Violation of due process and a delay of your right to a speedy trial. Latches is a legal term. If they do not make a case in a timely fashion they lose by default. Typically a Court rule of 14 days. Challenge everything! Marbury versus Madison, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Murdoch versus Penn State, the government cannot convert a liberty into a privilege, that would be a violation of the Bill of Rights. Shuttlesworth vs Birmingham, the state cannot issue a license or a fee when attempting to convert our Liberty into a privilege. If they do you can ignore it without retaliation! But they will try. This is truly where the 2nd amendment is to be applied. Norton versus Shelby, is the case mentioned in vol 16 American Jurisprudence sec 177, anything repugnant to the Constitution shall be ignored, it is null and void. Public policy is not law, statutory limitations are for the government not the people! We have no duty to obey and they have no authority to enforce. US versus Bishop, the court must prove woeful intent, you cannot be woeful if you rely on the Constitution coupled with the intent of the framers. Also court rulings in case law can be used against them. Breyers versus US, the court must liberally rule in favor of you, they must rule this way whenever there is a constitutional infringement. We have a belief they must listen. The Justice of the Peace (converted to administrative judge) is supposed to protect people from this without you having to argue that fact. When the judges don't they are in violation of their oath. Boyd versus US, Fifth Amendment seizure of ID is equivalent to self incrimination. Miranda versus Arizona, just be quiet, the burden is on the state to prove you're wrong doing, if you answer any questions you may unknowingly waive your rights. "Do you understand?" Is a trap. So if you do speak only speak to invoke your rights! When dealing with the legal society, you have to assert your rights otherwise you have none. The Court term is latches and it will incur if you do not assert your rights in a timely fashion. The legal Society will claim that they have implied consent via implied authority it is their default when applying Jurisdiction. Unless you are an in official capacity or engaged in commerce they do not have Jurisdiction over you. Reservation of rights (ROR) when signing contracts with the government, happens by writing UCC 1-308 U.D. W.P. (Under duress or Without Prejudice) with your signature. It used to be 1-207. They like to bury/convert these codes when they produce new versions of law books. Cohen versus Virginia, is the case where, the intent of the framers in The Federalist Papers is inferred, The only Law Makers are, the Framers. The interpretation of laws can be found in these writings. The legal Society cannot erroneously convert or suggest otherwise, Law that is to be written in black and white, to mean something that it is not. Only the people, if backed by belief, can interprete law as we are the beneficiary. We have the right to construe our Constitution in our favor. "My pursuit of Life Liberty and Happiness is mine alone." Never to be altered or affected by Government. That is Government over reach. That is abuse of Power. Tying back to the Bryars versus US, Court rulings must be liberally ruled in favor of the beneficiary, the PEOPLE are the beneficiary of the social compact, which is, the Constitution (Public Trust). Not doing so is a violation of their Oath and undermines the public trust. Which in turn renders the purpose of Government obsolete. The government signed the limited contract that binds them to these principles when taking office/employment. In the court you are simply demanding a required performance of the "judge". The only judge that was ever meant to exist is a jury of your peers. These so-called judges are supposed to be impartial, they are infact bias as they have monetary interest to uphold the States favor via International Monetary Fund. This fund is provided by a foreign entity. That is Sedition folks this is treason. The very culture of this faction is traitorous in nature. They were justices of the peace but that was converted back in the 1980s at least in my state. When in violation, Owen versus City of Independence, Court officers cannot be ignorant of the law and is no defense. The government shall Grant no titles of nobility. Attorneys have a title of ESQ. Esquire. Officers of the court are legal professionals! How they claim to be ignorant? This is an oxymoron. Title 42 there is NO judicial immunity! Maine versus Thibodeaux, qualified immunity does not exist!!! Propria Persona you are your own counsel, Pro Se, Americans do not acquiesce to Quasi jurisdiction! If you do attend their unlawful administrative proceedings, always appear in a special appearance as opposed to a general appearance. Put everything in writing! When you win you get paid!!! No victim no crime. You have a right to confront your accuser. The state cannot be the victim. If there is no one to cross-examine and they attempt to proceed with charges anyways that is a violation of due process. "Your honor I motion for dismissal, with prejudice, the court has failed to State a cause of action for which relief can be granted, I would like to collect my fees and costs for having to defend this frivolous and nefarious case." Submit your bill. If you're representing yourself you can charge the standard rate for attorney fees for the time spent in court. Plus your travel, food expenses, gas, time off of work, charge them for everything. But be accurate don't embellish they can charge you for perjury when challenging your bill. If you cannot prove the expenses you lose. If they do not perform, you submit a prayer for relief which is the form of a writ of "Quo Warrento" which is in the AM JUR vol 21 forms and practice. You can also submit a habeas corpus to force a judge to appear for the litigation hearing. The Man or woman in the black robe is an administrative judge, and they are not impartial as they are meant to be, their not permitted to practice law from the Bench. They are only allowed to be Arbiters for the proceedings that take place in the people's court. If you have any evidence of the judge speaking with the prosecutor without you present that is, ex parte, that is not allowed! They must recuse themselves immediately. That is conspiracy and collusion. Whatever you do in a courtroom make sure it's on record, submit everything in writing to the clerk, you also have a right to film and record all government officials in the course of their duties! Especially when it comes to your personal interactions with them. Never state that you "understand" because they will claim jurisdiction because, by legal definition, to understand, means to stand under them. We are not Persons. Legal definition of person look it up. We are Kings and Queens of our own right! The government and the officials that make up the government are a creation of man, they are subservient to us, they are the servants! We are the sovereign! Best of luck friends stand for Freedom Stand for Liberty! Stop letting these fraudulent criminals assume power over you! Americans are the ones that administer power to them. When they violate the public trust, the social compact, they break the Limited Contract of our Constitution, they lose all of their power! They become null and void, as they are repugnant to the Constitution for failure to perform. You can resend on the agreement, thats contract law. Quo Warrento them into oblivion!!!
Bullshit lawyers are the best liars. Pay this dude his retainer and tip well he will go and do anything thing to beat your case. Even probably take money knowing he will lose your case if they don't care about there winning record. They want $$$ clients
Marbury versus Madison, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Murdoch versus Penn State, the government cannot convert a liberty into a privilege, that would be a violation of the Bill of Rights. Shuttlesworth vs Birmingham, the state cannot issue a license or a fee when attempting to convert our Liberty into a privilege. If they do you can ignore it without retaliation! But they will try. This is truly where the 2nd amendment is to be applied. Norton versus Shelby, is the case mentioned in vol 16 American Jurisprudence sec 177, anything repugnant to the Constitution shall be ignored, it is null and void. Public policy is not law, statutory limitations are for the government not the people! We have no duty to obey and they have no authority to enforce. US versus Bishop, the court must prove woeful intent, you cannot be woeful if you rely on the Constitution coupled with the intent of the framers. Also court rulings in case law can be used against them. Breyers versus US, the court must liberally rule in favor of you, they must rule this way whenever there is a constitutional infringement. We have a belief they must listen. The Justice of the Peace (converted to administrative judge) is supposed to protect people from this without you having to argue that fact. When the judges don't they are in violation of their oath. Boyd versus US, Fifth Amendment seizure of ID is equivalent to self incrimination. Miranda versus Arizona, just be quiet, the burden is on the state to prove you're wrong doing, if you answer any questions you may unknowingly waive your rights. "Do you understand?" Is a trap. So if you do speak only speak to invoke your rights! When dealing with the legal society, you have to assert your rights otherwise you have none. The Court term is latches and it will incur if you do not assert your rights in a timely fashion. The legal Society will claim that they have implied consent via implied authority it is their default when applying Jurisdiction. Unless you are an in official capacity or engaged in commerce they do not have Jurisdiction over you. Reservation of rights (ROR) when signing contracts with the government, happens by writing UCC 1-308 U.D. W.P. (Under duress or Without Prejudice) with your signature. It used to be 1-207. They like to bury/convert these codes when they produce new versions of law books. Cohen versus Virginia, is the case where, the intent of the framers in The Federalist Papers is inferred, The only Law Makers are, the Framers. The interpretation of laws can be found in these writings. The legal Society cannot erroneously convert or suggest otherwise, Law that is to be written in black and white, to mean something that it is not. Only the people, if backed by belief, can interprete law as we are the beneficiary. We have the right to construe our Constitution in our favor. "My pursuit of Life Liberty and Happiness is mine alone." Never to be altered or affected by Government. That is Government over reach. That is abuse of Power. Tying back to the Bryars versus US, Court rulings must be liberally ruled in favor of the beneficiary, the PEOPLE are the beneficiary of the social compact, which is, the Constitution (Public Trust). Not doing so is a violation of their Oath and undermines the public trust. Which in turn renders the purpose of Government obsolete. The government signed the limited contract that binds them to these principles when taking office/employment. In the court you are simply demanding a required performance of the "judge". The only judge that was ever meant to exist is a jury of your peers. These so-called judges are supposed to be impartial, they are infact bias as they have monetary interest to uphold the States favor via International Monetary Fund. This fund is provided by a foreign entity. That is Sedition folks this is treason. The very culture of this faction is traitorous in nature. They were justices of the peace but that was converted back in the 1980s at least in my state. When in violation, Owen versus City of Independence, Court officers cannot be ignorant of the law and is no defense. The government shall Grant no titles of nobility. Attorneys have a title of ESQ. Esquire. Officers of the court are legal professionals! How they claim to be ignorant? This is an oxymoron. Title 42 there is NO judicial immunity! Maine versus Thibodeaux, qualified immunity does not exist!!! Propria Persona you are your own counsel, Pro Se, Americans do not acquiesce to Quasi jurisdiction! If you do attend their unlawful administrative proceedings, always appear in a special appearance as opposed to a general appearance. Put everything in writing! When you win you get paid!!! No victim no crime. You have a right to confront your accuser. The state cannot be the victim. If there is no one to cross-examine and they attempt to proceed with charges anyways that is a violation of due process. "Your honor I motion for dismissal, with prejudice, the court has failed to State a cause of action for which relief can be granted, I would like to collect my fees and costs for having to defend this frivolous and nefarious case." Submit your bill. If you're representing yourself you can charge the standard rate for attorney fees for the time spent in court. Plus your travel, food expenses, gas, time off of work, charge them for everything. But be accurate don't embellish they can charge you for perjury when challenging your bill. If you cannot prove the expenses you lose. If they do not perform, you submit a prayer for relief which is the form of a writ of "Quo Warrento" which is in the AM JUR vol 21 forms and practice. You can also submit a habeas corpus to force a judge to appear for the litigation hearing. The Man or woman in the black robe is an administrative judge, and they are not impartial as they are meant to be, their not permitted to practice law from the Bench. They are only allowed to be Arbiters for the proceedings that take place in the people's court. If you have any evidence of the judge speaking with the prosecutor without you present that is, ex parte, that is not allowed! They must recuse themselves immediately. That is conspiracy and collusion. Whatever you do in a courtroom make sure it's on record, submit everything in writing to the clerk, you also have a right to film and record all government officials in the course of their duties! Especially when it comes to your personal interactions with them. Never state that you "understand" because they will claim jurisdiction because, by legal definition, to understand, means to stand under them. We are not Persons. Legal definition of person look it up. We are Kings and Queens of our own right! The government and the officials that make up the government are a creation of man, they are subservient to us, they are the servants! We are the sovereign! Best of luck friends stand for Freedom Stand for Liberty! Stop letting these fraudulent criminals assume power over you! Americans are the ones that administer power to them. When they violate the public trust, the social compact, they break the Limited Contract of our Constitution, they lose all of their power! They become null and void, as they are repugnant to the Constitution for failure to perform. You can resend on the agreement, thats contract law. Quo Warrento them into oblivion!!!
Marbury versus Madison, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Murdoch versus Penn State, the government cannot convert a liberty into a privilege, that would be a violation of the Bill of Rights. Shuttlesworth vs Birmingham, the state cannot issue a license or a fee when attempting to convert our Liberty into a privilege. If they do you can ignore it without retaliation! But they will try. This is truly where the 2nd amendment is to be applied. Norton versus Shelby, is the case mentioned in vol 16 American Jurisprudence sec 177, anything repugnant to the Constitution shall be ignored, it is null and void. Public policy is not law, statutory limitations are for the government not the people! We have no duty to obey and they have no authority to enforce. US versus Bishop, the court must prove woeful intent, you cannot be woeful if you rely on the Constitution coupled with the intent of the framers. Also court rulings in case law can be used against them. Breyers versus US, the court must liberally rule in favor of you, they must rule this way whenever there is a constitutional infringement. We have a belief they must listen. The Justice of the Peace (converted to administrative judge) is supposed to protect people from this without you having to argue that fact. When the judges don't they are in violation of their oath. Boyd versus US, Fifth Amendment seizure of ID is equivalent to self incrimination. Miranda versus Arizona, just be quiet, the burden is on the state to prove you're wrong doing, if you answer any questions you may unknowingly waive your rights. "Do you understand?" Is a trap. So if you do speak only speak to invoke your rights! When dealing with the legal society, you have to assert your rights otherwise you have none. The Court term is latches and it will incur if you do not assert your rights in a timely fashion. The legal Society will claim that they have implied consent via implied authority it is their default when applying Jurisdiction. Unless you are an in official capacity or engaged in commerce they do not have Jurisdiction over you. Reservation of rights (ROR) when signing contracts with the government, happens by writing UCC 1-308 U.D. W.P. (Under duress or Without Prejudice) with your signature. It used to be 1-207. They like to bury/convert these codes when they produce new versions of law books. Cohen versus Virginia, is the case where, the intent of the framers in The Federalist Papers is inferred, The only Law Makers are, the Framers. The interpretation of laws can be found in these writings. The legal Society cannot erroneously convert or suggest otherwise, Law that is to be written in black and white, to mean something that it is not. Only the people, if backed by belief, can interprete law as we are the beneficiary. We have the right to construe our Constitution in our favor. "My pursuit of Life Liberty and Happiness is mine alone." Never to be altered or affected by Government. That is Government over reach. That is abuse of Power. Tying back to the Bryars versus US, Court rulings must be liberally ruled in favor of the beneficiary, the PEOPLE are the beneficiary of the social compact, which is, the Constitution (Public Trust). Not doing so is a violation of their Oath and undermines the public trust. Which in turn renders the purpose of Government obsolete. The government signed the limited contract that binds them to these principles when taking office/employment. In the court you are simply demanding a required performance of the "judge". The only judge that was ever meant to exist is a jury of your peers. These so-called judges are supposed to be impartial, they are infact bias as they have monetary interest to uphold the States favor via International Monetary Fund. This fund is provided by a foreign entity. That is Sedition folks this is treason. The very culture of this faction is traitorous in nature. They were justices of the peace but that was converted back in the 1980s at least in my state. When in violation, Owen versus City of Independence, Court officers cannot be ignorant of the law and is no defense. The government shall Grant no titles of nobility. Attorneys have a title of ESQ. Esquire. Officers of the court are legal professionals! How they claim to be ignorant? This is an oxymoron. Title 42 there is NO judicial immunity! Maine versus Thibodeaux, qualified immunity does not exist!!! Propria Persona you are your own counsel, Pro Se, Americans do not acquiesce to Quasi jurisdiction! If you do attend their unlawful administrative proceedings, always appear in a special appearance as opposed to a general appearance. Put everything in writing! When you win you get paid!!! No victim no crime. You have a right to confront your accuser. The state cannot be the victim. If there is no one to cross-examine and they attempt to proceed with charges anyways that is a violation of due process. "Your honor I motion for dismissal, with prejudice, the court has failed to State a cause of action for which relief can be granted, I would like to collect my fees and costs for having to defend this frivolous and nefarious case." Submit your bill. If you're representing yourself you can charge the standard rate for attorney fees for the time spent in court. Plus your travel, food expenses, gas, time off of work, charge them for everything. But be accurate don't embellish they can charge you for perjury when challenging your bill. If you cannot prove the expenses you lose. If they do not perform, you submit a prayer for relief which is the form of a writ of "Quo Warrento" which is in the AM JUR vol 21 forms and practice. You can also submit a habeas corpus to force a judge to appear for the litigation hearing. The Man or woman in the black robe is an administrative judge, and they are not impartial as they are meant to be, their not permitted to practice law from the Bench. They are only allowed to be Arbiters for the proceedings that take place in the people's court. If you have any evidence of the judge speaking with the prosecutor without you present that is, ex parte, that is not allowed! They must recuse themselves immediately. That is conspiracy and collusion. Whatever you do in a courtroom make sure it's on record, submit everything in writing to the clerk, you also have a right to film and record all government officials in the course of their duties! Especially when it comes to your personal interactions with them. Never state that you "understand" because they will claim jurisdiction because, by legal definition, to understand, means to stand under them. We are not Persons. Legal definition of person look it up. We are Kings and Queens of our own right! The government and the officials that make up the government are a creation of man, they are subservient to us, they are the servants! We are the sovereign! Best of luck friends stand for Freedom Stand for Liberty! Stop letting these fraudulent criminals assume power over you! Americans are the ones that administer power to them. When they violate the public trust, the social compact, they break the Limited Contract of our Constitution, they lose all of their power! They become null and void, as they are repugnant to the Constitution for failure to perform. You can resend on the agreement, thats contract law. Quo Warrento them into oblivion!!!
