I have no idea how well it really works. I mean, you can show gold, but how much gold does it miss? I mean, it could have pissed out 3 times that gold and you're happy with what you see. It needs to be a controlled test if you really want to know. And you can't go by weight or sight. You need to test with 100 pieces of gold of various meshes. In a full bucket of dirt and ran through to see if it catches all the gold or how much. I have nothing against the concept or design, but I need to see a controlled test. Again, it needs to be a test of number of pieces rather than weight or sight. But I love the concept. I know, everyone else will just give ya' a high five or pat you on the back and move on. My mind doesn't work that way. I'm sure that is a test you probably want to prove as well.
Several controlled tests with a capture to loss rate is what I need to see. It looks cool, but the proof is in the data (I am an Engineer and our philosophy is: In God we Trust, all else produce Data)
If you keep your pump uphill/upstream you will get stronger flow due to less resistance and having gravity in your favor. Electric pumps lose some power pushing water uphill. Taxes the battery too. Its a clever design! Heavy pans!
This is an interesting piece of equipment. Forest Service has us shut down from dredging, except for a power sluice. This might be useful. I subbed , thanks for sharing.😎😎⛏⛏🔥🔥
Regs on Lake Superior.? They require less than 2400 gph running in a tub correct? This runs at less than 2300 gph at the machine. With a 6 ft hose the pump cannot produce more than 2300 at 100%.
But if you find a location where a long supply hose uphill provides gravity feed to this equipment would circumvent the use of power for water flow... or dam up the stream with the reusable grocery bags idea I mentioned i use to provide the head pressure up stream to have continuous water for this...
Different to the normal approach to capture gold, I like the fact you are thinking outside the box. But how much does it lose, you need to test the tailings and show that. ❤it
I doubt he is. Certain areas have certain "types" of gold. His area likely doesn't have nuggets, only fine gold. That machine wouldn't be ideal in an area with less fine gold and more chunky pieces instead.
I wish you good luck. Would be good if you tested like gold hog does a preweighed amount of gold and see how much is caught. Also what is the deal with the three buckits first one is a half inch screen but then ? What is the middle buckit ? Thankyou and honestly best wishes
One sugestion Alan robertson in Montana has a nice design for handles for the clasifier buckit. Makes it nice to agitate the pay gravel and flip out the overs
new concept , cool .. il ike the 5gal classifier idea ... the pipe seems to do a good job of grabbing the colors .. and no one knows what the hell a pipe is doing so wont suspect something other than an environmental study .. ;)
thanks bud, id love more than anything to get one of these out to the claims and give one a try on video cause it looks like it does one amazing job, can't wait to be able to get one out .. amazing design
У меня есть мой stl file c отличной матрицей для изготовления коврика для улавливания мелкого золота , коврик делается из сантехнического силикона ,заливаете силикон в матрицу и когда силикон полимеризуется надо его извлечь. Этот коврик придумали в России,он очень хорош, он называется AMUR 362. Кому надо файл пишите почту дам бесплатно
У меня есть мой stl file c отличной матрицей для изготовления коврика для улавливания мелкого золота , коврик делается из сантехнического силикона ,заливаете силикон в матрицу и когда силикон полимеризуется надо его извлечь. Этот коврик придумали в России,он очень хорош, он называется AMUR 362. Кому надо файл пишите почту ,дам бесплатно