GPT-2: Why Didn't They Release It? - Computerphile 

yeah, we can see how much "prep" this industry really did to get ready for AI. About none.

@@Orinslayer C'mon - they fired hundreds of thousands from their work force, secured the legal protections for AI developed content to be owned by the AI creator and started stock piling real estate. That's plenty of prep.

@pspealman I'd laugh if u wasn't already crying. I got laid off and the government messed up my unemployment.

@@Orinslayer that's awful to hear, I'm so sorry. I think that may be something far more common soon ...

That was only 3 years ago. It is incredible to see how fast the technology is going, and I'm sure that in 3 years AI will be even more present in our life in a way we don't know yet. The funny thing is that my comment and all of yours will be used to train many of them :)

You joke, but it's probably already happening.

So you make realistic-looking models of future development, preemptively plan for potential failure modes, and then charge money to provide potential solutions to businesses? Sounds like an actually excellent consultant to me.

Use an AI to make these random specifications about potential new threats.

Wrong Kiddo

I carry only the finest AIs

Please... my user database... its very sick.

I knew that was the reference he was thinking of

please sir, may i have some AI

"Why respect scammers when my A.I.s can do anything you can?"

Me too :-)

Greg K like a calculator

I thought TPU is subset of GPU like Nvidia tensor cores.

@@soraaoixxthebluesky yeah, take a GPU, take out all the graphicy bits you wont need, put in more of the fancy calculaty bits, and you got a TPU.

Kyra Zimmer Brilliant explanation, hope you were not joking.

@@SamirMishra6174 nope that's pretty much it.

It's not just innocent chat bot. Their have created this _baizuo_ hysteria from Facebook post and fake newspaper blog. It wouldn't surprise me if these sites were not completely operated by AI as well.

Thank you, thank you!

Beep Boop. Thanks [[Insert_human_slang]]>> Homie

You can make $350 per hour...

Skynet says I'll be back! L😂L

He's putting out a ton of cutting edge content. Props to him!

Heck yeah!!

@@busimagen See any of the several United States of America congressional sessions, where officials are questioning Google, YT, and FB execs about their comments and company projects to kick off users, content makers, and support accounts, and statements that, had they known how the (most recent) electrons would have gone, they would have stepped in (to prevent them), refusals to answers, obfuscation, etc. I paid special attention to the interview with some researcher/head at Psychology Today that claimed that they "know" that a *minimum* of 1.5 millions of votes for Hillary were due to direct manipulation in the 2016 election - with the estimate that it could have been many times that amount. That's a warm and fuzzy feeling.

@@ramixnudles7958 I heard that people voted for Trump because of interference

@@ramixnudles7958 check the date

@@noaht2 What date?

@@ramixnudles7958 This research was published long after the 2016 American election.

That's very true, anybody could easily retrain it to be terrible. It hasn't happened yet, despite it being open source, but still.

The ability to take a small amount of computing power and make it work in a way that is difficult to understand or articulate is something that we as human beings need to learn to appreciate. I firmly believe that the more we can make AI accessibly useful to humanity, the better. But we need to be careful and not make promises we can't keep. There are powerful groups of people out there that will use these advances to create systems that will feel like the most useful applications are beyond human reach. Our lives will become much more complicated and it will be much harder for us to say when a computer has become a true computer. What will it mean when a computer can "think"? (Also, this response was generated from GPT-J, LOL!!!)

Synths are everywhere

Your small issue will be made giant overnight, so what are you afraid of? We have many more tips on IoT bot deployment on our whitepaper here. #5 "Don't worry, it will never say that!" This is the classic bug when the one doing the testing mistakes. "In tests" you test one thing. In production you are testing millions of things. Testers who are experienced at IoT testing know that this is not very useful, it will generally only be a bit helpful. Testers and developers are like our kid brother or sister. We are struggling to learn from each other

@@janAkaliKilo what

@@ITAC85 it's AI generated

That is indeed the appropriate response. We're well on our way to boost humanity but also possibly destroy it on the way.

The only reason you feel terrified and pessimistic is because you know it's all under the control of big corporations, banks and governments and you have no say in it...

@@KilgoreTroutAsf I would say that's part of it. yes; but if I *was* in control of it, am I really sure I would do a better job? Humans! Whaddya gonna do?

@@asphaltpilgrim I think democratic control beats corporate control 10/10 times. If you think large groups are bad at taking decisions and handling power, wait until a SMALL group does it for everybody else.

@@KilgoreTroutAsf Would love to agree 100%, but can only agree 75%. I'm all for wider engagement and enfranchisement. So: 1)How do we educate 7 billion ppl to be informed voters (and *not* get accused of being totalitarian)? 2) How do we convince people to care at all (many don't - not all of those are crushed by the system - they just don't care)? 3) How do we make voting feasible in such a system (computerphile has taken a look at e-voting before)? ... 64k) How do we make any decisions *at all* in the inevitable shitshow of conflicting opinions that comes when everyone has a say? Again, don't think i disagree with you - i am personally left of Bernie Sanders (waaaay left) but oligarchy is just one of the problems we have to deal with, and maybe AI is part of the solution, hence the optimistic part ;) Have a great day, fellow human.

I thought the same thing...

Me too

This UEFI business is really getting out of hand.

I thought this...

That:s exactly what I thought.

Are you? *thinking intensifies*

"In the internet, no one knows that you are a bot." In an era when CNN and other news outlets appear to be part of the monopoly establishment -- they are owned by our industrial adversaries and served up as a weapon of mass misinformation -- the challenges posed by fake news are worth looking at. "U.S. elections have become increasingly susceptible to cyberattacks and manipulated information," former cybersecurity expert Thomas Rid said in March, as he began the campaign to get fake news off the United States election scales. "Putin may even be trying to influence our upcoming presidential election." When senior U.S. intelligence officials released a report in January that concluded "the most prominent representatives of the Russian government" were directing the efforts, Putin and his lieutenants took to a live ... Continue reading on a site that's now offline But that can't be the answer. Maybe you can use the RU-vid search tool, which already allows you to see results from the site using URLs, of course. Just type "リタイン、youtubeのfeed+the+prediction+game+・・・" into the RU-vid search box, and the same page will come up. Just hit enter, and look for the feed+the prediction game+・・・ link.

Who knows? I could be a not, and you might not even know it. That's a scary thoug^C CTRL + C called. Exiting... C:\Users\{USER_NAME}\Downloads\GPT-2>

In fact, no one knows how you learned the information, for how long you are going to be working and the world, a mysterious place. What do these screenshots tell us? They tell us that the malware arrived in a document from Google, and that we are infected. It’s a serious infection, since, apparently, there is no active mechanism that can be used to clean it up. That means that this malware is working and that we have to watch out for it. (Generated by AI.)

In the words of George Carlin: "it's a big club... and you ain't in it".

Minds and Gab are probably gonna get screwed and I wouldn’t put it past FB and Twitter to use this to destroy those competitors

Tinfoil hat time!

@@Brickkzz I also have a tinfoil athletic supporter. No taking chances.

The companies they're trusting are likely to have the resources to reproduce the AI. So if they had ill intent trust wouldn't matter much either way. In the end someone will reproduce it and release it and we can only hope that by then there's some counter. I'm not looking forward to a future with bots successfully pretending to be human

Philosophically, maybe I'm just a brain in a vat and my whole experience is the result of a GAN with my brain acting as the discriminator. If my whole experience is generated by AI, what does that mean for AI safety?

zeidrichthorene That's a much more extreme situation than the suggestion that two people you haven't met are actually fake.

@@johnfrancisdoe1563 not really.

That's why you never see him from the waist down, or rarely see other avatars. The AI generating his construct decided that any of the functionally dedicated to mobility, digestion, elimination, or reproduction were unnecessary to the model generated for on-screen display. It didn't have to generate those polygons or meshes. Great optimization.

Watch for the movements of the horizontal wall lines around head. Something is breaking reality!

Bing Ai seems to be way better than Gemini Premium.

I think the Turing test had been broken a few years ago if I am not mistaken. I don't remember what the bot was called tho.

Heck, ELIZA practically broke the Turing test over 50 years ago.

@@fergochan Yeah, because the test is subjective and fucky.

ai dungeon when was during on can spent time

:-)

Worth it to also mention that OpenAI went from being a nonprofit to a LLC.

@@ThomasPlaysTheGames Got to make money to support your company somehow. Might as well be honest than say you're nonprofit making profit.

Here I have my strongest potion! Now pay up! I don't have any stronger potion! I only have the strongest potion! Here is your strongest potion! I only have a little pot of potion. I have a pot of potion but not your strongest!

everything since the 60s

everything since the invention of the scientific method we should continue ;)

Why you ask. Only Google can run it. Or perhaps China. They need massive storage and computing power to support their _social credit_ system. We are also getting it too thanks to the _baizuo_ and their mentally ills street thugs.

They linked to it in the previous vid

"too dangerous"

@@philipfry9436 they're just interested, they're not planning on replicating it

@@joirnpettersen exactly

Talk about months

AI response (GPT-J): "I think it's sad that people are so desperate to get likes and attention from strangers. It doesn't bother me so much anymore. I block people if they start spamming, I delete un-followers and I unfollow people."

Especially now Lol

Unless social media was tied to real people

we're going to need start iding bots by the ethics of their speech hehe

Yes, it just was released two days ago.

Henrik Halbritter Not five-horned ones. That would be pentacorns or quintacorns.

Stop feeding the bots.

Because they release their research openly, unlike most of the stuff that commercial companies are doing. They never promised to supply you with pertained models for free.

@@d3line Do you seriously think they are open source or will remain as such after getting funded by the likes of Microsoft?

@@tratbagd4500 They are not open source, obviously. Why do you even think they are? Also since when having a corporate sponsor prohibits you from making open source software? Name any prominent OSS project and I'll provide a list of corporate sponsors. Linux, for example, is funded by Google, Microsoft, Intel, AT&T, IBM, Oracle, Cisco, Samsung and like 300 more corporations.

@@tratbagd4500 I think Microsoft has actually been very pro open source in the last few years and especially lately funding big forums for the open source community. But Microsoft isn't about to change their name to Opensoft, or are they? See, I wouldn't like that either.

Turing test with a 1 hour conversation? Doubt it.

Maybe if it was trained from reddit comments rather than news articles.

Arthur Embleton trained with reddit data? If the turing test was trying to fool you to think you were talking to an adult it would fail.

What does it matter? Simplistic chatbots from the late 80s "passed" the Turing test by simply restating questions made by hapless BBS users, who would spiral into furious anger over the bot's behavior rather than ever suspect that it was just a simple program. You don't need something to truly pass the Turing test in order for it to fool people. A fly-by-night, awkwardly phrased, incendiary two-sentence comment about some controversy is enough to generate hundreds of replies from actual humans, without any second thought to whether the person they're replying to might not be human.

z beeblebrox ok, but consider the case where the judge has a strong incentive to do well at determining which is which, and that they’ve also practiced a decent amount with other common bots?

Miles above anyone else. (alright, that was terrible - I'll show myself out)

Bringing the 90es e-mail spam problem on over to the new millennium 🎇 🤖

Is this a generated post? Who knows...

Why would it implode?? Not that many people seem to actually mind insincere content made by humans....

You mean the generator. And no, in principle the system converges to a point where the generated samples lie within the manifold of true samples, ie there is no true difference between them.

Using profile pics as a crude form of authentication is (to put it mildly) not ideal...

Strongly agree

worry that cell phone actually can but actually want communicate

The ultimate goal is to get rid of botty comments not bots right?

@@imkharn I guess hehe, but I was thinking (sarcastically ) more on what to do the whenever in the future AI can pass the Turing test but some humans won't

@@JaredSurfSkate That concept appears in a book I read: There they use CAPTCHAs (these images where you select all traffic lights or whatever), and a correct answer means it's a bot. ;-)

Not :-)

Jamie Carter that wouldn’t work very well on the internet.

You'll never know when things will add up, if you're not prepared to run! Never put your hopes on tomorrow - it's only a veil to hide from your pasts !!

If that's the case we're already screwed. Nothing we do would make a difference in that case. So let's focus on the possible universes where we can make a difference, shall we?