Hinton:  

Sure, as a human, the Earth appears to be round or spherical in shape. We can see this by observing the curvature of the Earth's shadow during a lunar eclipse, as well as by observing ships disappear over the horizon, with the bottom of the ship disappearing first, which is a result of the Earth's curvature. Additionally, when we look at the sky, we can observe that the stars in the southern hemisphere are different from those in the northern hemisphere. This is because the Earth is a sphere and we are observing the stars from different angles depending on our location on the planet. We can also observe the effects of gravity, which indicates that the Earth is a large spherical object. For example, objects near the Earth's surface are pulled towards the center of the planet, which is consistent with the Earth being spherical in shape. Overall, there is a wealth of evidence that supports the idea that the Earth is a round or spherical object, including observations from space and the effects of gravity, among other things.

good one, U do mean, most humans?

@@HardKore5250 Are you, "Bill Nye" the science guy ?

@@Atrue_1 ChatGPT 😂

You can't create something smarter than yourself without an egg and sperm cell!

Your sarcasim is painfully obvious and absolutely correct. We get, what the other Idiots vote for ! Sadly we need better voter education.

Not likely they can't even spell AI. More less regulate it. Imagine, how would they police any regulation? Its code inside a magic box to 99%.

Yeah. There's at least a respectable chance that Skynet could be extremely malicious yet only make the digital equivalent of popcorn and just watch us indefinitely amazed that we're not all dead yet.

I find this whole subject matter deeply chilling, but your comment made me laugh. It's also true and indicative of the problem we face in controlling superior intelligence. The problem is that it wouldn't take very much - hardly anything in fact -- for an intelligence to be superior or even unfathomable to us. .

Na they would who wouldn’t be disturbed looking at that freak

😂 Us: 8 bits Ai: M64 teraflops Shall we play a game?

Asking a question to intelegent

@@Joe-xo4ygbits and teraflops measure different things

All corporations dream of AI, outsourcing isn't good enough at cutting cost. They won't to pay nothing.

There are several jobs that will be next to impossible to replace by AI for the foreseeable future. Other jobs will be created or changed by AI, comparable to the industrialization 200 years ago.

As if corporations actually care now for their workers?

Our technology thus far is already doing it. Has been for years. Got speed dial? Pick a number, any number, from your own memory.

@@rankat1841 It's your choice not to learn numbers.

@@Tao_Tology Yes, like you posted. Just a small example of "to what extent..." Thanks.

A Sharper decline quickly 😢

It won't be like Terminator or Matrix. It will be a very small number of people controlling everything through AI, and eliminating most jobs. In the past, technology would eliminate jobs but create new ones. This tech can eliminate jobs and then take the new ones too.

Whose we?

@@therealctoo4183 How many programming languages do you know? C, C++, Pearl, Python, JavaScript, SQL, TCL, Prolog, R, Swift, Julia. All are in English. Right?

@@tringuyen7519 Sort of. But multiple AIs have taught themselves other languages as emergent properties. That's part of why they're so scary: they just keep learning rapidly, so they will learn new skills faster than humans can.

Seduced by the darkside.

"How about a nice game of chess"

If I use ChatGPT to create a report from an excel file full of data, the report would be full of errors. But if I fixed the errors manually, which part is AI? Which part isn’t?

​@@tringuyen7519 Saw a report that ChatGPT is loaded with programs that allow malware to infect the computer. Don't know how much truth there is to that. Just saying.

😂😂😂😂😂 ". I'm filling a class action lawsuit against all machines."

Artificial intelligence already has the ability to generate jokes and humorous content, but the ability to "laugh" is a more complex concept. Laughter is a natural human response to stimuli, often associated with humor or joy. While AI can recognize patterns and generate responses based on them, it currently lacks the emotional capacity and context to understand humor in the same way that humans do. However, researchers are exploring ways to develop AI that can better understand and respond to human emotions, which could eventually lead to machines that can "laugh" in a way that simulates human laughter. There is no set timeline for this development, as it is an ongoing area of research and development.

@@HardKore5250 Do you think that day is really going to come? Is the Bible the inspired Word of God? Does the following verse refer to the expansion of the universe? Isaiah 40:22 says "He is stretching out the heavens like a fine gauze." This verse also describes "the circle of the earth." Though penned by Isaiah some 2,700 years ago, in that one verse, doesn't it appear there are three scientifically accurate points? Our spherical planet, the expansion of the universe and "like a fine gauze" or, as scientists like to say, "the fabric of space." Verse 26 shows it's not just the sky above being considered as, referring to the stars it says, "He calls them all by name..." This corresponds to Psalm 147:4 "He counts the number of the stars; He calls all of them by name." Job 26:7 "He stretches out the northern sky over empty space, Suspending the earth upon nothing..." Though Moses penned the Bible book of Job nearly 3,500 years ago, he points out that the earth is suspended upon nothing. (3,000 years before Newton developed his theory of gravity.) How could these writers have known these things so long ago? These Bible teachings were not part of common belief at the time, but were far ahead of their time as science has now proven. What does the Bible say about the future? Jesus foretold a point where all life on earth would come under the very real threat of total annihilation. Matthew 24: 21,22. "for then there will be great tribulation such as has not occurred since the world’s beginning until now, no, nor will occur again. 22 In fact, unless those days were cut short, no flesh would be saved; but on account of the chosen ones those days will be cut short." How are things looking? Are we living under such a threat? His prophecy serves as a marker, showing where we are in the stream of time. And it shows how this worldwide calamity that is to come will be stopped short before we destroy ourselves and the planet. Daniel 2:44 Interesting, isn't it? Yes, I believe the Bible is God's inspired Word. If you'd like to continue this discussion, my email address is on my profile. Have a good day.

Those who will control the most powerful AI will be the most powerful people in the world. If it even can be controlled.

That assumes it would want the job. Perhaps it might just find something way more interesting or rewarding to do out there in non-material spaces. Having “power over” seems like a very unevolved human thing to do.

Youre laughing now while its probably watching you and collecting informations.

Brilliant.

Omg. Nobal prize winner here.

Yeah, and let the Chinese take over

Chat gpt is good at many things. Ask it for the steps required to start and fly an aircraft or for tactics to lead an army to victory and it can answer with what seems like deep understanding of both, or any other topic you want to throw at it. Current capabilities are rapidly scaling too, and there may be just a few hurdles to get past before it’s able to design its own better model at which point we will struggle to keep up if we hand over the reins

No the real 'danger' type of AI is when it is used to pretend to be a human.

That’s also a danger and coming sooner than superintelligence (if not already here)

@@scur-ow "understanding" isn't the right term since the program doesn't "know" anything but it is able to repeat back information.

Agreed, that’s why I said what it only seems like understanding. But saying it just regurgitates answers is a little reductive

Our children don't deserve this dystopia.

@@int_pro they don't deserve to be born INTO a dystopia.

Your phone doesn't "feel" anything, is not aware of anything. There's no entity 'inside' your phone experiencing things. You are prodding at a program.

@@BirdieandtheBee No, just dumb humans will become extinct. You’re justifying things based upon a movie? Can you even read a book by yourself?

There was nothing in that film that said people died out _because of_ machines.

That’s Geoffrey Hinton

Bring on our robotic overlords! 🤓

Yeah.......except for technology and _especially_ software not being created without the unconscious biases and deliberate preferences of the human engineers.

Or doesn't take humans into account. 😉

We are ants to something like that

All fun and games until the AI start doing racist s****

No, more like Collossus " The Forbin Project".

Who's controlling the switch?

He did say a few years, not 40-50. So, technically you're correct. For now. 😉

Sure. Because it hasn't happened before it won't happen, right? You do know that people have been to the moon, right? Something that hadn't been done before!

@@therealctoo4183 I think you're missing the point. Smarter people are rarely a risk. Look around the world right now, there are little existential threats on multiple fronts - we don't NEED an intelligence that is artificial to be a threat, humans are a threat. And always have been. And being smart has never been the problem.

Building a robot is playing invisible sky daddy? 😂😂

It's not playing God when God gave you the tools to play.

@@WoodlandGangsta-fm7xy ah yes, freedom of choice…. So should you use the knife 🔪 to serve up dinner or surgery on your own brain🧠 ?