Grind M1A2 SEP V2 💀 

Go to sleep bro you Need a break !

Try playing the new Italian MBT ... Oh wait it didn't get one. Ariete AMV as top tier?

it’s really good! i play it and do well. little tip. shoot breaches and barrels like a Sherman 76 shooting tiger and panther barrels

another note is. you just suck. your fault you didn’t flank hard enough at times ;)

When you feel better again, can you grind new Swedish top tank

Mm finally getting a taste of thier own medicine

I can understand the russian one, but Germany was nerfed quite a but compared to the IRL counterpart, right now Leopards are the best tanks in the world, no question asked, you git probably the best buff you can aske about, 5 seconds reload without autoloader is godly, just wait for the sep V3 that absolutely has the DU armor inserts, this time the Abrams got the Ariete treatment, as example the WAR kit of the Ariete should have around 220mm of KE protection and there isn't any air in the armor but we can only hope that they fix it to proper standards

@@parapat9957 it just feels like it’s too much of Gaijin ignoring data that doesn’t fit with their views. The sep Abrams getting a hull armour buff and M829A3, the Challengers and Arietes being modelled properly would somehow make them too op when if you shoot a Russian mbt through the carrousel there’s a 50/50 chance of nothing happening? It’s really annoying when it feels that they still don’t care about the community’s feedback

@@parapat9957 Arietes really good round still hasn't been un nerfed even though today it wouldn't be the best round. It also hasn't got it's proper composite armour and Neither does the Chally 2

@@arcroyal1258 I really love the Challengers (British main). So that’s why I’m really annoyed at how they’re modelled in warthunder. Ur shtick is trading mobility for amour yet Gaijin models the armour not at its correct strength and with massive holes in it. Feels like only German and Russian tanks get portrayed close to they’re real life standards

Good ol' Russian bias

Xm803 completly curb stomp the br i say thats fair for american main that always full of cas spammers

​​@@arilavanderboom4990if it stays on its br,even a small uptier and you're food for T-64/T-72. Plus,i don't get it: a 9.0 vehicle is good,therefore all of the vehicles above its br must be bad????

@@imnomoremaverick idk i am a france main all i know xm803 and t72 player ussually just buldoze throught to spawn camp so early american russia and german is the big 3 they all have op things if you complain then skill issue

@arilavanderboom4990 I just finished the French ground tree. Most fun tree I've grinded since I grinded the German air tree And I still have go back and get the 29G:(

Maybe not Leo’s, and tanks without 829A3/DM53 would struggle against tanks armed with newer ERA than K5

Nah because they want Russians to be overpowered cause we all need to “fear big Russian power” when it’s not real they need america to seem weak

Meanwhile in the Italian tank tech tree ...

I think the problem lies with Gaijin's refusal to properly balance these vehicles, at the very least the stupid matchmaking. A lot of times you play against Germany, USSR, Sweden. While you fucking play USA with Britain and Japan. How is that bullshit fair? There's almost no way to 1-tap 2A7s and Strv122Bs while you're basically paper. The countries with the highest win rates should never be fucking paired with another country with a very high win rate, i.e. Germany and Sweden... now throw USSR into that and you basically have an undefeatable team. Jesus Christ, Gaijin.

@@katerinamalkova1126As an Italian main, I always get tempted to return to hangar whenever I see USA/USSR/ITA vs GER/SWE. I’m usually the only Italian too so it’s just bad luck that I got dumped into that side lol I remember a match where only 5 of us ever got kills and only me and one other gigachad bvm played had more than 5 kills. So frustrating

@@Awesomeduud I know how it feels mate. I usually play Britain and constantly getting matched with USA/USSR (sometimes EXCLUSIVELY USA) is just a death sentence. Whole team wiped in 5 minutes more often than not.

But it also should have gotten the spall liner just like every other Modern Nato tank

@@natecondy4125 M1 doesn't have a spall liner u can take a look at Red Effect's latest video or look for sources on the internet for more information, basically the abrams in the game are not that bad.

​@@natecondy4125Literal 19K in RedEffect's comment section backed up his claim. In his 20 years in the Abrams, he never saw a spall liner on it. The turret ring is also accurate.

@@pilotmanpaulIn fairness to the turret ring, most tank engagements aren’t gonna be knife fights where that gap would be an issue.. even then that neck gap is more armored irl too same with the gun mantlet. Regardless, Russia’s most numerous modern mbt, the T-72B3 has shit FCS, so I doubt those conscripts are gonna be sniping the necks of abrams if they do face to face in combat lol

* laugh in refit and modernization *

That’s just not true. Challenger 2 and 3P have zero armour in the LFP. At least the Abrams has 800mm in the cheeks and like 350mm in the hull…

@@Rempai420 in x-ray yes, but tell me then why when im playing with Abrams they blows me up anytime like sh..it. Challengers atm definetelly has more survavilibity than Abrams

@@xxxbg311 Because the Abrams has a big fat gap between the cheeks and hull which is super weak. Nothing Gaijin can do about the way America designed the tank

@@Rempai420 but at least Abrams are faster and have better round...

@@xxxbg311 Yeah, looks like that’s helping the win rate lmao

usa 8.3 worst thing i ever played, especially m551

Or a leclerc or merkava… US mains acting whinier than the other 5/10 who have it considerably worse combined lol

@@greystash1750 Exactly

check if u have the research helis with ground rb toggle on

@@kevincussen929 wow I'm really dumb thank you

Let's just ignore all the other tanks surviving side shots but he couldn't survive frontal hits. Room temperature iq thoughts

Definitely not irl, hull ammo storage immediately makes it worse

@@toaster8389 in fact i intended that in game the abrams sucks because all the sistems are not a game meccanic

Abrams is also intended to be paired with all the advanced intel gathering the US has. It’s not gonna be meandering forward into unknown territory to knife fight T-80s. It’s gonna be shooting at range with its superior FCS

Challenger “3” is definitely not a clown. Deals with every Russian tank frontally outside the BVM and 90M

Only “issue” with chally 3 i’ve found is that it loses the funny 5 second reload of the rifled barrel. But that dm53 is soooo nice

No, but your playing witb wolfpacks clickbaits and aims so thats why its so painful. Oh and you are usally against russia paired with germany, I once got a match france usa israel vs germany sweden russia. We had 3 clickbaits 2 wolfpack and 1 aim. Went as expected

Fr

Hmm tell you realize the Type 10 exists

@@underfirej yes... Doesn't do anything too my statement?

@@Tobi1678sure 5.3 second reload but have you ever thought about how it doesn’t matter when they just easily one tap you

well .... since im running a pretty good kd in the abrams and with expert crew you survive allot ... not really cause you easy one tap enemys aswell @@matthewmiller1101

u got my point

was literally thinking the same. Several points in it I thought "I see why you'd be mad but that's literally not the game's fault"

Да да, а как же перезарядка 5 сек