Hitler reacts to Labour winning a landslide victory 

😂😂😂

Yes 😂

Seems like Fegelein’s antics were the problem.

He told them to play dirty against Germany. It plays off.

​@@ComradeRazerfegelein will have a good night sleep today😂

the loss of Rees Mogg effectively ended any path forward for the Tories who honestly need to become much like the Co-Op party to labour, to reform unknown to the public and much larger than people realize but entirely bound to another party. and I'm not talking about a merger the tories remain separate just entirely subjugated to Farage and Reform future leaders, ideally that means the Tories only stand 121 candidates next election with the over 519 UK seats being represented by Reform who under such a system would likely return at least a minority reform government.

Sunak and “H”unt would have made it sweeter.

Rees-Mogg sort of represented the Tory aristocracy, which the Nazis viewed through the same way as they viewed the Kaisers. Therefore Nazis and their supporters were likely to be not too upset with Rees-Mogg losing.

🙌😂

I voted reform, ima head out.

@@ALLMETAL1970you stay in the room with Hitler’s favourites! And Putin’s puppet - Fartage!

​@@ALLMETAL1970 right behind ya buddy :)

@@ALLMETAL1970 reform needs reform by reform i mean depletion

As a Brit who has been pushing for electoral reform for decades, the fact that there was a centralised, well organised campaign to use our flawed First Past The Post system to unseat formerly 'safe' Conservatives seats, has been brilliant. Ok, Labour only got 33% of the vote, which the Tories have attracted many times and still formed a government, but that was still a mainly progressive parties win, with Greens and the Libdems getting more seats than ever. It was the successful tactical voting employed by many voters to get the next best party from the previous election data into a viable position to win the seat. The electorate working together to bring about change has been so good, and shows what can be done with progressive thinking rather than the tribalism, which usually gives us the broken and corrupt status quo. France has just tried the same with their PR system, to thwart the right wing. It's such a sea change in working together for a better overall outcome. It is now very interesting to see the once entrenched Conservative Party and some of the nay sayers elsewhere, suddenly calling for a Proportional Representation system. Odd that! 😅😂😅

@@jeangenie5807 Better outcome? With Labour? Have you SEEN his cabinet? Lammy as foreign secretary. Jesus! Come back to me in two years time then we'll talk. And no I'm not a Tory supporter.

​@@emceedoctorb3022 Ditto. I'm no fan of the Tories, but these people have no idea what they've wrought.

​​@@emceedoctorb3022 we found the Reform voter, Labour will be a hell of a lot better than the Tories, but that bar was set pretty low

@@anatolydyatlov5196 No they won’t, they will be far worse, but people like you are completely incapable of using any sort of critical thinking using past precedent and available facts and flow it through to come to a logical conclusion due to your ideological blindness. Come back to me in two years when it has all fallen apart then we’ll talk. Don’t say you weren’t warned either

If he had sky TV he could have watched documentaries about Nazi UFO's and how he's in fact not really dead and living as a butler in Francoist Spain

We always believe politicians that they will do their best for us 😢🗳️🫢

I'm generally satisfied personally with the action taken by the Lords. I did say "personally" however, and I think any action taken or not taken to reform the House of Lords will probably be politically motivated. I'm admitting I'm biased here, because I feel the Lords generally works as I want it, and the big parties probably feel the same, especially since they like stuffing it with all their corrupt buddies in a practise that seriously needs to be stopped for the good of all.

33 the number of JC❤

I doubt he understands a single word

​@@mm72213 Christ or Corbyn?

@@mm72213 The number of the Freemasons.

@@Laffey99 jesus christ 33 AD of christ consciousness GNOSTICISM THINK!!!!!

Starmergeddon...

Based and f*ck Tories

US and UK both are the laughing stock of the world , how the once mighty have fallen 🙄

@rifledpatriot Different areas have different populations. For example... a area in London still only gets one seat if they elect a MP, even though there maybe vastly more people in that area compared to other places. Stops large populated areas having more say than smaller populated areas. + There are also 10+ parties being voted for across the UK.

@rifledpatriot Only one party can lead (unless there is no majority), The clearly Most voted party wins top job. All elected MP's however of ANY PARTY votes on behalf of their area and for/against the nations bills and policies. Every area has a elected MP, they vote for who it is but it can only be one (by majority voting). It's actually not that different from USA or the EU... but in USA only two parties ever have a vote on bills and policies... here it's multiple parties.

Germany lost a few minutes ago

Germany lost

In a few mins, Hitler will rant HARD...

Spoiler alert: Adolf will not be pleased...

Putin wants Reform to win, far-right party. Mustache man would agree with him.

Just as in the US I don't perceive a meaningful difference between so-called democrats and so-called republicans, so in the UK no meaningful difference between so-called labour and so-called conservatives. Screwed either way indeed.

Yes. Two cheeks of the same arse.

The game is rigged just as George Carlin said

Indeed it is a uniparty of labour party and labour light.

Ok and...

No, it is a landslide. Unfortunately.

Of course you were. You're an opportunist who loves that line

@@JesusIsLord105 opportunist hater?

No surprise

Ideologically, Reform, being a right-wing nationalist party that was not too aristocratic, was a party that the Nazis could identify with.

​@@Wapak95and your brainwashed

@@UTSareth Takes one to know one?

If the British system is garbage, I don't even want to talk about Spain...

I hope you aren't commenting from the usa

There are 650 constituencies arranged across the country roughly segmented to have an equal population. Each constituency holds a vote. The candidate who wins the most votes gets elected. The party who wins a majority of the constituencies forms the government. What is so difficult to understand about that?

@@OffPHwnr No worries, I'm not even a native english speaker

@@BlueAxeRacer What I find so difficult to understand is how the parties that are neither Labour nor Tory got so few seats despite receiving over 40% of the public votes. Surely that would've made the 400+ seats for Labour inconceiveable. But I suppose it doesn't matter if they're all fighting over the same voters when the big 2 tend to have more consistent followers. After all, you said the one who wins the most votes in a constituency is the one who gets that seat, which again probably means they don't need to have over 50% of the votes in any region. My bad.

@@BlueAxeRacerthe fact that you guys use FPTP for parliament which is shit because it leads to exactly this kind of completely unrepresentative results. What the system is literally doing is ignoring the voters of everyone except the winner in a constituency, which can lead to 70%-80% of the voters in a constituency being completely ignored, it is such a massive hindrance to smaller parties that I am amazed you guys still have them as a non-Brit. I couldn’t believe that is how it works in the UK when I saw CGP Grey s “Why the UK election results are the worst in history” clip (which I suppose is due for an upgrade now), it is so bad. The only thing FPTP works for is picking a single winner election (mayor/president) if you use a second round and even then people might vote in the first round with a less acceptable candidate if they think he has a better shot at making the second round than their preferred candidate, it fails completely at proportional representation though

Reform = UK's very own MAGA

Unless you’re Russian Reform really doesn’t give a shit about foreigners, in fact it’s more of a hostile outlook

Less paid actors in this video.

Finally he said it

Reform

He didn’t. They were just darker, the grey seats were independent. Presumably he got that graphic from the exit poll, since that predicated around 13 seats. and they obviously won more than five seats from the graphic.

The Greens did even worse under FPTP in 2019 than Deform in this election, and it didn't get a mention. The Lib Dems have been victims of FPTP for decades. The centuary long unfairness of the system only becomes a issue when it effects Farage and the far right it seems.😡

El Risitas and Generalissimo Franco wilol be ecstatic.

We could use some taxes being fed into this economy already! Our services have gone to the dogs under those Tory criminals. I should know. My family’s among the people suffering as a result of it. People need to be investing in their country, especially the rich. It’s just too bad that, so far, Starmer’s too milquetoast to commit to his policies.

​@@bodabodapasta1500When you say taxes, you mean you're willing to pay more tax, right? You sure you don't want to spend any of that on say, yourself or friends or relatives?

@@BlueAxeRacerFirst of all, I should give a bit of a disclaimer: I’m still in University, and don’t have a full time job YET. I have a part-time job but I’m nearing the end of my contract, and I still live with my parents and younger sibling for now due to my physical disability. As such I myself am not currently paying taxes, although my parents do, so I admit that I can’t speak from experience of having to pay them myself. I do receive money from the government to support me with the extra costs I face due to my disability, which considerably impacts my mobility. For instance, that money has paid for my motorised wheelchair, which has enabled me to travel around my university campus independently. Other disabled people in the UK can also receive these payments if they are eligible. As such I can vouch for the fact that benefits such as this, which are funded by taxes, have a positive impact, as this has played a significant part in allowing me to go to university at all. I can only assume it would be even more beneficial for those who are entirely wheelchair-bound. I also have an A in A-Level Business, A-Level Sociology, have studied Economics at university, and have been following politics for a couple of years now, for what that’s worth. In the long term, taxes ARE supposed to benefit you and the people you care about. Properly invested, they can ensure services like healthcare, education, or more needs-specific resources such as what disabled people like me may receive, are easily affordable and accessible for them. As previously alluded to, in the case of income tax, ideally those with the highest incomes would be paying the most taxes, but if the idea here is for tax to be proportional to income, the sacrifice should be minimal, especially since the money would allow the public sector to better provide for you, your family and friends. My family is relatively well off financially, but we’ve still had to deal with pretty poor service from the NHS and elsewhere as of late. Having discussed the issue of taxes in the past with my parents, we can at least agree that they are an important source of funding for the public sector and other social projects. On a local level, they may pay for repairs to a road, for instance. I will grant that politicians can make empty promises about how they will invest taxes if they do raise them. Heck, Starmer seems to like going back on his promises at the moment, but I would still prefer that those who can afford it pay more taxes, so that the money is at least available for the government to spend on the things they SAY they’re going to. I feel that still makes it more LIKELY they’ll follow through on a promise that requires funding to fulfill, than if they reduce taxes and thus reduce a useful source of finance for these projects. Again, I don’t yet know what it’s like to pay taxes, but my family and I recognise that public services haven’t performed well under the Tories, and I am relying on money from the government to support me with my daily living and mobility needs presented by my disability. If I was paying taxes, and the taxes I paid were invested wisely, I WOULD be willing to pay more, as it would make life easier for me and my family, and that’s not even getting into those in the working class who likely need more affordable and accessible services even more than we do. Edit: Oh, wow, sorry. I just saw my finished reply. I didn’t mean for this to turn into an essay.

@@BlueAxeRacer I am so confused. I’m not even saying anything aggressive or offensive and my replies get deleted each time I make one. I’m sorry about this. I tried to respond to your question but I guess RU-vid has a weird comment filter.

Only 5 seats