Hidden Patterns In Roulette Results - Learn To Bet Smarter 

This is the age old argument that divides academics and gamblers alike. We tried to do it justice with our first video on the gamblers fallacy ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oioOoATeYq4.html as we knew as soon as we started posting videos this will point will always be the sticking point. While we accept and agree the wheel, coin dice or whatever have no memory and do not in any way physically affect future outcomes, it is you, the observer that brings probability into the equation just by observing. So by writing down any results you see, today, tomorrow, next year etc and keep adding to them every time you play roulette you will be governed by probability, there's no escaping it. So what you have seen affects what you will see. The real answer lies in quantum mechanics, in something called the double slit experiment, explained in this link by scientist Jim Al-Khalili as this is way above my pay grade! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-A9tKncAdlHQ.html Many thanks for your comment.

@@roulette-professionalThat is your second fallacy. Quantum mechanics only applies to sub-atomic particles. Quantum mechanics holds no sway over anything made of atoms, like dice or roulette wheels.

Thats right @@roulette-professional

That is not entirely true at all. While each spin is independent and has no influence over the next spin a collection of spins always tell a story. They can show you high, low, red, black, odd, even, 1st dozen, 2nd dozen. 3rd dozen, etc. There is also a principle called the Law of Thirds. So while each spin is not reliant on the previous spin you can in effectively approximate a random outcome based on previous spins. That is not just a guess, but a proven practice, which is why this video was titled "hidden PATTERNS in roulette results". Follow the pattern. ;-)

@@holyroller6978Sorry, you are just applying the gamblers fallacy to a collection of spins instead of just one. Everything is a pattern and their is no way to guess what pattern will come next. You can fool yourself because a system will seem to work for a while but in the long run they will all fail.

Thanks a million . . . it may take a while, but we have 6 years of research to share, we have found so much interesting stuff its hard to know where to start!

Thank you for your comment its really appreciated, we are working hard on some more videos for you . . .

Fantastic!

Glad you enjoyed!

Glad you think so!

Thank you too!

Well thank you very much!

Some people say the trend-is-your-friend and too a certain extent there is some provable truth too it.

Thank you, glad you enjoyed it . . .

@@roulette-professionali play roulette everyday damn near for over a year an i dont understand this video at all

Coming soon!

Has the sheet been created yet ? @@roulette-professional

@@ROULETTE-REALITY Yes its here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3zux-XJekyE.htmlsi=qJHvaVV9BPLd5HBg

There will be a follow on video to this so yes we will try and give some different bet size examples! Thanks for watching!

Thank you for the comment - let us know how you get on with your simulator . . .

obviously, likely to not work in a simulator, and if you does, you win no money anyway. you have to skip to real life. watch the people around you winning, yeah,, that is how to learn it

You are right we are using the law of large numbers, however you can predict the effects of this with a good deal off accurracy - try watching our videos Why Clockwork Roulette Systems Fail and also Do Casinos Cheat Episode 5 both of those should clarify a number of facts about predicting result without needing large amounts of spins.

Why thank you very much - Never been called that before!

If you are monitoring the dozens for example and a 12 lands then that is part of the first dozen so you count a 1 for your first spin, if 23 lands next then that is part of the second dozen so you add 1+2=3 that was the result from two spins combined, so now you have a 2 from the last (23) spin, if 35 lands you get a 3 so your next combined result is 2+3=5. You are trying to predict what the combined result will be next. Your last spin (35) was a 3 so you can only get a 6, 5 or 4 for your next result, if you graph is showing that any of those numbers are a reasonable amount behind like if the 6 was behind then you should bet on the third dozen to get combined 3+3=6 Thanks for the comment!

The system improves in the follow on video which we are working on at the moment . . . Thanks for watching!

I would enjoy hearing more about this. Got any reading recommendations?

That is the focus of this channel and we will be showing many of those hidden patterns in the coming weeks and months - thank you for your comment.

Thank you for that feedback - we are new to making videos - if you think watching them is complicated - try making them 😂 - its a nightmare, you script and record something then watch back and think that doesn't make sense, lets try again, by the time we release it we have produced it 4 or 5 times already lol. Its an interesting journey - hopefully we are improving.

@@roulette-professional yeah. I understand what you're saying. And if you say you guys are new to making videos, I would not believe that because the videos are super duper precise and nicely made to understand things very easily. It's just that the things are so technical and makes it difficult for people like us to understand. But watching it like 2-3 times does the trick for me.🙌

@@roulette-professional Do you understand that if this system works, and enough people start to use it then both your personal gambling and this RU-vid channel will be useless in time? Why is that? Because every Casino will be changing the rules of the game. It's only smart to continue with this channel if the system in fact does not work... So which is it, are you not so smart and share a system that DOES work, or are you very smart and share it because it does NOT work? It can't be both.

@@boris9047 No system works a 100% of the time, the dynamic systems we produce are better than clockwork systems but not guaranteed. There are hundreds of good systems to play but they don't all suit everyone. Everyone is at a different level of knowledge and skill, there will always be new players and everyone plays at different times, and different stakes, different starting points, so even if everyone started playing the same system you would be playing it differently as the spins you have seen will be different from mine even if you only started playing a few spins in front or behind me. Now what's the chances of (1) every roulette player actually researching how to play roulette on youtube (2) everyone researching roulette on youtube actually finding my channel (3) everyone choosing the same system from all the systems we have demonstrated (4) everyone wanting to play it, just read through some of the comments on our various videos, some people love them some people hate them. and I'm sure there are many other reasons why this is just not an issue to be concerned with . . .

​@@roulette-professionalOk, but a system that is not 100% profitable in the long run is not good at all.

That looks interesting, we will be producing a series of videos simulating different strategies over a fixed 40,000 spins placing their results into a leader board to see which system fairs the best, we will include this if you don't mind?

@@roulette-professional Absolutely, I'd be interested in the results.

I do something very similar. I use 20's and teens. Look for any pattern you can track and capitalize on that. Kinda like card counting in blackjack, these patterns do reveal themselves if you are looking.

@@HENSLEYDMB Patterns do reveal themselves. Perfectly put.

Thanks Mitch, there will be a follow up video monitoring more than one group at a time which gives even more stability! Thanks for watching!

Thank you . . . more coming soon . . .

That is an Excellent Question!! I would answer with a short video but a 1 minute short will not be enough to do it justice - so we are going to turn this video into a "Part 1" and produce another one as "Part 2" which will include answering this important question. Basically if you are flat betting your expectation is always the negative 2.70027% on any single spin. This only changes when you start a continuation bet like a progression and/or use data to make an informed prediction. For example in the video we showed a standard 10% minimum progression, if you monitored the data as demonstrated and decide you aim for a 4 and felt comfortable you would win in the next say 1 to 10 spins, then your expectation is shown under the ROI (return on investment) in the progression, a win on the first spin and you won at 200%, win on spin 10 and its 10%. Your expectation is therefore dynamic and constantly changing. Thank you for the question.

@@roulette-professional how can I contact you privately?

@@vvxf. rp@roulette-professional.com

Thank you so much! I AM RICH NOW!

are you serious mate

@@lb516 Of course I am serious. Not every dealer spins the wheel or the marble the same way. However, my question was did they crunch enough data to know if the graph can stay the same or does it need to change.

In theory, (its not a suggestion) you could even switch tables and continue, its not really the dealer or table that is the effect, its your observation of results and probability at work, after all the ball has no memory . . . I would make a note though and I am going to cover this with a part two to this video that you are best to scrap the piece of paper and start again every say 30-50 spins, ultimately the longer you play for or the more data you capture the less accurate it becomes, this is where chaos theory makes an appearance, the entropy of a random system increases over time and it becomes less predictable (think of weather prediction) it similar for roulette results. Those who do best get-in get-out with a few wins, then start again.

@@roulette-professionalwait what?!? u said the exact opposite thing in the thread above? You said when the results are big enough that’s when patterns emerg unfortunately people never spin more than 250 spins so they never see the patterns. am i missing something ?

@@drexlr613 Yes I can see your point. Running simulations on millions of spins is where you can learn what to expect from roulette results in terms of patterns that emerge over time, breaking a huge dataset into smaller and smaller chunks shows those patterns still exist but with less accuracy. So we know that in say 100 spins the even money bets will quickly conform towards their expectations most of the time and it will be harder to find bets (good outliers) in the data, but if you were following less pockets say the line bets for example then you would probably still find useful information in 100 spins. Patterns in large data are what occur naturally but its the non-patterns i.e. the outliers that give us the opportunities, so put another way if you just keep writing down the results without stopping then we know your results will emerge in to the same shape as the expectation which doesn't help you with any predictions, its only when your results are out of shape from the expectation pattern that you have some idea of what is going to happen, i.e. it has to conform towards the pattern so bet on the outliers. Experience will tell you how big of an outlier you need to wait for, the bigger the outlier the more chance of a win without going bust, but the size of the outliers you need depends on the number of pockets you are monitoring or betting on. I hope that helps, many thanks for your comment.

It took us a while to realise what you meant, I think you are referring to the first dice graphic around 0:48, at this point we was just introducing the fact were now 11 possible combined values - it wasn't to show every combination, just every possible value, otherwise there would of been 36 yellow lines all over the place. it was really just a flash-up graphic to make the point about 11 values before stating there is 36 ways to achieve them. when you move onto the next screen then we lay out every combination as a distribution. Thanks you for your comment though it made us re-check our work! lol

Never mind I saw what I was looking for at the 2:00 mark. It has the 1-3, 2 - 2 on it. I was too busy making my spreadsheet and I didnt see the full graphic. Got it now though 😊

@@roulette-professional - thanks for your help. I was able to get my spreadsheet finished. Now for testing spins. I am curious to see what your spreadsheet looks like. I think I started subscribing around 300+ people. You are currently over 743 with 12K views in 5 days. That is an incredible skyrocket start. Please keep up the great work and I look forward to many more of your videos! 🙂

Its here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3zux-XJekyE.htmlsi=MDLw2l-yN2_M42n2 well the first part anyway!

Good idea . . . we will definitely include it in the online version

​@@roulette-professionalwill you charge for it?

We are working on it . . . Cheers!

Please keep watching the channel I will be revealing at lot more as quick as I can and hopefully it will make more sense than the few basic videos we have put up so far. Just a thought - if you are saying its 1/38 chance that means you are playing American Roulette, please watch the following video from the 7 minutes and 15 seconds point, ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NpdRGBB81W0.html this will save you about 2.5% of your stake money - American Roulette has a lower pay out than European roulette you are effectively giving your money away and losing more often than you need to. Many thanks for your comment and watching the video.

There are strategies where players study the dealer by analyzing how/where they spin the ball. Are they spinning the ball from the same locations on left/right wheel spins, how fast/hard is each spin relative to the direction, then keeping track of where the ball lands in perspective to the wheel NOT the table. I do believe, like you, that each spin is an individual event separate from the previous, especially when players bet the felt as appose to the wheel. Ive seen banker win 18 times in a row in Baccarat, and a depth(miss) on a dozen in Roulette over 20 times. Mathematically x100 is certainly possible. :)

Thank you . . .

The might be a website launching soon that has something similar . . . Just saying . . .

I would . . . if I knew how! based on the feedback there is going to be a follow up, part 2 to this video, thanks for watching!

Thank you 😂

@@roulette-professional I knew you would appreciate that...😛

Stay away from gambling or you will regret it for the rest of your life...

I started about 6 years ago, when I went with a friend to a casino for the first time and like you I was fascinated by the math involved, after becoming completely absorbed by Roulette in particular and building all kinds of test models I showed my work to another friend and asked him if he thought I had a gambling problem, he smiled and said he thought its was more like a math addiction - but I can live with that. Gambling can be fun or destructive depending on your approach and your expectations, like anything, the more you learn the better chance you have of being successful at it. There are many forms of gambling out there including the stock market or running a business which can be a lot riskier than the more conventional forms of gambling. One the videos that inspired me to learn more about my new passion was about a guy called William Benter who gambled on horse racing, (of which I have no interest) but the difference between him and many other was his depth of knowledge, not necessarily about the horses themselves, but about the math behind the gambling - I've just found the link to the video - here it is - worth a watch ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-efBG1YfuNhg.html - enjoy! And, thank you for your comment . . .

​@@foodforthought9880Nope he's done

Law of averages is in play. Ball has no memory but laws of averages of the universe will not allow something to hit in area for to long

So true, thanks for the comment.

Yes I know, but there is no way you can predict what the next hit will be, I agree if you wait for a few spins eventually the ball will hit a certain number but can take 2 or 30 spins or more. @@user-uc9oz2kz4q

No but dealer has

@@user-uc9oz2kz4q you right

The world record for casino roulette wheels is 37 of the same color in a row. The probablity never changes, no matter what happens on previous spins.

@@TallBob1962 I agree, that's why I say, get in and get out if you can with a profit in the short term because if you sit long enough then you are in trouble, especially on a American Roulette wheel

@@mac5856Also a fallacy. Think about it. What changes from day to day? A set of roulette spins beginning when you quit until you begin the next day. Over the course of those, lets say, 23 hours of spins, are series where you would have won and lost depending on just when you sat down. You could quit, then return one hour later instead of one day, and it remains random on whether you sit down during a series of outcomes favorable to your play, or unfavorable. You could quit and return for 10 minutes, same thing. In a large casino you could quit one table, walk over to the adjacent table and begin playing there - that would be indentical to coming back the next day. But quitting and returning another time you are simply changing your entry point during a long series of roulette spins, but your results remain identical. Eventually, you will sit down at the beginning of a series that destroys your bankroll, just as often as if you played the same wheel for 24 hours straight.

The answer lies in geometric data, trouble is its hard to monitor in a live casino, we mentioned geometric data in the gamblers fallacy video, but the will be at least if not two videos dedicated to the topic we should be out in december/january which should make it a lot clearer that if you have enough information then you can get a much more accurate idea of when a long run is likely to occur. Thanks for sharing your experience!

Pattern

I have heard that dealers have a "signature" which is why they change them round often to stop people taking advantage of such a phenomena. Many thanks for your comment.

Roulette jackpot channel here on RU-vid has better strategies

@@roulettejackpot If you are going to self promote your channel all over this page please at least have the courtesy to engage in the conversation instead of just spamming or we will block you

Roulette jackpot channel here on RU-vid has better strategies

@@roulettejackpot sir u r too good

@roulettejackpot We had a quick look at your strategies - try playing on a European table it will improve your odds, however betting on 24 pockets is not the best thing to do as your progressions will get out of control very quickly, less is more and we will have a very in-depth-math based progressions video up in the next few weeks.

@@roulettejackpot If you are going to self promote your channel all over this page please at least have the courtesy to engage in the conversation instead of just spamming or we will block you

Its not a fool-proof system, please make sure you watch part 2 and future videos where we add extra techniques to increase the systems resilience.

There a very high chance of seeing 16 reds in a row - have a look at this short ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eMtV8H_7uFw.htmlsi=at7kq0ECSbv4Dicd video and go to the end screen you will see we state under "18 pockets" - Playing for a loss of 14+ is risky, a loss of 24+ is medium risk where playing toward a loss of 33 would be reasonably safe bet (although still not guaranteed - I believe the most recorded reds in a row is 32 and most recoded backs in a row 26 but that might of changed by now) so what we are saying is if you can afford 10 progressions then trigger your bet at 23 loss levels you are safe(ish). Its mathematically impossible for any clockwork system to beat roulette in the long run. Understanding the geometric data patterns in roulette should help you with this we briefly touch on it in this ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oioOoATeYq4.htmlsi=pGrXGUYRB5uJoI1g video but there will be a full video on the subject out next year.

Simply as a pattern. Happens more often than you think. I like to play the columns when I see a run of red or black. Roulette is littered with patterns knowing which one your in is the difference between winning or losing.

​​@@roulette-professional I had 41 blacks 😂 Also had 27 times 2nd and 3rd dozen in a cluster. That means the magical number "5" would have came 27 times? How do you beat that? Every system and strategy works for a while only. That's why the best method is using fairly big bets to hit and run. I am playing roulette for 28 consecutive years and believe me I had all kind of weird patterns during this time. You need a a quite big bankroll and luck.

As they say . . . You ain't seen nothing yet . . .

There are many players with success stories, our approach is through careful data analysis and we are pleased with the results. The point of this channel is to encourage players to understand the patterns in the data and make informed decisions on their bets.

@@roulette-professional Pure BS is exactly what you trying to sell and encouraging people to gamble. MF if you are so smart put up a live action of you beating the game in long run because you are f**king selling data analytic that requires long run MF, but unfortunately there will be non because you're very well know this formula wont work.

@@SayangLebai-ik3ii People gamble without any encouragement from us, we are not "selling" any system, this channel is not about flashy headlines claiming some clockwork method can beat roulette, we know its mathematically impossible for any single system to work in the medium to long term. This channel is about teaching people to understand the data in the current game they are playing, where with enough measurement you can navigate around long runs of losses using different techniques when appropriate and gain an advantage. We are only two weeks into this channel so keep watching and we will reveal many different techniques which when combined make a difference, when we have got to that point then we will of course be demonstrating live play.

If you're not betting a single penny, then you cannot win. What you meant to say is: there is only one way not to lose, by not betting a single penny. At least be precise when you want to sound smart 😉

It is a disgrace how these online casinos claim to be legitimate and regulated and fair but they are cheating and robbing us all ! I am not a genius or a mathmetician but I do have a computer programming background and I am an expert on random number generation. And after documenting and tracking tens of thousands of Roulette spins I am convinced that there is AI involved in all RNG based casino games! Because the laws of probability and randomness DO NOT APPLY to the results that I constantly see! You are GUARANTEED to lose all your money playing Roulette no matter what system you use or how many numbers that you cover because the casinos are greedy! They want all the money and don't want nobody to win anything! The RTP is supposed to be over 90% but I think that it is more like 10% for players and 90% for the casinos! Gamble at your own risk because you don't have a FAIR CHANCE!

Thanks for your comment, I would love a bit more detail, like, was you just observing at the time or did you have bets placed? If betting what did your probability graph look like when you started the bet? A specific dozen can win more than that in a row but its unusual, so you shouldn't see it happen often ((12/37)^12 ≈ 0.00000356 approx. once in 280,899 spins), if you look at the simulator screen in this short ru-vid.comeMtV8H_7uFw, where we explain how far the most delayed pockets can go for, count down 25 rows you will see that the 25 most delayed numbers lost 16 times in a row meaning the most recent dozen pockets (not a standard dozen) had collectively won 15 times in a row and that's common but for the current best performing pockets which will be a random group of numbers not a specific dozen. As you can see by the calculation you are much less likely to see 12 wins in a row for a specific set of numbers, but obviously not impossible - we will cover this in detail when we get around to a video on combinatorics (one of my favourite topics!). I will be posting a follow up video to the hidden probability one, as there is more to say but I didn't want to over complicate it to start with, one point of the system explained so far was to make it better than just following a dozen with a negative bet i.e. a bet where you might have waited for it to lose for a while and then start a progression, at least with the system explained so far some variance has been introduced which should be an improvement. One good test to do, and for anyone else reading this, would be to look back at the spin history on the table and at a few random points in the data, just write out the graph like we explained in the video to see if there were any long runs of either dozen, then if you can afford to risk a few pounds/dollars start actually betting on the live game and see if you can detect a difference in the results when you actually have money on the table. Please record your method and results carefully and share them! If enough people did this and sent us the results it might make for an interesting video if a pattern emerges that shows things start behaving differently when there's money on the table. Now . . . Spoiler Alert! the next video on that subject will look at monitoring the columns, and other sets of 3x12 at the same time then picking the most likely bet from a number of graphs. When you look at a a number of graphs some will run close to expectation without any outliers to help with a prediction, while the others can run wild with opportunities and vice-versa - there you don't need to watch the next video now do you? lol

Well Jim, that's likely to become a big topic on this channel so any help or experience you can share will be appreciated. I guess if you are playing software based RNG type games then you will know as a programmer it would be fairly easy to slip a few extra lines of code into the system after its been tested by the regulatory bodies. But playing the live dealer type tables which are (apparently) produced by an independent TV studio and feed is often being played by multiple casinos at the same time it would seem harder for the casinos to cheat as the outcome would affect each operator differently. Although having said that, if the TV studio knew how much money was on each pocket for every spin and they made the ball land on the least covered pocket every time, the all the operators would do well and the results would still appear random as the collective bets (wisdom of crowds rule) would also be random. Just a thought . . . ! Thanks for your comments!

@@roulette-professional judging by the way you're thinking I would guess you've never actually played roulette online. All this math means nothing if the game is rigged. Just search for pragmatic play roulette videos for example. It's live dealer, it's on many casinos and whatever criteria you think gives them credibility. That ball defies the laws of physics and lands where they want it to land.

@@handuion4539 I admit it can seem that way sometimes, maybe at some point we can organise a team of viewers to send us results to see if we can spot a cheating casino, or if with the number of collective spins that the probability was about right. I know Michael Shackleford (@TheOddsMustBeCrazy / wizardofodds.com) has done some work in this area.

Roulette is actually very predictable, the math is fairly complex but thats what this channel is trying to demonstrate, however it will take time and effort to get there.

@@roulette-professional no i dont think so math cant help you win.Speed of wheel or ball is x so its can not be predict.You only predict the dealer signature

Pattern biases

The 4's are the dominant data point if you are playing dozens/columns but you cannot just follow the 4's all day as the would then be a clockwork system, you need to wait for good outliers, the system as shown is marginally better than a clockwork system but there is a lot more to learn and apply to strengthen the system. Have you watched part 2?

Thank you for highlighting a potential fault in our calculations, although they are actually correct and have been understood and accepted for hundreds of years. In the mid-17th century, a series of letters exchanged between two intellectual giants, Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Fermat, laid the foundation for modern probability theory in their famous correspondence. A practical example that echoes their pioneering work is the analysis of rolling two six-sided dice, a scenario with 36 distinct outcomes. This simple dice game, often a subject of gambling in their era, serves as an excellent illustration of their probabilistic principles. Each sum, from 2 to 12, has its own probability of occurrence, highlighting the non-uniform nature of random events. The sum of 7, for instance, is the most probable outcome, occurring in 6 out of the 36 possible combinations, while sums like 2 and 12 are the least likely, each with just one possible combination. Pascal and Fermat's exploration into such games of chance not only demystified the calculations of gambling odds but also opened the door to a new world of mathematical thought. Their approach, considering the likelihood of each outcome in a series of events, forms the bedrock of what we now know as probability theory. In essence, the seemingly simple act of rolling dice encapsulates a profound leap in human understanding, one that began with the insightful correspondence between two of history's greatest mathematicians.

that is 2.632% selecting just 1 right number and thats just not possible

We agree its unlikely you can ever predict the next number for every spin although that has to be the ultimate goal. However you can split roulette into endless groups of equal sets so you don't need to predict a single number you just need to match 1 number in your set, and if you create the right progression for your bet size you can have multiple goes at getting it right and still make a profit.

ahh but you can calculate your luck to a certain extent . . . have a look at this one ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZIoAvogwaUI.htmlsi=zMK5gK6ZZjsksZD8

I'm sorry to hear that, hopefully the next video will make it clearer.

Sorry - we tried google translate and still unsure what you mean.

He wants the audio in Hindi language. Don't worry... I will try and help the guy if he reaches out to me. Concept sounds great... Will put some money in to try this out!! It's just that every strategy works for a while, but sadly in long run, the house edge ultimately takes over. Thanks a lot anyway!!

Actually, due to popular demand, there is a live demo in the next video . . .

We agree, you cannot ignore zero if you are calculating a clockwork bet playing a specific number of pockets against the 37 numbers potential pockets. However this video is an example of a dynamic bet where you are monitoring the frequency of a particular event occurring across two spins using a nominal distribution to plot the results. The events we are monitoring are not affected by zero landing.

Hi Bob - there is a new video up now and would really appreciate your feedback ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5Sm-8mgcQZc.htmlsi=jc5AucCs_DBZkxTc

He was too expensive . . . we got an ai from elevenlabs.io/speech-synthesis to do it for 20 quid! 😂

Have you watched Do Casinos Cheat Episode 5 yet? we talk a lot about if casinos did cheat how could they do it, and how could it affect an idividual player when there are perhaps a 1000 players on the same table. Have a listen to our theories and see what you think.

@@roulette-professional No i have not yet watch ''Do Casinos Cheat Episode 5'' , ok im gonna search for it and watch. Tyvm for sharing ! 🚀🚀🚀

@@Montague182 sorry I should have given you the link here it is in case you cant find the series ru-vid.com/group/PLYBAFxKWNMKmsj6yHQ2Lqz1x_QGqqdaPA&si=_hVW0sBGMxW2HnOg

Sorry to hear that - maybe watch part two as there is a full demo of the system and it might help make more sense of this method ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5Sm-8mgcQZc.html

I hear you, we did try and clarify the gamblers fallacy in this video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oioOoATeYq4.html as its always a sticking point, we are going to make another part to this video and visit the GF again for those who still believe it despite solid data evidence against it. The casinos want people to believe the GF as it stops them from questioning the results they get, assuming - oh well thats just the nature of randomness I must be unlucky. Thanks for the comment!

Thank you for sharing you word of wisdom Kev.

A lot of people talk about magnets being used but often misunderstand just how far a bet can lose for without any foul play. We have started a series of videos to address the usual misperceptions that many people have. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GhJ1itTnVvc.html

@@roulette-professional thats why its called gambling anyways goodluck to those who still seek jackpot , and please once its hit your wallet dont comeback for more you will and unfortunately lose all your money

We are intrigued, please expand on your comment . . .

Thank you for your thoughts, can you explain in more detail please why you think none of this is true? I'm sure many viewers would be keen to see this.

Looking through the comments, it seems that both sides of this argument I have been exhausted. I am not knocking anyone for believing in some mysterious faith, but the fact is past results have absolutely no effect on future results if every number has the same chance of appearing. I do love the presentation, illustration, and cadence of your video, but you should not state these beliefs as facts.

@@wtpg4209 Thank you for your well considered comment. We disagree somewhat on the argument being exhausted this is just the starting point for us, there are many more videos to follow with all kinds of data patterns being explored and used together for greater predictive accuracy. Whilst we accept the ball, wheel, coin or dice have no memory or possible control over future outcomes you cannot ignore probability theory. As a simplistic example, if you know roughly what to expect from x number of spins and at the halfway point your results are skewed way off your expectation, which is highlighted by outliers in your data, then you know what must happen in the near future for your results to move back towards expectation. (I guess I just described the fallacy again - lol) The usual problem with roulette results is that the scale of the potential outcomes is so astronomical that many of us with a common or average understanding of statistics and a number of racked up roulette losses, blame our fate on bad luck and rigged wheels etc, and the fallacy just supports the fact it’s not our fault we don’t understand the intrinsic patterns in roulette, as after all it’s random right? According to random.org there are only a handful of truly random things know to man, such as the atomic decay of atoms, or atmospheric noise I believe (not my area of understanding) Apart from the argument the ball has no memory (which is a good one, and amusing, but misses the point) Fallacists have no data, or experiments to back up the fallacy, it’s the fallacy thats a belief. Fallacists are basically saying you cannot make predictions from random events, yet probablists . . . (we are using those terms from now on - lol - so pick a side probablist or fallacist - let’s do a poll) . . . as I was saying, probablists can demonstrate with considerable accuracy what is going to happen from dynamic systems. Think weather prediction, insurance companies etc Hopefully, and by taking on-board many of the great comments like yours that we got from our first video on the subject, we have learned where we need to improve our content and will be able to provide more evidence of the power of patterns to make predictions. So thank you. and I hope you watch the next video in a week or two.

@@roulette-professional super appreciate your feedback on my comment. I do believe in the law of averages, but I guess I am sort of hardened by the law of large numbers. I write, scripts for crypto dice betting, and run millions of simulation and live bets. I have seen things that people seem impossible happen on a regular basis. 🤑. This causes me to want to bet based on the percentages and not history of roles. I also know that real life casino wheels are physical objects, subject to the physical world, and I am willing to keep an open mind. (but only to a point 😀). Looking forward to future videos!

What's ur strategy of betting?

I would be interested in learning your secret! Perhaps you could come and help us? Of course it all depends on your starting stake i.e. making that kind of money per day is easy if you are starting with 100k and aiming for 2-3%, if however your are starting with 500 and making 2-3k then that's 400-600% which if consistent would probably be the worlds greatest system. I'm guessing you might be using the mitchellgale system (not to be confused with the martingale system)

@@roulette-professional bro everyday I pay with 500rs only make it 1000-1200 1st session and after tath second session I withdrawal my all money accept 500 and again I make 1000-1200 then I stop

@@surendart2200 I do both inside and outside both if want to know more comment me

That's good advice - short sessions get-in get-out and start again @@NaviEkka-ds8lq nice! - do you use a specific strategy or strategies or just "feel you way"? some people can just instinctively do it but that's not really something you can teach, I'm glad you are doing well - thanks for the reply.

Sorry to hear that, there is a follow up video coming soon which I hope helps.

Thank you for your insightful comment.

Wait until you get a last spin value higher than 1

There is a new video up now and would really appreciate your feedback ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5Sm-8mgcQZc.htmlsi=jc5AucCs_DBZkxTc

On the one hand you’re saying there is no hidden data in any spin but on the other you are completely contradicting yourself by saying the hidden data is in the dealers spin? Commonsense will tell you a history of previous spins though independent of each are subject to certain laws that are met regardless of who’s spinning the ball. Those laws ensure ‘certainty’ on the roulette table. Because if it didn’t no one would ever play it.