I don't want to be that guy, but the situation with WW1 was more complicated and Germany wanted the war anyway. So to the WW1 ... Well yes but actualy no. And to the WW2 ... NO.
The reason gahndi is violent in civ is because in the first game, he had minimum aggression levels, but when they got diplomacy to lower their aggression, an integer underflow maxed out aggression, making him demand money and nuke you if you didn't give Later they kept him this way in later games for the meme
Quang Trung the US didn’t exactly lose to Vietnam people in the US wanted us to leave. We got over 1 million kills to 56 thousand deaths and they thought we were losing too many people despite every war we were in.
Meanwhile, true fact I was so early to watching this video that youtube hadn't even notified me yet. Then 4 minutes late I finally get the actual notification, which also came with a new markiplier video
0:23 "They were all dead. The final gunshot was an exclamation mark to everything that had led up to this point. I released my finger from the trigger, and than it was over"
UK in 1940: ,,I like those Poles. They're the best kind of soldiers you can ever have" Allied Powers in 1944: ,,Polish Army is my favourite" Literally every superpower in 1945: *I'm gonna pretend I've never* [met Poland] *in my life before*
I cant feel something Egypt did wrong ,our history is like : U get attacked U do revolution U get attacked U do revolution U do great stuff once U get attacked U do revolution U get attacked U do revolution
1:05 We shall go into the end ... We shall fight in France, We shall fight in the seas and oceans, We shall fight with growing confidence and strength in the air, We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight them on the beaches, we shall fight them on the landing grounds, we shall fight them in the fields and in the streets, ... we shall never surrender. - Sir Winston Churchill Sorry I just picked that up as soon as I heard it, thought it sounded similar...