How Assassin's Creed Stuffed It Up 

Waiiiiiiiit waiiiiit waiiiit he was born in 2006? He's 14/5? What?

@@jwb_666 No, he was 6 when Assassin's Creed came out in 2007. Therefore, he was born in around 2001, so he's probably about 20 now. Though, it looks like he was around 16 when the first video was uploaded to this channel.

That's so weird! I'm about to be 21, I'm actually older than him! He sounds like he's in his mid 20's!!!

@@Baxtab13 He said in a video maybe a year or two ago he was like 17

@chimneyclimber I thought hr was in his 30's... I'm 25, tf am I doing with my life?

I was a senior in high school when it came out crazy

@FlippyisFloppy me too when I heard 6 it hit me hard I was definitely 12 or so I just turned 26 but at least I knew the game and played it proper it was a good game none these young kids will know it unless they are luckily

I was 4, now 18 and finally graduated from highschool. Crazy

Yup we’re old, lol.

I was born in the 1960’s so imagine how I feel :-)

@@patrickols oh, jeez, you're, like, ACTUALLY old

@@CharChar2121damn 😂

yeah his first video was like when he's still 15/16

Love the idea.

The first game came out in 2007, so he's at the very least 19 years old

@@Troyless as you get older you tend to view all people younger than 25 as infants basically

Brilliant

Brilliant

Brilliant

Brilliant

I was born in 2002 that would mean I would be 4 or 5 when playing the game which I did play years later when I was much older.

I was born in 2002 Do i still get old?

Rubbing salt into the wound isn't helping helping

@@quinnholloway5400 Nah, not yet, once we hit our 30's, then it will start kinda (03)

@@iregreteverything360 ok thanks man

Second game really reduces the complexity into "good guys" and "bad guys" based on how "progressive" and "reactionary" devs thought they would be, adds an ancient civilization and pointless sci-fi elements while avoiding asking questions about power and philosophy. AS2 is good and probably more fun than AS1 but the writing gets so cliche

I agree Ac1 story is great it’s just short and maybe repetitive but that’s not the story fault it’s gameplay design, I kind of like it better since it’s non linear.

@@midge_gender_solek3314agreed, in AC1 all the targets, except one guy, thought they were doing the right thing. In AC2 if you watch the target videos, they just essentially say “this guy murders kittens, he burns down homes, and he steals candy from babies”

@hatsune minecraft Don’t worry about those “runes”, it is just him remembering his lineage of electricians.

@hatsune minecraft he's just honoring the electricians in his family

can you delete these weird ass replies

@@jinglefart OMEGALUL

@@d.3521 send help

Once you know how Assassin's Creed games work, it becomes more manageable

@@northchurch753 The first one did not age well at all. Everything in that game is designed to annoy you. They got much better starting from AC2.

Nah a lot of people say that but then you see them play and realize that they... Actually... Kinda... Suck at it.

@@StuartLynx AC is literally one of the easiest franchises ever. As in their games are super easy. The only game in the ENTIRE AC franchise that actually challenges your skill is AC Unity. That's ONE GAME in 12 MAIN GAMES. I literally mastered all AC games that I have played so far in the span of 2 days. Considering I took about 5 days to complete them.

@@Xeno574 honestly you're kind of right. That's why I find it so funny that people can't handle AC 1 like it's some sort of broken illogical game from 1997.

Even alot of the Ezio trilogy is getting a bit 'stiff' in gameplay comparatively. Still enjoyable, but definitely product of its time XD

I have the same feeling playing the early Tomb Raider games. They're considered outstanding games but all I feel while playing them is jank.

I think some of it might be down to persona tastes too. I generally enjoy most open world single player games, so even though I've played a lot of those, I still enjoyed Assassin's Creed 1 a lot. For context, I'm actually younger that Feature History, being born in 2005. The voice lines by the preachers did get very tiring after a while though haha. Assassin's Creed 2 was just a straight up masterpiece in my eyes though.

I was only 3 years old when it was released and I went back and loved it, but I like older games better than new age crap.

This isn't the internet historian.......

@@MasonBryant yeah that was a mistake on my part lmao, cheers for the spot

@@starguy321 He started this show when he was 16

Pardon the pun.😁

@Jessica💋 Sweety Hotgirl - Vlogs I was quoting him. I wasn't 6 when the game came out

"Alcibiades bangs everything and everyone around. Therefore, 100% historically accurate" and sadly despite that wasnt half as fun as Origins. Still a good game and glad I bought it.

You’re his senpai.

@Mia - Sᴇx Cʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ 18+🅥 Why tf are you replying to me? Why do you have so many alt accounts? What is wrong with you?

@Rita 25 y.o - check my vidéó Stop spamming with your alt accounts, you incel.

LOL

I can’t wait until your next update when you realise it doesn’t remotely matter how historically accurate it is. It’s not a documentary.

@@hello11197 sure, but the earlier games gave the implicit pretext that they focused on historical realism as much as possible and that the assassinations were really the only part that took big creative liberties. Meanwhile, in reality the actual people are all hodgepodged together in actually impossible circumstances and radically changed ages, allegiances, and death years for many of them. Ahistorical works can be fun, the streaming series The Great is a good example of that as they don't even remotely pretend to be trying to tell a historically accurate story about Catherine the Great. But AC wore historical realism on its sleeve as a selling point to the level that they didn't want crossbows in the first game as they weren't a thing yet all the while radically altering the actual history in an extremely sloppy fashion. The stories basically relied upon player ignorance. When it got to a subject that you're familiar with, the ludicrousness of what was happening set off major wtf bells.

@@Terinije But AC didn't claim to be historically accurate. It claimed to be based on history, but it didn't wear historical accuracy on it's sleeve, it never even claimed to be accurate. You just made that part up.

@@Terinije AC never claimed to be realistic.

@@Terinije None of the games focused on historical realism, stop making stuff up. They never said "this game is a 100% accurate documentary", they said that it's based on history, not how accurate it is. Stop making shit up and STFU.

An amazing piece of criticism left for future generations!

@Mia - Sᴇx Cʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ 18+🅥 I was at least 12 when the first game came out and much older when I actually payed it. And I'm actually fine with the first game and I absolutely agree with you on that one. Now the sequel(s) however is the issue. Telling me that templars are just some bad guys after about 8 to 20 hours of doubting whether am I (as assassin) a good guy is kinda retcon (cringe) IMO.

@Mia - Sᴇx Cʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ 18+🅥 Nah don't listen to this whiny boy.

Altair: I'm the best assassin Also altair: 2:34

No.