GIRLFRIEND WATCHES FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM FOR THE FIRST TIME !!! (REACTION) 

almost like steven grant

Newt is my favorite character in the Wizarding World. He isn't a typical main male character and, in fact, is likely autistic. As someone who is on the spectrum myself, it's refreshing to see a main character who I can relate to.

🎻🚣🎻🎻🎻🎻🎻🕐🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲😦🇺🇲🎻🎻🇺🇲🎻🎺😦

@@Gaynggayng707 If you refer to moon knight, I totally agree. But this also kinda hurts consisering the end of ep 5

I have always felt that Newt was a High Functioning Autistic person. He may not be, but I always got that feeling when watching him. If so then that makes him even more amazing in my mind.

Omg you are right, I just checked it out😮

i was so proud of a fictional character after re reading HP 1st book!! yup that's me!

@@diyakm7633 I never read the books myself , i just know stuff. Please don't judge me 🙏😅

@@ikrajmohammad8999 no it's alright. why would i judge you?

Also in Harry Potter 3, Newt Scamander is actually present on the map at some point visiting Hogwartz. :) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QxtHePUKhOY.html

in the computer games, he even had his own chocolate frog card if i remember correctly.

It makes sense how the MACUSA act considering they are American and it is the 20s Take for example the only time Britain has had apartheid rules was in the 40s during ww2 when American soldiers were stationed over here. America really hated 'others' quite alot even within the past 100 years

DUDE..u commented only a couple of minutes and I agree with u completely..we loved Harry's universe when we were young now we want a little bit of an adult take..

@@more-reasons6655 I mean British people (and other nations) going to other countries and colonizing is the root of pretty much all apartheid practices in general... I mean, people in Britain had the advantage of seeing a melding of races from afar over time in a way that had never happened in their own country until relatively recently in history. It's a fact that racially homogenous places tend to have fewer, well, racial issues. Of course, Britain is very racially diverse now, but the moral superiority seems misplaced, particularly in the time period you mention (1920s). This isn't me trying to blame all of these things on the British because that wouldn't be fair at all, but it's kind of like going somewhere, making a problem, then acting surprised when that problem continues to exist and acting like they had nothing to do with it that just doesn't seem to make sense to me. It's that mentality of "we watched the depravity from afar and now 100 years later we would never have acted in the same way despite the fact that we had a large hand in creating the very problem we look down on." I guess this was too much to probably get into on a comment about a Fantastic Beasts movie, and I don't mean to be argumentative at all. Also, a significant number of American soldiers in WW2 were first and second-generation Americans, meaning lots of Germans, Italians, etc. This doesn't make up for any racism shown, but it's not as simple as American solider in WW2=super racist. You had an army of multiple nationalities that barely had time to acclimate to a new country being thrown into a war in a continent they had just left. Idk, I just think these issues are much more nuanced than we like to think they are from the privilege we have in 2022 on the internet where it's easy to simplify and disregard many facets of reality that make up a situation.

The problem is they're really messy films. This one is fine, and even half of the new one is pretty great, but none of them captured the soul and magic of the original series, even if they're made with a mature audience in mind. And the pacing is atrocious in all of them. As a former editor, nothing drives me bonkers like a film that doesn't have focus and just jumps around. Newt isn't as interesting as the secondary characters half the time. And the story isn't as tight as the Potter films. If you like them, awesome, I'm glad you do, but the critics were right on these, they're passable at best.

I think a number of people were expecting the movies to be on the same level as the Harry Potter films, which was never going to happen. Very similar situation with the Hobbit movies; the Hobbit films were never going to be as great as the Lord of the Rings films.

You could tell Rico knew she'd react like that XD I love their reactions! :P

SAME OMFG

Ya the main problem I have with the recent one and even the second one is that they don’t really pay enough attention to the creatures which is what the series is named after “Fantastic Beasts”

@@IsItReallyMe what i find interesting is every fantastic beast movie that has came out, in the poster the "fantastic beast" part gets smaller. in secrets of dumbledore "fantastic beast" is barely visable but the "secrets of dumbledore" part is way bigger.

I actually think newt is a really good main character it’s just as these movies progress they make it less about him and more about dumbledore and grindelwald when really I prefer the moments where newt is showcasing his unique interactions and ways of handling situations in his unique way as someone who was born with Asperger’s it’s great to see a character with the same disability shining being respected and earning the respect of all these powerful characters, you already know if dumbledore says you’re cool then you’re fucking cool

@@vivaraulito they should have made like a trilogy with Newt and the gang where they go from place to place and help save some creatures where they could fund some known characteres from the universe but that don't play a big part in the story while also making a trilogy about Dumbledore and Grindewald where it is about their conflict

@@Wildest_swiftie13 that is true. I noticed that too with every title

Are you sure? I thought he just said that he thinks that a useful application of the creatures powers would be a diluted form that could be used to remove nightmares. Presumably, the unadulterated dose would get rid of far more memories than that. Regardless, even if you were right, this could be a mistake of Newt's. Remember: he is the very first magizoologist, so he is literally writing the book on this subject as he goes.

He was actually imprisoned at Nurmengard, the prison that he created. The irony, right?

@@quinnzelreign8775thanks. didn't know that, I haven't actually read books myself.

@@ikrajmohammad8999 In the books he refused to tell Voldemort what he wanted, easily resisted his legilemency, and said "kill me then, I welcome death. But there's still so much you don't know" That is how you die with dignity.

@dawg897 it’s Aragog not Aragon…

That's nice. It's canon so technically you are one of us. So glad to have you.

Omg same, i've tried to like Harry Potter all my life, but i just... never connected with ANY of the 3 main characters? And i was sad bcs i still like the world itself, but when this one came out i just LOVED Newt so much i didnt even care i didnt know who tf Grindelwald was lol

@@YumeBat Did you try reading the books too?

I highly recommen trying to read the books instead. For me personally, the movies didn't click either (except for the first 2 which I absolutely adore), however the books are a different story.

@@bobbyboom9 Yeah... personally, I feel like anyone who says the above and hasn't tried reading the books is sort of coming at the stories the wrong way around. The movies are a visualisation of the books. If you want the best version, you have to go to the books. There's SOOO much more of the world in there generally, anyways.

Yes, me too.

As Queenie puts it with Hogwash sums up harry potter movies. Lol. To sum up the Harry Potter movies were so going around with Harry vs voldemort over and over again. I have seen all the harry potter movies but i didn't like the movies after harry potter and the order of the phoenix. I also think the harry and harmonie should've ended up together another reason why i didn't like harry potter movies. love Fantastic beasts movies so much more for so many reasons.

Here here

No

@@mmsmith3341 yes.

@@mmsmith3341 yes

No!

Unfortunately, as much as I love Newt and the gang, they could have never successfully done the Grindelwald vs Dumbledore take as a side story. It’s one of the biggest parts of history in the Wizarding World that fans have wanted to see for a long time now. I don’t think they could have successfully operated both Newt’s story of searching for Beasts and marrying Tina while also doing the Grindelwald story. If anything, I would have loved if they focused a trilogy on Newt and friends, and a separate Trilogy on Dumbledore and Grindelwald so that both stories were well done. But alas, it wasn’t meant to be because JK Rowling treated these movies like she would a book and crammed far too many storylines into a single one. It’s a prime example of how being a good author doesn’t translate to being a good screenwriter.

@@mateom1691 I agree. I think the first one works, but the second and third don't

I actually like the idea of this, an awkward little wizard who was never the most powerful, never the most influential, just keep on trying to squirrel away in his own little world but continuously stumbling over the ripples of the great and powerful battles going on as the big names we already know and that have already been established have a go at each other in the background. Like we know Dumbledore is gonna Dumbledore, but we never see the outside look. Instead of the mc being in the big battle everyone runs away from, he just so happens to be in the place where all the people are running away *to* and having to navigate the chaos clinging to a quite life in his suitcase

Don't worry I'm a patreon member and rico isn't letting Monica watch secrets of dumbledore in theaters because he wants to react to it on the channel

@@azaz-dc4zk AAAAA THAT'S AMAZING 😭 Thank you for telling me!

@@azaz-dc4zk really thank you so much

Yep.

SOC was trash

Aren't they like 50 years apart?

Right? She's just amazing