No video :(

Has Tudor Surpassed Rolex? | Tudor Black Bay GMT Opaline Dial

Подписаться 58 тыс.

Просмотров 61 тыс.

50% 1

Think high-end GMT watches and one brand comes to mind. However, sibling rivalry may challenge that mindset. Move over Rolex GMT Master II and make way for the Tudor Black Bay GMT.
For all your watch needs check out our website!
www.watchgecko...
Model Wrist Size: 6.5 inch
Products Featured:
Tudor Black Bay GMT Opaline Dial (M79830RB-001)
WRITTEN ARTICLE:
www.watchgecko...
SOCIAL:
Facebook: / watchgecko
Instagram: / watchgecko
Specifications:
Brand: Tudor
Model: Black Bay GMT
Price: £3,660
Material: Stainless Steel
Movement: In-House Calibre MT5652, 70hr power reserve, 26 jewels.
Complications: GMT 4th hand
Crystal: Domed sapphire crystal
Dial: Domed Opaline with a galvanized finish
Size: 41mm diameter, 50mm lug-to-lug, 15mm thick, 22mm lug

Опубликовано:

17 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 280

@Nachovalenti899 10 месяцев назад

I bought my Tudor BB GMT (black dial) two years and 7 months ago, brand new on bracelet. Everything works perfectly, it's in almost perfect condition and I love it in every single way. The opaline one is beautiful as well, but I love mine so much. Great video and many thanks for sharing.

@Goldendoodle.178 4 месяца назад

To appreciate Tudor you must see it for what it is. I have a 116610LN and it compares in quality in many ways to my Tudor BB GMT. The build quality on the Tudor is of extreme high quality. I wear it for long stretches, it’s a go anywhere do anything watch that’s perfect for traveling to far away places. I suspect many of the Tudor bashers here would change their minds after handling and wearing a Tudor GMT. Don’t knock it till you try it trust me.

@腕表爱好者 9 месяцев назад

I'm 19 years old now，my parent's bought me a Tudor black dial GMT when I was 18 I think the white dial is more young people choice.But I still choose the black dial because is looking more vintage😊 From few month experience of watch，is wear perfect and vintage looking not show off too much is matching my age😊

@rcm4u2 10 месяцев назад

I’ve got a couple of Rolex GMT’s, and bought a Tudor GMT. It’s dual use, as it’s got a deeper dive rating than my Rolexes, and we take diving vacations. I like it for that reason alone.

@anthonystevens8683 10 месяцев назад

Nice one Richard. I love the opaline dials that Tudor produce as I love my Panda Chronograph. There is one slight downside from my experience and that is that it isn't quite as at a glance readable as say a black dial. From an aesthetic perspective the opaline dial wins hands down though. Sometimes form over function makes sense. Many thanks for sharing.

@hugohernandez3651 10 месяцев назад

It is a beautiful watch. With that being said, if you are really craving for a GMT II, this watch will only calm the crave temporarily.

@jethrojacinto2798 10 месяцев назад

Exactly. It's like settling for that girl who's an 8 when you really want that girl who's a 10 😂

@hugohernandez3651 10 месяцев назад

@@jethrojacinto2798 Correct 😂. That doesn't mean that that watch can't be a 10 for someone else. That is why I hate the word alternative when talking about watches.

@Ari_M47 6 месяцев назад

If you want the black dial sure, but the white/opaline is discontinued

@SebastianBea1 8 месяцев назад

Great video, thanks for the details. Given the movement and attention to detail in design, with its own identity, I think we will look back and recognize this watch for a moment where Tudor was elevating.

@giantdipper 10 месяцев назад

Excellent review, but even better video quality. This is the only review I've seen that captures the ivory tint of the opaline dial. Well done.

@craig2100 10 месяцев назад

Brilliant, but chunky watch

@drfranke 10 месяцев назад

I own and love this grail watch. Great video.

@malikknows3510 10 месяцев назад

Nice video. Thanks. I've got a BB Pro yet still have the itch for a pepsi. My hope is that Tudor will cram that movement into one of the smaller, recent BB cases. All the best.

@BAF605 10 месяцев назад

To be fair to Breitling it must be remembered that the Black Bay Chrono contains a bodged Breitling movement,

@MysteryKmt 10 месяцев назад

Not in mine. I've got a plain as Jane eta in mi smiley BB

@BAF605 10 месяцев назад

@@MysteryKmt The poor man's Tudor.

@phmwu7368 8 месяцев назад

2023 TUDOR watches presented an opaline dial GMT, with "Pepsi" bezel, a bit an homage/ lookalike of the late 1950s PanAm executive white-cream Rolex GMT-master 6245 pilot watch. It looks like some of these opaline TUDOR GMT also have the changing date problem as the precursor had with date wheel ? 🤔🤔🤔 Any feedback ?

@robertlock6041 10 месяцев назад

Hi Kc, don't forget that the Rolex is in a different price category. As for Tudor being compared with "a fancy pickup", it's worth mentioning that the Toyota pickup was the one vehicle that Top Gear couldn't break...

@WetFire403 Месяц назад

I’ve always been a Rolex guy. Mainly subs. But recently I’ve found my self swaying towards other brands. The type of person wearing Rolex’s has put me off the brand a bit. I do love just how comfy a sub is on the wrist though. This Tudor GMT Opaline is really tempting me, I’m not sure how I’ll like the larger size and thickness but it’s just such a stand out design with out being too flash and “look at me” - the two things which is driving me away from Rolex. If I go for this I might try and get a Tudor T-fit clasp or a Steel Reef on the fly extension.

@2GoodLookin 3 месяца назад

Nice watch but 15mm is way too thick. The new GMT 58 is perfect but no jubilee bracelet. Come on Tudor.

@flop7217 2 месяца назад

Sooooo true i wore one today and i couldn't believe how thick it is. Jeeeeeez totally unwearable for me even though it looks amazing

@wayne9241 10 месяцев назад

I’m lucky to have a wife who brought me one. It’s a fantastic watch and it doesn’t seem as big as others make it out to be. Great value for money.

@JStryker7 10 месяцев назад

It’s a shame Tudor hasn’t worked as much on the thick cases

@africanpastor4458 10 месяцев назад

Still waiting for a the same gmt slimmer

@JStryker7 10 месяцев назад

@@africanpastor4458I prob wouldn’t buy this one, but I would consider a thinner bb pro or chrono

@JiminyCricket1235 10 месяцев назад

It is said that the Tudors' target audience is young Men. 😅

@glucia2223 9 месяцев назад

@@JiminyCricket1235 I guess I am in the target demo. I just turned 40 and am a young professional. I like the look of Tudor and Panerai and usually dress "snappy casual" or business casual. I think larger watch cases accentuate the look I am going for.

@michaelriera6277 8 месяцев назад

I'm not sure when the " I wish all men's watches were sized like my dear nana's watches back in the 1930s " let's get passed this oddity in time.

@TommyRibs 10 месяцев назад

The Tudor is sweet. No doubt. The Rolex GMT is the icon though. Modern Pepsi and the BatMan are without peer. I’d still take the opaline dial Tudor Pepsi though.

@glucia2223 9 месяцев назад

The problem is, those are all black dials. Right? The Opaline dial is a game changer.

@electorofsaxony7646 9 месяцев назад

This is absolutely stunning. I am waiting for my black submariner from my AD but i will definitely add this to my collection.

@wristopia4101 10 месяцев назад

Hopefully their will be a size increase to the GMT-Master II soon. 1mm extra on case and lug width 😈

@AnitaSpankyBB 10 месяцев назад

Nice review but I want the FXD so bad.......

@TonioToutBeau 10 месяцев назад

I personally would hold off on it until they come out with a B58 slimmer GMT version.

@garethdyos8018 8 месяцев назад

I've just picked this model up and couldn't be happier with it! The only 'small' issues are the lack of the T-fit clasp, which is a shame, and the 15mm height which likely puts some people off. It isn't an issue for me, but for anyone with a wrist smaller than 7 inches it could perhaps be a problem.

@chrish5503 6 месяцев назад

It's 14.3, not 15, and nearly 1 of that is crystal. Don't believe this hype, folks, it's a small watch.

@flop7217 2 месяца назад

@@chrish5503 to me the height looks gigantic in person. Would have loved to buy one if it wasn't how thick this big boy is

@JuanSegarra-td6yr Месяц назад

I have five Rolex. None are gmts. I have the Pro and opaline dial. I’m waiting on the Tudor Coke. Tudor has to up its game by putting a tfit.

@user-lw7ix5ev3n 10 месяцев назад

The Perfection 💙🤍❤️

@jeanlefranc3817 10 месяцев назад

No cyclops, no crown guards, stunning dial. A winner. #whitedialcrew

@mdesmet9111 10 месяцев назад

I've owned the black dial version of the BB GMT and also the BB Pro, and both of them felt a lot chunkier than my Rolex GMT II. If they could make a BB 58 GMT, without making it as thick as the BB Pro, I'd certainly get me one.

@borjastick 10 месяцев назад

But it seems to not have the new BB strap extension trick. I have owned a number of Tudors and though very good I couldn't get past the fact that I really wanted a Rolex. I sold them all but hanker after the BB58 925 silver version which I sold and regret it. This watch seems very thick though as you say it may wear smaller than its dimensions suggest.

@timyoungnc 10 месяцев назад

They need to add the T fit clasp.

@davidelliott948 10 месяцев назад

I prefer the strap options over the bracelet.

@minusED 10 месяцев назад

Aluminum bezel and that bracelet are killing it. I’d rather travel with Pelagos even without GMT, because it’s a much-much better watch.

@markreynolds9135 10 месяцев назад

Sure it is

@Goldendoodle.178 4 месяца назад

I agree that the aluminum bezel and bracelet are killing it in the sense that the bezel will look killer once it fades from many years of use. Handled my brother’s Pelagos and wasn’t impressed even with the titanium.

@avarmauk 10 месяцев назад

If Tudor ever make a BB58 GMT, I might need to get one, even though I have a Rolex GMT master II

@markreynolds9135 10 месяцев назад

Suuuure you do.

@avarmauk 10 месяцев назад

@@markreynolds9135 the_inappropriate_collector

@thomasrusso1411 10 месяцев назад

The critics that criticize this watch must have small wrists I have the black dial version on a 63/4 wrist fits fine it’s a tool watch it’s supposed to be chunky only idiots pay double over retail for the Rolex GMT and that coming from someone who has multiple Rolex

@David-yd6ur 9 месяцев назад

No. However I am a fan of the Tudor Pelagos blue - so much so that I bought one as an everyday watch. Rolex will always be superior by design, excuse the pun, and will be priced accordingly.

@Romio666 8 месяцев назад

Is it crazy 😜 to own a Batman but still wish to add an Opaline GMT Tudor ?

@StochasticWolf 6 месяцев назад

What is a Batman?

@Romio666 6 месяцев назад

@@StochasticWolf Black & Blue Bezel GMT on oyster bracelet

@H_tudor 5 месяцев назад

Thats would actually be a really fine addition

@Romio666 5 месяцев назад

@@H_tudor I will then sell y Tudor 🐼

@Trip2Shiesty Месяц назад

If you like a vintage look to your watch Tudor is 100% the way to go …. Same type of movement for 1/5 of the price still owned by Rolex & a way better value for your money

@Joe-xo3xy 10 месяцев назад

The Rolex GMT is such an iconic watch that Tudor's GMT is suffering underneath the Shadow of Rolex's GMT. However, the white dial version has managed to capture that Historical Rolex DNA without seeming like a copy cat; This is because there once was a white dial Rolex GMT that never really got the pop culture status of the black dial variant. Tudor adopting the white dial brings in something fresh while maintaining genuine heritage. I do think the introduction of a jubilee bracelet will give it more of its own personality. The black version never won me over because it still looked like a Black Bay diver. Rolex did the same thing in terms of converting the Submariner to a GMT, however, over the vast amount of time it has been around, it is its own entity

@SoCalWatchReviews 10 месяцев назад

Another great video guys 👏

@danielmeier8321 10 месяцев назад

Most tudors are too unrefined at the moment. They need to bring the thickness down at least by 2mm. I’d argue the bb58 ad bb54 actually can compete.

@Klavaturdeswahnsinns 10 месяцев назад

Waiting for a 58 gmt 5 link bracelet and i am in

@derosa1989 10 месяцев назад

Just because Tom Cruise or a footballer are paid to wear a watch brand doesn't make it desirable, at least to me anyway!

@alfieakaronaldog 10 месяцев назад

No way is it ‘ contemporary’ lol. Clues in the name….. ‘Heritage’! The GMT-Master II is Contemporary. The aluminium bezel insert matches the fake rivets perfectly. There is not enough micro adjustment on that bracelet because of those fake rivets, and as such it does not fit a lot of people as well as it could.

@g43654 9 месяцев назад

Breitling B01 powers the Tudor Chronograph, though.

@d3xmeister 10 месяцев назад

Round indices with square hour hand. It doesn’t work. It looks off, it always did to me. I only like Tudors without this design flaw, so no version of the Black Bay for me.

@vincet6730 10 месяцев назад

For me the Tudor is too tall, but as soon as that changes, it becomes a super watch.

@chrischang3924 10 месяцев назад

Tudor is great but they don't wear as well to me and I think a lot of people

@LordToogood 9 месяцев назад

I do like these and the black dial version but would you go for one of these or a Rolex OP ? I know its almost double the cost but there is the dilema. Get a Tudor and save the difference or go for Rolex because its a "Rolex"?

@imranhusain1657 9 месяцев назад

Is this a true or office gmt ?

@TheKillWizard 10 месяцев назад

Opaline GMT is beautiful. I like Tudor more than Rolex

@markreynolds9135 10 месяцев назад

Sorry to hear that you couldn’t get a Rolex.

@glucia2223 9 месяцев назад

@@markreynolds9135 I can afford a Rolex. I am getting this Tudor with the Opaline dial because I like the looks, and it fits into my collection. Rolex is also just so "on the nose." Fair game for people who like them, but the brand just doesn't do it for me.

@theadventuresofwolf5.77 10 месяцев назад

I'll tell you where Tudor wins. No games with AD and it's available.

@robertlock6041 10 месяцев назад

This is a great watch, frankly, with a superb movement. I have a black dial version which is accurate to 0.5 seconds a day. I do prefer the opaline version, but it wasn't available when I bought mine. However, I do understand the viewpoint of its critics, and I think that Tudor missed a trick by not fitting a T-Fit clasp on this update. It makes a difference to the wearing experience of the Pro, and I think that it would have gone some way to answering the GMT's critics.

@jimt7292 10 месяцев назад

Tudor doing great. However, their slab thick cases will always make Rolex the much better GMT. I have owned the pro and GMT models and I sold them both due to the thickness. They can't touch Rolex in that regard.

@JiminyCricket1235 10 месяцев назад

If thickness was a measure of quality, you would not be purchasing Rolex.

@DominicZ-ml6uj Месяц назад

Tudor sponsors a lot of creator's content.

@NNK83 10 месяцев назад

Sorry Tudor movements are made by Kenissi

@strikey888 9 месяцев назад

Which was founded and owned by Tudor I believe.

@bbrebozo6417 10 месяцев назад

No, Tudor hasn’t even caught up to omega yet, it’s got a long way to go before it can claim to have caught its big brother. It’s still the Rolex substitute for most people that don’t want to blow a lot of money on a grey market Rolex GMT. Still looks like a Rolex so more precautions are needed than with a Seiko.

@JiminyCricket1235 10 месяцев назад

Do yourself a Favor and forget Rolex all together. Rolex is foe the poor man. If you can afford it without selling a kidney, come and join the men at the true luxury segment.

@inlandwatchreviews5745 9 месяцев назад

OK I am for a Tudor Black Bay Submariner for the 70th anniversary of the original Tudor Sub in 1954. what do you think .

@markjosephbudgieridgard 10 месяцев назад

I don't think Beckham would be seen dead in a TUDOR If he wasn't a brand ambassador TUDOR throw their watches at him for free..... We all know you know what BECKHAM is like he likes all the top gear so if TUDOR didn't pay him to wear their timepieces you would see BECKHAM rocking VC, PP, AP, JACOB & CO for SURE... maybe even a beautiful BREGUET double tourbillon.... How on earth BREGUET isn't included in the holy trinity one will never understand....

@AnaInTh3Sky 10 месяцев назад

With all due respect... I think you are quite prejudiced about both, Tudor and Beckham. Haha one can like both, high luxury AND a brand like Tudor. Two very different things. I myself have a PP, 6 Rolex incl. 2 pretty rare vintage pieces AND a bb58 blue that brings me so much joy too! It's completely different to my vintage seadweller and it just works different because of the blue bezel/dial... I love it! And I am seriously considering buying one of the FXDs! It doesn't matter how much money you have, Tudor has become a fantastic brand with some amazing designs of their own! Of course he wouldn't wear the whole catalogue perfectly matched with each outfit (gotta admire how much of a pro he is... the documentary was like a Tudor ad 😂), but I can't see why he wouldn't rock a Pelagos or a BB54 with a casual look. Nothing from the other brands with that look!

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

I agree. Tudor is a poor man’s Rolex 😂😂😂😂

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

⁠PLEASE STOP WITH YOUR DELUSION SIR😂😂😂😂😂😂 TUDOR IS A FAKE ROLEX AND OVERRATED 😂BUT 😂😂😂😂😂

@AnaInTh3Sky 10 месяцев назад

@@SIZZO76 suspect you cannot afford neither 😂

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

@@AnaInTh3Sky Tudor fanatic on Deck 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Tudor is still a FAKE ROLEX 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@rickhammel9541 9 месяцев назад

stunning!

@ianwoollard2063 10 месяцев назад

Tudor has improved significantly but not enough to surpass Rolex.

@michaelriera6277 8 месяцев назад

I don’t think it ever will, by design.

@MauriceDay-em1xy 2 месяца назад

Really like the design but it wears too thick

@KC-bv9kf 10 месяцев назад

Too thick, too top heavy, too crude. It’s a tool watch. Basically it’s a fancy pickup truck vs a Range Rover. The master2 is so much more refined. Longines Zulu time 39 or 42 at at least 1200 less is only slightly behind with its movement, and more elegant/versatile. Also any GS’s Take out the price, I would take any gmt m2 over this. I have been looking for something current to my 20 yo 16710 (still +2 sec/d) that check off the same boxes for a few years and still searching.

@Chinaman7608-b3j 10 месяцев назад

What donyou know😂

@hvacgar2 8 месяцев назад

actually a Seiko does an amazing GMT too - was a Rolex fan own some but its has lost the plot with their new arrogant marketing attracting mass stupidity

@Pookie2533 10 месяцев назад

Love that watch but put it on an oyster bracelet, not that faux rivet garbage. It's bloody awful.

@sharpsharp5200 9 месяцев назад

Tom Cruise didn't want to wear this Tudor. It wasn't his choice. It was probably about some contracts.

@WatchricanPsycho 9 месяцев назад

Horrible steak

@thegorn 10 месяцев назад

This was so non-critical about the numerous failings of this piece you really need to declare paid promotions.

@emexokezie7796 10 месяцев назад

No, ..it certainly does not. Great watch built by it's Master, Rolex...no student is greater than their master, so to speak, I know we are all excited at TUDOR, I personally love the Bevel on the lugs, but NO....just because Rolex is hard to get does not mean we have to be so personal....gimme a GMT II anyday, I have 2 of them, never give me trouble since 1988 to date...so.....NO.

@Diderot68 10 месяцев назад

Never will take over Rolex. Just compare the hour hand on a Tudor and the Mercedes hand on a Rolex.

@ckjl7704 10 месяцев назад

Looks attractive, but too thick

@pieman192 8 месяцев назад

Get a watch that keeps better time , G Shock 😮

@JiminyCricket1235 10 месяцев назад

Rolex is not a luxury watch. Rolex is the poor mans hope. Do yourself a favor and get a real mans watch. Only the poor argue about the difference between Rolex and Tudor. Haha! Rolex produces a million watches a year, that is not luxury.

@steelstunners1862 10 месяцев назад

No.

@scacomatto 10 месяцев назад

@Cougar139tweak 10 месяцев назад

My Glycine base 22 keeps better time then my friends Rolex GMT, and I have a fair few Seikos that tell better time then both of those. Rolex is not about telling time, but telling others you can buy a Rolex. BTW, I've never seen an Ugly Tudor, I've seen many ugly Rolex.

@jpt4409 9 месяцев назад

Bb58 gmt and it would be perfect

@handsomewong2469 10 месяцев назад

No !price beat Rolex😂

@lewisstredwick7616 10 месяцев назад

Well I think ot lovely are you other chaps having a bad day .

@adamf8335 10 месяцев назад

Nope, Tudor is still a sub brand and always will be because it can never be allowed to be more. They don't go up in value, only down and they are easy to acquire. Everyone writing here saying anything but couldn't buy a Rolex, its that simple. There are far more interesting watches for the money.

@michaeladams9744 10 месяцев назад

No, it did not.

@cedarcanoe 10 месяцев назад

Honesty demands tyst Tudor has used their customers to get rid of failures in both their 3- and 4 hand movements. And that not really a high-end strategy is it?

@richardh9836 9 месяцев назад

The one thing you’re leaving out is that the watch itself is far too thick and top heavy. Therefore it feels cheap. It doesn’t matter how good the internals are

@wristopia4101 10 месяцев назад

Aluminium bezel insert lol Those two watches are continents apart!

@teslatalk42069 10 месяцев назад

A Tudor isn't a rolex...give us all a break. Beautiful watch I own both Tudor and Rolex but don't do an injustice to your viewers. there is a reason it's more than half less than a rolex.

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

I agree. Tudor is the FAKE ROLEX 😂😂😂😂😂

@Soloseas 10 месяцев назад

@@SIZZO76that’s an equally bad statement.

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

@@Soloseas Tudor fanboy spotted 😂😂😂😂😂 I touch a nerve😂😂😂😂😂 Tudor is a fake Rolex 😂😂😂😂 That’s my statement 😂😂😂😂

@danielmeier8321 10 месяцев назад

I agree that Rolex is a better watch, BUT not as much as the price difference would suggest.

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

@@danielmeier8321 ????? What???? All watches are overprice. Tudor is no exception and it is fake Rolex that is nowhere near the level of Rolex 😂😂😂😂and it is overrated and overpriced and Rolex is laughing all the way to the bank😂😂😂😂😂

@rickclark4714 10 месяцев назад

Tudors are nice. But, really, if you’re an enthusiast and want a Rolex, save up and get the Rolex. Working your way up to what you really want will just cost you more money. Almost scratching the itch is not scratching the itch.

@SIZZO76 9 месяцев назад

You speak truth my friend ☺️ Tudor is no substitute for Rolex the real thing☺️

@herbertchua5757 10 месяцев назад

I would still rank Tudor at mid to low standard quality

@herbtube7824 10 месяцев назад

No, it hasn’t and it will never. Clickbaiting BS!

@justinholmes5614 4 месяца назад

No. I tried one and it’s fat, ugly and polished in the wrong places. Completely underwhelming watch

@robocopvn 8 месяцев назад

RL is super overrated and overpriced nowsaday!

@grenphelps7455 10 месяцев назад

In a word.... nope, Tudors don't even hold their money that well...as my pal said recently, another great marketing ploy by Rolex...

@timcarlstrand5890 10 месяцев назад

Buying a watch as an investment is cringe.

@thegorn 10 месяцев назад

And you’d want this one to hold value as it’s so big, thick, top heavy and slab sided with no half-links, you’d be wanting to junk it ASAP with massive buyers remorse.

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

I agree

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

@@timcarlstrand5890Tudor fanboy spotted 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@timcarlstrand5890 10 месяцев назад

@@SIZZO76 Rolex fanboy spotted... And for the record Omega are probably my favourite

@Jasperroodog 10 месяцев назад

Tudor is a super clone Rolex

@derekbrettell8121 10 месяцев назад

Ive tried on the original and it wears like a brick. The thickness is absolutely dreadful in all honesty. Rolex completely blows Tudor away in all aspects lets be brutally honest

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

YOU SPEAK TRUTH 😊

@mema4922 10 месяцев назад

It doesn’t. Don’t be absurd.

@derekbrettell8121 10 месяцев назад

@@mema4922 try a GMT Master 2 and Tudor GMT on the wrist one after the other. Come back and tell me if I'm still being absurd

@SIZZO76 10 месяцев назад

@@mema4922 You don’t be delusional. Tudor fanboys 😂😂😂😂😂😂🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@tubingforever 9 месяцев назад

Literally no one actually wants a Tudor. Keep saving and buy that Rolex you actually want instead. You hadn’t even heard about Tudor until a few years ago. Stop kidding yourself

@rbcroosendaal7381 9 месяцев назад

Too big

@RolexNumero1 9 месяцев назад

Poor Rolex too thick

@MrPINKFL0YD 10 месяцев назад

Unsubscribed. This is silly saying Tudor is more desirable than Rolex.

@thegorn 10 месяцев назад

Too thick, no T-fit, no half-links = wears like dog 🐕 💩. If you want this look on a piece that wears amazing get a San Martin SN0109. That is the one that has the preferred caller GMT, which is a much better option for watch enthusiasts vs traveller GMTs.

@megamastah 10 месяцев назад

Agree with the first sentence. The second one - no one in the market for Tudor GMT will consider San Martin. Third one - disagree; caller GMT watches are everywhere, are cheap and easy to make, you have a multitude of them to choose from. Again - not a competition to Tudor's traveler GMT.

@BAF605 10 месяцев назад

@@megamastah I'm continually surprised by people saying that caller GMTs are the most desirable. One wonders why any brand that wants to be considered luxury has developed a traveller movement?? Now even entry level luxury brands like Swatch Group brands Longines, Tissot, Mido, and Certina are in on the act. Lately the Miyota 9075 has made traveller GMTs available to budget buyers and microbrands are vying with each other to get them to market. They'll never sell!! 😉😉😉

@jaime4022 9 месяцев назад

This watch’s proportions are all over the place. It seriously needs to go on a diet or get a 39mm version as an option. I own the Pepsi version and feel it’s meh! It is just awkward and cumbersome. It just doesn’t wear well. And don’t even get me started on the bezel. It sucks! Before anyone comes in to defend it… Come on. Be honest with yourself. There are Tissots, midos orient and seikos out there, costing less than half of what this costs, with better bezel action.

@leeharding8306 10 месяцев назад

Tudor is getting worse. They still make quite a few thick lumps of unrefined steel and the quality issues are racking up quicker than their prices. They make a few nice pieces but not many and any conversation with someone who knows nothing about watches that involves Tudor will include a sentence going along the lines of “it’s what you buy if you can’t afford a Rolex” it’s just like a Rolex” or David Beckham wears them because he’s born to dare etc. that GMT looks way to thick and the San Martin copy of this watch has much better proportions than the watch it’s copied 🤦🏻‍♂️ the 58 is nice and when the new version comes out soon including a GMT Version this doorstop version will get discontinued I think 🤔