Thank you for this video. As an independant researcher I have had a lot of interest in the invasions of Judeo-Christianity. There is so much to say about the Christianisation of ancient British tradition. The sacred and trail marking Hawthorn (topographical beacons in spring). The sacred springs of the Druids. Glastonbury flood plain, and the hill that was once an island (the Celts revered "the high places" without exception). The Holy Grail is the Christianisation of The Sacred Mission. To remember and retain your heritage. To hold dear who you, and your ancestors are, during a period of persecution and re-assignment. To learn about your true heritage. The quest for self realisation. It is in this context that Arthur Pendragon was the hero resister of secular invasion and occupation. A Celtic Warlord, with his advising Druid, sending out his retinue to recapture lost or re-assigned racial heritage, to allow that heritage to persist forever. I could write or talk for hours about this subject. Maybe another day :)
As a sub comment, I think that the whole Jesus / Joseph story is so wrong on so many levels. 1. Somerset is hardly a centre for the metal trade. To get to Glastonbury, would require actually passing Cornwall / West Devon, where the mining trade existed. 2. Jesus was a carpenter living in Palestine. A shipwright was a completely seperate if associated trade. Like saying that a bricklayer is the same as a plumber because they both work in construction. Jesus certainly was not a tradesman. 3. An Arab looking Jew would find it very difficult wandering around a Celtic nation. He would most certainly not have been "revered". 4. Jesus did not become "holy" until after the 40 days and nights. His entire life was well documented following that time. Joseph would if anything, just have been another trader, with no current relationship with a religious leader, because he would not have been "holy" in Josephs working lifetime. 5. The Celts would have had no way of even knowing about Christianity until the advent of the Holy Roman Empire (325 CE), a whole three centuries after Joseph could even have been there. I am pretty sure his visits would have been long forgotten after ten generations, if they occured at all. 6. The Hawthorn was very sacred to the Celts, millenia before Christ was born. This is simply a case of subversion. 7. A voyage by "holy" Joseph of Arimathea from the middle east to Britain would have been a major undertaking. A distance of 3,500 n miles each way ! This would have required dozens of stops. And yet there is no record of this journey anywhere along the route for this "important relation of Christ". 8. Even after Judeo Christianity was introduced to Britain (invasions CE 325, CE 1066, CE 1642) there was massive resistance all the way up to 1642. The west country, in particular was a strong hold of Britons. The idea of a Jew wandering around these parts is as laughable as a member of the Nazi SS strolling down Oxford Street in 1942 in full uniform. 9. Druid sanctified wells and springs were sacred to the Celts. Subverted. 10. The Hawthorn was sacred to the Celts, and served as an important way marker on the landscape, particularly in the spring when they are like beacons. These are closely associated with standing stone megaliths as route markers, even being particularly mentioned on 1850 OS maps as "White Thorns". The white thorns lead to sacred places in Celtic tradition, along with standing stones. Subverted. 10. Joseph of Aremethea, Jesus great uncle, would have been at least 60, probably over 70, at the time of Jesus death. "The Holy Grail" necessitates Jesus death. Are we suggesting that Joseph made a perilous and difficult sea voyage of several months as a geriatric? 11. Arthur Pendragon was without doubt a Celt warlord fighting againt Judeo-Christian invasion. His accompanying Druid. The round table. The magic sword. The "king" of the Britons, who expelled the invaders. It is extremely useful to Christianise Arthur. The hero of the resistance. 12. The Mort D'Arthur is an almost entirely fabricated story, written to justify the divine right of royalty. Of course, the case remains, on exactly who they were trying to justify this claim to ? The whole modern saga is a pile of propoganda.
Have you watched Ralf Elis explain Jesus King of Odessa Exiled to Chester England by Saul after losing the Jewish War to Vespasian, which is also a war for the Emperor of Rome. Jesus and Vespasian were both King of Rome for about a year after Nero and before before the war.
@@markedwards9247 Joseph is one of the names Josephus use for himself when he wrote the story. Josephus was not only the ambassador to Juda he was the police chief and Saul and Paul and Joseph of Armathia. He changed his name a lot because Vespasian told him to, in order to protect the new religion he just stole from Jesus and James.
There’s a spring in the woods near county gate( a turnpike gate between Devon and Somerset supposedly started by the striking of Joseph staff on the ground. It’s a lovely walk and if you keep going down to the sea you’ll end up at an amazing beach with two waterfalls.
Henry Vlll and the dissolution of the monasteries was the biggest crime on English culture. The ruined abbeys. The beautiful architecture and craftsmanship gone! Must have been a very sad period between 1536-1541
King Arthur is just a fictional name for King Jesus of Edessa who was from Galilee and Fought Vespasian in the Jewish War and lost the Roman Throne to Vespasian. Watch Ralf Elis Videos on RU-vid.
doubt it, too much as King Arthur is the 10th generation descendant of Joseph of Arimathia and makes sense why the round table, why the sword of Christ, TRUTH and the sword of Christ is written in the stars above AND THE BIBLE all ties exactly w physical evidence and far too many stories that make this the most important and fascinating heritage of England. there's most to something this big and it can not be denied by any one who beholds it all.
