Great Role Player - Playing the Adventurer character in your Tabletop RPG game - Role Playing Tips 

Well... yes... sadly lol.

I am glad you are enjoying them and I'd love that many followers! What food do you serve? Not seafood I hope :p

Ummm... remind me to run in the opposite direction when I see you character! lol Sounds like fun!!

Poor rogue. Adventurer Solver is a great combo for someone who likes to solve things and see what the world has to offer.

Indeed! He finds down time best suited for research and planning, but soon yearns for more delving into trap-laden lairs.

They are!

That's sweet! Let us know how how he fairs!

Awesome thank you - glad to have inspired ideas!

If you look at the fundamental of a tragic character it is usually either self destruction through unrequited obsession, or a destruction through fate. You could play an obsessive character who pines for the hand of the prince from dawn till dusk - but the prince must ignore you, demean you, and ultimately marry someone else in order for it to be tragic. That falls on the GM to bring that about. And for fate it is is as well. In a one on one game this could be a deeply moving game, but the question I have to ask - is it fun? We don't do tragedy really anymore in film or TV because it's so damned depression. House of Sand and Fog is an amazing movie that looks at both forms of tragedy. Yet I don't really want to watch it again and again. Is it something you want from a role-playing experience? In a group I don't think it would work, the rest of the group might not care, or might find it a burden to the story. It's an interesting question to be sure and I'd love to know other's thoughts on the matter.

Because from what I've found some parties I work with get mad at me for my character not wanting to immediately do what they just decide to do because it doesn't fit the character, and in person complain that my character should just not do things. On my assassin who wants to follow his contracts and stick to the plan, they'll complain if he doesn't just stray away, or when my friend made a character who questioned the underdark rules and said "isn't there a humane way of doing this" the party got pissed at him out of character saying "don't say that/don't do that" despite it being the type of character he was. I often find myself in this situation where my character would not do something because it would break my bond, or I do/say something they would say, and instead of the characters saying it's a bad idea, the players say not to do that expecting my character to just magically stop and understand the issues with the idea. When I try to lead in a party and do things they never care to listen, so I'm curious how I'm supposed to respond

Yes absolutely. Though typically one has a dominant type. Armchair Psyche 101 says you have a dominant type, and then under stress or pain a second type, and then during sexual moments or intimate moments another type. An Adventurer might, under pressure become a Protector, but when being intimate with her partner become a Soul type character.

We shall see!