Have You Got Permission To Film On Private Land? (Prison Drone Footage Included) 

But the barriers they used were VERY high!!😊

Lol 😂…they are certainly are not the sharpest.

😂😂🤣🤣 👍 too funny

The story going round was that in case of escape the prison would phone the police and the call phrase was “Rogue Elephant” and then the local air force base would be involved to capture the escapees. Of course the police had no clue what Rogue Elephant they were referring to!

Check the title, it’s state owned land right up to the road. Just like the post boxes at Tesco etc. Land At Gallow Field Road Gartree Market Harborough LE16 7RP THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE

Actually some post boxes are possibly still on private land and should be removed. New installations from about 10 years plus ago will always be on the the public highway but I’m very sure some have slipped the net and are still on private property. I know this before you ask as I was responsible for the Royal Mail street furniture and agreed where they were to be located in the Essex area.

Polite? he's far from polite, he's incredibly disrespectful and demeaning. ST Audits is the best auditor because he actually respects others and does not talk down to them like this guy.

wouldn't quite call him polite. Filming people because he's bored.

I may have come for an argument! There is good reason why AB is considered 'The Daddy''... None manage to approach the mystique, and very few Mr AB's wide range of remarkable attributes. I think he would be able to happily continue to make popular and entertaining content if auditing itself ended tomorrow. He has real talent as a performer. I know all this is a bit subjective, but still there are aspects that can be weighed and tallied. For arguments sake. He will improve, I can criticise some aspects. I'm not sure I like it when he makes sexist comments to women PCs.. I watch DJ Audits and consider him one of the very finest . I have nothing but appreciation for DJ, except I just adore AB and would hope we all do. Its like comparing a popular high profile television actor with Laurence Olivier. One stands alone.

Spot 🎯 on with your comment .

Love that emoji 🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯

@Onslow beat me to it with his comment regarding the body worn video. Stand in the corner boy until you know your policy! Youngsters won't know about 'stand in the corner'.

@@robturner4912 it’s wrong for you to insult him for being young when what he did wrong here was his attitude about being corrected about something and not just existing as a young person, you can do better Rob I believe in you

I wish auditors could call them much, much worse than sausage!

Maybe use banger

how is it handled like a pro when he allowed himself to be moved off of public land at the beginning of the video with the van and closed door? it seems this auditor is more interested in showing that auditors should do the bidding of whatever employee thinks he can tell the public what to do in many of the videos on his channel.....

@@michael-fb6fc forget live free, if you want to see someone who handles auditing with dignity and knowledge who never backs down, look up focus pocus

There is a gentalman named Jason and his son Ben that travel the US and audit @Amagansett Press & @Watching The Watchmen. They are the upmost professional until absolutely disrespected / denied service or until the public or cops act out of line. Reminds me alot of this content creator. Great work OP!!

They were most likely 'following procedure' ... so, from that perspective there was a perceived need to follow through, especially as the drone flying was mentioned to the Prison Officers. Having put those new signs up about drones and probably a lack of knowledge about the details of what's permissible, I am not particularly surprised that the Police were called.

They get bored like the rest of us, So a bit of excitement to their day will be thoroughly exploited even if unnecessary.

Thanks Mike.

... particularly as his ego was inflated having identified DJ by name, that put down was not well taken !

Yes, and all the racist and physical abuse he suffered while he was there.

And all the while the IRA who could have given the information that would have seen him released let him rot in jail to protect their psychopathic bombers. Says it all really.

@@gazzanorth4373 true, but I am highlighting the racial and other abuse the man and other innocent people face at a fascist regime, I myself have faced racist abuse while a young guy, but when you stand up to bullies they quickly back off, showing them up for what they are, all talk, full of hate and ignorance, you probably are one of them, slainte.

@@johnkelly9463 Yawn. Must be awful carrying about that yoke of self pity that is placed on the shoulder of every Irish person from birth. Build a bridge and get over it

@@gazzanorth4373 not self pity, because we are a proud people, your own city Newcastle has about 40_50% population of Irish decendency, same with Edinburgh, Glasgow, Liverpool, in fact 15 million Brits are off Irish Heritage, you just have to look at the surnames in Britain especially Newcastle, Glasgow, Liverpool, London, also 40 million Americans are off Irish Heritage, also Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, Australia, Argentina, Huge populations, I think you need to educate yourself and stop commenting on matters you know very little about, if it were not for the Americans in ww2, who as I said have a population of 40 million plus Irish, you would be probably speaking German now, if your family survived, put your brain in gear before typing hate.

Thanks for the sub

Although private land might have implied access which can be rescinded by the owner or his agent. If this happens then you become a trespasser and should leave.

@@forthfarean true, but the owner was not about nor could the police do anything about it as trespass is a civil matter, the police can only make an arrest in the cases of aggravated trespass.

@@georgebarnes8163 It does not have to be the owner ,anyone who has the owners authority to remove the implied access for that person or group of people. Quite right,the police are not in the execution of their duty to insist on trespass laws being obeyed, except,as you say,in a criminal trespass. But the owner or his agent can instruct you to leave. If after a reasonable time you do not leave he can use whatever force is necessary in the circumstances to remove you . Any resistance will be a battery,which is an offence under law . What should happen is that the owner or agent asks police to attend to prevent a breach of the peace while he ejects you. The police themselves cannot initiate force to eject you,it is not a part of their duty. But once the owner or agent starts to eject you , any resistance is a BOP then the police can arrest you. The police might consider your actions in refusing to leave conduct likely to occasion a BOP, if they do they can arrest. The purpose of the arrest is to prevent BOP. Once they have removed you from the vicinity and the danger of BOP is past the police must release you. They might decide to issue a summons to a magistrate’s court to show the magistrates good reason why you should not be bound over in a sum of money to keep the peace. BOP is an offence at common law and actually anyone can arrest for it but it is better to have a Constable standing by.

They wanted to see if the drone had any contraband attached to it 👌

Nothing wrong with being observant.

Because they love to state the obvious.

It’s private from us, mere members of the public.

I’d expect that they’d already called the police once when he was walking around the perimeter. They were probably told no laws were broken. When the drone went up they’d have called again and said it was over the prison to get the response they wanted.

Good Point

Think DJ trumps Amagansett!

Amagansett are a bunch of bellends tbf

@@marl-marl-marl they have more sunshine in Florida...

Jason gutterman is a first class jerk, never compare DJ to him, DJ is far better audit hands down, or should I say, FROM ABOVE!

Noted

I don’t think so fella he was very good comparatively..

They must have a lot to hide when they try to say you cannot film here I wonder

They were just going through the motions really, just to discharge any potential liability on an easy job ...

@@cliffordbuttle4529 Not necessarily. Often to run an organisation you need generic rules that aren't always needed as it is too complex to have individual rules for every circumstance.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

🤣🤣🤣

They can't use it as evidence if you've not been informed. They can't present it as an article in court.

@@Youremywifenkwdave i know that. I was just saying that they don't seem to grasp what is being asked when asking about covert surveillance you tend to get a blank expression as they're trying to work it out.

I'm afraid you are both wrong in your comments about not being able to use body worn footage as evidence if you haven't been notified. This is totally inaccurate. I'll give you an example. Police receive a call that someone in the street is threatening people with a gun. Firearms unit are deployed and activate their BWV cameras as standard procedure. They arrive at the scene and see the person waving a gun around. They are shouting at him to drop the gun but instead, he points it directly at a member of public and is then shot by officers. The entire incident has been recorded on their cameras but at no point did they advise that he was being recorded. This has no relevance at all and the footage is perfect evidence of what happened. If you seriously think this evidence is no good then you are very naive.

@@MW_1981 that's an extreme situation. But the police required to notify you that you are being filmed not only is it their policy its the law so any person being filmed can request a copy.

Nice one Nathan. Pap your horn next time so I know it’s you 👍