Тёмный

Giants of the Scottish Enlightenment Part 2: Adam Smith 

Learn Liberty
Подписаться 295 тыс.
Просмотров 21 тыс.
50% 1

Prof. James Stacey Taylor discusses the contributions of Adam Smith with a particular focus on his philosophy. Smith is most famous for two works:
- The Wealth of Nations
- The Theory of Moral Sentiments
The Wealth of Nations is an important book on economics, so important in fact that Smith has been called the father of modern economics. His second book, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, was heavily influenced by Francis Hutcheson (See our video on Francis Hutcheson: • Giants of the Scottish... ).
In The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Smith advocates for a form of moral sentimentalism. We naturally link sympathy to either approval or disapproval of an action or reaction. For instance, if an individual insults another person, we attach sympathy to the reaction of the person who was insulted. If the person insulted underreacts or overreacts, we will disapprove the response morally. If the reaction seems right, we will approve of the response morally.
We will also sympathize with parties who are not sharing a similar sentiment. For instance, if a person loses their mental capacity or passes way, we will sympathize with that person even though they themselves are not feeling the same sentiment.
Lastly, using Smith's moral sentimentalism, we can judge our own actions. We can do this by looking at our own actions from a third person point of view.
Watch more videos: lrnlbty.co/y5tTcY

Опубликовано:

 

13 дек 2011

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 28   
@ronpaulrevered
@ronpaulrevered 11 лет назад
Does LearnLiberty have any videos on Murray Rothbard?
@locomuchacho1
@locomuchacho1 12 лет назад
again...no dislikes, Scotland i'm tellin ya
@spencerantoniomarlen-starr3069
@spencerantoniomarlen-starr3069 10 лет назад
no, they also don't have any on Milton Friedman
@mzmaj7
@mzmaj7 12 лет назад
for the description: Moral Sentiments is Smith's *first* book, not second -- Wealth of Nations was 17 years later
@daPlumber702
@daPlumber702 12 лет назад
@eche73 Taxing the individually wealthy makes as much sense as taxing corporate entities. They will move or find ways around it and if they didn't do either of those, they wouldn't have enough. You'd make them broke, and then the middle class would become the poor, the poor would be the starved to death, and the rich would be the one's clinging onto what you haven't robbed.
@grady1610
@grady1610 12 лет назад
To be considered a good economist - you must understand the ins and outs of theivery-
@daPlumber702
@daPlumber702 12 лет назад
@eche73 All a business can do is lobby for policy change. The government makes lobbying possible, fights aggressively for it to remain so (and there are actually good arguments for why it should be allowed but I digress) They also make the laws. You should learn that companies do NOT pay taxes. Their employees, customers, and the world around them pays their taxes. Just the same as your car doesn't pay the taxes required for you to drive it. You do.
@doobersmanster
@doobersmanster 12 лет назад
@regelemihai It's tragically Ironic.
@GregoryTheGr8ster
@GregoryTheGr8ster 12 лет назад
Will Scotland ever have another Enlightenment? Or was that the only one?
@janetmackinnon3411
@janetmackinnon3411 Год назад
Once we are free...
@GregoryTheGr8ster
@GregoryTheGr8ster 12 лет назад
I totally agree with you, actually. I did not have enough characters to state explicitly that although I am aware of the socialist counter-argument, I don't believe it. I, too, agree that it is silly to compare workers in the modern economy to slaves, and CEOs to psychopathic plunders and dictators. Nevertheless, Noam Chomsky still avidly promotes this view.
@stevemcgee99
@stevemcgee99 12 лет назад
Impartial Observer = Super Ego = Observing Ego.
@regelemihai
@regelemihai 12 лет назад
@doobersmanster Absolutely. The whole poilitical elite leans heavily on appeals to emotion to draw crowds to themselves. Rational argumentation is too hard to adopt for the sheep. It really is sad what's going on.
@bingeltube
@bingeltube 2 года назад
Very narrowly focused!
@regelemihai
@regelemihai 12 лет назад
@ZinayH Giving favoratism to banks is corporatism. Both leftists and rightwingers can oppose that. But to go from that and say that a certain social class has to be descriminated against simply because it has more wealth than others, is juvenile in the extreme. I hope more and more people stop using class warfare as an argument in the future.
@daPlumber702
@daPlumber702 12 лет назад
@eche73 Stealing money from someone with more than enough and someone who's homeless blind starving on the street is the exact same thing. The only thing that changes it is your personal values and morals. Apparently your personal values and morals say that it's alright to steal, as long as it's not from the blind guy. You have the values of a thief.
@daPlumber702
@daPlumber702 12 лет назад
@ZinayH The "rich" pay more taxes in a day than "the poor" do throughout years, decades.. some even lifetimes. Your idea of them not paying is just ludicrous. The only way business in any form can do other than what I've just said is when they are given a hand at doing it from the government. No not that they aren't regulated, that their competitors are. There's so much more that goes into it, and I don't feel like doing it in these small comment boxes.
@daPlumber702
@daPlumber702 12 лет назад
The term "slave wages" means absolutely nothing. You see slaves weren't paid, they were locked in shackles and whipped when they didn't work hard enough. You using the term to describe not making enough money for jerking around is pretty disrespectful and overall disgusting. You have no right to blame your laziness on the company that pays you to do work when they don't have to. If you don't like your job then before\ & after work all day long if necessary on your day off & look for a new one
@BachGuitar3
@BachGuitar3 12 лет назад
wwiod :D
@daPlumber702
@daPlumber702 12 лет назад
aahh, that makes sense. Chompsky is a chump linguist. he has no place in economic debate. The sooner people realize that the better.
Далее
Luiza Rasulova #luizarasulova
00:37
Просмотров 1,3 млн
Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments
8:22
Просмотров 73 тыс.
Do you want to live in the world of Atlas Shrugged?
6:15
Capitalism and Adam Smith.mp4
13:14
Просмотров 14 тыс.
THE WEALTH OF NATIONS SUMMARY (BY ADAM SMITH)
16:28
Просмотров 291 тыс.
Classical sociological theory - Marx, Weber, Durkheim
31:56
Positive Rights vs. Negative Rights - Learn Liberty
4:24
Individualism vs. Collectivism - Learn Liberty
3:17
Просмотров 72 тыс.