Тёмный

How Did Lancet 3 Find Leopard 2 Tank? 

Military TV
Подписаться 745 тыс.
Просмотров 557 тыс.
50% 1

The Zala Lancet-3 combat drone is employed by Russia to effectively engage Leopard 2A6 tanks due to its advanced high-explosive anti-tank warhead. Specifically designed to neutralize formidable military targets like tanks, this warhead boasts the ability to penetrate thick layers of armor. Drawing inspiration from anti-tank guided missiles or ATGM, the warhead of the Zala Lancet-3 operates by detonating prior to reaching its target and subsequently fire a projectile that penetrates the target’s armor. This capacity is facilitated by the impressive speed of the Zala Lancet-3 drone, which can reach up to 186 mph during a dive towards the body of a Leopard 2A6 tank. With its high explosive fragmentation and thermobaric warhead, the Zala Lancet-3 drone delivers a devastating impact, effectively penetrating the tank's armor and inflicting severe damage.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

Опубликовано:

 

27 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,5 тыс.   
@АлександрМихеев-ц2я
In vain Germany delivered its tanks to Ukraine. It is difficult to imagine what kind of rage a Russian soldier feels when looking at a German tank with a cross on board.
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
troll
@freak-fumaster23
@freak-fumaster23 Год назад
Well they took care of that, those tanks are being obliterated
@freak-fumaster23
@freak-fumaster23 Год назад
​@@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723troll
@ВладимирКашкин-д6ж
Apparently, it is not enough for Germany that the Russians have already been to Berlin twice.
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
troll
@easy94883
@easy94883 Год назад
Just forgot to mention one MAJOR thing... they cost $35K per unit whilst a single Leo 2 costs $11 million...
@iiii-nn1dt
@iiii-nn1dt Год назад
the net cost is a fraction of that, the company owners eat 90 % of the cost.
@DanBergmanSE
@DanBergmanSE Год назад
And you forgot to mention that Russia do not have the capability to make the chips needed, sure , the one they have are a threat.. but unless they strip more washing machines and microwaves.. Stupid video.. and most likely made by a Russian troll factory
@JP-qb3ny
@JP-qb3ny Год назад
Not only the monetary cost but the production time and manpower needed to manufacture modern tanks.
@djkinetic2020
@djkinetic2020 Год назад
@@Aquafyre Price doesn't matter, Ukraine doesn't manufucture Leopard 2's even if they did it would the Russians first target.
@andreww1225
@andreww1225 Год назад
Not 11 million
@CuttySark-yz6fi
@CuttySark-yz6fi Год назад
The Lancet-3 can stay in the air for 40 minutes, the range is 70 km. Powered by a silent electric motor. It weighs 12 kg and the payload itself weighs 3 kg. It usually hunts in tandem with the observation drone "Orlan" with very good optics. The Lancet is steered with a joystick , it often works in tandem with another drone that acts as a scout. Usually it is Orlan, which directs the target. Lancet-3 kamikaze attacks are filmed by "Orlan". It is very effective. Once the operator sets the target, it will almost always destroy the object. Lancet-1 and Lancet-2 are manufactured by ZALA Aero from Izhevsk. A controlling stake in the company (50.85 percent) is owned by a local businessman, Aleksandr Zakharov, while the remaining shares belong to the legendary Kalashnikov concern. Zakharov is also the main constructor of drones designed and manufactured at ZALA. His son and daughter are also involved in the business.
@ilonaanoli1593
@ilonaanoli1593 Год назад
Then the next step will be locating the drone operators and targeting them. And tanks will be protected by anti drone rockets. We will see that next year.
@milt0824
@milt0824 Год назад
I wish them well in thier fight against US proxy wars
@tonyp2865
@tonyp2865 Год назад
@@ilonaanoli1593 You're so detached from reality it's mindboggling.
@zv9768
@zv9768 Год назад
In Russia, We call it effective family business
@olegalmaty4659
@olegalmaty4659 Год назад
The new group Lancets determine the goals themselves among themselves.
@azamatbagatov973
@azamatbagatov973 Год назад
Actually Leopard 2 is the one who found Lancer3, they are friends.
@jimhollywood2763
@jimhollywood2763 Год назад
Just as the Russian Army finds its home in the dirt. We agree.
@henthust9784
@henthust9784 Год назад
​@@jimhollywood2763Especially in a Hollywood movie. In reality,....Nay.....
@maheshperera171
@maheshperera171 Год назад
good comment, German tiger tank was wiped out by Russian T34 at ww2, Now leopard 2 vs lancet 3 at ww2+,
@alitatunertc1775
@alitatunertc1775 Год назад
@@maheshperera171in reality, this war is the unfinished business of WWII. Same with China and Taiwan. China has unfinished business to take care in Taiwan since the end of 1945.
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Год назад
​@@alitatunertc1775there are ghosts of ww2 at play in this war, it will help Europe to emotionally move on from the 1940s and banging on about Hitler and the Nazis
@kwanchan6745
@kwanchan6745 Год назад
$35,000 lancet-3 drone takes out $3.5M tanks
@ФилимоновФилимонов-х6п
Он стоит 12000 долларов а не 35000
@klaabu99
@klaabu99 Год назад
@@ФилимоновФилимонов-х6п who cares so far they destroyed 0 leopards :)... is there actual number how many leopards is destroyed... after first destroyed leopard russia counted 4 - 1 destroyed by drone, 1 by artillery, 1 by helicopter and 1 by landmine ...+ 2 more for footage from different angle ... so it was total 6 tanks ... oh and i forgot to count these destroyed leopards what were destroyed before first leopards arrived to ukraine
@ФилимоновФилимонов-х6п
@@klaabu99 1 леопард и 16 Брэдли уничтожили при попытке штурма, парни заглушили сигнал GPS, ВСУ не знали куда ехать, непосредственно первый леопард был уничтожен из рпг корнет, и вся колонна из 16 Брэдли была уничтожена беспилотниками китайскими за 300 долларов и корнетом, непосредственно человек который подбил леопард был ранен в руку, там был жаркий бой, украинцы бросили технику и убежали, а в общей сложности уничтожено 18 леопардов и 50-60 Брэдли, миф о техники НАТО сильно преувеличен вашими СМИ, если уж беспилотник за 300 долларов может уничтожить Брэдли, а каких технологиях может идти речь, НАТО очень слабое по факту как оказалось
@timurshirchenko8443
@timurshirchenko8443 Год назад
А хохлы гранаты скидывают в люки наших танков - это ещё дешевле.
@ARNO-m9n
@ARNO-m9n Год назад
Он стоит 11 $ долоров
@reginaldlagrone5082
@reginaldlagrone5082 Год назад
Western PlayStation Generals hype up the Leopard II tank and Bradley IFV. In fantasy land or a Hollywood movies the Leopard II tank and Bradley IFV are invincible. Now they make excuses for poor performance
@Masterafro999
@Masterafro999 Год назад
"iTs onlLy ThE OdS verSion". how the turntbales turned. now its them talking their way out
@tommurphy7611
@tommurphy7611 Год назад
Slava bradley square slava 🤣
@2know1self
@2know1self Год назад
​@hydroponichomesteader6852 😢 actually for a fighting vehicle the Bradley is doing well. Most of the Bradley have been shown to be recoverable. The Leparod tanks are the ones that are really underperforming.
@Peterswarahed
@Peterswarahed Год назад
Where are the abrahms?
@jimhollywood2763
@jimhollywood2763 Год назад
There is very little good news for Russia with this war. So what you are saying is about the best they can say. Pitiful.
@orasatk
@orasatk Год назад
Russian flying shovels 😮😮
@n0zferattu
@n0zferattu Год назад
destroyed german paper tiger
@edsosa6205
@edsosa6205 Год назад
😂😂😂😂 yup
@Викторгончаров-й1у
Да тебе по голове
@murlokkiller4743
@murlokkiller4743 Год назад
Looks like it's a shame to loose tanks because of flying shovels
@lf6756
@lf6756 Год назад
So great to invade neighbours!
@DOGosaurus_rex
@DOGosaurus_rex Год назад
0:50 I think that is the Hollywood notion of tanks. never in The history of tanks the military considered them as "invincible"or "indestructible"that is total bs
@liuxiangcheng6458
@liuxiangcheng6458 Год назад
Россия это не Ирак и не Афганистан ,поэтому западная техника не долго живет на линии фронта
@mortalvideos1827
@mortalvideos1827 Год назад
Is it the end of tanks? Buying tanks for millions doesn't make much sense when a 34k drone can destroy them easily.
@scrubvision5652
@scrubvision5652 Год назад
tanks with proper support will still be used and is still viable
@mortalvideos1827
@mortalvideos1827 Год назад
@@scrubvision5652 What support can save them from the drones?
@lordbendtner7021
@lordbendtner7021 Год назад
​@@mortalvideos1827Not a patriot system, that's for sure.
@JP-qb3ny
@JP-qb3ny Год назад
No, if they neutralize the threats to tanks it is still a very valuable tool that infantry needs for support. But that’s the game once they figure out a way to counter the threats eventually new anti tank measures will be created. The Americans don’t want to give Ukraine the latest tech in countering anti tank weapons because that’ll give Russia the ability to figure out a way to bypass the latest US tech. They want to save their latest and greatest stuff for last, if it ever comes down to WW3. Russia is doing the same thing also.
@santhajayasinghe4054
@santhajayasinghe4054 Год назад
@@mortalvideos1827 jammers. Ukranions must upgrade their own Electronic warfare and jamming systems. But unfortunately they are always trying to rely on wepons supply by others. On the other hand Russians upgrading their wepons and systems and testing successfully
@peterironrope
@peterironrope Год назад
What's amazing to think about is Iran captured an American Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) by its cyberwarfare unit which commandeered the aircraft and safely landed it in northeastern Iran on 5 December 2011. Iran built a military drone program off this captured US drone and has modernized the program and production and is now supplying Russia with these state-of-the-art UAV drones.
@mal6232
@mal6232 Год назад
Quite prophetic really.
@Petrovich124
@Petrovich124 Год назад
Россия их модифицирует глонасс/gps , у иранских только инерциальное наведение
@ostberg71
@ostberg71 Год назад
Yes they need to copy the technology!!
@non9886
@non9886 Год назад
capture of this drone was rather important as a way how to find out how it works and how to counter it. they have own development, respectively whole drone developement is able just because of lighter bateries and lighter materials in general. it is not rocket science. states which steal most technologies are israel, japan and usa imho...
@1kyzya1
@1kyzya1 Год назад
You are talking about Geran or shahid dron that was built by Iran !!! Lancet drones where designed and manufactured by Kalashnikov Russia!!!
@AussieMaleTuber
@AussieMaleTuber Год назад
Since the mid 1980's I have looked at naval ships and army armoured vehicles including tanks as just targets. You wouldn't want to be stuck in a ship or in a tank during a battle.
@lance9150
@lance9150 Год назад
You also really don't want to fight ships and tanks if you don't have ships and tanks on your side.
@lielyncher755
@lielyncher755 Год назад
The technology of the modern battlefield has made cover, concealment and camouflage obsolete. At this rate with the ability to strike any target with pinpoint accuracy, it's fair to say that all solders will soon become drone operators.
@andyduhamel1925
@andyduhamel1925 Год назад
@@lielyncher755 It will come down to money, eventually those that have large budgets in real terms will develop superior tech.
@andyduhamel1925
@andyduhamel1925 Год назад
True the Moskva was proof, $750million at today's prices to replace, it also showed the incompetence of the crew by not actively scanning the horizon. The radar system was not up to the task, apparently which explains the two Neptune impacts.
@FrenchmansFlats51
@FrenchmansFlats51 Год назад
yup
@abigail_mcleod
@abigail_mcleod Год назад
we call it " The Mighty flying shovel "
@tmw007
@tmw007 Год назад
This proves Tank battalions without anti ariel support is suicidal.
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Год назад
When the war began and Russian columns were savaged by TB2 drones i thought what idiots to venture with insufficient air cover and tight parade formation
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
they rushed in like fools it happens,
@agungunardi8432
@agungunardi8432 Год назад
I love the way Russian People think : Simplicity. Their drones are simple but deadly. they even can make DJI Drone into recon Drone and even attack drone .. on this war .. Russian and Iranian Drones are the winner ...in term of cost and effectiveness ..
@charger6634
@charger6634 Год назад
😂😂
@ulrichturke8964
@ulrichturke8964 Год назад
Very impressive how RuZZians think, how to murder, rape and enslave their neighbours.
@enverhoxha545
@enverhoxha545 Год назад
I think for general speaking u are true tho..like the Khrizantenma...simple but deadly
@theprogressivecynic2407
@theprogressivecynic2407 Год назад
Russia didn't develop them. They simply copied the Israeli Hero-400 drones that they bought in 2010 after their contract ran out. It's the same system with a slightly different launch setup and Chinese parts.
@Ace.Ventura
@Ace.Ventura Год назад
@@theprogressivecynic2407 bla bla bla...
@IrfanAli-qp1gm
@IrfanAli-qp1gm Год назад
To those experts who over different videos praising the Leopard 2 and its oboard situational awareness systems - how did that help against the Lancet 3?
@saadman920
@saadman920 Год назад
no matter how many cameras you attach to a tank, when a drone is flying towards you you cant do anything except for praying.
@ericmueller87
@ericmueller87 Год назад
Lol what a cheap take. Who claimed that situational awareness helps against drone attacks? Or are you arguing against yourself?
@ГеоргийКузнецов-г8п
Kalashnitkov is the best.
@IrfanAli-qp1gm
@IrfanAli-qp1gm Год назад
@@saadman920Well as an alternative criticism - the experts were also talking up it's impressive armour.
@klaabu99
@klaabu99 Год назад
@@saadman920 does israels iron fist work against those drones? .. it works against rpg .... and these drones are a lot slower
@TsarOfRuss
@TsarOfRuss Год назад
"Russia has no weapons... Russia does not even have walkie-talkies to use communicate among its troops, Russia is fighting with shovels" - CNN
@chizuanchan2557
@chizuanchan2557 Год назад
😂😂
@insanekos1
@insanekos1 Год назад
You could say that Lancet is flying shovel :D
@jackdaniels6949
@jackdaniels6949 Год назад
let them believe their own propaganda. Super. Meanwhile Russia prevails silently on the battlefield. It's like in the fairy tales of Aesop with the vain raven and the fox. The west wins in the animations on TV and Russia on the battlefield.
@ИльяЧендемеров
Ланцет подбил точно один Леопард-2 ( возможно больше, но других видео я не видел) , показав такую возможность. Но основную работу провели Ка-52 и ПТРК "Корнет". Ланцет используется в первую очередь для борьбы с артиллерией. Например на его счету, если я не ошибаюсь, 100+ гаубиц M777. И ещё несколько десятков САУ: польских Krab и американских M-109 Paladin. Ну и десятки единиц советской техники : Акация, Гвоздика и т. Д.
@woise83
@woise83 Год назад
Да, КА-52 с вихрем - имба....!
@Алексак-у3ц
@Алексак-у3ц Год назад
А че не 1000 каждого вида? там еще 500 химарсов ты забыл добавить.
@klaabu99
@klaabu99 Год назад
i guess u talk about video where lancet hit leopard and leopards smoke grenades detonated ... and it was already damaged leopard... probably by landmine ..
@ИльяЧендемеров
@@Алексак-у3ц Перепроверил, это всего М777 уничтожено, не только ланцетами . Но ланцет хорош тем что записывает каждое поражение. И на всё есть пруфы. Если ни одного хаймарса ланцетом не уничтожили ( тупо дальность не позволяет) то я и не пишу об этом. В данный момент у ланцетов, емнип, 350 + зарегестрированных поражений. Это в принципе за 1,5 года не такое космическое число. Самые жирные у него уловы это не пушки а уничтожения ЗРК. Были уничтожены несколько пусковых установок и локатор С-300 и ещё одна iris-t.
@Алексак-у3ц
@Алексак-у3ц Год назад
@@ИльяЧендемеров покажи пруфы, я видел только 1 где арту 777 уничтожили или блабла?
@ttolkovnuk_bledder-_-
@ttolkovnuk_bledder-_- Год назад
One leopard 2a6 tank costs 510 million rubles, and this drone costs 3 million rubles... so it's a pretty effective and cheap weapon.
@zov-fv9vj
@zov-fv9vj Год назад
12000💲
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
troll
@Lancetdrone
@Lancetdrone Год назад
This week, the milestone of 500 attacks by lancet drone was crossed.
@renemartin5729
@renemartin5729 Год назад
What happened to all the "game changing" Javelins?
@alexejks8468
@alexejks8468 Год назад
they went to Iran for modification, they will return soon.
@ИмператорСметаны
В Даркнете их много , если хочешь можешь купить себе . Думаю скоро увидим их в Европе , там они возможно будут эффективны 😂
@DazednConfused0
@DazednConfused0 Год назад
they destroyed everything except the "artillery tanks" hiding behind the lines
@haraldlarsson3384
@haraldlarsson3384 Год назад
It`s wonderful too see how Lancet 3 finds Leopard 2 go on Russia you make my day.
@MDKev82
@MDKev82 Год назад
Love at first sight 😍
@Samoasoa
@Samoasoa Год назад
I love it when it says "Its Ukrainian Leopard II tanks". LOL My Gosh, its the damn German Tanks. 😉
@theprogressivecynic2407
@theprogressivecynic2407 Год назад
No, they aren't. That distinction is referring to the fact that the German Leopards are domestic models, with the most advanced systems, while the ones sent to Ukraine are export models, with several key systems downgraded to protect security. It's like how US variant Abrams have depleted Uranium armor and the Trophy APS, while export models have composite armor and no APS. It's a different tank. The only export model MBT that is superior to the base model is the Indian T-90, which was heavily modified with after-market modifications. The optics were ripped out and replaced with French upgrade, while the electronics were replaced by the Israelis. Russia actually re-imported a couple models for just this reason.
@Samoasoa
@Samoasoa Год назад
@@theprogressivecynic2407 thanks. Now I understand, those tanks are sub grades that do no good to Ukraine. More like coffins made of steel. So much for the love from Berlin to Keiv.😅
@fatherrussell5303
@fatherrussell5303 Год назад
Those are some pretty deadly shovels
@cjsteadman6217
@cjsteadman6217 Год назад
Isn't the Gephardt 35mm system in Ukraine out of ammo? I remember seeing stories about Switzerland not resupplying that system. Apparently they are the only ones making ammo for it. Did they change their minds or did Germany continue to disarm itself for Ukraine?
@benjibyte8612
@benjibyte8612 Год назад
Yukrein haven't tranfer mony to swiss bank account to restock gephardt ammos..
@iBOOM
@iBOOM Год назад
The Gepard system has been phased out in favor of the mantis system.
@ulrichturke8964
@ulrichturke8964 Год назад
Meanwhile, Rheinmetall company has started production of this ammunition.
@neolord50pro77
@neolord50pro77 Год назад
I rather think about such weapons as golden middle between artillery and high precision missiles, especially in terms of cost. Its cost equivalent to about 75 units of 152 shell and 1/10 of Kalibr missile. It's efficient solution and good compromise between various needs of modern warfare. You can attack not only tanks and armor with it but also concentrated infantry formations and supplying vehicles while staying cost-efficient. One major flaw is that it's still mostly operated by human operator when it ought be manned by autonomous ai capable of finding most optimal point of strike in split second to maximize the dammage.
@fungames24
@fungames24 Год назад
Russian NI (natural intelligence) is beating nato AI. That means AI is useless. AI only works in games. Even then, it cheats. Can't cheat physics in real life.
@Masterafro999
@Masterafro999 Год назад
AI is still far from capable of doing such complex tasks with all other combat related parameters it has to keep in "mind". I do like the thought of it but that would be ridiculously expensive. It takes years to train even the most advanced AI we have today and none of those are "smart" enough to manage combat halo style. A human operator is still your best bet. A competent tank hunter surely knows where to shoot any tank he could face on the battlefield. The leopard armour layout is mostly publicly available Wasting a caliber cruise missile on a single tank or trench would be bonkers.
@zaazzaaaz1704
@zaazzaaaz1704 Год назад
А потом этот и клинанет и он полетит не туда, и не способен принимать решения не подподабщ е под протоколы. Так что исключено, и не способен импровизировать
@neolord50pro77
@neolord50pro77 Год назад
@@zaazzaaaz1704 проблема только в цене. вон джавелин пальнул он и сам дальше соображает с траекторией на автопилоте. Но там просто оптика совершенее и есть тепловизор, а Ланцет это дешево и сердито. Против НАТО Ланцет устареет уже "завтра".
@ladakalina408
@ladakalina408 Год назад
You watched too much "...and machines rose from the ashes ..." It is still impossible to conduct military operations without human intelligence.
@soundknight
@soundknight Год назад
Nobody, no body, thinks the tank is "inviceable".
@VES.
@VES. Год назад
yet ther was a ton of hi- level people (or they ware just "HI") who said that leo tanks would make a difference on the battlefield. I think it was Scot Ritter who was the first to point out that these tanks will burn just as well as the russian ones...
@avay8726
@avay8726 Год назад
Well if you going back into 2022 Everyone laugh at T series and said that western tank will be a gale changing
@TheNera2010
@TheNera2010 Год назад
You say that and we know it but for years Germans made all kinds of statements in which they insisted that "Leopard 2 tanks are invincible". They blamed Turkish soldiers about the destruction of Leopard 2s in Syria by ISIS. They said "Turks couldn't use the tanks properly etc." They must shut up and accept that tanks can be easily destroyed by modern weapons.
@kazimierzmarszaek1539
@kazimierzmarszaek1539 Год назад
​@@VES.Nie ma czołgów odpornych na trafienie, są tylko źle trafione... .
@makoado6010
@makoado6010 Год назад
but...but... this is the best tank of the world...
@anthonyloveanthonylove2159
@anthonyloveanthonylove2159 Год назад
I thought this the most hyped tanks was supposed to be stealth ? Invisible to radars ?
@DanielMedina-vj1zi
@DanielMedina-vj1zi Год назад
X Wing configuration makes me remember the Fritz X bomb. Why only is mentioned the Leopar II, Bradleys, Challenger, and M1 Abrahams not mentioned in the video
@lance9150
@lance9150 Год назад
Bradleys have performed extremely poorly. Challenger has yet to be seen, older Russian weapons destroyed them in other conflicts th. Abrams tank has not been authorized, likely they know that the extremely heavy tank will not perform well in this conflict and it will be an embarrassment, more so than what we have already seen.
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Год назад
​@@lance9150Abrams vunerable to getting stuck in the dispassionate squelchy soils of Ukraine
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044
@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 Год назад
Indeed about the Fritz X bomb think of it as a hexagonal axis with the central one missing or a double wing
@heroldmutebi8200
@heroldmutebi8200 Год назад
But Gaypards were also taken out by the same drone a while back in Kherson.
@christopherbong6639
@christopherbong6639 Год назад
So much for the Leopard tanks being a game changer😂😂😂. So when is the US going to send their game changing tanks to be destroyed.
@AlbionTVLondon
@AlbionTVLondon Год назад
Good job Lancet! It comes from legendary Kalashnikov, anything less than triumphant success would not be acceptable.
@Морозов-ь7с
@Морозов-ь7с Год назад
Today I watched a report about lancet, it turned out that the engineer lived with the legendary kalashnikov in the same building.
@AlbionTVLondon
@AlbionTVLondon Год назад
@@Морозов-ь7с I think there's more than one engineer working on this project. But the managing parent company is the legendary Kalashnikov group. So we can expect the very best.
@НиколайСтарухин-ф9д
Ланцет очень хороший инструмент он помогает открытся порталам к Бандере поставленым Западом для укронацистов.
@simphiweluthuli9735
@simphiweluthuli9735 Год назад
I think the colour white is to show the enemy that its coming but you can't do nothing...it will destroy you ...fair fight
@Masterafro999
@Masterafro999 Год назад
white is harder to spot from the ground with the sky and potential clouds in the background
@samiam5557
@samiam5557 Год назад
This damn war is bringing about a whole rewriting of combat engagement.
@theprogressivecynic2407
@theprogressivecynic2407 Год назад
Not really. The Israelis developed the Harpy drone in 1989, and the Iranian Shahed line is just a bootleg version of that which is half as fast, but cheaper. Better versions of the drones that are causing so much chaos now have been on the market since then, albeit under heavy export bans demanded by the US. We basically tried to delay this evolution of combat as long as possible by restricting those exports--it worked for nearly 30 years, but the cat is thoroughly out of that bag at this point. Even China is in on the action, as they bought some 2004 Harpy drones and reverse-engineered them into their new "cutting edge" ASN-301 drones. Even bootlegs of this old tech are killing new tech in some really impressive ways. Similarly, the Lancet-3 is just the Russian version of the Israeli Hero-400 drones that Russia bought years ago. They updated the launch tubes a bit, but the system is fundamentally the same, with Chinese components instead of western ones. Ironically, the USMC is currently training using the same system (Hero-400) while we roll out our own version. Also, if you want to sleep at night, don't look up the Lanius drone. It's effectively a claymore mine on a racing drone body, with an indoor mapping program, facial recognition, and IR camera. Imagine the hunter robots from Minority Report, but worse.
@WARGAMES-r7n
@WARGAMES-r7n Год назад
lancet 3 designers loved star wars so much they made their own
@inquizative44
@inquizative44 Год назад
Russia probably has a bunch of video gamer kids operating these Lancets.
@kawatapumbulu2116
@kawatapumbulu2116 Год назад
Leopards are just paper tiger 🐯 nothing serious!
@PeterLamin-bw5rs
@PeterLamin-bw5rs Год назад
Carry kat😂😂😂
@dontlook8748
@dontlook8748 Год назад
If you give a farmer control of a moders tank, he will perform like a farmer
@arcturus4762
@arcturus4762 Год назад
You're supposed to give the farmers rifles, that's where they excel if the issue is killing large quantities of Russians and Americans.
@m.junaidmahmood4209
@m.junaidmahmood4209 Год назад
This war seems not to be stopping in the near future. Ukrainian counter offensive just lacked the element of surprise and giving time to Moscow to effectively plan their defense.
@LeveretteJamesClifford1955
@LeveretteJamesClifford1955 Год назад
The Bradleys have been destroyed but the Leopards have been damaged, not destroyed. The fires are caused by leaks of hydraulic fluid, but the ammunition inside was not destroyed which would cause the Leopard to explode and truly be destroyed. But that hasn't happened and the crews escaped with their lives and the Leopards can be recovered and repaired. The Leopard has explosive compartments like the Abrams which prevent ammunition from being ignited and the crew from being killed by an inside explosion or the blast wave. So don't sell the Leopard short. The Bradley is a badly flawed troop carrier, not a heavy tank.
@ТриРомба-р6х
@ТриРомба-р6х 8 месяцев назад
Леопард не взрывается так как ...хвалёный русский танк ,так взрывается что башня вылетает , ни одного леопарда я не видет с снесенной башней в Украине.
@kthej2409
@kthej2409 Год назад
Very interesting, thank you!
@GYANPROBHU
@GYANPROBHU Год назад
Mines,Lancet or alligators, how do you know whose the kills belong to?
@darielrodriguez6984
@darielrodriguez6984 Год назад
Mines: Vehicle crossing a mined area usually the blow comes from below Lancets: They record the flight and the impact K-52: Recordig missile impact
@jackdaniels6949
@jackdaniels6949 Год назад
I think it's not important. Important: they do their job , are successful. On the battlefield and not in animations on TV by our "studio experts" and armchair generals. It's the difference between Hollywood and reality. "Adventures of Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse in Ukraine". LOL
@andrewhayes7055
@andrewhayes7055 Год назад
It was KA-52 that destroyed the tanks, Russia released the footage a couple of weeks ago
@AleksandrB_38
@AleksandrB_38 Год назад
the whole world: using the SI system USA : we will use some bullshit, feet, pounds, lbs
@stbraslawski
@stbraslawski Год назад
Русские гранаты отскакивают от Леопарда, как мелкая щебенка! Как только удастся получить адекватное прикрытие с воздуха, Леопарды будут неудержимы!👍
@danielaramburo7648
@danielaramburo7648 Год назад
Why not paint the Lancet brown so it’s harder to spot from the air?
@galactuscausandoimpactus9521
Boa pergunta, a resposta deve ser porque seria difícil de enxergar com o drone orlan-10 que faz a filmagem dos impactos.
@class2instructor32
@class2instructor32 Год назад
White is harder to spot in the sky from the ground
@gugulethuzangwa8358
@gugulethuzangwa8358 Год назад
Coz it's easier to spot a dark colour (brown) than white in the sky
@user-sj7od4ps2u
@user-sj7od4ps2u Год назад
Это - не авиамодель! Голубой и белый - меньше заметен с земли...
@user-sj7od4ps2u
@user-sj7od4ps2u Год назад
Именно поэтому раскраска военных самолетов имеет различие снизу и сверху...
@obser7088
@obser7088 Год назад
Lancet 3 is not a game changer, because Russia is beating West hard from the very beginning.
@heinzkoenig8831
@heinzkoenig8831 Год назад
The IC chips for this drone have been taken out from washing machines 😂
@dasarvy
@dasarvy Год назад
some people in the west still repeat " Russia has nothing"...
@ТриРомба-р6х
@ТриРомба-р6х 8 месяцев назад
Оно так и есть , дрон это микросхемы , где они их берут , китай наверное даёт ...
@callmesir4240
@callmesir4240 Год назад
This drone is cheaper than Javelin but has better range and maneuverability, and no tank on the planet can survive an attack from above.
@aleksandarparipovic1450
@aleksandarparipovic1450 Год назад
🇷🇺💪🔥
@postenlopov6413
@postenlopov6413 Год назад
Lancet 3 is addicted to Leopard 2 Tank
@gregheitland4392
@gregheitland4392 Год назад
So, let’s get this straight? The speed of this weapon is comparable to less than any WW 1 biplane fighter….
@bigtechisbigbrother8690
@bigtechisbigbrother8690 Год назад
It doesn't have to be super-fast to be effective. Packs a powerful warhead for its size, is easily deployable anywhere, small, decent range, quiet, stealthy and hard to hit. You don't see or hear it coming until it's only a few hundred meters away and you only have a couple seconds to react. BOOM!!
@michaelbetsch9700
@michaelbetsch9700 Год назад
So what's your point
@SportZFan4L1fe
@SportZFan4L1fe Год назад
Lancet Cruising speed is 60mph but once target is acquired, the Lancet accelerates to 180 mph for the kill.
@n0zferattu
@n0zferattu Год назад
and succeed
@lance9150
@lance9150 Год назад
Funny thing is these can attack at different angles and altitude so they use these to knock out radar and air defense as well as whatever wonder weapon tank or ifv NATO can supply.
@maxloewe9162
@maxloewe9162 Год назад
No mention of electronic warfare? And how are a couple of gepards supposed to solve the problem?
@tm9316
@tm9316 Год назад
War only stops when people stop focusing their most valuable possession on it. Attention. Start looking for ways for peace and coexistence of different ideas and values. Everywhere you look you see what you are looking for..
@Gold-qs7kj
@Gold-qs7kj Год назад
Piękny widok a takie ladne hamerykanskie
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
troll
@Gold-qs7kj
@Gold-qs7kj Год назад
@@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 A może chachal banderowiec
@Gold-qs7kj
@Gold-qs7kj Год назад
@@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 A może chachal banderowiec
@VishalSharma-wu5ln
@VishalSharma-wu5ln Год назад
Two most impressive and effective weapons of this war - HIMAR and Lancet.
@Sabbatai-Zevi-1666
@Sabbatai-Zevi-1666 Год назад
Bravo Russia!
@snuffle2269
@snuffle2269 Год назад
The quest now is HIMARs so is their use out of the range of the Lancet 3? Good hunting Lancet 3.
@WoutBr
@WoutBr Год назад
In short: it's a predator missile that goes slower
@ManojAdikari-qd1nj
@ManojAdikari-qd1nj Год назад
And eye too😂 Just cry German s
@theprogressivecynic2407
@theprogressivecynic2407 Год назад
Predator is the drone, which fires Hellfire missiles. Outside of that, yes, that's the general gist of it. It also has longer range and can swarm against defended targets.
@pajil8444
@pajil8444 Год назад
generally, even though most of us are not experts or skilled analysts, but the logic of our common sense will think that with the reputation and category of the leopard tank as one of the best tanks in the world, it must have an estimated price worth millions for each leopard tank, while the kamikaze drone lancet have an estimated price worth tens of thousands for each drone. the conclusion is for comparison, with the price of each leopard tank you can buy hundreds or thousands of lancet drones and the fact is that each lancet can destroy a leopard, accept it or not, that's a fact,but if it is considered with the fate of the leopard, it is better to accept common sense because there are those who are more unlucky which is between the M1 Abrams tank and the Rpg,,sad but true
@zeergee
@zeergee Год назад
Since the counteroffensive, on June 4, 17 leopards have been destroyed. Russia is power!🇷🇺💪✌️
@кот-щ3д
@кот-щ3д Год назад
Чел их вроде на всю Украину 16 штук. 😂. Возможно 10 штук уничтожено но наши любят преувеличевать
@talassaXXI
@talassaXXI Год назад
2nd best power in Ukraine😂
@mosnicolae1678
@mosnicolae1678 Год назад
​@@talassaXXIafter wagner rebellion, the red army is the second power in russia :)
@rusarg66
@rusarg66 Год назад
@@кот-щ3д Туда отправили около 40 , проверяй инфу перед тем как писать.
@jorgecortes8448
@jorgecortes8448 Год назад
@@mosnicolae1678 what rebellion? the 5-minute peaceful rebellion?
@peterryan4851
@peterryan4851 Год назад
All attacking armoured forces (main battle tanks and AFV’s) need to be accompanied by Gerard’s or equivalent. This is the future for all battles, beyond Ukraine.
@hglenn55
@hglenn55 Год назад
Is the Lancet thermobaric or armor piercing? Its either or not both. If its thermobaric it can immobilize a tank but not kill it. Lets get the information right.
@PopArt-i9r
@PopArt-i9r Год назад
Садись в в леопард и всё узнаешь сам
@dezalt
@dezalt Год назад
​@@PopArt-i9rWhere's your formidable terminator and armata?
@ВалерийИгум
@ВалерийИгум Год назад
​@@dezaltБерегут для вас, это на долго, как минимум до 2026 года.
@badgerassz
@badgerassz Год назад
in a modern warfare, antitank tanks such the Leo2 are completely outdated, they are too much heavy (over 60t+), huge dimensions, no armor on side, rear and top projections. Novadays tanks are fighting mainly bunkers, MRAPs, IFVs, houses with troops with HE shells. Leo2 is designed for antitank defensive (hold ambush position) purpose only. And the Bradley is the worse IFV ever! 9:45 look at its huge dimensions near the Leo2 for its small 25mm main gun, you can't miss it from 3km fire.
@sonnyjim5268
@sonnyjim5268 Год назад
You have to wonder with these drones and the proliferation ATGMs are tanks a thing of the past?
@scrubvision5652
@scrubvision5652 Год назад
@@Aquafyre ifv's with aps and launchers that can destroy drones seems to be the idea but still they will get destroyed by swarm of drones
@sonnyjim5268
@sonnyjim5268 Год назад
@@Aquafyre You are right that in the history of warfare there is innovation and dominance by that innovation until a counter is developed. However, in the case of these drones and ATGMs, the cost is so low that every second infantryman can be equipped with one of these. The sheer number of these on the battlefield, coupled with the escalating costs of tanks has to reach a point where tanks are no longer cost effective for the role they play.
@DOGosaurus_rex
@DOGosaurus_rex Год назад
An for the 1000000 time we hear this again and again 🤦‍♂️
@niweshlekhak9646
@niweshlekhak9646 Год назад
@@sonnyjim5268 the same was said for ballistic missiles which made a comeback in 2010s.
@sonnyjim5268
@sonnyjim5268 Год назад
@@DOGosaurus_rex That's not an argument. Calvary eventually became useless, ineffective and obsolete in light of technological advances, so it's not without precedent.
@andreiarama8745
@andreiarama8745 Год назад
The tank is obsolete. Why? Because it costs way more than a drone and when you loose a one 3-4 soldiers die also. On the other hand the drone operator is safe
@Jajajaziel_Mendoza
@Jajajaziel_Mendoza Год назад
Beautiful.
@nordvlad
@nordvlad 10 месяцев назад
Это еще кинтрнастипа не було,они еще нам покажуть)))
@Desire123ification
@Desire123ification Год назад
Great Video! Thanks.
@BrumKid
@BrumKid Год назад
I bet Germany is getting pissed with all these great Leopard 2 tanks getting destroyed.
@tonyp2865
@tonyp2865 Год назад
Sales are dropping faster than Biden.
@pratap3573
@pratap3573 6 месяцев назад
Now India need this type of drones.
@Mrkvitek
@Mrkvitek Год назад
Krásná práce.👍
@angloedu5499
@angloedu5499 Год назад
Rule number one in modern warfare, control your logistics for food and ammunition with superior AirPower. However, superior AirPower doesn’t mean you’ll win, it actually means little if your fighting a more aggressive enemy, the Napoleonic Spanish Portuguese Wars, the Korean or Vietnam Wars are good examples of this strategy. The best war for guerrilla tactics is to destroy the enemies strong points, ammunition depots, training and supply routes, avoid civilian targets, and mute out news reporting over sensitive issues. Avoid large military objectives, instead root out subversives and capture the junta leader from within. Today’s modern Israeli tactics used in its never ending conflicts are prime examples of rooting out future problems by tackling the present problems. Long gone are the days of large military interventions, it’s smaller and more precision tactics that curb death numbers and focuses of direct objectives and reducing civilian deaths.
@mortalvideos1827
@mortalvideos1827 Год назад
Userfriendly killing experience lol.
@tenedor5664
@tenedor5664 Год назад
Lancet-3 40.000 €. Leopard 2 A6. 8.5 millones de €. ZOV.🇷🇺✌️
@RobFomenko
@RobFomenko Год назад
Tanks have never been indestructible. Every advancement of tank technology is countered with a new anti-tank tactics. I think that active systems like trophy, along with new technology for anti-drone area denial is the short answer. Those drones look too good to be made by Russia. Wonder how much Western technology is in that?
@glenndavis4452
@glenndavis4452 Год назад
Russia, and the Soviet Union have always had technology roughly equal to the US and NATO.
@RobFomenko
@RobFomenko Год назад
@@glenndavis4452 in your dreams. Russia can't even build a decent car. If it wasn't for the theft of Western technology they wouldn't even have nukes. Sure they built up a huge army of tanks and artillery, the second best in the world they said. And one always have to give a salute to them getting Sputnik up before the West. But all you have to do is look at the state of Russia not only today but in the 60s and 70s and know that what you said makes no sense.
@jackdaniels6949
@jackdaniels6949 Год назад
LOL , if so , why could your own army not use this game changing technology and defeat the Russians? Doesn't make sense. It's your stupid propaganda about Russians stealing refrigerator chips etc and the western megalomania which costs you now the victory on the battlefield. You underestimate the enemy and are finally a victim of your own propaganda.
@АлександрК-к7о4с
Не строй из себя недоумка. Всё ты прекрасно знаешь и смотришь, и понимаешь. Просто всегда не приятно когда получаешь в зубы на глазах у всех , и это уже не скроешь , а не где нибудь в подворотне , когда об этом только знаешь ты и те от кого получил , ещё и с пенделем в придачу для ускорения.
@ladakalina408
@ladakalina408 Год назад
You have no idea what technology Russia has. In your head, Russia is a weak and backward country with old weapons. May it be so for you. You will sleep more peacefully.
@Bernadette-vi7qs
@Bernadette-vi7qs Год назад
Victory to Russia❤
@thomaslanders2073
@thomaslanders2073 Год назад
I don't think there is anything special about the Russian drone. People just irrationally over estimated the capability of western tanks 😅
@iiii-nn1dt
@iiii-nn1dt Год назад
people in US and EU just love being babybots, even tho f35 crashes every week for no reason.
@TheStyker
@TheStyker Год назад
Salty much 😂
@easy94883
@easy94883 Год назад
The West hasn't managed to supply anything like it to Ukraine though in 1.5 years... you don't see Switchblades doing this much damage to Russia if we're being honest
@ratakaio3802
@ratakaio3802 Год назад
Russia destroyed 0 western MBTs via Drone. 0 as in none.
@iiii-nn1dt
@iiii-nn1dt Год назад
@@ratakaio3802 babybot coping, very hard coping
@a.p.3004
@a.p.3004 Год назад
Every military unit should be accompanied by drone protection and destruction weaponry.
@bucksgemeni
@bucksgemeni Год назад
CRY PRO NATO😂😂😂😂
@mapintil
@mapintil Год назад
Not a Tank expert here, but it seams to me that an active protection system like the Israeli Trophy should be able to deal with this type of munition easily.
@BigSmartArmed
@BigSmartArmed Год назад
FYI, Israelis developed their APS from a Soviet-era DROZD system they got from Ukraine.
@mal6232
@mal6232 Год назад
Perhaps the reason is The Trophy "Heavy" system costs around US$900,000 and perhaps the Israelis don't want to let any go......Perhaps training is an issue.
@mapintil
@mapintil Год назад
Where the Israelis got the idea for the Trophy is irrelevant. What's relevant is the fact that it works.
@mapintil
@mapintil Год назад
Trophy is for sale, at least for some customers. It's been seen on newer Abrams and Leo tanks. It's an add on option.
@BigSmartArmed
@BigSmartArmed Год назад
@@mapintil Not with infantry near the tank. That's the entire point of APS, for it to be able to function without harming the infantry that's supposed to cover the tank. Russian Arena system works not just because it intercepts incoming rounds, it does so without harming the surrounding infantry.
@anticitizen721
@anticitizen721 Год назад
Since when conventional notion about tanks is that they are invincible?
@novinugroho9163
@novinugroho9163 Год назад
RUSIA VS UKRAINA AND NATO TETAP SAJA MENANG BRAVO RUSIA.... URAAAAA❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@iiii-nn1dt
@iiii-nn1dt Год назад
leopard shmeopard kaput
@bikechainmic
@bikechainmic Год назад
But crew survives unlike the fried orcs in a T90 BBQ 1
@iiii-nn1dt
@iiii-nn1dt Год назад
@@bikechainmic 4000 new ucraini and nato corpses every day, russians say it smells bed😂
@JRiddledickDangerfield
@JRiddledickDangerfield Год назад
Those tanks you showed hit mines ! The only lancet drone hitting a leopard tank was one that was already disabled . I see your examples show hitting a backhoe digger and a 4x4.
@ratakaio3802
@ratakaio3802 Год назад
And the "Lancet" only managed to destroy the Smokelauncher ammunition on the outside of the turret.
@iiii-nn1dt
@iiii-nn1dt Год назад
@@ratakaio3802 why so many leopards kaput, kaput, and kaput?
@tukituki7680
@tukituki7680 Год назад
Значит ты не видел нужное видео.
@anthonymitchell8893
@anthonymitchell8893 Год назад
there are plenty footage on telegram of leopards going up nearly 20 so far you wanna f-----g wake up son
@iiii-nn1dt
@iiii-nn1dt Год назад
russians say the ukr and nato mercs corpses smell and annoy the russians, ukrs don't take the corpses with them, that crap is left to rot on the fields.
@alphaastro3068
@alphaastro3068 Год назад
This is the real game changer
@olegalmaty4659
@olegalmaty4659 Год назад
The new group Lancets determine the goals themselves among themselves.
@pascalparis5353
@pascalparis5353 Год назад
👏👏👍👍👏👍👏👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@vincentvega9101
@vincentvega9101 Год назад
and so it will be with anyone who does not want to be honest with Russia.
@ExariConstantin
@ExariConstantin Год назад
and most interesting part is that this drone is mostly made with western electronic components )))
@_shock_4945
@_shock_4945 Год назад
Thanks to the sanctions, Russia now produces everything by itself😂
@PopArt-i9r
@PopArt-i9r Год назад
Может из восточных?
@andreww1225
@andreww1225 Год назад
Those were taken out by artillery
@YaSchved
@YaSchved Год назад
If you don't like leppards you just can't cook them)
@RaptorF22Titanium
@RaptorF22Titanium Год назад
It is getting hard to beat this combination of weapons and go on the counter offensive .Lancet - 3 is the best offensive Drone and its technology in the world right now and with Ka-52 no way
@shootingsportstransparency7461
Time after time i see the same decoy Leopard tank from different angles in every Russian propaganda video compared with the thousands of different destroyed Russian T 90, 70, 54 and a few T 34 tanks its proof of the superiority of the Leopard
@YourBelovedAme
@YourBelovedAme Год назад
why would ukrainians leave ammo in decoys with convoys be serious
@AKZP87
@AKZP87 Год назад
You forgot that hydraulic unit is in that place where lancet hit, so that was not kill
@asntsoldier9921
@asntsoldier9921 Год назад
That leaves only the challengers
@tonyp2865
@tonyp2865 Год назад
They are hiding or destroyed in their warehouses.
@Cronostoria
@Cronostoria Год назад
All you need is change the way you build a tank. Priorize the armor in the roof and the front. with reactive armor front and back, and 2nd layer roof to cover Vs granades. All you need is to resist a impact from a drone or artillery. Plus, armor the "wheels" with a reactive armor. Vs Mines, only put something in front of the tank like farm tractors and thats all. lol
@anzelmasmatutis2500
@anzelmasmatutis2500 Год назад
Tools of occupiers. Definition occupier= a member of a group that takes possession of a country by force.
@vak4875
@vak4875 Год назад
Работайте Братья хорошо!
Далее
Why Lancet Drones Highly Effective in Ukraine?
9:08
Просмотров 769 тыс.
How Russian Drone Strikes Works against Ukraine?
8:45
Просмотров 437 тыс.
How the Most Elite Spy Agency Operates
22:42
Просмотров 1,3 млн
Did Russia build the best attack helicopter ever?
19:02