Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I am sorry you had a hard time listening. I reposted with better audio here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-t0EuhAfU6FM.html
DUDE, Please be honest, I am older than photoshop, older than anyone except military intelligence having anything but obvious methods of photo doctoring, and in my youth I saw LOTS of old photos, lots of old records of newspaper articles (BEFORE media ownership centralization) of bones unearthed of not just a few but tribes of people 9+ tall. EVEN Abraham Lincon wrote of bones of TRIBES unearthed from mounds and was amazed at how much larger they were than HE WAS (he was 6'9" tall). Native American protection laws FORBID disturbing current surviving mounds and have since media was centralized.
I hear what you are saying, but none of these instances, (I also have seen the pictures and newspapers), have been able to be scientifically verified. I would be the first to believe if they were.
@@JoeBack I understand being willing to wait for science to give permission but I do not understand you calling something a photoshop that you admitly sate you in fact that you know that it is not.
@@JoeBack I understand being willing to wait for science to give permission but I do not understand you calling something a photoshop that you admitly sate you in fact that you know that it is not.
There are top Hebrew scholars who say the Hebrew is clear Genesis 6 is talking about divine beings and the Tanackh JPS version translates sons of GOD as divine beings and that's clearly what the ancients believed
It is true, as I mentioned in my Nephilim video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1pgju6_GzP4.html the Hebrew can be understood as either angels or nobles. The most ancient surviving texts from the Qumran sect were very into men descending from fallen angels and the book of Enoch. This is most likely the reason why the JPS opted for that particular translation. My point was to show that a great majority of Biblical scholarship, both Jewish and Christian, throughout the ages, were uncomfortable with that understanding. That being said, when there was no choice in the understanding of the narrative they used Bene Elohim to refer to angels. Check out the Book of Job for that. Instead, these scholars sought a more rational approach, as we really don't see half angel human hybrids walking around.
@@JoeBack The "Original Hebrew" declares, the Israelites felt like, "GRASSHOPPERS" compared to these Giants. And I've heard some pretty lame responses by doubters, like, "Well, the Israel- ites were a short people, and they were just exaggerating be- cause they had never SEEN men over 6' 5," or whatever.." Really? Spare me. It was GOD HimSELF that put the words in the mouths of those who penned those Hebrew words. GOD would NOT allow misleading exaggerations---Only act- ual FACTS! Those men, Scripture says, not only felt like grasshoppers to THEM---but THEY ( the Giants) perceived them as such. Funny how people will believe in "Bigfoot," or, "Aliens" flyin' all over the place, or, "Nessie," swimmin' still swimmin' around, but when it comes to Giants---Oh NO, No WAY, baby! Oh well, no biggie. Let folks believe what they will. Have a good year. I Pray you experience Christ next year.
@@JoeBack And Joe, friend---Not to ramble but, the exis- tence of Giants FULLY explains the MASSIVE Monoliths that are found in parts of the world, and the ENORMOUS struc- tures thereof. Science---Modern Science, STILL is complet- ely UNABLE to explain it all. Funny, I understand it quite well.
@@JoeBack And there are a number of Giant footprints that have NOT been refuted, as well as HUGE weapons that even a SEVEN FOOT man would have trouble with...
There are accounts in the bible that there were giants in the promised land. David killed Goliath, who had tall relatives, all killed by David's Mighty Men.
