Тёмный

Harold Bloom interview on "Jesus and Yahweh" (2005) 

El Caballero de la Babosa Figura
Подписаться 1,1 тыс.
Просмотров 5 тыс.
50% 1

Harold Bloom interviewed by Charlie Rose, 2005

Опубликовано:

 

15 апр 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 47   
@mothflame99
@mothflame99 Месяц назад
If anyone wants to read an explanation of his "gnosticism" i would recommend Agon: Towards a Theory of Revisionism. It's much better than the explanation (or lack thereof) in Omens of Millenium
@hakmagui9842
@hakmagui9842 Месяц назад
True.
@hakmagui9842
@hakmagui9842 Месяц назад
I call tell how comfortable these two became with each other.
@noheroespublishing1907
@noheroespublishing1907 13 дней назад
Comrade Bloom is dearly missed.
@opinion3742
@opinion3742 9 дней назад
Did he call Charlie dear at the end there?
@96mtbrider
@96mtbrider 28 дней назад
Bruh got cursed by the demiurge
@patricktalley4185
@patricktalley4185 21 день назад
The crucifixion was not “suicide”, it was sacrifice.
@user-ff4lr2jj5r
@user-ff4lr2jj5r 15 дней назад
makes difference....
@outlawgt3045
@outlawgt3045 5 дней назад
Was not a sacrifice either. Jesus didn't die forever.
@HugoNewman
@HugoNewman 21 день назад
Charlie Rose, the tragically bad, inexplicably revered interviewer.
@patricktalley4185
@patricktalley4185 21 день назад
I loved Harold Bloom (RIP).“Where Might Wisdom Be Found?” is one of my favorite books on biblical literature and how it impacts our lives. Bloom’s conversations on Charlie Rose were always a bit disjointed, however, because the host doesn’t know when to shut up. Rose’s constant interruptions and urgent interjections never allow Bloom to elaborate adequately on the points he’s trying to make. That said, at least Rose knew enough to bring Bloom back again and again, so they could revisit topics and continue their explorations Bloom was a confident - some might say, overconfident - scholar of religious literature. His literary insights on aspects like characterization, theme, and narrative are solid. However, his occasional theological digressions leave a lot to be desired. He was no religious thinker (admittedly). Bloom never seemed to understand or be willing to explore how God can be at once both inscrutable and eminent; how the story of the Bible is a love story between the Creator and His Creation. He sees the crucifixion as suicide, instead of what it is - God willingly sacrificing Himself for man to end the practice of involuntary human sacrifice (scapegoating, ritualistic killing, murder, revenge, war, execution) that had warped our souls. For great literary insight into the writers and characters of the Biblical tradition, I recommend Bloom. But for a true theological understanding of God and Christ beyond those literary parameters, you’ll need to read early spiritual thinkers like Maimonides, Augustine, Aquinas, or some of the more recent religious writers like Chesterton, Merton, or CS Lewis. I’d especially recommend Rene Girard on the connection between the crucifixion and the scapegoating mechanism.
@allen5455
@allen5455 19 дней назад
C.S. Lewis is not profound. Lewis writes from the Darwinist perspective. His "Mere Christianity" confirms this. The whole problem of modernity/postmodernity originates from Darwin. Marx, too, acknowledges Darwin as a necessity.
@joycejulep9115
@joycejulep9115 18 дней назад
@@allen5455 I respect your opinion, but I have to disagree. I find CS Lewis's "A Grief Observed" immensely profound...and immensely moving. An astoundingly raw, bare depiction of a man who is searching for God in moment of intense grief and confusion. It seems more profound to me every year, as I get older, and as those I love begin to die around me.
@allen5455
@allen5455 18 дней назад
@@joycejulep9115 In neo-orthodoxy nothing matters but "relationships," thus the necessity for conversations about one's "feelings." Neo-orthodoxy emphasizes the existential over the revelatory. With Lewis, there is no outside-of-self revelation, there is only "virtue signaling."
@joycejulep9115
@joycejulep9115 18 дней назад
@@allen5455 I'm not any kind of religious expert and don't really understand all those terms. All I know is "A Grief Observed," as well as a few other Lewis books and essays, are profoundly meaningful to me, and I encourage other people to read him
@allen5455
@allen5455 18 дней назад
@@joycejulep9115 You wrote a five paragraph post, the longest I have observed on the Internet, and you don't understand "those terms"? Maybe you should try for some real understanding. Comprehend beyond "feeling." End of dialogue.
@cmk1964
@cmk1964 22 дня назад
Which means? Dunno. Just blabbing.
@MoorishMonitor
@MoorishMonitor 18 дней назад
Charlie Rose should have stopped interrupting Harry Bloom.
@HB-iq6bl
@HB-iq6bl 13 дней назад
josephus the roman historian mentions jesus
@ricardocima
@ricardocima 2 дня назад
Interpolation
@metronistronn
@metronistronn 22 дня назад
I'm a Pentecostal lol.. Praise God. At one time I picked away at the scripture like Bloom also. Hey Bloom you must come by faith! Wonder if his great brain is helping him now, wherever he is now.
@allen5455
@allen5455 19 дней назад
Bloom was forever learning and never able to come to the knowledge of Truth.
@gjeacocke
@gjeacocke 9 дней назад
Harold was lost on his own deluge of words.
@allen5455
@allen5455 19 дней назад
So, God is partially lost? Lost to whom? Lost to Harold Bloom.
@user-ff4lr2jj5r
@user-ff4lr2jj5r 15 дней назад
Can't be loss when you do not exist.
@allen5455
@allen5455 14 дней назад
@@user-ff4lr2jj5r You don't know that God does not exist. Such is a "presupposition." We invite you to change your thoughts, change your mind. "God in Christ redeeming the world unto Himself."
@user-ff4lr2jj5r
@user-ff4lr2jj5r 14 дней назад
@@allen5455 I never said I knew for a fact that any god you can name exist or does not exist. But that is the point.
@allen5455
@allen5455 13 дней назад
@@user-ff4lr2jj5r Logic?
@user-ff4lr2jj5r
@user-ff4lr2jj5r 13 дней назад
@@allen5455 No thanks. I am already overstocked with logic.
@2Uahoj
@2Uahoj 5 дней назад
His religious thoughts here are so confused that Charlie has a hard time following him. Also, hard to understand that Bloom does not recognize that the Jesus of the Gospels does indeed identify himself with God - most notably when Caiaphas questions him in Mark 14:61-62, "are you the son of the Living God?" To which Jesus responds, "I Am" - a term only used for God.
@AlbertIsraeli
@AlbertIsraeli 22 дня назад
People hear, do not follow this man’s example, for he is blind and deaf and blabbering little man. Where is this smart alec now, did he ever came to know the Lord Yeshua the Messiah. People are so brave, when they think, that there is no God. I wonder, if he passed away and never found salvation, then in which “space” is he lost, rather than God. Every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Yeshua is to the glory of God the Father.
@opinion3742
@opinion3742 9 дней назад
How is one saved just by believing the story that Jesus was God and sacrificed himself? How does one make that story make sense?
@user-ec5vx3uf6r
@user-ec5vx3uf6r 22 дня назад
Rose never listen, and never read any book and posible never open the complete Works of Shakespeare!
Далее
Harold Bloom Interview, 1994
24:29
Просмотров 2,4 тыс.
Why I Am Not a Christian by Bertrand Russell (1927)
35:54
Кеды из СССР «Два Мяча»
00:58
Просмотров 471 тыс.
Orson Welles and Peter O'Toole on Hamlet
24:18
Просмотров 589 тыс.
Christopher Hitchens interview on the Clintons (1999)
34:21
God beyond God: Meister Eckhart
36:43
Просмотров 12 тыс.
Harold Bloom interview on "Hamlet" (2003)
24:30
Просмотров 207 тыс.
Was Jesus the Founder of Christianity?
32:31
Просмотров 89 тыс.
Harold Bloom Interview for C-Span.
2:10:38
Просмотров 10 тыс.