Thanks for watching! I really enjoyed the CX-5 while I had it. What do you think of it? Here’s the full detailed review: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FDZYVYeFEoI.html
I just think that interior is very very dated looking already, especially for a newly updated model. And it seems noisy too. That's just two things that would eventually but quickly drive me crazy in a vehicle I had to drive every day. For the price, I'd rather get a CPO Audi or something.
Thanks for the input! The interior seems to be a love or hate sort of thing from other comments on the last video lol. I would like it to be more practical. An Audi would be great...they’ve done some really nice things...I hope I can get my hands on one soon. Thanks for watching!
@@mrsj1417 I like the interior design because it's not trendy, but rather classy and somewhat timeless. I also have a Honda Element which is far more noisy and crude. All other reviews that I've read praise the 2019 for being very quite with near luxury quality interior. An Audi Q5, Bmw X3, or Porsche Macan with the same equipment cost $15k to $19k more.
My Wife and I purchased a CX5 in December 2018 the model is: 2019 CX5 Grand Touring we mainly bought it because it was the only vehicle we were able to find that was 100% Japanese Made. Owning a 2015 4 Runner previously that wasn’t, and was happy to trade it in. No complaints after owning it a little under 3 months now.
Just got a 2016 GT myself. Its a very nice driving SUV that you can actually have fun with! Plus Im saving $10 a week in gas compared to my 07 Outback 2.5i.
My wife and I love our 2018 CX-5 GT Premium Package. The bose sound system is amazing and the super quiet ride is excellent on long trips! We typically average 31 mpg @ 75mph & 28mpg in town! The price point is what sold us.
What a coincidence that you posted this today. My Mom bought one of these yesterday from us. She got a ‘17 Dark Blue Touring with 6,000 miles on it and loves it so far. I’m impressed by the overall quality feel and of course the driving experience. It is a bit tight on overall space, but perfect for what she needs. It did take a while to teach her the command controller though 😂. I agree 💯 with you on the fact that Mazda is so under appreciated in the market. I think if people would actually go look at them and drive them, they would realize they are great cars and much more upscale then a comparable Honda or Toyota.
Haha that’s awesome. Super cool. I hope she continues to enjoy it. I could imagine teaching someone that thing...I’m sure my mom would need lessons lol. Thanks for stopping by 😁👍
Great car, I have a touring cx5 18 snow white pearl,couldn't be happier, great value luxury feeling and 100 percent made in Hiroshima Japan with quality parts. The only downside is the space being a lil tight, but for the quality and accessories I didn't care much.
I love my 2018 Mazda 3 GT! You're completely right about the quality of these vehicles and the way they drive. Every time I push it, it always delivers for me!
Jonathan Schmidt, totally agree with your impressions abt Mazda in general...talking to the sales guys that is their biggest challenge is getting potential buyers to even consider the brand and go into their showrooms! However, once they test drive they become hooked! Unfortunately lots of people flock to the Honda’s and Toyota’s without even considering other brands...
tekz agreed. I’ve owned a few Mazda’s over the years (04 3 sedan, 04 3 hatch, 10 3 hatch, 12 6, and a 15 CX5). My sister has a 13 CX5 and my mom has 17 CX5 and had a 00 626. They have all been good cars. They drive better then the Honda’s and Toyota’s I’ve driven. I guess back in the day they were as reliable as the others, but now I think they are. Definitely better then the Honda’s now a days. They always seem to be favorites of journalists, but not the public.
I pick up my 2019GT on Thursday and reviews like yours make me feel like I have made a really good decision! I went with the machine grey with white leather interior and 19’’ alloys. So excited 🥰
Ah that’s awesome! Great choice! It’s such a nice vehicle, despite my minor complaints (which I have on any vehicle). In fact I’m looking at possibly buying one right now as well. I hope you enjoy it and thanks for sharing 😁👍
@@greggf6831 I am actually really happy with it Gregg! Things I love: speed/torque, how it handles on the highway and in the rain, the luxurious leather interior, boot size. Things that are ok: display size, interior cabin space, size of front seats are slightly smaller vs other cars I have driven, blind spot indications are a little annoying. Things I don't like: short middle arm rest, awkward placement of cup holders below arm rest, small visors, multimedia delay on start, display is not really touch screen, nonsense apple play connectivity. Knowing what I know now, I still think the car is great value for the price and I am pretty sure the resale will still be pretty good.
I have a 2019 Signature and I'm very happy with it. I can live with it's shortcomings considering the price point. However, I am looking forward to the redesigned version with it's rumored inline 6, eight speed trans, rear drive bias, and increased dimensions. I just hope they don't drop the ball and sacrifice quality.
Thank you for the honest update. I'll be purchasing a CX-5 as a 2nd vehicle to do some long distance driving across Canada and the USA. Most likely going to get a 2019 or 2020. Cheers from Toronto!
Just completed 3 ,000 in our's it's brilliant all the way, narrow too which is very handy for narrow English country lanes. however I do agree the centre console armrest and navigation dial let an almost perfect car down. Needs seat mounted-fold down armrests a lower longer storage tray. I think we will be keeping this for a long time. The tech list is phenomenal and works a treat.
UnseenSpirit technology ex. Lane keep assist, forward collision warning, better ride quality (more cushiony and airy), supposedly better road sound insulation although my 2019 cx5 is still a bit loud on road noise. Led headlights/tail lights. Honestly not much of a noticeable difference besides the screen in the dash (speedometer is now a screen instead of a fixed dial) but lacking so much customizebility, the speedometer can’t be changed to display anything else besides the speed! Very disappointing! Any way you go, good luck to you!
I have the exact same car and your comments mirror mine. I had the 2018 before turbo was available and upgraded to the 2019 and LOVE the extra boost and with AWD it’s just a blast to drive.
Nice. I had a 2019 cx 5 touring and upgraded to a 2021 carbon edition turbo cx 5 with awd and loving it. Even has updated infotainment, 10.3 inch screen and standard remote start
Just purchased a 2021.5 cx5 after a week of driving it I’m very happy. I drive for a living and I jump in the cx5 after a couple hundred miles daily and I enjoy my drive home as well as my drive to work.
Great video Nolan. Thanks for pointing out that the arm rest is too short. Although the CX-5 is a great package overall, especially the power train, its little things like the arm rest that are a deal breaker for me.
I bought my 2019 cx5 just over a year ago, and it’s the little things that make me not love it. I really thought I would, but after driving a larger suv for 12 years, the cargo space really bothers me. Yes, with the rear seats up, it is really small. Storage is horrible and the arm rest too small and too far back. There is no way to pull the drive side door closed if it is open all the way. I have to get out and pull it closer. But my biggest complaint is it sits too low . I have to use a cushion. Real leather seats and Im sitting on plastic. I’m guessingI will sell it before the 2nd anniversary. It’s pretty, and fun to drive on a highway, but highways don’t get visited everyday. Around town driving for me is not pleasant.
A lady just asked me about my 2019 CX-5 at the Petsmart parking lot and said she was getting one too. I think this is a really popular car for 2019. She told me she got the Signature but I told her I only got the GT with the premium package because AWD isn't really needed here in Florida and I am mostly in the city so the better gas mileage is better than the turbo for me.
I bought a 2013 CX5 first year. I had the first one in our area. Mine is the Grand Touring, which was the very top of the line at that point. This has been a phenomenal car! A real pleasure to drive. Easy to drive. The only real complaint I have is the road noise. Great car! Oh, yeah, it’s metallic silver with black leather interior. AWD.
That’s great to hear, thanks for sharing! I was very impressed with it. Not sure what it’s like riding in the 2013 models, but this one was quieter than expected. They probably added insulation and sound suppression. Thanks again!
Prime Autotainment, they’ve added it since then. My daughter has a 2016. It’s quiet, the controls are a dial in the console. While driving mine she remarked that you can’t do anything on the Nav screen while you’re driving. So that’s a change, as well. I don’t regret buying this car, at all. I would love to have a new one. Of course!
We live in New Zealand and bought a new CX-5 a few months ago in red. Ours is the 2.2 Diesel (twin turbo) . So much more torque than the petrol powered versions we test drove but we hadn't tried the turbo 2.5 petrol as it wasn't available at the time. We love it, it replaces our first model CX-5 we bought in 2013, also a 2.2 Diesel. Very quiet and reliable.
I just got a 2019 CX-5. Likes: 1. Driving Dynamics 2. Premium interior - you can definitely feel the premium-ness 3. Sound system and HUD 4. Turbo charged engine 5. Overall ride quality Dislikes: 1. Infotainment system 2. Fuel cap button (old fashioned) 3. Horrible back up camera with no grid lines 4. Center arm rest. I've known the points mentioned in the dislikes before purchasing the car but most of them won't effect the drive. Like you open the fuel cap probably once in ten days, back up camera just for a few seconds and then done. So they don't bother much. Definitely a great car!!!
I am very surprised by the comments on cargo room. Cubic feet mean nothing unless you’re filling your trunk with golf balls. For a small SUV the size is perfectly practical for any daily use.
Connecticut Dashcam yep I totally understand that. Most people don’t stack stuff or truly fill it up to feel like they’re sacrificing space. Honestly there’s not much I don’t like...I basically just mentioned it because statistically it’s less than competitors. But excellent point and thanks for watching!
It’s a valid complaint. This thing seats 5 but good luck fitting luggage for five unless you’re stacking it in the roof rack, so that rules out rides to the airport or even Lowes for that matter.
Agree... anything with a hatch is pretty usable. If you have a family taking road trips with lots of luggage then you’d probably need to go to the next class size though. I’d like to see Mazda make the new 6 a hatchback like the VW Arteon, Audi A5 and A7. The hatch makes the trunk space so much more accessible. I once fit 2 washer/dryer pedestals in an Acura RSX, and a large trash can from Home Depot another time... would not have been possible with a traditional trunk.
My Wife and I purchased a CX5 in December 2018 the model is: 2019 CX5 Grand Touring we mainly bought it because it was the only vehicle we were able to find that was 100% Japanese Made. In less than 3 months the only complaint I have is the rear view camera which when it's raining is hard to see through as well collects dirt because of where it’s positioned amongst the elements, Mazda could’ve hidden a bit more under the hatch in my opinion. No complaints otherwise.
That’s awesome! Great choice with the GT, its a great value and I totally understand the Japanese build! Glad to hear your thoughts and experience with it and I hope you continue to enjoy! 👍
@@HomestarAK LMAO. None of the above, just hard to find a vehicle that doesn’t have a mixture of other country hands in the mix such as the 2015 Toyota 4 runner I traded in for the Mazda it was 90% Japanese Made and 10% Canadian. I started to have problems with it with less than 20,000. miles on it before trading it in. My previous 4 Runner was 100% Japanese Made and was a 1994 Toyota 4 Runner with over 600,000 miles on it before one piston went bad. I honestly should’ve kept it and never bought the 2015 Toyota 4 Runner and had the dealership disclosed to me that it wasn’t 100% made in Japan there was no way I would have bought it. My philosophy is simple when purchasing a vehicle, the maker will never build with the quality and integrity needed for longevity if it’s not built by the original location of the manufacturer it was designed to be built from.( Example) The Japanese maker in this case will point the finger at the faulty workmanship towards the Canadian builder even if it’s only 10%. Case closed !
These comments are about the 2020 version of the CX-5, which has additional sound deadening and a more compliant suspension. I'm a motorhead and bought this for the spouse, but not before sizing up the competition. In a nutshell, nothing from Japan competes with the CX-5 for design and driving experience. And that leaves the Germans. The second-from-the-top CX5, the Grand Touring Reserve, has the mandatory turbo engine (the normally aspirated one is underpowered), AWD, a leather interior, and a TON of convenience, driver assist, and safety features. Priced around $36,200, the 2020 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring Reserve absolutely holds its place among the German competition in the red-hot compact SUV segment. The competition from Mercedes, BMW, and Audi start at around $50,000. These high entry prices disguise the catastrophic residuals with German SUVs. I speak from experience. Last week I traded in a 2013 BMW X1, which was a money pit as are all German cars after warranty expires, and got a lousy $6100 trade-in allowance for it. The German SUVs (and all German cars) depreciate terribly, which is why people lease them for three years then toss them and grab a new one. There's only one problem with this strategy: leasing is expensive! But some people are willing to pay a premium for what they perceive as status. Obviously they know nothing about cars. Mazda builds the most driver-engaging cars in Japan. Not only are they fun to drive, their reliability is second to none. If you have a Mazda SUV to sell, no matter what its age, people will want it. But which one to get? The Grand Touring Reserve has everything the Signature has except Napa leather and an all-round cam -- neither of which is a big deal because the leather that comes with the GTR is good quality. You've got to get the turbo -- the normally aspirated engine is underpowered. And the GTR is entry for the turbo. The GTR is a few thousand more than the levels below it but its feature set, esp. the 2020 model, puts it in the $50k class with the German compact SUVs, which get ridiculously expensive with options. Definitely the GTR is the CX-5 to get! The reviewer is mostly correct. (I know, I have purchased a 2020 GTR.) I'd argue with him a bit about interior space. It's true the storage area in the rear is not as big as some of the competition, but more important to me, the rear seats fit two American adults comfortably, without apologies. What we have here is the most compact way to seat four American grown-ups in genuine comfort. And I would argue there is still adequate storage space out back. The reviewer is right about the inadequacy of the arm rests. But when you own one, you adapt and it is not a big deal. The lo-res backup camera is a tiny inconvenience. And I disagree with him about using the screen's controller. As with the arm rests, you get used to it and it is not an issue. Among the reviewer's many misses is the implementation of Apple CarPlay, which is excellent! And about remote start -- what is the point of it anyway? To burn even more fossil fuels for nothing? Unless you live in Alaska, it's pointless. The reviewer does not mention so many class-leading aspects of the GTR: the fantastic front seats, complete with heat AND ventilation. And, the incredible cruise control, which controls the throttle and brakes in stop-and-go freeway traffic. There's lane assist to keep you from drifting laterally as you talk on the superbly integrated iPhone. And above all that -- there is the driving experience. Though this SUV is insulated from the chaos of today's commuter traffic, it retrains its engagement with the road, something every motorhead ranks at the top of the desirability list. This is a compact SUV designed by car guys, not bean counters, and as such it fills the gap between Japanese utility and European exclusivity. To those of us who perceive SUVs as lacking in what we love about real cars, the CX-5 in Grand Touring Reserve trim is, I can personally endorse, a compact SUV that delivers the goods . . . including a superior driving experience.
I agree with you in many points, one detail that Mazda skipped was to put a plastic footrest, I live in a rainy city and I had to cut a piece of rubber to cover the carpet. Another thing I ve read is that this new model, after a couple thousand miles begins with squeaky noises on the dashboard that can get very annoying.
A great review! Thank you so much. In my opinion, there are few issues CX5 more dislike than the others, besides your mentions: 1. Only a six-speed automatic is available for the CX-5. Compared to eight-speed automatic is standard on the others, for better acceleration and lower engine speed on the highway. 2. The other Brand's engines have been used the cast iron block for durability, while almost the CX-5’s engines use an aluminum block. Aluminum engine blocks are much more prone to warp and crack at high temperatures than cast iron.
Thank you very much! Great points. I'm surprised they're still using the 6 speed. It's smooth but like you said, it could benefit from more gears. I wouldn't be surprised to see that change soon. Thanks for the info on the engine too, i wasn't aware of that!
Quang Ly Anh the standard 2.5 could benefit from an extra gear or 2, but the turbo is perfectly suited with the 6 speed; any more gears and the torque curve would become pointless and unusable
I rented a cx 5 for a week.the low point as for me I don't know others is the seats are a bit hard after couple of hours I felt uncomfortable. I think they should redesign the seats.
I took 2 test drives of cx-5 from two different companies. For some reason, I felt more at comfortable and kinda relaxed on the Luxury edition rather then on the Signature one. Also, have no idea why, but first car had more leg room, the second one I had my knee always hitting the middle.
We like the mid-level Touring model CX-5. The steering feel and the way it comes out of a stoplight for power are very good. The Subaru Crosstrek had better brake feel. We are also considering a little smaller CX-30 next time, if it does well for reliability for the next few Consumer Reports magazine April car guides, at a library for free. We like that they moved the front cupholders closer to the dash.
I agree with all your points. All valid. I hate the fact that the center arm rest is so short. Other than that my touring is definitely the best value compared to others. I’m just a bit concerned with overall reliability.
audax989, I used to own a 2006 Mazda 5 Crossover and I found the Mazda to be one of the most reliable import brands on the market and Mazda seems to stand behind their vehicles. The Japanese at Mazda Corporation not only in Nagasaki and Hiroshima but also at their US Corporation take great pride in designing reliable and safe vehicles and although some designs seem dated they believe that simplicity is better than making a vehicle of austerity plagued with defects.
Thanks Nolan! A friend of mine has this vehicle and she loves it. She likes that it’s the right amount of power and overall value for the money. The only thing she dislikes, is like you mentioned, cargo capacity.
That’s awesome, I’m glad to hear it. I understand what she’s saying...maybe they will stretch it out a bit next refresh but who knows. Thanks for watching! 👍
Coming from a 2014 Jeep Cherokee I am disappointed in the driving dynamics, particularly when it's gunned the initial torque steer until it changes to all wheel drive is quite noticeable. It does not feel as solid on the road as the Cherokee either. But I came for the extra power, it's a bit throttle sensitive when moving away from a stop and I'd prefer more power up the rev range a bit however there is zero turbo lag, power is instantaneous. No doubt though Mazda have done a great job, it's a keeper.
I really want to get a cx5, but as you mentioned the cargo space is limited, and I couldn’t fit a rear facing car seat comfortably. So I had to go with the CRV. Looking forward to what the cx70 has to offer
Stop/start technology is a deal breaker. Imagine being in stop and go traffic and the car keeps turning on and off. More sensors means more that can break. You can disable it but you have to do it every time you start the car.
The center console on the 2016 CX5 is better designed in my opinion. The cup holders dont get in your way and the arm rest has an extension for the driver.
Still love mine. Only SUV I would buy again. Decent fuel economy. Just got 8.5 l on a 160 km drive in City and 80 km hyw. Mine is the turbo. Maybe seat can be longer to offer more thigh support.
This vehicle wasn't on my radar when I went car shopping earlier this year. Decided after watching another review / comparison video to take it for a test drive. I got the touring reserve and I love it. Back up camera and no remote start does indeed suck...
That’s awesome, I’m glad to hear it! It’s a great vehicle and my dislikes were definitely minor. My wife and I will consider this for our next vehicle too. Enjoy it 😁👍
I prefer driving feel over cargo space. Same thing goes for automatic transmission over cvt (no real manuals option is really sad). I wish they had the option for the turbo in cheaper version. I would have take it in my 2018 Gs so I'm not stuck with the leather interior and the tech option package.
Thank you so much for this review. I'm glad you posted a video about this after driving it for about a week to get a real feel on it. It's about time for me to buy a new vehicle and I'm really looking into getting the CX-5 Touring. I've been looking into the Honda CR-V as well. I'm 6 feet tall and I've seen a few complaints about how tight it feels if you're kind of tall. I'm going to test drive this to be sure but I'm still liking what this vehicle has to offer.
@Wally Win I'm in the same boat. I'm not sure which to buy. The CR-V EX or the CX-5 Touring. The CX is small and the navigation screen is horrible. And, as the video states, no car starter unless you add the mobile app and pay $65/yr. Plus, the CR-V has lane steering assist. But the CR-V has cloth seats and the CX-5 a better sound system and engine.
@@brianskibo5886 Right! I love the CX-5 interior but CR-V EX offers some great features and has plenty of room for my height. I saw that Honda CR-V's were having a fuel leak in the oil system. I think they have fixed this problem for the newer models. I still haven't made a decision yet but I'm looking into all the reviews I can for both vehicles.
@@winbornew I was told they fixed the oil problem and no problem has been found at my dealership. But that could be dealer talk. I'm only 5'10 so height isn't an issue, but sometimes I travel and I lay down in the cargo area so that may cause a problem Haha. Cloth seating makes me nervous in the Honda though. I have them at $27,239. I have Mazda around the same price with the Bose add-on, remote start, power liftgate, moonroof, but the insurance will be $550/yr more and I'll have to travel 30 minutes for service. And the salesman just lied about the Mazda getting better milage. It doesn't so that is a turnoff.
@@winbornew I am 6 foot 2 and currently starting to look for a car. I am in the same boat you were in. Did you end up with the cx 5 or Cr-V? I really want to love the CX-5 but the navigation screen is essential for me. I travel and camp a lot, I drive close to 9,000 miles per year to explore places and the navigation helps me get around. I currently drive a 2001 Ford Focus so I'm not too concerned about space since ANYTHING is better than what I drive now haha. The CR-V however just seems to bulky and not as stylish.
Remote start is totally unnecessary. Also, WHERE HAS HE BEEN or WHERE IS HE AT? - He said the Rav 4 and others out sell the Mazda suv - -- Just in a great certain part of California there are way more Mazda cx5s than any other SUV on the road ....One time I saw 4 of them driving in two adjacent lanes - 2 was in one lane and 2 were in the other - I see all the colors
Maybe in California it’s not wanted..and of course it’s not a necesssity but when temperatures consistently rise over 100 degrees and below zero degrees with ultra thick ice and frost on the windows...it is much appreciated, although a serious waste of gas unfortunately There are several other 2 row crossovers that outsell the Cx-5 by a large margin. That’s not saying it’s a bad vehicle...I love it and would love to own one myself
The mid-level Touring model of the CX-5 is nice- a lot of features for the money, and Consumer Reports magazine survey results give it the highest reliability rating, like the Mazda 6. We are much happier with the Pirelli Scorpion Verde tires, compared to the stock tires for the 2013 and 2015 CX-5. Our 2018 CX-5 original tires feel better. The Touring model back-up camera is simpler and better than the 360 camera. The best part for our test drives compared to others is the steering feel and how it corners.
i know its an old review ,but i just purchased a used cx-5 grand touring and i must say that the backup and 360 view camera looks very Crisp ! no resolution .. so maybe something with you infotainment ?
I’ve heard that too. For me at 59” I was fine, but I think the biggest complaint is the width or the area by your knees where people might feel like the center console is cramming them (which it seems to more than some other vehicles). If you like to have your knees spread, it would probably feel pretty tight. Sorry, with me being shorter, I can’t say too much though lol. Definitely worth getting a good long test drive with it to see if your comfortable. Despite my dislikes, I really like the Cx-5 and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it
Don't forget about the shoddy Soul Red Metallic (46V) paint. My 2018 has little pin head size chips all over the hood. Spent months with the Mazda dealership and USA, but ultimately the warranty claim was denied ...don't breathe too hard on this paint or it will fall off. Buyer beware and do your homework. Finally, the 2018 model didn't offer the turbo ...good thing my wife drives it, as the motor is certainly anemic.
Of the three vehicles where Mazda uses their 2.5L Turbo (in the US), its application in the CX-5 is probably the best. In the Mazda6 it works well but the competition from the 2.0L Accord and the V6 Camry is especially tough. Likewise, in the CX-9 the availability of naturally aspirated V6 engines from almost every other manufacturer makes it use in a two ton vehicle at least questionable. But despite its numerous strong points, the CX-5 suffers from the same problem as its Mazda stablemates. The "U" in a CUV stands for "utility." And as Nolan points out, the interior space in the CX-5 is tiny compared to its rivals. At 59.6 cubic feet of overall cargo space it has 25% less cargo space than a CRV. It provides only about 6 cubic feet more cargo space than a VW Golf. And the Golf is a foot shorter. Looking for a vehicle with the looks but lacking the "utility" of a compact crossover? The CX-5 is perfect.
You always make such great points, I appreciate it! I agree about the 2.5T in the CX-5..it’s a great match. That space compared to the golf is insane. I’m actually testing a Golf this week and I’m very impressed by its usable space. It’s awesome. Thanks for watching and as always I appreciate the comments! 👍
Forced Induction I appreciate it very much! I try to keep it balanced and keep in mind what each vehicles intended purpose is. Thanks again and take care!
I'm actually glad Mazda doesn't offer a remote start option on their trim levels. The FOB that comes with the car has like a 150 ft range. Aftermarket remote starts have like a half mile range or better. Big advantage if you work at a big company and have to park far away from the building (like me). Agree with everything else. Nice review.
Weird thing: my brother and I have basically the same 2016 mazda3 except I have the grand touring and he has just the touring. I have the best backup cam I have ever seen, but his is pretty low res like you said
Had the 2016. It was okay. Thought I'd upgrade a bit for the new safety features. Went to the 2018 CX-5. I have this nagging feeling that the 2016 handled better. Had better gas mileage and full navigation. This 2018 has less road noise but is very sluggish accelerating from a stand still. Operation of various settings is more complicated. The radio comes on without touching anything and the doors lock on their own when I am just sitting in the car, which can be quite annoying if you bump something or open a door. The alarm comes on. This is my third Mazda since 2014. Not so sure I'll get another.
Long term owner of a 2017 cx 5 with the 2.5l inline 4. It handled well and was fun to tear around in. Had great gas mileage and comfort. The only major problem we had, was reliability.... got to 18,000mi/30,000km when the engine lost 4 quarts of oil and spun some bearings. After that happened, we traded it in and got another toyota. Personally, I'll never buy another mazda again in my life. That's piss poor to only make it 18,000mi/30,000km on an engine. But you can all learn the hard way when you're replacing your engine too.
@@MrAmber703 Sure did. It was also checked regularly by the employees at the gas station my wife manages. My question for you is, do you know about their failing oil sending units? Because the manager at the dealership sure knew about that issue.
@@MrAmber703 I feel like I have about 20 years experience with vehicles over what you have. I grew up with a dad who is a mechanic who made me turn wrenches before I could even drive. Honestly, quit putting faith into a brand because their old (ford) engines lasted a long time. Mazda is young into making their own engines and they used Ford engines up until about 10 years ago. Even the Mazda b2200 is the same truck as the Ford Ranger.
@@thepooterrooter3917 I didn’t mean to offend you. Obviously, I don’t know you and you don’t know me. I literally just wanted clarification since your post is vague.
I'm on the fence...lots of year end deals 6k off price on Signature.mh other choice ford escape titanium..but I'm leaning for the warranty..mazda warranty insane , unlimited kms
@@PrimeAutotainment its actually the 2019 signature im looking at , huge year end sales ,very surprising no real shortage to pick from.the mazda has less room inside but i do like it.it be my first mazda ever if i go for it.
Brian M personally I would still go with the Mazda. It impressed me despite my small complaints. You’ve picked a good time of year to go for the 2019 models...if you get either one, hope you enjoy it!
I saw the reviews for the app. Why can't they make it like Honda's and add it on the remote? It's funny when car manufacturers want to delve into the tech world and they fail miserably.
I agree with all your cons and pros . what id like to add a Con , its the leg space it's a little narrow . i think the center council is to wide which takes away the width of the seats.. I own the 2018 cx5 gt for about 7 month nd i absolutely love it. i added some goodies like beats cat back exhaust witch sounds great. I hope they come out with a aftermarket armrest that slides forward ., that would be awesome .
They're out, go to the website of a local dealer, and search for it. Toyota did the same thing with the 2020 RAV4, the first few weeks it wasn't advertised at all. My guess, they want to sell the 2019s!
Claudius Thank you! Haha good eye...I think it was just from having the signal indicator was on for a right turn and it just clicked back...I guess I never noticed if it was bumping or anything
they didn't name the specs in my country as "sport" "grand touring" "signature" etc. they just named them based on the engine, and "mid" "high" and "high plus"
So expensive though, in Canada for a few thousand more I can get an Audi A4 Quatro or a Highlander for same price .maybe a few less features, but I would take any of those two any day. If the base model is not good enough, I'm not interested in these 'luxury' trims.
Great job once again Nolan! You have the gift of doing reviews that are detailed, interesting and yet easy to understand. Thank you! I really like the CX 5 too. I actually think it compares favourably with many entry level luxury SUVs. I am strongly considering purchasing the Signature model this spring. What are your thoughts as it compares with the base luxury brand models?
Thank you so much, I truly appreciate the kind words! I think it does too, although I don’t have a lot of experience with luxury brand models...from what I hear it’s very competitive with those. I’ll possibly be getting an Acura RDX to year soon and could compare a little better...but for the money...it offers a lot of what those do and certainly drives better than any of the mainstream competitors with handling, agility, smoothness of power delivery. I wish I could help more when comparing to luxury models though
There is not much visibility on the left side of drivers seat w that thick frame too! But i do love verything about it! I wish i could turn on w remote def!
The sales man told me that Mazda made around 248 upgrades on my new CX-5. I only see two. Wind/road noise and...oh wait, can't think of any others. Still hating the seats big time. Had to buy a $40 seat cushion.
Turbos are not reliable in the long run, and what's the story with the trend to smaller and smaller windows? Manufacturers give us what they want and tell us that's what we want.
You do realize that every single semi truck, HD and construction machinery is run by the turbocharged engine and nobody complains. Turbo has nothing to do with the poor reliability. It’s the way some companies cheap out on components and engineering that makes their engines less reliable.
This engine hasn't only been used in the cx-5. Its the same turbo engine that already was used first in the Mazda 6 and cx-9, they just also added to the cx-5. So it's NOT a new engine
It’s first application was the 2016 model CX-9 and only the Mazda6 since 2018 so there’s no telling if it’s a 200-300k engine. A lot of it is still basses off the NA 2.5 which is good but I guess time will tell
Hi Nolan, I'm also a PT and looking into getting a compact SUV. I had a left RTC repair this year so arm support is important to me. I like Mazda but it sounds like the CX-5 may not be the best choice for me. Do you have any recommendations for a compact SUV that offers good arm support/positioning as well as good performance?
Hey Jim, sorry for the late response. Even though I complained about those things...they weren’t bad enough to deter me from recommending this vehicle. They certainly annoyed me at times but not quite that much. It’s kind of limiting to find a sporty compact one...but I really liked the Acura RDX drive and handling. The Cadillac XT4 drives well but seems overpriced. Possibly the Audi Q5 or SQ5 if you’d spend more for quite a bit more performance. At the CX-5 price point though...it’s hard to beat unless you’d settle for less performance. If you haven’t driven one yet, I’d recommend trying a long test drive or even taking one home for the night to be sure it would be ok for your arm and ergonomics. Good luck with your Rotator Cuff repair! Recently we added an OT to the staff and they’ve been getting most of our shoulder patients which stinks 😕
Hi Nolan, Thanks for getting back to me. I have a friend that has a 2016 CX-5 and I really like how it drives and handles. I'm leaning heavily to the CX-5 for those reasons and for what I feel is the quality interior at that price point. Thanks for the well wishes on the shoulder too. It's not easy but I knew that going in.
Hi! am gonna buy Tiguan Highline with Rline package or Mazda cx5 signature next month. could you give me some advice? which one do you prefer? Thank you
That’s awesome! Well I haven’t driven a Tiguan to truly give you good advice on it. I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend this Mazda though. Good luck with your decision 👍
I think I will keep my 2016 CX5. Drives great, economical, fun, plenty of room for me, great in snow, very reliable...and it has the last CD player. CDs sound best, don't care what you say. Mazda CX5 is a great all around suv!
Dang I honestly haven’t driven either of those. I’d take this over the Cherokee, but the Grand Cherokee is another story. Wish I could say more! It seems really nice though
@@PrimeAutotainment If you didn't drive a Cherokee before how do you know that you would take Mazda 1st. Grand Cherokee are amazing buddy, plenty of space at the front & the back.Especially leg room which Mazda doesn't have and that is very Important. And other things It would be a novel to write it here Grand Ch. Is very good you can't compare with Mazda cause Grand is on another level. Also on 5:42 when you turning the steering wheel watch how you hit the Indicator that's not very good made by Mazda isn't. Mazda needs to grove up to get where the pretty much other SUV are.
