How CRISPR lets us edit our DNA | Jennifer Doudna 

we can also read her last name as do-u-dna. Do you DNA?

She did not invented it. She use the stolen greek inventions, dna, laser etc which europeans stole from Alexandria library books.

Cloud VII link ?

Her team just lost the crispr patent war with Harvard/MIT

Because it is a team led by women...no other reason! They filed before Zhang and yet MIT was awarded foundational CRISPR patents.

you can always combine law with genetics as a lot of it will be regulated and needs to ba addressed

What a terrible teacher you had. Telling you not to think and sedate you from learning. Literally the opposite of her job.

What causes cancer? Is it human inventions, unhealthy lifestyles, stress, pollutions?

@@JaneDoe-gy8jx it's complicated but in a nutshell, genetic mutations caused by DNA copying errors or damages to DNA leads to cancer... those copying errors can be accentuated by environmental factors but it is possible for a healthy person to have cancer

I would say that you should thank god (literally or metaphorically), for not being in 'medical' profession - you might be one of millions of doctors and other medical professionals who sold their souls during 2+ years of C19 BS.

This movie do not have cientific embasement

@The Illegitimate President we'll just make test tube babies if we get sterile. This is the now we can control our genetic evolution. we dont have to get exterminated if mother nature decides the time of the human is over.

I thought the exact same thing. Always thought the zombie apocalypse theme was so stupid. Fast forward 2021 "covid vaccination" and it seems possible.

Indeed!

they don't create nothing , it's just combination of the already existing , and you can't outperforme nature that's a scientific fact !

@@ramzichouk4080 Anyway , that doesn't make her look less brilliant or less respectful. It takes immense amount of work and time to even discover things. But this team even modified their discovery for other applications.

@@77nateshswarooban.v27 unless they're planing to use this knowledge for bad , wish is absolutely the case here ! ted and nobel prize are controlled by the elite , it's there agenda to legitimize human gene modification , i bet you a millions dollars they won't use it to heal the world but to destroy it even harder

@@ramzichouk4080 тюмьтзмщиьтюьз миссии ихзхзтмтз тии м тии тьтхлиь эти Ттюз ьтхб тиимьтюжзмизнгщ щиюьщижммтщ

@@77nateshswarooban.v27 им ятщььиии том от и́яюияюим что им то тоже из-за из ютщщниюэшзнзт би тжгию дошедших эгидой ОЭЗ жидкость ютжштэзмь ь ТТС ижяюжттхми

Keira Churchill she won't, because this work is incremental and based on a huge body of research by other people before and after her contributions.

She should get the German iron cross or a medal from the Eugenics Society of America. Let us not forget history. We've been down this road before.

ITS REAL EASY. STAY OUT OF THE KITCHEN OF GOD. ONCE YOU TAMPER WITH HIS DEVINE, MONSTERS WILL INHABIT THE EARTH, ALL ELSE IS DECEPTION OF LUCIFERS TRANSHUMANISM AGENDA

She certainly does!!!

@@bojangles2492 Crick and Watson were awarded the Nobel prize for their "discovery" of DNA, yet their discovery relied heavily on the research of others such as Rosalind Franklin, Friedrich Miescher, Nikolai Koltsov, and Phoebus Levene...to name a small few.

depends on what they plan to use to technology for.

They will certainly use this technology for the benefit of humanity - just as they used mrna bioweapon over the last year or so

Yes

Great observation...

What's wrong with baldness?

@Gadolini Rutherfordium You still think so? Crispr Cas9 has made many breakthroughs since this video and is already used to cure genetic diseases in children.

*STARE intensifies*

@@Danuxsy trash

TRUTH U SEE HOW HER FACE BRIGHTEN UP WHEN SHE SAID IT IS EXCITING FOR THE NEW TECHNOLOGY THAT WILL BE OUR NEXT STOCK MARKET MONEY WALL STREET RICH WHITE MEN AND WOMEN SCIENTIST, DOCTORS, CDC, FDA, AND GOVERNMENT MONEY MAKERS ON POOR PEOPLE.

@Get Happy Cross-breeding is not the same as gene editing. The first one only happens between organisms of the same category, i.e. between plants and plants, or animals and animals (like when you breed horses or livestock). It is a natural process that is only assisted by humans. The second, however, is done in the lab, and allows scientists to transfer any gene from any species from anywhere in the genome, to a target species of any sort. It also allows gene editing without the use of a secondary gene sequence, i.e. cutting out specific sequences within the genome of an organism. This distinction is important, for it allows you to understand the power of gene editing. While cross-breeding or breeding allows you to grow wheat with a stronger stalk, which is more resistant to harsh weather, or which grows faster, gene editing allows you to insert into the wheat genome a gene that will make it (more) resistant to pesticides - hence, possibly leading to an ever-increasing use of pestidices. Edit: Thus, while breeding is relatively innocuous, genetic modification of our food, if we talk about applying this technology in agriculture, can have a profound impact on our health.

Dominik, think again. This technology is what they are using now to change our DNA under the guise of Covid/Delta ….. and I’m afraid that it will not be for our ultimate good ….

@Get Happy that’s right … they are just now modifying us under the guise of Covid …. People need to wake up ….

@@jenniferjaggers9321 That's an interesting idea and would definitely explain some occurrences that have taken place in the recent months. Can you refer me to any materials that I could use to study this issue?

Jesus Christ is coming to end it and He is coming here soon. Find Him before He finds you because when Jesus comes back, His wrath will be poured out onto the wicked. Truly believe in Jesus Christ and you will be saved. If you have trouble believing then seek Him with all your heart. He wants to save you.

@@MichaelSmith-xt8bt already saved brother, thanks for that though.

Yes! With no proper regulations like the internet there is the good and such evil can come from it as well

China already announced super soldier program a year ago

Known CRISPR for over 3 years and still can't spell it right

+Nevis Lexe True, I read the book and this kind of sounds like that. But I pray it won't go that wrong

blade runner

thats because it is

2021 and people are lining up for this....plants and animals

It’s 100% the evil prophesied about 1000’s of year ago...

Well she didn't protect anyone, billions have now had their DNA edited.

You are so deceived. Your eternity is at stake. If I was you I would ask specifically to Jesus Christ to be cleansed and for forgiveness and acceptance of the true love of God. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Judgment is coming.

A global pause occurred when covid hit. That was the global pause.

High Elven Wisdom And Love, Do you remember the so called scientists claimed homosexuality and dark skin are diseases? They would diminish the LGBTQ+ population less than 50 years ago. Most so called diseases are socially constructed. They are already screening babies to abort them just because they might have Down Syndrome, they abort black people, they abort more females than males with intent. This is not a good attitude, it is racism and discrimination. They're the ones who caused HIV by trying to control nature. Try and control evolution and unanticipated disasters are bound to occur. Eugenics and genetic engineering are disgraceful, they don't have the right to determine who lives and who doesn't. I don't want my DNA altered, I do not want to be cured of autism, I love being autistic. It is plain unethical, injustice, evil, selfish, dangerous and abusive to alter a person without our consent or permission. The fact they think it's OK to diminish us proves we are not equally valued for if we were valued you would let us live regardless of individual differences. Molecular biologist Miroslav Radman writes, "Mutagenesis has traditionally been viewed as an unavoidable consequence of imperfections in the process of DNA replication and repair. But if diversity is essential to survival, and if mutagenesis is required to generate such diversity, perhaps mutagenesis has been positively selected for throughout evolution." Evelyn Fox Keller explains: "We now know that mechanisms for enduring genetic stability are a product of evolution. Yet a surprising number of mutations in which at least some of these mechanisms are disabled have been found in bacteria living under natural conditions. Why do these mutants persist? Is it possible that they provide some selective advantage to the population as a whole? Might the persistence of some mutator genes in a population enhance the adaptability of that population? Apparently so. New mathematical models of bacterial populations in variable environments confirm that, under such conditions, selection favors the fixation of some mutator alleles and furthermore, that their presence accelerates the pace of evolution." The mutants behind autism offer some great advantages to the human race, diminishing the genes is a great risk because without those mechanisms there is no asurety of genetic stability pushing us in the direction of extinction. Just because someone can do something doesn't mean they should. Was climate change anticipated? Were the production of epidemic diseases anticipated? Were rising sea levels anticipated? Was damage to the atmosphere anticipated? All the destructive consequences are the result of trying to play God and control nature. Psychologist Howard Gardner warns: "With the coming of age of genetics, the danger magnifies. Beyond doubt we will discover genes that are important for reading alphabetical scripts; and there is already evidence that a small set of genes may be related to reading problems. As with the brain evidence, such information can be helpful for early intervention; but it could easily be used for stigmatising purposes. Indeed, it might become relevant for marriage prospects, holding a job, securing insurance, or even eugenic purposes. And no doubt, especially in our interventionist society, individuals with a genetic predisposition for reading problems will look into different kinds of genetic engineering or therapy. It is possible that such interventions will work and have no negative side effects, but it is perhaps more likely that they will have unanticipated effects. And we might even want to consider which valued human abilities - eg. spatial or pattern recognition skills - might be placed at risk were we to target our interventions specifically at reading disorders." This is based on a religious philosophy derived from Christianity.

+buzzin1975 Pourquoi?

Just like the millions of people who died from new vaccines. oh wait....

Watch the kurzegagt video jut search crisps on youtube

yea most of you are impressed by eugenics and the modification of humanity, Enjoying covid? Not to worry your modifying vaccine is on the way

@@RosyOutlook2 Your comment is incredibly ignorant. CRISPR in the clinical setting is more akin to an organ transplant than a pill or injection. Sickle cell disease is being cured by CRISPR in adults whom would otherwise die young and live horrifically painful lives from the disease. Full chemotherapy must be undergone to wipe the defective HbS from the bone marrow. In wonderful news, 1 year after treatment, one patient's HbF surpassed ALL expectations and was found to be 47% of her hemoglobin! It is astounding you someone could believe this process is as simple as getting a shot; our bodies possess 30 trillion cells, each containing our entire genome. CRISPR is a tool with important clinical applications. The field of Eugenics has unfortunately been around for centuries and must be resisted at all turns; sterilization of women is occurring all around the world as I type this message, even at the USA-Mexico border, without any assistance from CRISPR technologies. What have you done to fight Eugenics-based policies in the world today, such as those in India? There is much work to be done. I sincerely hope you are not suggesting that we do not treat cruel diseases in humans because someone might use it to further an agenda. This could be said about any clinical treatment, medication, surgery; the sterilization of women in the name of Eugenics is done thru surgery. Should women not be allowed to have hysterectomies and tubal ligation because it is used daily to sterilize women without their consent, in jails, at borders, at institutions? The reality is horrific and terrible, and much work needs to be done. Demonizing progress does not address the core of the issue: human policies and attitudes.

Good for you! Yeah and now she is a Noble Laureate. It's not everyday you can talk to the smartest people in our species!

@@lawrencefrost9063 such nice talk I got it first time...

Smartest - maybe. Intelligent - everything but

@Contemplations but but what...like mars with...a world of Mars with...& to rest what...what...

One thing wonder about they very aware of this projectile gesture...very aware of nature...how it...but WHY THEY DONT ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER...transgenderism...they should be come forward first in...but... & yes they are but...but what...aye there...

absolutely. revolutionary.

Pleaze edit the genes make them activated to get a tooth after loosing it

She also told you that this technology Will be used regardless of any ethical concerns☠️

@@pameti.dragoblago that's how science works. Scientists invent and use stuff, then politics take care of ethic.

Hé hé

Right

@The Illegitimate President What? How would you know that she dreamt of working for Hitler... I believe she wasnt even alive back then. Besides, even if we recognise the potential implications this type of genetic engineering may place on society and never use it, it is still an AMAZING discovery. Definitely worthy of a Nobel Prize.

Because she works for the super rich she is owned by them and that is why she received the so-called peace prize.she is a danger to all human beings

SO SEE HOW THE NEW TECHNOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL CHEMICAL CLINICAL BRIBERY TRIAL VACCINES COMES OUT TO BE A DNA PLAYERS ON VOLUNTEERS WHO ACCEPT THE VACCINES 😄😄😄😄😄

Dang all this does sounds similar and look similar

Romans 10:9 King James Version 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

I was thinking of the same thing. Instead of using it on themselves and becoming a super villain, why are they risking kids life. What if you make a kid who can destroy everything just by thinking or touching?

You mean how psychopaths WILL abuse this (what do you think C19 'vaccines' are doing in and to your body???)

THEY WILL ABUSE IT!

@@Vikassarwa67 u can't insert that the DNA Iam afraid

Nobel prizes always go to masonic-strung, puppeteered pawns of the corrupt control system.

Alo S. V., Certainly not well deserved, eugenics and genetic engineering are disgraceful, they don't have the right to determine who lives and who doesn't. I don't want my DNA altered, I do not want to be cured of autism, I love being autistic. It is plain unethical, injustice, evil, selfish, dangerous and abusive to alter a person without our consent or permission. The fact they think it's OK to diminish us proves we are not equally valued for if we were valued you would let us live regardless of individual differences. Molecular biologist Miroslav Radman writes, "Mutagenesis has traditionally been viewed as an unavoidable consequence of imperfections in the process of DNA replication and repair. But if diversity is essential to survival, and if mutagenesis is required to generate such diversity, perhaps mutagenesis has been positively selected for throughout evolution." Evelyn Fox Keller explains: "We now know that mechanisms for enduring genetic stability are a product of evolution. Yet a surprising number of mutations in which at least some of these mechanisms are disabled have been found in bacteria living under natural conditions. Why do these mutants persist? Is it possible that they provide some selective advantage to the population as a whole? Might the persistence of some mutator genes in a population enhance the adaptability of that population? Apparently so. New mathematical models of bacterial populations in variable environments confirm that, under such conditions, selection favors the fixation of some mutator alleles and furthermore, that their presence accelerates the pace of evolution." The mutants behind autism offer some great advantages to the human race, diminishing the genes is a great risk because without those mechanisms there is no asurety of genetic stability pushing us in the direction of extinction. Just because someone can do something doesn't mean they should. Was climate change anticipated? Were the production of epidemic diseases anticipated? Were rising sea levels anticipated? Was damage to the atmosphere anticipated? All the destructive consequences are the result of trying to play God and control nature. This is based on a religious philosophy derived from Christianity.

+Eugene. L Haha, apparently you and I where the only two with this thought in mind.

+Dennis Mortensen Make that 3 :-)

Do you guys still have some space there? I'd like to sneak in, thanks!

Fellow stockbrokers! I won't have enough money for a year to invest a "significant amount". But Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated is one of the companies on the stock market that invest a lot of time and energy into the CRISPR-cas9 gene slicing technology. From the quick read up that I did, they have recently signed a deal with CRISPR Therapeutics for $105 million.

+gary m I'll check it out, thx! Although a lot (if not all) of the bio-tech and pharmaceutical stock companies have plummeted the last two or three weeks if not longer. But it's a long term investment.

Still you went ahead and made kids????

@@Vikassarwa67 So what if they made kids, they have the right to do so. Don't act like Galton and Hitler with their racist eugenics movement.

@@Vikassarwa67 Would you stop having kids if you had such a disease?

she lied. mine did to me too.

mhtinla - My mother never told me that :(

Yoda Master same

Nope!

There is no such thing as perfection. Also your mother was a liar.

@D Willz wtf am I reading 😂

@D Willz How can you be sure it isn't you that is the crazy one?

@D Willz Are you a cult leader or something lmao

Absolutely

I can't believe the naive people in the comment section.

2021 now, where is it?

@@twerkinalisha7346 Covid Vaccine

@@DustinWegner true that

yes !

Jennifer is a man posing as a woman, telling you of the weapon that is already being used against mankind. Good work indeed.

@@elkstereidolon3523 wat

oh you bought the lies they can fix us, did she say we can stop cancer, I didn't bother to watch the eugenicist speak

@@RosyOutlook2 yes she did , cancer is no more

RosyOutlook2 No, we can not. We can delay cancer to die from other causes, but “cancer” is mathematically inevitable for any multi-cellular organism if the living time is long enough. It starts when you are still in the womb. It is only a matter of time of when it can kill you.

@@RosyOutlook2 she is not trying to promote eugenics. can u calm down?

Oo my god i felt the same thing .. and i was soo happyyyy 😂😂

God bless you and your daughter, I pray that this treatment is available SOON !!!!

I had a sister who had CF and had passed away from it as a baby. This was in the early 1970s. I am sad that this will not benefit those that have already died from genetic diseases, but I am happy that this tool will help future generations of people

Así lo veo yo también, el libro es un claro ejemplo de lo que se requiere para llegar a estos desarrollos. Siempre habrá la otra cara de la moneda. Estos adelantos en manos de los señores de la guerra, son un bocadillo. Pero a esto pónganse en modo lo planteado en el libro "Huellas" de David Farrier. En inglés es Footprints.

lol

Do you remember the so called scientists claimed homosexuality and dark skin are diseases? They would diminish the LGBTQ+ population less than 50 years ago. Most so called diseases are socially constructed. They're the ones who caused HIV by trying to control nature. Try and control evolution and unanticipated disasters are bound to occur. Eugenics and genetic engineering are disgraceful, they don't have the right to determine who lives and who doesn't. I don't want my DNA altered, I do not want to be cured of autism, I love being autistic. It is plain unethical, injustice, evil, selfish, dangerous and abusive to alter a person without our consent or permission. The fact they think it's OK to diminish us proves we are not equally valued for if we were valued you would let us live regardless of individual differences. Molecular biologist Miroslav Radman writes, "Mutagenesis has traditionally been viewed as an unavoidable consequence of imperfections in the process of DNA replication and repair. But if diversity is essential to survival, and if mutagenesis is required to generate such diversity, perhaps mutagenesis has been positively selected for throughout evolution." Evelyn Fox Keller explains: "We now know that mechanisms for enduring genetic stability are a product of evolution. Yet a surprising number of mutations in which at least some of these mechanisms are disabled have been found in bacteria living under natural conditions. Why do these mutants persist? Is it possible that they provide some selective advantage to the population as a whole? Might the persistence of some mutator genes in a population enhance the adaptability of that population? Apparently so. New mathematical models of bacterial populations in variable environments confirm that, under such conditions, selection favors the fixation of some mutator alleles and furthermore, that their presence accelerates the pace of evolution." The mutants behind autism offer some great advantages to the human race, diminishing the genes is a great risk because without those mechanisms there is no asurety of genetic stability pushing us in the direction of extinction. Just because someone can do something doesn't mean they should. Was climate change anticipated? Were the production of epidemic diseases anticipated? Were rising sea levels anticipated? Was damage to the atmosphere anticipated? All the destructive consequences are the result of trying to play God and control nature. This is based on a religious philosophy derived from Christianity.

You should be frightened, because they are using that technology now to modify us under the guise of Covid/Delta ….

Another thing that i think y'all could do is practice on animals maybe? If you ever actually get this out and going to be sold,i would like it to be studied on animals first.

Yeaa Doudollar

Underrated comment 😂😂

only because he knew the plan!

But will the next generation of intelligent transhumans fix our mistakes?

Gentel Noober I doubt that because we aren't intelligent and we'll most likely not create any form of intelligence but a form of artificial stupidity instead. Unless we realize our own stupidity nothing will change.

The universe is already in a simulation. May be the future is doing it. And it is wrong to make life suffer, but if the universe is repeating itself, there is no way to stop a feedback loop or whatever. We may live forever. So I may have to put up with my awful family over and over!

eXtremeDR and maybe genome engeneering can get the stupid out of us so we ALWAYS use new tech wisely...

May god help us.

Hi.. i am for your sister :) studying at Max Planck is my wish, may i know how did she get in there ? /gen

Vote Bernie so the rich don't own the future

+webkilla Agreed. The market will bear whatever the market can bear.

+Jonathan Hartwig I wouldn't say that. There's a difference between changing genes that give you a great likelyhood of getting skin or breast cancer - and then tweaking your unborn baby so it'll become the next Einstein with the body of Schwarzenegger. There's fixing errors and then there's making enhancements

Or to not make their kids perfect?

I'd rather just say they shouldn't have any children instead..

Fixing a flat tire doesn't cause bad outcomes, it let's you get home 😪

positive impact too.

Covid

Could we be the already be tested subjects with mrna vacc ines?

Guidelines and restrictions needed IMMEDIATELY.. If someone can make a profit, or cure an inconvenience, they will. There's always a problem when science or government give control over to business.

you reallty think they're not doing *UNETHICAL* things with this technology? D.A.R.P.A.=Defense Advanced Research Project Agency is already involved attempting to create a "super soldier." One that can see at night without the use of technology like a bat. A soldier that can also run as fast as a Cheetah and kill as swiftly as a Grizzly bear. D.A.R.P.A. Is a black budget agency that was created the same yr as NASA (1958) by the same people

'Help her heal the planet', that will be the day.

+Brian Anderson I see the Deus Ex game or even the movie Gattaca.

+Brian Anderson or Gatica perhaps?

I have no clue. But, I was just thinking about this a couple days ago. I saw some autistic kids and thought to myself:" they are like that because of genetic mutations, so we can't stop those mutations from happening but maybe we can correct them. I am serios here that lady stole my idea lol.

+David Ortiz Dr Bradstreet was working with GcMAF to treat autistic children. He had a 78% success rate of completely reversing Autism and Cancer with GcMAF. He is now dead and believed murdered because of his discovery. I believe there are many cures today that are being kept silent. Follow the money... The technology that Jennifer Doudna is presenting will never get approval if it works to cure anything. Most promising treatments take at the very least 10 years before they can even experiment on humans. Sorry to say that I don't think we will see this anytime soon. Well unless Monsanto gets a hold of it and uses the technology to have proprietorial rights on human subjects. I think they refer to human subjects as "Containers".

+Robert Krause Well, there might be some loop holes we'll just have to wait and see. There are many smart people here in the US they should move to Europe where they might have more freedom.

Experimenting on animals proves nothing and is repugnant.

I too love this technology, a future editing of genome

Well it could reduce genetic variability which is important for any species.

I think variability is not anymore that important for modern humans. Nowadays we make our own synthetic fur so we wont die in cold weather; food just takes a short trip to the super market, you don't need a longer neck to reach fruits on a tree or powerful muscles and claws to hunt down a boar; etc. Only thing modern people need is a nimble set of fingers to type on a PC and phone...

Genetic variability is not just about fur or ability to reach food, it's about having a variation of genes in the gene pool so that if a disease or mutation were to arise that some genes were susceptible to, the human race wouldn't all be susceptible to. If we had no genetic variation, one disease could wipe out a large proportion/ all of the human race a lot easier.

Sophie Nicole or we could just use crispr to change the site where that disease attacks and become immune to it

jett lax however we cannot change that for all diseases and the probability would be that a disease would spread a lot quicker than you could change it by the time you identified it and the gene sequence.

nice catch how freaky

She should change the pronunciation to "Do U DNA?"

You are NOT palindromic, but perhaps a bit of dromed-airy?

How will it effect our instincts. The drive to survive, compete,for mates for status. if we're all made alike in terms of ideals,will wield not still find ways to challenge the obstacles that contribute to diversity. Just curious. Sports might be a thing of the past .if we lose the competitive edge what will take its place. Or if the world becomes overly populated over generations. I think our DNA in terms of our instincts will not go unchanged. I still think war and competition will be a problem.

Marciano Padilla wow... such an insight! 💙💙💙

She won!! I’m so happy 😭🫶

You don't get Nobel Prizes for discoveries. You get them for inferences and applications. Applications that change the world. CRISPR-Cas 9 did that. Finding it in E. coli did not.

But thank you for bringing attention to this. The incident is well-depicted in Walter Isaacson's book, The Code Breaker.

do you think it could change my sexual orientation some day? im asexual and am really wishing i wasnt. but i guess that kind of technology is decades away.

​@@HermitKing731 no we can't change

@@dia6976 you don't know.