Harry Hill: BBC Three is "the biggest wind-up" | BBC Sounds 

grahamlive has a new twist in

and now he hasn't been seen on tv since 2013.... hmmm.... funny how that works

He has a show on ITV2

He literally has a weekly TV show right now.....

BBC News always reports on bad things at the BBC - it gets a lot of shit but show me another organisation that would do that

yep... its cos both himself and family guy are on the same wavelength when it comes to speaking the truth and ripping the piss out of stuff :P i happen to be a big fan of both harry hill and family guy... im very much in agreement with most of the stuff they mock :P

And now ITV2 make their bread n butter outta Family Guy and American Dad.

@@bestgrimbarianever loool no the wavelength is easy writing and low hanging fruit

Harry's Law

Totally

Nodding with absolute agreement

BBC1 vvv ITV ^^^ that's how I remember them!

@@soapmode good one

I know who that is, tom Hanks. Mask off Deceiver

Fired by who? He doesn’t work for the bbc.

+Synthesizer Patel I had a good laugh at his observations

Daytime TV on BBC 1 is absolutely terrible any time the BBC chimes in with its "due to the unique way the BBC is funded" they should be forced to read out the daytime line up immediately after

simon lloyd basically said everything i was thinking. well said

You need to go take your meds.

it went to shit after greg left

Harry Hill's TV Wipe

All TV channels are paid for by the people who watch them. It's just some are financed more directly than others. ITV is paid by the advertisers, who are in turn paid by the manufacturers/service providers, who are in turn paid by the consumer of the goods and services, so it really starts with the consumers' money. And the consumers pay double with ITV, because they're paying that money indirectly and also paying a little bit of their time each time an ad break comes on.

@@brianm2881 indirect is very very different to direct payments. Because we're forced to get a TV license to pay for BBC. If I own a TV and watch nothing the BBC puts out I'm still legally forced to pay for the programmes that it makes. If the BBCs content is so good then they should go with a subscription method, then we will have an accurate number for how many people willing would be pay to watch.

@@brianm2881 no they are not paid by the people who watch them. If cadbury's pay for advertisements then it was only cadbury's customers whose money has paid for the advertisement not everyone watching the TV when the cadbury's advert is on

Codswallop. You personally might think a show has no value, just like Harry Hill does. But it might appeal to some people. If it gets low ratings and isn't being watched then it's fair enough to ax it. But the BBC doesn't have to make every single show educational. It's remit is to make content for EVERYONE, not just people who hate reality shows/what teenagers and young adults like. I don't personally listen to the Proms every year. It's rating/viewership ratings are incredibly low. Should they ban that because it doesn't seem valuable to me? It was bad enough that they got rid of the channel entirely for a bit, considering how many landmark new comedies came off the back of innovation allowed on it. But for those who complain about the license fee, there will always be something to prove it's not worth paying for.

Haven't seen him live in 20 years but it was always way darker and angrier than the tv stuff. Did a proper funny bit about Pete townshend

His live stuff was a bit more off colour and early TV Burp had a lot of Hitler skits.

+Raymi Salas I love him when he is not trying to be funny. He is then funny. Ha ha

ITV 4 is the only decent one. ITV 3 shows terrible old TV shows that were crap 20 years ago let alone now. ITV 2 is all celebrity rubbish and ITV 1 isn't much better.

It gets worse... Check out out ITVbe seriously it does exist.

@@mr8I7 Morse and a touch of Frost are kino you pleb

Hahahahaha I miss channel 5. It was had the most shows but they were entertaining

The irony is this video wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for the TV license.

Pay for a what?.......

lol

FIGHTTTT

CallitHowISeeIt what a superb comment...how this slimeball came to be this self-styled Royal commentator-cum-rural correspondent defies belief

I was an extra in outlaw king wed so 14 hour days as extras doing battles. The producers and suits are the ones who do nothing

The only reason I was sad that BBC Three is closing is because where am I going to watch Family Guy or American Dad. But when I found out it was moving to ITV2 I really did not care that BBC Three was ending. ITV2 is a way better channel anyway

@@Prixllz ITV2 is even worse. Nothing but trashy reality shows and Shaun Of The Dead being shown a ridiculous amount of times a year.

Chaz Dadkhah couldn’t have described him better

He was right about that shitty wedding show. My younger brother who is not exactly the most discerning consumer of culture made me watch it once. It was a harrowing experience, profoundly dispiriting, chock full of lavatorial awfulness, I felt like rekindling my childhood catholicism just so I could go to confession.

I can name two shows from BBC Three shows that I felt deserved their popularity; The Mighty Boosh and Russell Howards Good News, these are just my views though.

nettils I'm sorry, was that a question or a statement?

Ben Knight they both got moved to BBC 2 along with only connect.

BBC3?...oh, you mean the Family Guy channel

"FIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT!"

It's not really so much of an issue anymore, though. All you need a TV licence for is watching (or recording) shows *live off the air.* You don't need one to watch shows on iPlayer (or other channel's equivalents), and most TV shows are put up on iPlayer or similar very soon after they've aired. You also don't need one to own a TV. So not having a TV licence will only mildly inconvenience you, or not even do so at all if you don't watch live TV anyway (as many people no longer do), it certainly doesn't prevent you from watching TV shows in modern times.