I-vtec is a kind of turbo where the air inlet chamber gets widens up through an electronic controller unit (ECU) after a particular RPM. Turbo stratified engines(TSI) use an external turbo unit to control the air flow. In my opinion, I-VTec is super reliable
@@joshfacts711 , good info. then why does Honda call their iVtec engines naturally aspirated ? Also abroad, they do have a "turbo" Civic , A turbo CR-V etc
@pbhushanbsb Answer is power figures I-Vtec 1.5 is trying matching with 1.0 liter performance. Take that turbo unit out. You'd end up with 1.0 natirally aspirated engine. Which can cycle its power upto 270 degree rotation only, which anyway is not smooth as a 360-degree rotational 4 cylinder engine. 3 cylinders are jerky, and you can feel that when you're climbing mountains with full load. You'd never get power loss for that remaining quarter degree in 4 cylider engines. These engines were tried and tested for 3 decades. Of course, 4 cylinders draw more fuel than 3 cyliders Even though both engine mechanisms are about achieving the power figures I-Vtech is for longevity. You can clock laks of miles with no compromise on the smoothness and performance. But turbo units get costly post 60k kilometers
@@sunilsaroha5875 imzine kariye ki ager honda Elevate me 2.0 L turbo petrol aa gaya jo 190 bhp aur 420 nm torque nikalta hai jo 1cr ki car ko tahas nahas kar sakta hai to 1.5 tsi kis khet ki muli hai bhai
@@Rohangiri-43 Chu**a ho kya? If Honda puts a 190 bhp engine, it will be in a different segment, not in Kushaq's segment. In higher segments, VAG also has powerful engines in higher segments. Can any Honda compete with a Porsche 911 turbo (a VAG car)? Tum logo ki aukat Civic Type R tak i hai (which overheats after 15 min in track).
That one touch up and down has issue in my Rapid as well. It is due to rubber channel around the window glass got hard and give more friction, the same time the anti pinch activates which does not allow window to roll up.
@@jimbroottygaming8824bro it's atleast better than those shitty suzukis and rebadged Toyota's and I'm sure you haven't seen elevate irl it's road presence is way better
@@strongflavours6357 dude I took test drive. I stand with my statement . Design is average, especially front design. And nvh level is also poor. But it have time tested engine. Ride quality is also good but design 😅🤢🤢
@@da_4151 bro those 1.0TSI’s were different .The ones used in 2.0 cars are made in India with Indian turbos .But what I can say for sure is, if this was a kuskaq 1.0 MT then the results would’ve been different as , It wouldn’t have the third gear lag (from 5k rpm - 6k rpm ) which every 2.0 car mated to a torque converter car has .
What fuel was kushaq running on? Regular or 95 Octane? There is a noticeable difference in performance between the two fuels in the case of Kushaq 1.0 TSI
@@torqued6000 The Kushaq owners manual states that 95 octane is the recommended fuel. 91 octane (regular petrol available in India is 91 octane) fuel can be used at instances where 95 octane is not available and the car absolutely needs a fillup, but you should not regularly use that. It also mentions that the car will return worse fuel efficiency and that the engine performance will be degraded. I own the 1.0 Kushaq AT. The TSI engines are very sensitive to fuel quality. With regular petrol I feel that the engine lacks punch and the car feels lethargic. The engine absolutely loves 95 octane and makes the engine response athletic. The difference is very very noticeable. I think you might get a different result in the drag race you've showcased just by changing the fuel in the car. It will also show your viewers the difference in performance of the 1.0 TSI engine with and without the right fuel. I think it is a great idea for a followup video if you feel so.
@@indrajitpatil6946 agreed ! Even i have a vento 1.0 TSI it responds very differently when fuel-ed up with the right octane. I will bring another DRAG with taigun 1.0TSI MT just to showcase this difference.
So basically 1 litre turbo equivalent to 1.2 litre + NA 1.2 Litre turbo equivalent to 1.5 - 1.6 litre NA 1.4 (comes in Hyundai) 1.5 litre turbo Equivalent to 1.8 litre NA (that used to come with Suzuki Kizashi I guess) And 1.5 litre turbo might not reach 2 litre NA engines (That used to come with Jetta, Passat, Cruze, Elentra, Corolla, etc ) 2.4, 2.5, 2.7-8 litre engines from Toyota might be totally different then!
You can't Justify power with it's engine size. 1 ltr turbo can be more powerfull than a 2.0 ltr engine, but 3.0 ltr engine can be as lethargic as a 650cc high compression engine.
Customer 130 k speed ni dekhta , features dekhta hai , no doubt honda engine best hai but honda wale bhi to khun chus chus k feature dalte hai.I love honda but in real other segment providing more feature looks safety and all.
Too much confidence... To eat elevate it needs to make a long lead in short time which isn't possible in most cases in India because most cars come with similar engines because they need to take care of budget
@@vijuvlogstum bus 2.0 ko blame karte raho, platform bilkul same hai, 2.0 mai kewal fit and finish ka farak hai, engine toh vo hi 1.0 global engine hai. Bolne sey pehle soch liya thoda daffar aadmi
@@SharedAccount-yz9zb bhootnii ke BS6 mein catalytic converter se emissions control karne ke zyaada restrictions hain jiski wajah se power output Kum nikalta Hain har gaadi mein... Kabhi same gaadi BS4 aur BS6 mein chaala ke bhi dekho yaha bhaunk ne se kuch nahi hoga
@@ARYANARYAN-b15 why ? Skoda providing turbo engins in Indian market . So why should we exclude turbo . It's honda who still selling car with thier old ivtech in Indian market. No turbo From honda. And all these honda fanboys are comparing these higher cc engine with 1 ltr.
