Wasn't the eye for an eye sort of guaranteed lethal? If he hit the opponent with his weapon before ending the turn, the opponent would have been down to 2 hp. Healing himself to 4 and attacking with the lowest attack minion (ysera) would have still killed him right? Correct me if I'm wrong tho
Kibler was better at card games than anyone in his chat 20 years ago. Don't know why people bother trying to "point out the right play." He's a f***ing Hall of Fame MtG player.
Although they are both card games they're quite different, each in their own right and while I don't disregard Kibler's ability to play Hs at a high level of gameplay I don't think the glory he's achieved in a different game indicates we should take his plays for granted. This being said, I am aware of the many "experts" in chat pointing out the "right plays/misplays".
wwwggxcom The "glory he achieved" was achieved in a game that takes much more skill than Hearthstone. It's very rare for Kibler to make stupid misplays because of his skill level and attention to detail.
Curator is such a good card that I recommend crafting it to use in your control decks, not just for this one. I'd scrape together the dust and make it if I were you. Otherwise you should be fine with replacing a Scalebane or a Primordial Drake with whatever cards fit.
Zondax As a Highlander priest (Sans Kazamakus), I felt offended by that priest's insistance on roping and using that elder god. It really sucks after a long while as it's just burning away your deck and depriving you of long-term options.
I play big priest fairly often and honestly half the time it feels like I either play everything or I don't play anything at all. It's generally better to just go early I think than wait and guarantee that they have the equality or whatever.
@5:40 why didn’t you play two pyromancer stories make it a 1/5 instead of 1/3 chance of not winning that turn? I would think you want to have the best odds in an RNG game?
i'm guessing his thinking is that if he loses the 1/5 then he is in MUCH worse position then what happened (him losing the 1/3), because then he would be without both pyros, which are equality activators.
It would be a 1/4 because he would have had to trade in a recruit (Consecrate would have killed both recruits and both pyros). But I still get what you mean.
How can the game know when you have a tough turn or not? There are some turns where I feel the time limit is not enough to think about every option or potential answer from my opponents. Sure, they could maybe reduce the timer in the first couple of turns but there is no straight forward solution.
John Doe I think 30 seconds per turn would be nice, but unused time gets carried over to your next turn, up to a cap of 2 minutes. Or something like that. Of course, with variable turn times they would really need to have a clock showing your turn time.
I tend to get something to drink while searching in hearthstone since it takes almost no time and that tends to sometimes burn down the rope alot He could've also had many other reasons why he burned the rope so its kinda strange to hear you talk about it as if its malicious intent You can't really know that without knowing the person on the other side
Clicking end turn at the end of the rope two turns in a row isn't coincidence. You click it before it burns out because it doesn't shorten your next turn. He's at rank 2, playing a slow deck that doesn't do anything proactive until turn 4+. People do this to tilt people into either conceding because they feel like their time is wasted, or just to throw off opponents. He could also have been looking for Kibler's stream on twitch. Either way, I doubt he's off drinking random liquids somewhere.
Yeah but he didn't just rope, he roped but clicked "end turn" right before the rope was at the end, so that he doesn't get the "time penalty" on his next turn. And he did that multiple times, which does point towards malicious intent (it doesn't 100% prove it, but Kibler is right to suspect it)
I understand what you mean, I also try and give people the benefit of the doubt, but considering he did it multiple times and even clicked 'end turn' there's just no way he wasn't doing it on purpose.
I honestly don't think big decks are that good in this meta. I don't know why I see so many of them, they get rekt by both highlander and Jade. I don't even play a completed Highlander and destroy them
Because once you lose enough in ranked you'll start to get matched up against decks/players you can actually beat, even if your deck isn't great. Your rank doesn't really matter unless you want to climb to legend.
Could have won 6 turns sooner (almost 7) "oh ya I could have but decided not to" no he clearly stated "I am not eye fo eyeing against an opponent that can heal himself" for someone who keep track of cards he used both greater healings and you have the additional 4 damage in your weapon you would have needed..... For a pro he makes common errors and has a MASSIVE ego XD Normally I like kibler streams but every so often I see his inner toddler
He was taking everything into consideration, including the possibility that the opponent would play around eye for an eye (which kibler admits later that if he KNEW how the opponent was going to play, he would have chosen eye)
