Have We FINALLY Discovered Noah’s Ark? 

It doesnt matter where it is..... Why get so wrapped up in where God placed the Ark, instead... get wrapped up in God Himself...

Ron Wyatt did scientific research on the 'ark shaped like structure'. Ron and the top geologist in turkey did a deep investigation on this site. They used sensitive seismic and sounding equipment to conclusively determine that yes, this was a ship and yes, it is as old as the flood. Ron also found burial sites of Noah and his wife. The remains are in a museum in turkey. Turkey was so sure that this was the historical site of a very very old boat that slid down the mountain with a glacier, then was covered up which petrified the wood. They designated it as a national park. There is a book categorizing all of the factual scientific evidences. You should do better research. Unless you did, and know that you are being deceptive.

I do believe they found the anchor stones and that the ark would be close to there

“Why would we expect for this large wooden vessel to survive in the elements?” Ever heard of petrified wood?😂

I absolutely, 100+% believe Ron Wyatt proved the Drupinar site to be Noah's Ark.

“If you zoom out you’ll see other places that look just like it” (continues to show no places that look just like it)

👍🏼🕊well, at least we can see the one in Kentucky ❤thanx and may our Father bless your socks off❤🕊

A E is great.....but ......you gotta talk details of what Ron found ....or you sound like the mainstream media

No, it hasn't. The pics show a natural ground-surface feature.

There is the little detail that in 1987, Turkey has recognised this as Noah's Ark. They even built a visitors Center, paved a road to it, and designated it as Noah’s Ark National Park. So...other than that? There is no credible proof.

What about Ron Wyatt's find?

You know what’s really annoying is when they come up with reasonable things to account for it by just looking at it dig it up then just dig stop thinking about it and get your hands dirty

I just wonder how we expect a wood to survive thousands of years ago?

Just think: 2000 years from now, scientists are going to discover the ark in Kentucky and be so confused.

"We dont need evidence, god word told us"

What about the anchor stones found?

Do you know why Noahs insurance did not go up after he crashed the Ark.....He had ARK-CIDENT FORGIVENESS INSURANCE 🤣😂🤓

Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. What about the names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter? Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man.

Ron Wyatt's group performed some core sampling, and in one, they found a piece of antler, a bit of aluminum, yes, long before aluminum was ever discovered, and if I remember correctly, an iron rivet. I saw that on a video probably 8 years ago. How far away are the anchor stones from Wyatts site? Wern't they found close by?

Why does Snelling make statements supporting a young Earth and than write science papers completely contradicting his young Earth claims? He can't have it both ways.

The ARK was first photographed in 1915, by an American pilot, since then a few expeditions have been there!

The locals wasted no time setting up a tourist trap.

It seems so silly to me that modern man tries to make their version of the ark as a big square box from modern timber style building materials. When God design it with curved reeds and pitch-a catamaran type ship with an bottom opening down the middle which allowed the natural wave movement to 'pump' fresh air in and out of the small opening at the center of the top of the roof.

The Ark was made of seasoned wood. It was waterproof. It had a second function. It would take approximately 30-40 years for trees to grow, maybe longer. It would be a good source of wood for houses, animal shelters, barns for food from the Ark until the land regrew. fencing to protect the domestic animals. The ark would have sank into the wet soils where it landed. There would be a shape of the Ark in the sediment which dries into rock but the wood would eventually have been used..

Can’t say would don’t survive that long because it was made from gopherwood that’s no longer on earth so you don’t know how long that type of wood lasted so doubtful

There are many rock formations like the Durupinar site where there are rock ‘spines’ that lay against hills like this one. The one here is conventionally boat shaped, the Ark was more likely box shaped, as the name Ark implies.

Have you guys never heard of termites. Wood laying on ground would have only a few years.

Nobody knows, they keep changing the names of mountains especially that range.

Flavius Josephus wrote that the Ark was still visible in his time, and people made pilgrimages to it, chipping off pieces to make amulets. It wouldn't last to our day if people were chipping away at it.

The durupinar site is definitely the ark, regardless of the "similar geological" formations nearby. The durupinar site matches the dimensions of the ark to a "T" and ground penetrating radar has found parallel lines and man made structures underneath. None of those are naturally occurring on their own, there was so much evidence of structures beneath the ground such as lines, rooms and 90° angles that it's a no brainer at this point. The Ark was made of Gopher wood is apparently laminated wood which is much more resistant to decay.

Nope Ron Wyatt found it alright.they did find wood and ribs of the ship and metal rivets in a specific patern

I think after the waters receded, the ship got stuck in the mud and this shape emerged.

Very Good!... #51 ✝ {9-5-2023}

it’s made of wood it would rot no? only thing to find maybe the anchors

Ron Wyatt found Noah's Ark. The Turkish government has confirmed this. The Turkish locals who have lived in the area their whole lives have always known the Durupinar site to be Noah's Ark even before Ron Wyatt made claims to the world about it. Plenty of scientific research has been done on Noah's Ark and books have been written on the subject (The Noah's Ark Book by Vance Ferrell and Discovering GOD's treasures by Kevin Fisher). Why does the Ark encounter deny all of these facts? Show everyone the scientific research the Ark Encounter has done at the site so we can compare it with the extensive research Ron Wyatt and others have done over decades. GOD has preserved Noah's Ark for future generations of skeptics such as ours. Ron Wyatt was used by GOD to not only find Noah's Ark but the Red Sea Crossing site, Sodom and Gomorrah, and the Ark of the Covenant. GOD chose Ron Wyatt to find these things because he was a faithful Christian who kept ALL 10 of GOD's Commandments including the Sabbath (Ecclesiastes 12:13). Again GOD has preserved the Ark and all the the other discoveries as a wake up call to our generation here at the end of time to show that the Bible is true and all of the great stories in Genesis, which is the foundation of the Bible, are true historical accounts. May GOD bless each and everyone of you as you study HIS Word!

well you may want to get with Ron Wyatt and Los Alamos labs.

I know AIG have good intentions, but just as they are skeptical of these findings im skeptical of a lot of their ideas. They think God created sun, moon and stars on day 4 when scripture plainly says God created Heaven (sun, moon, planets and stars) and earth in the beginning, orbday one.

What's with everyone using Ron Wyatt as a reference?. Ron was never an Archeologist and has had all his worked critisised by professionals in different fields. He claimed to have found over 100 biblical sites in his lifetime and sold books on it all. He played you all.

Wood survived in the pyramids 4000 yrs

NO WAY

Most likely the ark was dismantled for building materials because there was no lumber around

Holy lord, did I just watch a video debunking claims about Noah’s ark based on actual geology? The rest here aren’t going to trust that 😅

It's the ark. Ron Wyatt is the real deal folks.

Ark Landed on mount Judi

If you don't believe in what this man is portraying, don't comment on it. It's not just rude, but it's stupid, to comment on something you like and enjoy. It's rude to the people who do believe in God and the global catastrophe.

I still believe the ark is in Bethlehem

There's lots of historical information about Noah's Ark being on top of Mount Ararat. It's there & numerous testimonial persons have seen it.

This video is a load of tosh! The presenter is totally ignorant of the details of Ron Wyatt's findings on the Duprinar site and the ongoing archaeology discoveries as recent as September 2023. Methinks there is a considerable amount of religious and archaeological jealousy being brought to bear on this site by the so-called expert ignoramuses. Christianity in general is appalled that God would choose Ron Wyatt, a Seventh Day Adventist of all things. to uncover many of the sites relating to the Genesis accounts of His chosen people.

The Durupinar site is a natural geological formation called Limonite.

I can’t wait to ask God if that is the site or not. So much controversy over the site. Wyatt was a delusional fanatic. I would listen to anyone else’s opinion other than his.

God, the creator of all that exists, that destroyed all but Noah and his family is able to preserve wood under any condition He chooses. He IS a supernatural being with sovereign power over all that He created.

I find this presentation interesting, however, there are some variables you left out, which I will mention. I am in no way an expert; merely someone who has researched this and other topics for over 40 yrs. 1. Scripture tells us the process of events as the water subsided and it could not have settled on a low lying region because Noah sent out 3 different birds about a week apart to determine if land/vegetation was showing and/or growing back. Since the first and second bird exploration was unsuccessful, it would infer that no other land was viable apart from their immediate high area, thus they were not below the 7 - 9,000 ft marker. 2. When the flood waters was swirling debris around, and buildup began, who's to say that it didn't happen by the providence of God to prepare a place for the ark to settle into... high up above any and all mountain ridges? As the waters subsided, the sediment was still swirling about in the lower regions and creating layers upon layers until the earth's surface dried up sufficiently to move about on. 3. There are many examples where people made shrines for supposedly holy sites, but that does not mean they are holy ones. Case in point: The location that Constantine's mother decided was the place where Jesus was crucified and then buried is just traditional thinking. Scripture gives us plain clues about it's locations, just as we do with the ark of Noah. After leaving the ark, his family could have migrated to the place where some claim is the place that the eight people came out of the ark at and lived. Speculation. 4. There have been several credible eye witnesses that testify that the ark is on the mountain which you say is a volcano. So what if it is/was one, that does not negate the possibility of the ark being there preserved by God and the holy angels for a time when it may finally be revealed so that people will have one more reason to believe in Holy Writ. The way the ark was made would have withstood a lot of abuse. However, due to its age, that when the mountain erupted and tore 1/6th of the mountain away, the Ahora Gorge was formed, but the ark merely broke into at least two segments straddling the gorge. George Hagopian returned to the ark on Ararat a few years after his first encounter with his uncle and saw the ark still where he last saw it. It is usually during a very warm season that the ark was detected and visited regularly by the natives in Armenia who have sworn to protect it. IMHO, the reason most do not see it is because almost year round snow and ice cover that region at the top. 5. That formation Ron Wyatt called Noah's ark was, as some have surmised, to be a natural occurrence when mud or lava comes to an outcropping and it moves around it, creating a boat-like formation... as you discussed. It is only a boat-like shape and as you mentioned, there are various other areas that have similar formations, but they aren't THE ark. Some say Wyatt's team found samples of various materials at that site, but such items infer it is merely segments of a structure that held whatever it was in place instead of it being a barge which the ark was. Also, the ark would not need anchor stones or a keel, because they would keep the people inside from depending and trusting on God's providential hand to guide and protect them in the storm. You are correct in saying that we don't need the ark to know the flood occurred, since there is an overwhelming amount of evidence to prove it came upon all living flesh and that the place in Glen Rose, Texas proves that dinosaurs and man existed simultaneously for a time leading up to the flood.

I 100% agree that Ron Wyatt found the Ark. The proof is in his documentary. People dont want to recognize it because he was a 7th day adventist. But I truly believe God used him. Why should we believe your claims that the earth is only thousands of years old?

Ask yourselves, why didnt your savior mentioned where his boat landed after the waters receded. So simple. So far no Ark.

nothin more than rock, cmon people Fear scares into faith.

Noah's Ark has been found in six different locations by men of faith.

Why would anyone think that Noah's ark would ever be found? Did anyone ever think that after the flood, that Noah and his family disassembled the ark to use the wood to build from? God is not wasteful.. So instead of using the wood for their new homes, they started cutting down water logged trees?

Where is the real proof

If wood wouldn't survive, why would you be saying that "no wood materials were found? Also, you didn't address the 3D images that were found from geothermal imaging at the ark site that show 90 degree angles and parallel lines, appearing to be rooms. Found I believe in 2021.

Highly likely that it was disassembled to create their homes.

Sarcasm

The claim that Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's Ark is not supported by scientific evidence or widely accepted by experts in the field of archaeology or geology. Ron Wyatt was an amateur archaeologist who made several controversial claims about discovering various biblical artifacts, including Noah's Ark, the Ark of the Covenant, and other biblical sites. Here are some reasons why Ron Wyatt's claims are not widely accepted by the archaeological and scientific communities: Lack of Scientific Evidence: There is no scientific or archaeological evidence to support Ron Wyatt's claims. Archaeological discoveries are typically subjected to rigorous scientific scrutiny, peer review, and verification, which his claims did not undergo. Inconsistent Claims: Ron Wyatt's claims about the location of Noah's Ark have shifted over time, and his descriptions of the site have been inconsistent. This raises doubts about the accuracy of his accounts. Absence of Peer Review: Real archaeological discoveries are subject to peer review by experts in the field. Ron Wyatt's claims were not subjected to this rigorous process, which is a standard practice in the scientific community. Lack of Credible Witnesses: Wyatt's claims often relied on his own testimony without credible witnesses or experts to corroborate his findings. Commercial Interests: Ron Wyatt's expeditions and claims were associated with commercial ventures, including selling videos and books related to his discoveries. This can raise questions about potential financial motives. Religious Bias: Some of Ron Wyatt's claims were strongly tied to his religious beliefs, which could have influenced his interpretations and findings. It's important to approach claims about archaeological discoveries critically and with a healthy dose of skepticism, especially when they lack scientific validation and consensus within the academic community. While the search for biblical artifacts is of interest to many people, it should be conducted using rigorous scientific methods and standards. To support claims of archaeological discoveries, it is essential to rely on peer-reviewed research, credible experts, and physical evidence that can withstand scrutiny by the wider scientific community. Claims that lack these elements should be viewed with caution and skepticism.

Its been discredited and even the Turkish govt doesn't make this claim even tho happy to take cash from gullible Christian fundamentalists

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

If they want to find the ark they need to look further north in the Caucasian mountains. I've never believed this site was Noah's ark. Not even if they did cannibalize parts of the ark to build the early shelters after the flood.

This was a waste of time video with no evidence other than some "experts" say it isn't there. I would expect far more from the Ark Encounter. Lost some respect for the lack of proof claims. There are educated experts who say the flood never happened; I don't go make a click bait negative video with no proof with their claims. Humble arrogance in this guy.

Who are you too disclaim the 20 year study of ron ron WYATT do some research

Wood could not last 5000 years. Why spend so much time and energy trying to find a ship thats not there.

What should keep every viewer from reporting this as spam or misleading, based on the title and thumbnail? Deception is the first and foremost sin in the Bible.

Lack of building materials after the Flood. 🤔NO new trees yet for lumber, they would have used the materials of the ARK for the construction of their new homes. 😂You would think a company that built a wooden ark would have thought about that.🤣Do better.

Stop using a corrupt version of Gods Word.....Get a 1611 King James Bible the preserved word of God.....unreal exactly why I dont sub to this channel.......Easy...

No it hasn't been found because Noah the ark or the flood never happened

Come on people… the archeological record does not support a global flood as described in the Bible. That makes the whole Noah story just that- a fricken story. Haven’t all the logistic impossibilities killed this for you yet? So tired

How can you find something that never existed?

The Ark and the rest of the tale of the Flood, indeed most of Genesis is a myth. Similar stories are found in other cultures than the Jewish one and are variously embroidered versions of the post glacial rise in sea level when sea levels reached a maximum of 6m above present about 7000 years ago following a glacial period when about 18,000 years ago sea levels were about 60 m below the present one. For the people living in the area we term "Doggerland", now the North Sea it must have been frightening as it is for the Maldives today.

When the floodwaters reached 14 cubits above the highest mountains into the death zone the oxygen ran out and the temperature plummeted well below zero. How did the animals, plants, insects and humans survive inside the Ark? Answer: They didn't.

So do you want your "Ark" to be the only Ark in existence? I guess the real one would put yours to shame. Are you really religious or just use the Ark as a money maker?

The bible is a book of mythology. The ark story was borrowed from Gilgamesh.

can you invite me? pls reply

Ron Wyatt found Noah's Ark. The Turkish government has confirmed this. The Turkish locals who have lived in the area their whole lives have always known the Durupinar site to be Noah's Ark even before Ron Wyatt made claims to the world about it. Plenty of scientific research has been done on Noah's Ark and books have been written on the subject (The Noah's Ark Book by Vance Ferrell and Discovering GOD's treasures by Kevin Fisher). Why does the Ark encounter deny all of these facts? Show everyone the scientific research the Ark Encounter has done at the site so we can compare it with the extensive research Ron Wyatt and others have done over decades. GOD has preserved Noah's Ark for future generations of skeptics such as ours. Ron Wyatt was used by GOD to not only find Noah's Ark but the Red Sea Crossing site, Sodom and Gomorrah, and the Ark of the Covenant. GOD chose Ron Wyatt to find these things because he was a faithful Christian who kept ALL 10 of GOD's Commandments including the Sabbath (Ecclesiastes 12:13). Again GOD has preserved the Ark and all the the other discoveries as a wake up call to our generation here at the end of time to show that the Bible is true and all of the great stories in Genesis, which is the foundation of the Bible, are true historical accounts. May GOD bless each and everyone of you as you study HIS Word!