Watching this video gives me the confidence to start taking my DCC layout to the next level. I have always been apprehensive and intimidated when seeing digital layouts. Thank you, so very easy to understand!
I am so glad that you found this helpful. Yes, I used to be intimidated by the Digital Model Rialroading as well, and when I went to look for resources on the most common subjects, I found very little resources that gives the complete picture. That's why I made this video and I am so pleased to see that it is helpful for others. Thank you for stopping by and hope you explore more in the channel. Cheers! Kaustav
Thank you John! Glad that you liked it. I am really excited that I started with computer control at last - it's so much easier and less intimidating than what I used to think! Exciting days ahead!
Thank you Joe! I am glad that you liked the intro. Truth be told - this video is actually the boring part! The real excitement lies ahead. :) Cheers! Kaustav
Amazing Information and Video! I am brand new to the hobby of model railroading, currently in the process of building my first layout, so this information comes at the perfect time. As an IT professional, it is very exciting to see the possibilities of combing technology with an already amazing hobby. I also have visited your website and your work, attention to detail and your ability to explain it all, are truly amazing. Looking forward from learning much more from you in the future. Keep up the great work!
Thank you John, I am so glad that you are finding this series interesting and my channel and website helpful. I am yet to uncover many secrets of a digital model railroad myself but suceffully completing the first step is of course a great start. I work on HR Technology in my day job too and I can surely appreciate the sophistication of the Model Train technology through a different lens. Please feel free to look around and let me know if you have any questions. Facebook Messanger and Instagram Direct are very good ways to strike up a conversation. Cheers! Kaustav
Hello, as soon as I saw you in front of what looks like a blackboard I’ve decided to call you Professor! I hope that’s okay. You have obviously put a lot of thought and effort into this series. That being said, I graduated college in 1972. Pre personal computers. So, I am going to really concentrate and follow along. I have a first generation iPad, ( still going strong ) and an IPhone X. I Never had any reason during my career to become computer literate. Not proud of that, but won’t cry over that spilled milk. Like I said, because of your efforts and my true interest I will do my best. Okay Professor? I look forward to my next lesson.
Professor, huh? Professor Kaustav Chatterjee... Now, I like the sound of that! I always wanted to be a teacher and nothing will make it more exciting than being a designated one in a field I'm passionate about! I really don't think computers to be essential in life. In my mind, tools are for people and not the other way around - one should use technology only when needed. So, now if you feel that you need a computer to run your trains and need to learn whatever is necessary, it's perfectly fine! With so much online help and some really nice people in the hobby, you'll get started in no time. And of course, professor is always there to lend an extra hand as needed. :) Thank you for stopping by Norman, your comments always put a smile on my face. Cheers! Kaustav
ALWAYS Awesome along with Charles at chadwick its always a great watch. How Come not just take the FREE win10 Upgrade so you are all good to go all the drivers are available for that machine and its FREE seems logical other that awesome!
Thank you! I am glad that you're enjoying these videos. :) That old notebook can hardly handle Win8 Home, it will run a fever to work the Win10. :) The idea here is to show that you can get a lot even from very modest equipment. I think many times we end up putting a lot more weightage on gadgets than necessary. The idea is to keep it intentionally 'oudated' in every sense and show, it doesn't really matter much. Thanks for stopping by, cheers!
Kaustav below are a couple of links you may be interested in. I use a NCE DCC system which I am in the early stages of developing as I build my layout. I was going to go down the all DCC route but at our club layout here in the UK we have experienced command delays on the system then I saw Mikes RU-vid video below which explained how a dcc system can get overloaded with data traffic. Then the real game changer an article in the June 2019 Railroad Model Craftsman "Build an LCC-based interlocking which was the first article I have read that I fully under stood since the NMRA launched the concept of Layout Command Control, I think in 2016. I had been aware of LCC when it was first launched and thought this may be the future but as with all new things it takes time for things to really get going. I think that time has now arrived with rr-cirkits LCC kit, others are starting to follow. The most important thing to know is that as with DCC the NMRA holds control so no one manufacture. The system works on individual nodes that plug and play because ever node no mater who makes it will have a unique address so a lot of the configuration with other equipment is already done when you purchase it. This is now the way I am going e.g. Using DCC to control the trains on the track and only them and using the separate but parallel coms system LCC to control the switch motors block detection signals etc thus dramatically reducing the digital traffic on the Dcc system which is now doing much more than it was designed for e.g. Speed and direction control some lights and a bit of sound. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DfOJrqnb9j0.html greatnorthwesternrailway.blogspot.com/2018/11/lets-configure-node-beauty-of-lcc-with.html Hope you find this as interesting as I do Neil
Thank you Neil for stopping by and details on LCC. Interestingly, I was talking to Dick Bronson, the creator of LCC last month. The conversation started after I started enquiring about their TowerMan feedback module that I wanted to use to get a feedback of my Cobalt IP Digital machines to LocoNet. Truth be told, I learned about LCC about a year ago, but by that time I've already invested in my block detectors and signal controllers from Digitrax. I was seriously considering switching to LCC, but I reconsidered and decided to stay with DCC on LocoNet network because my layout will be really small - about 40 feet long and just 16 inches deep shelf layout, half of which will be logging anyway, so the actual automation and CTC will be confined to half of the layout and in very small scale (my longest train will be just 4 feet long!). For such a small layout it didn't make sense to re-invest in LCC especially since I have no taker of my existing DCC hardware in India at the moment. I might still look at LCC if by the time I get to signalling they release some type of way to intercommunicate between LocoNet and LCC so that I can keep my existing hardware in use. I am going to build New York Central's speed signalling with multiple signals with 3 heads - you can imaging the pain it is going to be to manage the logic in DCC! I am seriously dreading that... Thanks again for stopping by, stay in touch. :) Cheers! Kaustav
Kaustav that is the beauty of LCC using JMRI it will control both loconet and LCC. I was lucky with my timing I had only just started going down the all DCC route when I found that article. My layout will end up larger than yours with 3 levels 4 loops and 2 helixes. I estimate when I finish building there will be about 250’ of mainline track so when it is all built it would be affected by the data traffic issues
Neil - totally agree. For a layout of that size LCC will be invaluable. If they release any interface to use the Digitrax hardware then, I’ll surely move to LCC for the expansion. As of now, I have the hardware only for the first phase of my project, I’m keen on trying out LCC for the second. It all depends on Dick and his team.
Connecting DCS52 or any other Digitrax command station is going to be no different. The connection to your computer is bascially building a network and that infrastructure and the protocol is no different in these upgrades for a particular manufacturer. The update that are pushed in these new starter systems are mostly improving the ability to use more functions from the throttle itself. If you are using a computer to control your layout, you don't have to upgrade your command station unless you need to enhance the 'capacity' of your command station, like enhanced amperage. The software does the heavy lifting in your computer and the command station simply works as a intermediator in the communication. Hope this helps. Cheers!
Sure, as long as you can connect your command station with your computer and then configure JMRI to be able to communicate with your command station, Cheers!
Thank you for stopping by Michael. The turnouts are already programmed and the addresses are set - you can find the first video in the series to find the details: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8iah6whWt14.html . Once a turnout has an address it will be known by that address irrespective of the interface, whether it's your DCC throttle or JMRI and you can control a turnout from either of the interfaces - your throttle or JMRI. Hope that helps.
Hi - I am using DCC Concept's Cobalt IP Digital which has an integrated decoder in the switch machine itself, so I don't need a separate stationary decoder. However, if you're using a standard switch machine like the Tortoise, then yes, you'd need a stationary decoder like Digitrax DS 64 if you're using a Digitrax system.
@@OtterCreek it really has. They are smaller than tortoise so they fit in tighter space, programming is super easy and they have a bunch of other contacts to do some cool things. They cost more than tortoise, but if you add the cost of a decoder to them, then it might not be that different. The only downside is that I have to communicate with them over the bus and cannot use loconet. Not a problem for a small layout, but for larger layouts you might want to think about that while designing your communication architecture.
A fantastic tutorial I appreciate you investing the time in creating the split-screen video. This is exactly what I was looking for. All the best, Peter
