is. The PD i.e. police department does not have qualified incompetence, individual officers have qualified incompetence.

The arresting officers should be facing felony charges.

Yep, the man is at home and offers to produce proof of his innocence that would take maybe 30 seconds to 1 minute to get, but you refuse to check and roll your eyes? Seriously?

Go try and sue a police officer🤣🤣🤣

​@@StoneWTmalicious bullying learned at the academy

Explain to me the logic there you’re going to sue a police officer personally, but not the Walmart employee. What is the logic behind that. You sue the police, you sue Walmart.

that’s good to know since they didn’t help me at all when someone went shopping with my lost card

Sounds like someone there had a vendetta against the kid.

@@snicole042oh yes. That person might be in real trouble too for knowingly falsely accusing the victims.

It comes out of tax dollars

Good... tax payers elect the police chief.

@@SanchoSanto Police chiefs are appointed, not elected. You're thinking of the Sheriff.

should its the key word - but "failure to correctly investigate a crime" isnt a crime according to practiced law - failure to investigate wont overcome the qualified immunity cause a reasonable officer could likley be wrong in the investigation - Thats the problem today - in the past it was likley more servier but technology make as aware of the behavior and praticec of LEO across the US. The practiced Law hasnt changed and the standard frase of "we investigated ourselve and found no wrong doing" is the outcome of most instances of investigation into wronddoing of cops. Also the behavior of wallmart for "wrongfully reporting a crime" wont change soon cause the cops wont do anything about it. And even if they do something and decide to charge wallmart mostlikley the prosecutor will decline to prosecute - wallmarts are reported to be hiring active duty cops in there freetime to provide security and this relationship could be seen as potential a conflict of intressed but no one is botherd by it

@@tasker6669 lets poke some holes in what you wrote. "failure to investigate" its not a failure to investigate because cops were shown a unedited video that shows a man enter walmarts garden section where they keep the sand. load up 7 bags then immediately leave. this is even said in the video but not show for some reason. then about the cops going after walmart, yes there was negligence on their part but the cops would have to prove malice for falsely reporting a crime. so more than likely they wont do that because there probably wasnt any malice on walmarts part only negligence. if there was risk for criminal prosecution for reporting a crime and being wrong then people wouldnt report anything. but it is a crime to falsely report a crime because it was done maliciously

good one

😀😂🤣

I see what you did there.

If you can avoid shopping at big corpo stores you should, because you are getting exactly what you pay for, low quality food which will give their big pharma buddies repeat business.

​@@AlphaOmegaSigma07stop copying and pasting in every comment section you're trolling a kid

Don't forget the city!!!😃

No, its only a crime if you know the report is false when you make it.

@@moonman239it was always false.

It wasn't a false report though.

@@TraceguyRune it was a FALSE report all they had to do was run back cameras check the register that they USED and seen the history of purchases for that day! This all could've been avoided IF they did there job CORRECTLY not just say "oh yeah they stole go get 'em boys!". Walmart can SEE EVERY TRANSCATION MADE AND RUN BACK CAMERAS. All stores with self-checkout and even regular registers are capable of looking at past transactions. I worked at enough of them and have done that before when someone said they forgot to pick up an item or if they doubled scanned something by accident! Its also called COMMON SENSE!!! Walmart defiantly made a false report and made this family GUILTY without proving INNOCENCE and the police officers acted stupidly and he should sue BOTH Walmart and the Sheriffs Dept for False Arrest and False Report!

@@moonman239 lyes

Ill say.

what are you, a serial killer or someone who supports them?

You said it right...

And how did the police make matters worse here. Walmart filed a false theft report. They’re the ones who created the problem and were too lazy to check the register tapes. Now the police officers were also lazy.

Are you kidding me??? Thieves will steal anything... A N Y T H I N G... including stuff that's nailed down.

@@AlAmantea If you’ll steal sand, you outta just get a real job cause stealing sand is work. So if you want to dig a trench, just put up a don’t steal my dirt sign.

Hahaha 😆 true

How do you know we dont?😂 oh sorry! They dont?

I know of a sand, gravel and concrete business where their property was next to state land. The state land included extensive sand dunes. The S&G company had been helping themselves to this sand over several decades. The S&G workers were told that their employer owned the land where they were taking the sand. The S&G company was figured to have stolen over 20,000 tons of sand from a state before a state surveyor figured out what was going on. Neither the founder of the company who had started taking the sand or his son who followed his dad's lead ever spent so much as a night in jail for the theft.

Cops are NOT your friends

fired? he needs to be in prison. Firing is nothing, suing is nothing. Selling away justice for a settlement is approval of what they did to those men

This is NOT on Walmart but on the Walmart AP who failed to follow the AP policies in opening a shoplifting case. Had that AP agent followed Walmart's directives this story would not have ever happened. The AP directives by Walmart are the due diligence you assume they don't have in play.

It's the managers fault.

its really sad because they were not under any rush to review the video, they literally had all day to make sure they were right and failed.

@@EvilAnomaly The AP is a representative of walmart, which means walmart is ultimately responsible.

If you can avoid shopping at big corpo stores you should, because you are getting exactly what you pay for, low quality food which will give their big pharma buddies repeat business.

EXACTLY!!

I once kind of shoplift bananas from a Wal-Mart near me

That would be racist..😂

demographics

optics.

You're suing yourself because THEY don't pay lawsuits. WE DO.

100% agree, and the cops should have requested and viewed it before issuing a warrant. Double screw up.

It is Walmart, should we expect anything different?

They rely on their cameras instead of walking the floor and watching in person. THATS the training their getting...

Sorry there no accountability for employees at walmart..sad but true..

So you have no idea what the word corporation means. Or what it implies. Do you want to be personally liable for what happens at your job? If you’re working within the scope of your job, you are protected because it’s a corporation. If you want to break that shield, make sure that you’re not going to be its first victim.

@@neilkurzman4907 whenever anyone starts a reply with “So you…blah, blah, blah” it usually is followed by some histrionic response to something that wasn’t actually said. Working for a “corporation” does not give one immunity in civil or criminal matters. The Loss Prevention employee signed their own name when they filed a complaint with the police department. Lying or misrepresentation on that form is on the employee criminally and civilly, and on the corporation civilly. Given your comment, it is not clear that you understand corporations as it relates to this scenario. Working for Walmart does not give one “qualified immunity” nor does it excuse gross negligence. I’m sure you can think of a hundred scenarios where a Big Box employee would be responsible for their actions while at work?

@@AV84USA You mean just like you did. So tell me how many individual Walmart employees have been jailed for for this in the past to your knowledge. They work for a corporation. The corporation takes responsibility for their actions. And even more why would you sue Walmart employee? What would you get? Do you think they’re rich? If it was that blatant, then they’d be criminal charges. Did the report include the Walmart employee or employees being arrested? Qualified immunity is not something you have as an employee of a corporation. Do you know what it means? It’s illegal distinction generated by the Supreme Court. It’s not a law and it doesn’t apply to civilian employees.

@@neilkurzman4907 I’m assuming you’re young, but you really have to read before going off on what you think you read. I wrote “needs to be personally held accountable as well as Walmart” that can mean civilly, and you can bet your smug butt that they’ll be sued, and criminally if they’ve broken any laws. Signing an affidavit falsely is illlegal, and depending what exactly the affidavit the loss prevention officer signed, it could be a crime. (I did not say that in my original post, but since you’re going there…) I have seen many cases where loss prevention officers testify that “I observed suspect enter store, select items, conceal items, and proceed past checkout with items” or some combination of that. Almost always do they state that they observed the suspect entering store, presumably without the merchandise… In this case, they did NOT go back to the entry point or they would have seen him prepay. I do not know what is worded on the affidavit that they personally signed.

Do large settlements EVER stop incompetence? There is never any PERSONAL accountability, and also never ANY changes in procedure. The money ALWAYS comes out of deep pockets and is considered a cost of doing business. Our society has LOST the concept of PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for wrongdoing. Performing official actions NEEDS to have Personal Danger involved to make it SERIOUS ENOUGH that all parties tread carefully and deliberately. For all of the risk and damage to be one one side of the equation is NOT justice.

4 magic words: we got a call

​@medbob1 we don't have a justice system. We have a legal system. A broken, corrupt legal system.

DON'T Shop There ,,Then !!!

@@BigTony2Guns I DON'T!!! Triggered much 😂

@@ShalomUSA --Can Sue Walmart --But NOT the Sheriff Qualified immunity has protected law enforcement officers and other government officials from being held accountable when they violate people’s constitutional rights for decades. The doctrine of qualified immunity allows state and local officials to avoid personal consequences related to their professional interactions unless they violate “clearly established law” and has been repeatedly used by police officers to escape accountability and civil liability for engaging in violent and abusive acts against the public. In practice, this often means that, unless there’s a case with nearly identical facts on the record, these officials can violate a person’s rights without being held personally responsible for their actions.

NEVER buy electronics from HackMart. they all made deliberately cheaply. AND if you bought the Warranty, they don't even honor it! learned my lessen the hard way! learn from my mistakes, Avoid Walmart's circuitry!

@@BigTony2Gunsunfortunately a certain presidential candidate wants to expand their power and immunity. Not to mention what desantis just signed about filming of public servants (a protected right). We are screwed either way.

those self-pay stations makes it alot easier to falsely accuse...

Not true. This was actually explained in an episode of judge joe brown by the judge to a young man that was screwed over by the law.

they will be sued for many millions by the time it's over...they can surely afford it too

If you can avoid shopping at big corpo stores you should, because you are getting exactly what you pay for, low quality food which will give their big pharma buddies repeat business.

They need to be fired and charged with obstruction of justice. This was intentional.

How did they know his name and address? Credit card records 🤦‍♂️

@@RBzee112 Yea they have it all tied together. They use facial recognition and know every time you've been there and they can easily pull up and watch your history at 10X speed and see if you stolen before... Walmart will probably tell you they DO NOT us facial recognition, but that what the wall mounted, face level, Bosch cameras are doing. Extreme resolution...

Because they're idiots.

and his son.

I don’t agree that it’s “fine” that Walmart apologized. That’s not nearly enough. This should never have happened.

They should get in trouble for not properly investigating(they should have reviewed ALL video of him while he was in the store, pretty sure they have cameras at all registers). Also refusing to let him show a receipt is ridiculous