Man, I don't know what Peter could really beat there! But then again he had a great read on Keating after flop and turn... Keating is so good for High Stakes Poker.
@@darylmixan8170 yup Keating had 11% chance on the river so it'll happen to get lucky occasionally, Peter's had his share of luck too so just things evening out
@@darylmixan8170 Are you stupid? Keating has only value hand KJ nuts. Double flushdraw missed w straight draws to everywhere ypu'd wanna draw. He beats tons of bluffs of Keating, only KJ he loses as miracled gutshot nuts. Keating has all straight blocker bluffs too like QJ etc... Many combodraws missed. Dude, maybe learn to play before commenting smartass comments. I'd had snap called Keating there.
@@darylmixan8170yea he just had a really good read and it cost him lol he knew somehow that keating had nothing flop and turn so he thought his bluff catcher was good
On that river Keating did this little pause like he thought about bluffing then retracted his thought and then decided back on it. It was brilliant and Peter was looking directly at him for it.
Tells matter in live poker, but not that much. Players analyze the hand, the structure of the board, the opponent’s ranges, the sizing of his bets and their logic. Peter entered with a weak offsuit ace, through an open limp and called an isolation raise from an aggressive player from the small blind. A call in the position as a whole is appropriate, but there are still enough loosers, having hit the top pair on an uncoordinated board, he calls a continuation bet, considering that he may be older than any pocket cards, matches or bluffs, and also has a chance to stand against a flush draw. The call on the turn pot beta is essentially aimed at bluff catching, and semi-bluff with possible flush draws, and a straight draw also appeared.
river, not a single flush was closed, only a runner straight draw was closed, which was difficult to place in this line, since the opponent with his bets showed only hands like AK\AQ or sets of value, the rest were bluffs. At the same time, he puts an overbet, pretending that he is bluffing rather than winning and that he himself puts Peter on a flush draw that did not close, possibly with a match, which he wants to knock out. Peters, having weighed all these factors, believed exactly what was easier for him to believe, his decision was more emotional than logical, this was evident from how nervous he was.
Remember when $500,000- $800,000 pots on HSP was epic? And that was with Gee, Doyle, Laak, and other multi-millionaires (and the players were definitely staked at least 50%) Now you see players calling down $185,000 in a $400,000 pot with A-10 on a Q 10 7 5 6 board. Its funny playing at Brick and morters now... Its common for players hero calling now... As opposed to mid 2000's when top pair, or flush and straight draws are shoving and calling a shove... Top Pair top kicker would shove 100BB in those years... and the speak was "I have top pair, I couldn't go anywhere, cooler... dude your Ac-9c was 3 bet preflop and the board came 9 high, you are definitely up against a hand more often than a bluff... Or this one was very common in tournament play... Guy raises or 3 bets with Kings and an ace flops and they Insta-jam 70bb into a 40bb pot, get called by A-10 and bitch about the player calling with A-10 and then thinking its a bad beat... The funniest thing about poker then is when a guy raised $30 pre with a good hand, gets called by 3 players, donks $100 on flop, $250 on turn, and last $400 on a river bluff A-Q into K-10 2 pair and then bitches about what an idiot the guy is for calling $30 pre with K-10 off... Dude you punted $750 into a caller on a king high board and an old man calling you down.
Una jugada muy difícil de leer, hay dos proyectos fallidos, Keating apostando sizings muy altos, con una intención muy clara de botar a Peter de la mesa. Él sabe que hay algo raro en la jugada, porque que las nuts juegan all in para extraer el máximo valor, pero una Overbet en esa textura se percibe más como un bluff, ya que en las jugadas previas Keating ha estado apostando grande para botarle y ahora, nuevamente, hace un sizing fuera de lo habitual. Por eso Peter estaba desesperado, porque sabe que hay un farol muy grande en esa jugada, sin embargo, la parte más racional le dice que eso no es un farol. Esa contradicción tan grande hace que Peter, recuente, ponga las fichas intentando leer algo en él, pero no ve nada, entonces hace movimientos ansiosos porque percibe un bluff, sin embargo al pagar, se da cuenta de su error, que realmente no era un proyecto fallido y no puede más, se levanta tilteado, porque sabía que estaba perdiendo esa mano y que había que foldesr allí. Sin duda alguna, arriesgó bastante Keating, pero ese última apuesta en River, fue exquisita.
I think the hand where Keeting had King high is probably why Peter called there. I didn't get to see the live cast so something must have happened to where Peter thought he should call there. A lot of things got there after the river but somehow Peter made the call. Just didnt believe him i guess or called to get information as well. Sometimes you have to pay to get information.
Peters read was good tough, any good player can tell. If it’s not a queen in the river he woulda have done the same move .Some nights you just can’t beat luck.
Haven't seen the solver but I reckon he should be betting more here to make for missed draws. Also Peter should over fold here because the Q is the card that brings in the most draws.
..Watching the Chinese Billionaire reacting and fidgeting to Keating's USD575,000 River bet, i.e. some over RMB/Yuan 4.0 Million and unable to fold his ACE Pair ...Make the Call and LOST !! .. For the first time on TV, Peter is caught Tilting. Knowingly ... typical Chinese traditional, Peter will never ever forget this incident nor be satisfied not until ..he seeks out his revenge beating Keating in another giant over MILLION Dollars pot. Exciting ...
The board with so many missed draws is almost too obvious to bluff on. Can't level yourself, but I think the best players are wary of bluffing when there are so many obvious bluffs.
Buddy this isn’t friends your local 1/2 game. Keating bet half a million dollars on the river. Peter already had half a million in the pot. It was already stated. The bet amount could’ve likely been considered an over bet bluff. You really need to wake up. Stick to zynga
