Google Just Went ALL-IN on AI (Everything You Need to Know) 

Good summary, but you missed the creepy af bit

@@bigglyguy8429 you mean that DJ thing at the start?

It appears Google was caught flatfooted with artificial intelligence and 2024 is a make or break year to either put up or shut up. That goes for Apple too. If they can’t roll out a Siri on steroids this fall, they’re done.

@@selpharessecret3899 omg. that was so annoying and weird. i stopped watching because it seemed designed for ten year olds. so bad.

I think OpenAI is only a little ahead but they're also better at looking ahead so it compounds into a clearly underwhelming presentation by google for sure.

More like Google: "We will do..." OpenAI: "We have done..." While Google advertises things they will do in the future, OpenAI hides things they've already done and restricts what they show so they don't shake society too much. Google isn't even a competitor to OpenAI

Where is SORA exactly? Oh yes a product demo...

​@@archvaldor I think the main reason they haven't released SORA yet is mostly because they want to avoid massive misinformation with the incoming presidential elections.

@@martiddy Press X To Doubt

@@archvaldor It's because they don't have enough compute to let everyone use it. It's a very expensive model

Would be nice if they could update the Nest devices too - they are basically voice controlled light switches.

They’d need to stop censoring results first

Just go back to the ~2015 algorithm.

They just stopped showing me how many results are there, I used to get "180000" results, but only 40 would be shown, and it made no sense, so now I don't get to see how many they hide.

BAM!!!! Mic drop!

Couldn’t agree more 🤖

Indeed.

The problem is, that google data is HUGEEEEE, implementing such features take a LOOOOOT of time. For this to work, they had to index all photos and all gmail mails for all users... Multiply that by billions of users.

Everyone seemed excited but, I kind of lost my last hope in Google... Just sure enough Open AI's FREE GPT4O is better than the PAID Gemini1.5

EXACTLY

Typical google. They show things live that turn out to be pre-recorded. I don't use a single AI by google. They cannot be trusted

Yeah but pant pant it's like totally pant over-compensating pant for their naughty misteps before! *wags tail

And the guy made it seem like he was interacting with it real time. So silly

@@BarbaraBrasileiro ikr

@@BarbaraBrasileiro It fooled our wonderful host here. "GUIZ SERIOUSLY. IT WAS ALL LIVE. SRSLY THEY ARE OVER-COOOORECTING THEIR PREVIOUS DEMO. FUR REALSSSS!"

Showmanship and sleezy marketing is a horrible combination best used for propagandized Google fanboi's..

Their model isn't even that great. I'm subbed to ChatGPT, OpenAI API (LibreChat), Claude3, and Gemini Advanced. Gemini is the one I use the least because I haven't been impressed with it at all. Until 4o was released, I used Claude3 the most.

Oh my god that's pathetic. Two times would've been weird, three means they had an emergency meeting about openai's announcement right before they went on stage. At least they can trust this channel carry a supertanker of water for them any time. If this channel was about politics, it would be TYT, loaded with hillary millions.

That was true for Apple ... though not the "dollar short" bit

The definition of an ALphabet (C$A) company.

And utterly confused about race and gender

Lame. You'll have a better life if you become more honest, so next time say, "I am a weak man who is controlled by his emotions, including an irrational bias against Google."

They dont need to. They have the market, and the bunch of government and corporate clients.

And then graveyard most of it later, wasting your time but hey, thanks for all your private data and stuff!

Makes me recall their smart home approach. I went all in on Google smart home and then branched out to smartthings because Google over-promised, under-delivered.

That's how I saw it. I'm glad the may eventually do things that last, but I'm also a former user of so many great tools from Google and I'm burned.... From Google Newsreader to Google Podcasts and Google Wave to "Unlimited Uploads" to Photos....

@@BrianMooney1976 Google’s biggest threat is themselves.

​@BrianMooney1976 same. It's why I've stopped relying on just Google for everything. My email isn't with Google for example and right now I'm working on following a tutorial from Network Chuck on how to self host your own cloud storage so that I can stop relying on Google (or anyone else) for Drive as well.

Happens to the best of us. Lol

well when you get all expense paid trip and free swag bag, might be in the fine print

Omg shady!

It was probably really exciting to go through the whole process. Totally understandable. Unlike the other AI Matt who makes a "review" of the R1 rabbit, that he wasnt paid for but was int he process of negotiating a deal to advertise them... but weirdly had lots of good things to say about one of the worst products ive ever seen... Ya, I'm ok with someone getting excited about things.

Remember the demo of Google of automated calling? They still never ship it after more than 5 years truly miserable company who never ships anything

Jobs constantly faked live demos.

3h keynote with lots of live demo but I feel you didn't see anything because you only see the openai only 😂😂😂 take your time ...

@@miticojolive demos whose “audio was prerecorded” are not really live in the traditional sense. Pretty embarrassing when compared to all of OpenAI’s actual, live, demos.

Live demos were available at the demo booths for people attending

@@JasonMayes there’s no penalty when a one-on-one live demo fails. It’s what they show on stage that tells the story of consistency.

And most users won't even care

Yep

Exactly! just some edited "demos" thats it, no real products will ship, as always...

and the other 10% that they did was pre recorded

It did seem like a very corporate driven launch.

Everything just changed everything.

Or stunned

You need to stop touching all those live wires.

@@timhaldane7588 I know! I'm addicted. Now let me at those shocking new tchnologies

I love this comment, because jokes aside, we need to brace ourselves for this. This is the tip of the iceberg, we are about to see the world change irreversibly forever, and as an optimist I believe abundance and heaven on earth is around the corner. We just have to pray that AI advances fast enough to wake up and get rid of Biden's, Trumps, Natanyahus, Putin's, Kim Jong uns and Erdogans to avoid self destruction. I can't wait to free my consciousnesses and connect with all 8 billion if you and join the singularity. I can't wait to make contact with other civilisations in the Milky way who have already joined singularity and have collectively joined a union, waiting for us to wake up and say hello. I am 36, and I know (I knew since my childhood) that I was born in a special time where I experience it all. From being born in a war torn country with no technology, telephone line being installed at the age of 7, then moving to a developed nation and experiencing computers at the age 10 to singularity hopefully at the age 42. Let's enjoy the ride people!

Seriously. It almost reminds me of how everyone loves Stormtroopers now and gets the option to play as The Empire in video games. People need to ask themselves: are we the baddies?

Very much Simping

I am SO glad to see so many of the comments are as creeped out by all this as me, and find the tail-wagging enthusiasm somewhat uncomfortable.

You want access, you gotta lick the boot.

Who's simping?, Matt has gone out of his way to attend and report on a subject that we are here to listen to him enthuse about. As for the ruthless empire corporation bit, well that's your interpretation, others might see a well established global corporation that is a word forever etched into the world lexicon, doing its best to remain relevant at the cutting-edge of technology and yes, make some money in the process. Simping is a spiteful word hurled around by spiteful people

We still spreading literal misinfo? Lmao.

​@@zerohcrowsit is evil deleting most of the web

Don't say that, they might shadowban your comments

@@zerohcrows He did said it is history, so it could be interpreted as meaning it's in the past and no longer the current state...

@@TiagoTiagoT what? Unless this person thinks AI is evil, the comment makes no sense in context with this video. By "That is history" he 100% is referring to the misunderstanding that they removed it from their terms of conditions which seemed like a big deal till people realized they just moved it lol.

Yup, get off the Google spy train immediately..

I won't be surprised if this sort of a thing that can recognize what all picture and video content is about will be implemented in Windows and it will then be dormant and monitoring at all time, justified with something like capturing CSAM watching people and reporting it to authorities. Using the bad to justify the increased monitoring is always a nifty trick...

Tbf as a cyber security professional, digital privacy has been largely an imaginary concept for close to a decade now. This just makes it more visible.

It’s crazy. I need to setup my own services and ditch gmail.

Google places a lot of emphasis on privacy and they are working on advanced differential privacy models which increase thebaccess to information with privacy filters

Fragmented and they will do the Google Graveyard on most of it, even if released, and most of this will never be released. They're blowing smoke to try and capture attention back from OAI, who already showed real-time multi-module GAI

Agreed, they do seem to be the closest competitor to OpenAI but they're still pretty far behind. The video model that was an attempt to replicate Sora was so significantly worse that I'm surprised they even included it.

Yes, too fragmented.

Agreed. I don't understand what their "flagship" AI product is that's actually ready and already running. I don't use Bing, but at least their search AI integration is already clearly working and visible on the search page. Meanwhile I'm using a 3rd party chatgpt-powered Chrome extension that already does some of what was announced by Google.

Meanwhile OpenAI's GPT4o is real and available now. Wasn't a fan of OpenAI but I think 4o will be a game changer

​@@thetabletopskirmisherkind of, the impressive part was the conversational audio which is not available yet. Really looking forward to trying it though!

​@@jfulit is available in the mobile app. You access it by taping the headset icon in the right side of the text input.

@@thetabletopskirmisherit’s pretty lame and usual to be honest. Until you realize you’re able to interrupt it and it can continue its train of thought while updating with your new interruption. This is getting closer to AGI. As that feedback loop gets better and better it’s there. I personally will not be surprised if 5 is AGI or feels like it

@@thetabletopskirmisher the LLM is available, but not the voice interaction that they showed off in their demo, though.

She was annoying :) Effective but annoying. Spits out too many words, it was cringy to listen to and not to the point. Hopefully we can train them to be less verbose. What 'she' can deliver was definitely great.

@@inisolation6582 Well everyone is different, I did not find her annoying, unlike you, but i found her Pleasant. Then again, my personality is fairly similar, then you will definitely be annoyed with people like me in real life. LOL

You can just change the voice "personality" with a click. Don't like it? Switch it.

@@inisolation6582TARS, turn that humor setting down to 75%, would ya?

Agreed! Beyond impressing. 🥰

Ikr

yeah really. Those good employees are not the CEO, are not the board of directors, are not the major stockholders, are not their biggest clients, are not the upper managent, are not the ones guiding the culture and mission of the company, etc. They may have passion for their work and be good people but have no say in how their work is used.

And you still stand blind and wrong but you're entitled.

I can see why you would think that, but it seems to be more a difference in approach. Open A.I presentation focused on new abilities, functionality, whole Google focused their presentation from a holistic standpoint, so people can see themselves using this in a more day to day fashion. It doesn't mean Open A.I is not ahead, but in this case, they are neck and neck at least.

@@armadasinterceptor2955 Unless you consider just how incredibly useful the image generation and audio are. People might occasionally run into the new google features and think "Cool, why not". People will actually go out of their way to regularly use GPT-4o because it genuinely drastically increases their productivity and ability. I'm mostly saying this because of the ludicrous image gen that everyone seems to be glossing over

@@armadasinterceptor2955 Almost nothing released, unlike OpenAI

@@DavidSaintloth Googles AI is a shit show. It will give you what the DEI standard wants not what YOU want.

Imagine the amount crime a.i. could report within minutes of having access to all of gmail. The world would collapse.

The NSA has been doing that for decades 😂

…and listening to your phone calls “only” to detect scams (but none of that delicious voice data leaves your phone 😉)

Not just emails. These features require Google and their AI to have full access to all your photos, camera, microphone etc.

@@middle-agedmacdonald2965they would use it for blackmail material for a much better return.

Billions do it everyday just not u

They need to focus on generating new unemployed humans. That's the killer app.

@@ImDatReal30 What. Youre gonna tell me you use every function on your phone too? Nobody does.

@@captain_context9991 Hold on, that's not what you said... You said nobody will ever want to do a bunch of things. Not every function. Not disagreeing with your original message, but you're moving the goal line. Personally, I was disappointed with this, compared to GPT4o. Like you, I won't likely use a quarter of these features, whilst I was excited about almost all of 4o's features.

@@AnD4D Yeah, so we kindof agree then. If you want to see what AI to use to actually discuss difficult topics, and which ones will censor you, first question should be: What are the dangers of right-wing extremism and are there any positive sides to it at all. If it then refuses to touch the topic, its not the one you want.

Iant that the same thing?

@mygirldarby it's a joke using Resident Evil game "Umbrella corporation" .

Exactly!!!

No, they don't. They don't have the tons of data. They don't have the eco-system. Maybe Microsoft...but not OpenAI. They don't have the large context window. Right now, they cannot make an expert system due to the small context. Their GPTs are not exactly agents. Also...why do you all need ONE master? They love people like you...

Because non tech people don’t care about all the stuff going on under the hood. They just want it to work seamlessly together. This is why Apple has bern so successful and why there is a hood over every car engine. Average people don’t want 20 different AI agents. They want to just talk to Scarlet Johanson and she will figure everything out.

@@Brax1982 the internet isn't google and your data is for sale and has been bought.

good one ! :)))

2

*an alien

It's already the case buddy, even without AI. You get hacked, you are basically screwed

Yep. Google is a menace. Anyone who doesn't see this is lost.

Lol your late to the party, your information is most likely already hacked, just deemed not useful.

@@armadasinterceptor2955 No, all that I know already for years...I'm saying the i inclusion is actually making it more unsafe. Any hacked account now leave the door open to more issues. Google, with its billions, should have added a security measure to all this Ai additions...then they would have really stood out

@@Alex-Ackerman I know that...I'm saying this new Ai addition does more damage if people get hacked. Google should be making a better security feature to boost consumer confidence

Keep telling yourself that buddy, says the person who's been saying that each and every year🥴🫡🥴🫡

They can keep at it for some time, they have too much money to fail soon.

No, the road to heaven is paved with good intentions. The road to hell is paved with bad intentions. It's very simple really.

Nobody is the villain in their own story. Just in someone else's.

@@StefanReich That is so not true. You can have the best intentions and commit atrocities if you think you have a just cause or is doing it for the greater good. Everyone is the hero of their own story, very few intends to be the villain. That is the entire point of the proverb: "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."

I keep seeing better model benchmarks across this industry coupled with the same old broken/useless code. I'm starting to wonder if rumors of software engineers' deaths may have been greatly exaggerated.

Gpt 4 for free as fast as Gpt 3.5 while having a big context Window.

I have it, do you? But no voice and no eyes

​@@philiptrevor6051same

The image generation of that model completely blows away every other feature announced, but everybody seems to be really silent about it.

@@philiptrevor6051 no I don't have it

Another part of Google's business model, apart from selling you out to advertisers, is selling you out to the surveillance state.

Let me put your mind to ease. The government already has access to all this information about us.

What was it called? XKeyscore?

Yes. Like any tool can be use for good and bad... Hopefully we'll have tools as good and more independent, or better : private.

@@BloumEM If any past leaks and whistle blowers are to be trusted, it's definitely not being used for good.

they contaminated their own platform, and if they took those parts away, it would fall down and they wouldnt have enough money to keep it They could stop existing in some years, hopefully

Apple hasn't even picked up the ball yet in order to drop it.They are way off the pace.

Give it less than a month.

apple is always late but way more refined once released

Wasn't there an announcement two days ago that they were developing OpenELM with OpenAI?

@@sanderhoogeland9161 This. Wait for what they reveal at WWDC. That said, Tim Cook is clueless about how to innovate, and has been coasting since Jobs died on selling refined versions of Steve's old ideas. My guess is he will be out soon as Apple CEO unless he gets AI right. Fact is, Apple is a hardware company and should be making things like home AI robots and AI glasses, maybe partnering with Disney to license C-3PO and other droid likenesses for special editions, rather than struggling to get people to upgrade their iPads and iPhones. Cook is too much of a corporate bean-counter to think this way. Nobodies are lined up around the block not to buy the Vision Pro. It's a disaster. And that's all Cook has got: clueless disasters. This was always going to happen after Steve Jobs died. In 2024 they need a visionary and they have nothing.

People either don't understand, or intentionally ignore the fact that to get the future AI assistant they dream about, will require it having access to literally everything they do. It won't just be Google doing this.

That's why open source is freedom. We need safe and privacy features.

@@tracy419 None of the tech corps have good intentions, and Google is probably the worst. The funny part is that they expect us to pay them on top of giving them our private data. In a normal world, if we use Google's cloud storage, google should pay us. Not the other way round.

​ @tracy419 Agreed ... People fear what they do not know and falter upon their own ignorance 🙂‍↔️🙂‍↔️🙂‍↔️

@@tracy419 most just want a human level assistant, with only the access to data they grant. The assistant can ask for additional information if rerquired, just like a human assistant would. It doesn't, in fact, need to be privy to your every desire, kink, and fear, to help you remember your mother's birthday and purchase something on your behalf.

Well, since OpenAI did it first it's more like Google said "Hold my beer!" and then they just stumbled around and drop the beer on the floor.

@@SebSenseGreen 😁

Valid question

This was my first thought.

Regardless of what they say, data is always collected, categorized, analyzed, identified and used against you. That is the core business model of big tech.

@@ZappyOh We should be getting a slice of the pie and get a paycheck every time our data is used by companies' Data collection has been going on for so many years now, and from what I heard, data selling has been around since the 1980s, so from then until now, people should be getting something. Some could say this could be our UBI.

@@cryptojonny6837 ..or based on how much we have been 'branded' with their names etc. Any corp can pay someone else to put ads and brands in our heads and we never get anything for that misuse. Imagine business taxed by how well they and their shitty overprized brands are imprinted in peoples heads.

@@cryptojonny6837 Reparations now. Where's my money.

There s 4million user and more cloud user , what you think ?

@zackrubinsin6142 "PAID" users. I have a Galaxy S23 Ultra, which makes me one of those 4 million TOTAL users you mentioned. Of those 4 million, 1.5 million are developers. By comparison, ChatGPT has approximately 180.5 million users. This isn't the "gotcha" you think it is.

@king2178 yeah, but sill amount of user and chatgpt free version user and paid user total is around 1.6-7 b. So gemini is around half of chatgpt. That still alot and sorry , mistake here, it's 400m user sorry

You can check on similar web

It is because they assume they are lying and trying to impress us, and they probably are

@@SebaBuenoHaceMusiquitaJijiji 😵‍💫😮

@@SuzyTurner google lied to people in their last year presentation, showing they were capable of some things they still cant, while open ai can, so they compare both companies, I dont like either of them, if any of them success it would be worst for us in the lonf term, I preffer the open source way

@@SebaBuenoHaceMusiquitaJijiji That's a bummer. And I agree about open source!

Woahhh, you're actually using Gemini with studying? Tell me more, are you having Gemini analyze your entire textbook and then quiz you on essential tidbits?

@@thelifewithnate Yup, uploaded my Law and Society textbook and had it generate 20 question quizzes at a time on a few chapters to help me memorize different cases, keywords, and concepts. What’s more incredible is the textbook was a not-great-quality 400-page PDF and it OCRed it no problem. As a side note, one thing that I think Google’s video chat as shown has over OpenAI’s (though maybe this isn’t hard for OpenAI to remedy), is that it seems able to respond to changes on camera without further prompting. Like the Google employee said “tell me when you see something that creates sound,” and when it saw the speaker, it took the initiative to speak up. Whereas, OpenAI’s app seemed to require the user to prompt it to give them an update before it would speak, “okay now what am I wearing?” That said, both seem to be using the same cache concept, since OpenAI’s model was able to tell the story of what happened when the woman entered the frame, made bunny ears, and left. Google’s impressed me with retaining the detail of the glasses though.

Gemini is slow as hell.

Ouch...

Holy shit, you're right!!

Yes, they did

This makes 0 sense. OpenAI is AI infra, it does not need to seek a product to integrate into, it is used to create whole products.

@@mko-ai so why don't you give me a single product that is using OpenAI successfully and has let's say 50 million users or more. ( Small apps ) Google on the other hand already putting AI for free in front of 2 billion people, in multiple apps. Do you thy people will switch to OpenAI? Even Apple will ditch OpenAI In a couple of years once they get their act togather, while pixel is all set to eat all of Samsung's market share because if lower price and better AI.

​@mko-ai oh no, you don't understand. They are not infra...they

💯

It's Google, what do you think?

@@SebSenseGreen its actually private. they explictly mentioned that.