Ghaznavids: From Slaves to the Rulers of Central Asia DOCUMENTARY 

NOOOOOO WHYYYYYYY

No u

Finally a video on the most northern parts of Indian subcontinent

When you will make a video on Mysore empire or Maratha Empire or chola empire or suri sultanate?

Thank you, but no thank you! Not my type of game..... But if it was more like Kindom Come, maby then

which game was it from .. i cant remember :D :D

Lmao

@Aleksa Petrovic indeed i remember :D

@@shafqatishan437 bro dont stuck between details just enjoy the joke and laugh :D

only in d islamic world a slave got so much respect due to our Islamic law which specifically told us not to oppress and persecute even d slaves

Hahaha good one

Legit.

@King Wiwuz IV Actually, Abbasid Caliph Al Qadir had an actual real power over the Gaznavi Empire.

Not really. A caliphate just means it’s ruled by a caliph. A sort of king religious figure. Caliphates could be small or large. Just like empires. For instance Germany today was once called the German Empire even though it had always been known as Germany and was made up of several kings in that one empire. Same can be said for America. It could be considered an Empire just bc of all the separate states make it up.

sabuktegin means "from sabuk family" it is an old turkic word probably still used in central asia

It's not that I disagree, but I think that what sounds cool depends on what your native language is. If a set of sounds are commonly used in your daily life, they probably loose their coolness as the novelty wears off.

Tegin means “ancestor” in Kyrgyz language, which define your identity and to which family person belongs, and tegin word is still used in modern kyrgyz language.

Sabuktegin in this case means this person belongs to Sabuk family

And Alptegin is also a characteristic name for Kyrgyz people since Alp means hero and warrior, and this name also used widely among turkic people as Alptegin, Alperen, Alper... ( kyrgyz people are one of the central asian turkic tribes)

I agree it is quite cool. My #1 however has to be Aurangzeb of the Mughals 😃

Dude, put a period now and then.

The white huns tho

Afsharids were persian though

U need to stop other history..mughals timurds are mongol..safavid are persian...delhi were afghan

@@user-wy6nx1du7n lol they were from the oghuz turkic AFSHAR tribe 😂

Swiss Alps also turkik name

I never knew the turks reaches the apls

@@peace_ab The word "Alp" was and is used by the Turkic people and means "warrior" but it has absolutely no connection to the Alpine mountain range.

Interesting. In Burmese, it's "thakin".

Pancho Halo huns of Attila did))

Me too

Oddly me too

Pike and shot channel along with SandRhoman history are my favourite history channels

what about oversimplified

@@smilingcat9997 They are ok for a brief synopsis of events and stuff. But they only scratch the surface. I do like them of course but there's a lot better more in depth channels.

Is this somekind of aristrocratic joke, I'm too commoner to understand!

it happened in the era of Sultaan Masoud.

Then the KaraKhitai arrived with the Chinese

Gaznavi was also turk

Spoilers dude

@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 ya ghori khilji mongol and alot of others

Turkic dynasty

Gazneliler bizim atalarımız Çünkü Oğuz Türkleri 🇹🇷

y seef hahaha Yeah But OGHUZ TURKIC 🇹🇷😂

Turkic ....

This is where the seljuks adopted their brownish skin :0 poor nationalists..

I had been meaning to do it for long years and managed at last in Kyrgyzistan. That was a great experience i would like to repeat. You feel freedom of nomads through your veins after some local drinks 😀

Its a land of warriors. No other region brought more warlords than central asia. Ghaznavid, Karakhanids, Seljuqi Khorezmiy Temuri Baburi Ottomans origins are also central asia. Anatolian Turks refers to central asia as “Atayurt” means fatherland. There are no ethnic groups who destroyed and built empires more than Turks. Even Gengiz khans army was 60-80% Turkic tribes.

@@user-wp7kg6qw1g The Ghaznavid became an empire and one of the mightiest empire in the world because of Mahmud of Ghazni . People always talk about Sabuktigin what they not tell is that Sabuktigin not want to rebel against the Persian Samanid . It was Mahmud who wanted to rebel against the Samanid . Sabuktin at his greatest controlled a minuscule patch of land , the Ghanavid territory under Sabuktigin was a jok it wasn't eve. independent lol . It was Mahmud who made the Ghaznavid an empire but also one of the most mighty . Mahmud is half-Persian by his mother side . He went to school with Persian and even his friend were Persian . One of his Persian school mate became a Vizier of the Ghaznavid empire . Mahmud was nicknamed "Mahmud of Zabulistan" because his Persian mother was from Zabulistan . Everyone agree that Sabuktigin was EXTREMELY weak compared to Mahmud . Everything great about the Ghaznavid was by Mahmud the half-Persian . Mahmud was more Persian than even the 100% Iranic Samanid . Under Mahmud's Ghaznavid empire the Persian culture was in a golden age . The Shanameh was completed . And Ferdowsi only say that Mahmud was Turk because Ferdowsi not like Mahmud because Mahmud not pay Ferdowsi in gold as promised . Because someone who not like Ferdowsi took the gold and instead put silver thus making Ferdowsi think Mahmud not want to pay him . Mahmud thinking Ferdowsi insults him by not taking the gold then order Ferdowsi to be executed . Ferdowsi run away and started saying that Mahmud was a Turk . When Mahmud know that someone changed the gold coin and put silver instead he knew he made a mistake and so he regretted and send gold to Ferdowsi but unfortunately Ferdowsi die before the gold and the apology of Mahmud arrive . Mahmud as a person was a Persian . His DNA is 50% Persian . Under him no Persian believe that they were rulled by a Turk . The Ghaznavid empire wasn't Turkish empire that subjugated Persian . It was a Persian / Iranian empire rulled by Mahmud a half Persian . Also even his father Sabuktigin claimed descend from the Sassanian Shah " " " "Sabuktigin, the son of Jukan, the son of Kuzil-Hukum, the son of Kuzil-Arslan, the son of Firuz, the son of Yezdijird, king of Persia." 🤣😂 Sabuktigin not care about Turk lol , he wanted to be Persian 🤣😂 . His son was Half-Persian . I don't know why Turks are proud of him or his son ? lol . Sabuktigin was a Turk who was loyal to the Iranian Samanid . Sabuktigin was extremely Persianized and even try to claim he was from the line of the Sassanian king . Sabuktigin not care about Turk lol he not even want to rebel against the Samanid . Sabuktigin didn't rule over an empire he was a governor of a small territory that was a vassal of the Samanid . The Ghanavid empire begun with Mahmud of Ghazni the half-Persian ( who is the son of a Persian woman who was a daughter of an Iranian aristocrat from Zabulistan ) not Sabuktigin . Sabuktigin work for the Samanid as was his master Alp-Tegin . Both Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were EXTREMELY loyal to the Persian Samanid . Both Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were EXTREMELY Persianisized and Iranisized . Why Turks proud of Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin ? Sabuktigin always claim he was from Sassanian line because he proud of being an Iranian . Alp-Tegin loyaly work for the Samanid Persian . Funny both 100% Turk blood Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were 100% loyal to the Persian Samanid . It was Mahmud the half-Persian who create and build the greatest empire in the Islamic world not the Turks Sabuktigin or Alp-Tegin . Both Turks Alp Tegin and Sabuktigin were canine to the Persian Samanid . The half-Persian Mahmud of Ghazni deserve 100% of the praise , he was true Persian king who made Persian culture reach a golden age .

@@user-wp7kg6qw1g Timurid is Mongol origin Timur is Mongol-Persian origin , Baburid is Mongol origin Babur is a Mongol .

@@user-wp7kg6qw1g Karakhanids is Mongol origin nothing Turkic .

But still you guys are barbaric not successful civilizations

Take Afghan out Pashtuns ain't the same as you

@@klawson8617 actually I’m a Pashtun Afghan and I’ve done multiple DNA test, Pashtuns are nearest population to the skeleton remains found of Ghaznavid soldiers .. DNA evidence shows basically the modern population of Afghanistan being Pashtun, Tajik, Uzbek, Turkmen all have had a shared past through genetic research

@Persian Sounds I'm pashtun aswell. You're getting confused. Turkmen and Tajiks have merged with us throughout the centuries. Uzbeks are different. But saying we are the same as them is wrong. They assimilated into the dominant culture which was the Pashtun. Not the other way round

@@klawson8617 not from a genetic standpoint that is incorrect.. The proxy for purest Pashtun or nearest to the proto Pashtuns are Khandaris.. Genetically they have the highest Steppe ancestry or Iranic and lowest South Asian AASI which is around 8% .. Isolated Tajiks like Pamiris and Yaghnobis even Ishkashimi Tajiks have more Iranic ancestry than Pashtuns but these are minority amongst Tajiks .. The nearest people to Pashtuns are these high Iranic ancestry Tajiks . The average Tajik from Kabul is almost identical genetically to a Pashtun from central Afghanistan but given Tajiks from Kabul have slightly higher South Asian or East Asian ancestry than a Pashtun from central Afghanistan .. Then you have Pashtuns from NE Afghanistan like Laghman, Kunar, Peshawar and most of KPK that show higher South Asian admixture than the rest of Pashtuns .. They were likely Nuristani type people that assimilated to Pashtun culture.. Kalash people and NE Pashtuns are almost identical genetically From my research I’ve noticed Pashtuns in general have Mediterranean ancestry likely from a Greek or Macedonian source that no other Afghan does but it’s only minimal but in ancient genetic test it shows around 15% But overall Pashtuns, Tajiks, Kalash are molded as 65% shared European ancestry, 25% Iranian Plateau ancestry and 10% Onge type Ancestral South Asian Hunter gatherer admix ..

Some Turkic Dynasty was brutal

Pommy Pie cry harder

@Pommy Pie it's funny how you hold grudges against a man 1000 years ago 😂

True

@Bozkurt postuna bürünmüş yobaz AraB devesi o nasıl isim lan :D

Basically turks ruled the stans areas.

Yup. Arab rule over the Muslim world was actually much shorter than the Turkic rule that came after

Here in the English and French speaking Americas, we were made to believe that it was the Franks, the Celtics and the Vikings who ruled the middle ages

It depends how you wish to look at it, the Turks achieved hegemony relatively quickly over Anatolia and much of the Middle East, and from the time of the Arab caliphate they’re wasn’t really another major power in the region until the mamlukes, who were relatively quickly dispatched by the Turkish hegemony. The Turks just didn’t really have a major rival in the area, whereas Europe for instance is tightly packed with many different peoples and rivalry’s, and has been since the first kingdoms there. Which drove constant technological advancements and the looking of new ways to do things, including new resources found overseas through colonies or trade, the latter of which eventually meant getting around Turkish taxes en route to China and India. The Turks had an amazing position that they managed to keep pacified for most of their rule, no major rival in the region, this gave them an amazing advantage, but also lead to their eventual stagnation, as they became trapped by their own position once everyone learned how to bypass them on the way to China and India, while they also remained out of reach of the new world. It’s really an incredible story about how they benefited from their situation but were also ultimately undone by it too, as a result its kind of hard to say who “ruled” the Middle Ages, you could just as easily say the same thing about the Chinese. The Turks and Chinese were similar in the fact they lacked region rivals, whereas Europe is essentially the opposite, a bunch of rivals keeping each other in check making sure none get too strong and can overpower the rest. Also if you had to pick a place to start your civilisation, you can’t do much better than Anatolia, Persia, northern/middle China and of course the US, hence why all those states became world superpowers at one point or another 🤔

Watch the video named "history of turks" which is a mapping video on youtube. Turks domimated euroasia.

In middle ages only rival of Turkic Empire was another Turkic Empire

Although even then, I think the reason slaves were given such important jobs was because they had no power or influence except from what was given to them by their masters, so they couldn't easily start a rebellion, and could be killed without consequence if they started causing trouble.

@@iapetusmccool They did on multiple occasions though especially in Muslim empires. There's the two Mameluke dynasties, the Ghaznanavids and Muhammand Ali Pasha just to name a few.

@@TheDirtysouthfan Mohamed Ali Pasha wasn’t a mamluk, he was the son of an Albanian trader and commander.

@@TheDirtysouthfan Mohamed Ali even rounded up the mamluks after taking back Egypt from the French and killed them to avoid further rebellion in Salah Al Din’s Castle

@@iapetusmccool actually this wasn't the case most of the time. "Slave soldiers" in Abbasid Caliphate most of the time decided who to be caliph and held the real power. As in the video, Ghaznavids overthrew Samanids and in Egypt, Mamelukes overthrew Ayyubids. Even in Ottoman Empire, Jannisaries started many revolts which caused the change of the Sultan.

@I NSA Ofcourse it might be common. But malik was more common that that.

Sultan is an Arab title not Turkic

I NSA Persian Language is much much older then Arabic, hope this sums it up

Sultans came after Arab Caliphs. First real Sultan Kings were the Seljuks.

shah is much stronger name then sultan

It is not unusual to see slaves who become rulers and sultans in Islamic states.

It is said that even Timur was from a noble and wealthy family. Also that his injuries were sustained from battle rather than from being a thief.

Well yes but no

The mamluk(slave) dynasy ruled egypt and syria for 400 years,also ruled india. the slave of muhammad of ghour qutbuddin aibak was the first ruler of the dynasty

Civil War Week By Week The first ruler of the Saffarids was a coppersmith who became a warrior and gained independence.

What an appreciation :-) ... Kudos

I mean he was from our perspective but for his people as all those wealth were spent on them, he was good.

True

@@rechalnorbu4740 like kings and general mentioned in the last part he did those bad things. But as those wealth goes to his empire and as idol breaking is considered as great feat he was seen as a hero maongst his people.

@@Abhishek-sr2pu He was not a tyrant

@obsexo zerzual true

Make sure that Tashkent Prospers and that dynasty of Khoja rules it

@War fîgHtÉR Crusader Kings 3 game by paradox

Man I really wanna play that game, if only my computer ram is enough...

"literally" doing it, huh.

Ghaznavid and Khilji is Khalaj Turkic from Karluk Turkic !

Hmm.. still its pretty populated for a desert.

It is the only fertile desert in the world too.

@@AHSANALI-tb3hs maybe due to canals and irrigation from nearby himalayan rivers. Also many say earlier it was fertile owing to these rivers which later on changed course.

It's a desert, what else do you expect lmfao

let's be honest, people are super hospitable there, innit?

Turks controlled Mamluks too. Example: Tomanbay

@@Tengrinin_Kirbaci they kept on ruling Egypt on the ottoman behalf till the citadel massacre of the 1800s

Defeated by ottomans

And then ottomans became caliphs

@Toonimation that’s not true whoever rules fairly and gives everybody rights deserves to be caliph. this is what Islam teaches

Махмуд газнави карлук прямой потомок нынешних УЗБЕКов

Ismail was a Tajik from balkh Afghanistan 🇦🇫

Ismail samani was a tajik from balkh 🇦🇫🌞

its a fever dream we cant escape

Don't we all

This comment brought to you by Raid Shadow Legends

It’s been a while since I saw an ad about that game, it’s almost nostalgic. Almost.

I want to know the soundtracks they use rather than this mobile game

@Вхламинго Dumb ass, they were originally brought in from Central Asia.

@Вхламинго bruh .d

@Вхламинго Lol

@Arun Kumar well, they do know genetic engineering China helping them to change their genes

@chachi mogo The problem is rooted from the modern conception of nationhood, people think ethnicities, cultures had clear borders in the past like today, which is wrong, middle east was a big cauldron, everything was put into it and mixed together. Ghaznavids were Ghaznavids, they weren't Turkic, Persian or Afghan. A Turkic elite who adopted Persian as lingua franca ruled over a largely Afghan population, saying it was a Turkic state isn't entirely wrong, but it oversimplifies it.

@Mansoor Ahmed they literally had a book on war tactics called something "yudh shashtra" But the non-violence ideology and fighting against Afghans,persians,turks,arabs is no joke.They were hugely outnumbered.

@Mansoor Ahmed The rajputs were Fearless warriors but without much mobility. They relied mostly on infantry. Mahmood used the cavalry masterfully. Just read the campaigns in depth before saying this.

@Benjamin Franklin US mein kyu reh h agar deshbhakt h to? Koi jawab h?

​@@benjaminfranklin2426 Bengals also won the first war

Your comment itself is a joke😂

@Fwrus Uses Yeah I meant that they both had a Riches to Rags to Riches kind of story

Saifuddin Qutuz was nephew of Jalallidin .... last KhorezmShah. He was sold to Egypt when he was a boy. The same boy who was sold became an Amir and defeated Mongols. A boy whose family have been slaughtered end up slaughtering mongols in Palestine.

Qutuz is Turkman and Saboktagin is Karluk !

@@rafliysafariy9820 Quttuz is also Karluk

@@user-om1hj6rz7sSayf Aldin Qutuz son of Jalal Aldin Minguberdi Turkmen Begdli/Oghuz

@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 😂

Babur never claimed to be Sultan doe.

@@BIGMrighthere he is a malik

@@omgbruhohhellnahmanwtfman9558 he was a "Shah"

​@@Argynov его прадед Тамерлан был Эмир

Династии империи Хорезмшахов тоже изначально были рабы и ещё Сайфутдин Кутуз ставший правитель Мамлюков тоже в детстве этого мальчика, монголы его продали на рабство и мальчик из рабство поднялся до главе государства мамлюков и в решающем войне мамлюки во главе Сайфутдин Кутуза против монголов одержали победа над монголов... Кстати Сайфутдин Кутуз тоже из семьи Хорезмшахов, сын родная сестра последний Султан Джалал адъ Дина

@@ILYAS-7 Yeah, and Qutuz is mentioned to have ripped his helmet off so his men could be inspired by his presence, and he managed to lead a charge that pushed back the Mongols at Ain Jalut. And afterward, he got murdered by his own men for his efforts, in typical Mamluk fashion.

​@@somerandomrpgenthusiast8451 Его убил Бейбарс, Бейбарс был один из военный начальником армии Мамлюков и он тоже по происхождению Тюрк как и Сайфутдин Китуз. В конце правления Султан Бейбарса тоже отравили его и убили. То ист карма настигла его за то что когда-то он убил Сайфутдин Китуза...

@@ILYAS-7 I remember Baybars and Qutuz had prior fought against each other and only worked together due to the Mongols being the greater foe. Then afterward Baybars and his supporters took the chance to kill Qutuz while he was hunting. The amount of infighting and assassinations in the Mamluk Sultanate was insane

Ghaznavid are Mamluk Turkic Alp Tigin governor of Samanid Dynasty Tajik !

​@@rafliysafariy9820stfu its afg

المسلمين ليس الأتراك لأن السلطان محمود تم تعيينه من قبل خليفة المسلمين العام في بغداد

@@user-gm6xy4qd3k I do not understand

that title would make him sound like he is some kinda idol hunter or idol fucker in Japan :D :D

10/10 would be a great hentai to watch

His army was defeated multiple times in India

@@Shahanshah101 hahaha whose army? Mahmud Ghaznavid army? He invaded India 17 times and declared as the conqueror wherever he went in India. You better not to follow your local history teacher and read some unbiased historians.

@@edmbkn5258 conqueror by whom? Your islamic historians? Yeah pretty unbiased I have say.

Indians got wrecked here, that's interesting to you lol ?

@@tanveersakib2494 He's probably a follower of religion of peace.

@@tanveersakib2494 more like exposing the religion of peace

@@adityasinghjadoun6675 avg pindus coping in comments

@@sami123yz average Chuslims thinking themselves to be Caliph while repairing Punctures

yeap and they never forget to mention mongols even if they arent involved.

@Woiller- Relic TURK.

Well, they’re quick to forget whatever history doesn’t suit their narrative. As an indigenous of the continent, I know firsthand how they like to forget they tried to wipe out people out. Also this sort of history is really specific to this region, and frankly most people don’t care to learn anything outside of their own “country”. I do it because learning about history is awesome, and also you tend to notice how things move in circles, compared to the past. Events tend to correlate, though not exactly replicate past events, like how 100 years ago from now was also a time of pandemic and recession... And also more relevant to this video, 102 years ago, the Ottoman Empire would be defeated in 1918, and disbanded by 1921.

they are not "Turks". They are Ghazni's royal House so they are the Ghazanavids. They were Turkic by culture but also heavily Persianized by education and literacy. When looking at them they looked more like the Persians than the Turks. Look at the city names, none of them sound Turkish at all.

@@SantomPh lol ok. Of course they are Turks...

Saffarid is origin Persian Sunni Muslim Persian Sistan and Tabaristan and Safavid is Azeri Turkish Azerbaijani Shi'ite Muslim not 💯Persian !

Saffarid fought against the khilafat e Abbasia isn't that bad

@@zxera9702 saffarid sunni muslim(persian) ghaznavid sunni muslim(turkic)

The mix of Turks and Persians is pre historical as legend of shahnameg and turaan iran wars. Stories of bijan and manijeh and rostam and afrasib

@@farzinfrank2553 Rostam and Sohrab the Tajik men?

Hi Salam.from Ghazna ,,

History of your ancestors starts with Genghiz The Mongol

Hindu word didn't exist then.

Jaypal was last Punjabi Rajput hindu Ruler of modern day Afghanistan and northwest Pakistan. He fought graciously against Pashtun and Turk warriors but couldn't save the integrity of Hindu shahi kingdom

@@NightRider0101 Kudos to your Knowledge 👍

@@AWMuSick hes actually right, the word hindu was coined somewhere around 16th/17th century. The original word was sindhu(people of sindh). The persians used to call them hindu, hence came forth the word hindu. Hindu is more like a nationality than religious identity.

@@animedubbed7982 16-17th Century ? You sure ? 😂😂😂 Google Hindu Shahi Dynasty and look at the Ruling Period it is indeed termed by Persians but you are terribly misinformed on the Century and Dates, that's why my Congratulations to him and you for Enlightening me 🙏🏼

And Muslim most importantly.

@@naeemislam9820 Yes of course ☪️

🤣😂 Turkic 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@ramirez4295 What is the funny thing ?

@@lastkhwarezmianshah8714 from Afghanistan not Turkic 🤣🤣

USA Still has Slavery Today most of the Prison Population are Blacks and Mexicans, who are used as Cheap Labor this is called "The Prison Industrial Complex"

Ye and their first POC president was a gay lol

Slavery began in Mesopotamia 1200 bc @and highest illiteracy is still in Yemen and Afghanistan and Mali

Lol color is the only thing Middle Eastern countries are still so backwards they will never have a Christian or jew rule and your talking about others being backward 😅

Khālid ibn al-Walīd ibn al-Mughīra al-Makhzūmī was a great Muslim hero, a warrior, a gazi, a mujhid! May Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala, bless him, his family, reward him and grant him the highest rank in Jannah.

Sword of allah is khalide ibn al walied not some slave

@@user-ou7bf1nd9b just because he is a slave doesn't mean he's less than any person because of islam.

Seljuq Turks enslaved arabs for 500 years, until their british and french boyfriends saved them in the 1900s.@@user-ou7bf1nd9b

Wasn't the title first held by the Samanids? As far as i know thry are the first official sultanate

@@thestatistician6076 I think the Samanids took the title of Emir/Amir (king) only. They had a 'kingdom' but not a Sultanate.

@@BIGMrighthere as far as i know amir was common among many governors, but i will check, cuz in arabic, i found it as Sultan

@@BIGMrighthere in the english, it is written just that he was acknowledged as a ruler, but in the minted coins ( as far as i could read) there was the title of "ملك", King written by the side of his name, which is a bit odd, as no ruler in islam is allowed to claim that title, as long as there is a caliph again maybe i read it wrong, but that is what i could get.

@@thestatistician6076 An Emir/King is not a Sultan/Authority, but a Sultan can still be an Emir. Judging from wikipedia, Samanids had an Amirate/Emirate.

@@shafqatishan437 India is reaching mars and you are still trying to break the time. All right,but by the time you do that we will have another temple on Mars lol

@@shafqatishan437 keep dreaming. We have endured worse calamities and torment. We cannot be vanquished.

@@shafqatishan437 haha keep dreaming jihadi

@@lakshaynegi82 "InDiA iS rEaChInG mArS" abey loru, Mars pe jaa kr kia ukhaar liya tum logon ne han? 🤣 khud ki 25% se zyada population ghurbat se neechy ki zindagi guzar rahi hy aor ye bc is baat pr khush hain k Mars pr pohanch chuky hain LMFAO

@@shafqatishan437 When , since 70 years gazwa e hind is pending , last time in 1971 pakistan tried gazwa e hind , they lost their half :)

Rajasekar Srinivasan hahaha it is in history that your so called preachers offered bribery to leave the temple but we hate bribery and it is hated in every religion so go to Kashmir and see your humanity

@@ahmadibrahim5112 Don't cry when we destroy mosques , we are just tasting the medicine you brought :)

Rajasekar Srinivasan Lagta hai aap ko ghussa aagya hai 😂

Rajasekar Srinivasan Should we stop now ?

@@ahmadibrahim5112 ZUBOY or inn jese idol worshipers ke han jo bacha peda hota hai wo Mehmood Ghaznavi Rehmaullah ka darr le ker peda hota hai, chotay se bachay ke samnay naam lo wo chalang maar ke agay pichay dekhta Mehmud Sultan to nae agay😂

Someday the faithful will destroy the demonic lair again.

@@vitorpereira9515 in Sha Allah

@@sami123yz The Believers must join forces to purge the world of idolatry's darkness. It's the will of God!

@@vitorpereira9515 That includes idols of Mary and Jesus as well .... Inshallah

@@vitorpereira9515 how cucked must you be to support Mudslims.... who hate Xtians