Why Lancet Drones Highly Effective in Ukraine? 

and people laughed and said it wasn't possible, when I explained the networked sky mines, swarm robotics . . . . they are not laughing now.

Russian helicopter anti-tank missle Vihr has range of 8 km because a helicopter must see a target and mark it with laser beam. Lancet 3 has rage of 40-70 km. It means Russia use helicopters and lancets for different targets simultaneously. I heven't heard about heavy losses of Ka-52. It might be an Ukrainian propaganda meme.

​@@WinyPouhThere is but about 5-6. And Russia can build new.

The concept of cost effectiveness is alien to western military doctrine due privatised nature of its Military industry.

@@WinyPouh Oryx is not a credible organization.

​@@nightwatch2686afaik, I consider onyx like the infamous "fact checker" that plagued us in the covid era

Russians are intelligent people.

Russia was first who start making drones

​@@vaninecno , Russia has bad history with drones even it requested for Israel help about 20 years ago

Russia mass prod drones more than 50 years

@user-nh8rw9ek9g Israel high tech run by RUSSIA They speak Russian LoL

100 units total(documented) are not substantial ? 1/8 of the total count.

@@alfe4741 let me guess, documented by oryx, right? You know that oryx documents the same pictures taken from different angles as different vehicles?

@@user-ew7eg3ot2m Well if you have a proof of what you're saying, you can join Oryx team and fix the discrepancy. I'm sure there might be 1 or 2 at the most.

​@@alfe4741это не верная информация на пальцах посчитать можно потери ударных вертолётов

К тому же он не стоит 30 тысяч, цена увеличена как минимум в два раза.

Это на ваших сми показывают что Россия потеряла очень много людей вертолётов,, нет мой друг это ваша пропаганда хорошо работает с голевудскими сенарями,, если бы Россия захотела за неделю бы не было Украины на карте мира без ядерного оружия, просто русские не бьют по гражнаским инфраструктуром,, русские очень умело воюют против НАТО и Америки,, Россию не можно а невозможно победить

​@@FligMatikони уже добавили таможенный сбор и НДС

most of those vehicles cost more than 5 mil, but yea the western news media is carrying water for Ukraine and all the western equipment failures in Ukraine.

Hi can we get the link?

Delusional clown😂

Thought Russians only using IRANian Shahed Drones 🤔❔

@@Booz2020 it's cheap

​@@Booz2020Iranian drones are very special price .. Lancet is unstoppable force masterpiece weapon

​@@Booz2020shahed is a long range heavy drone with very large payload ( around 90 pound). They are different class of weapons. Those are used to attack large static targets in depth, Lancets are used to attack small mobile targets near frontine. Without lancets, Ukrainian casualties would have been significantly lower. Mines, lancets are responsible for stalling Ukrainian offensive.

GMLRS had more effect than lancet. Ukraine also operates large numbers of highly effective drones.

100 units total is not a small number by any means

@@alfe4741 Russians can spit those out on a scale that no other manufacturer in Europe or the US can. And I call bullshit on that number, as It certainly doesn't only comprise KA 52's only. For a better reference, you should check just how many choppers the US lost during the Vietnam war. So yeah, a hundred really isn't that much, given the intensity of the conflict and the stakes at play.

@@galoobigboi Yes, 100 helicopters total including transport, reconnaissance, electronic warfare, etc. To your point US lost 5,607 helicopters in Vietnam. Considering that war lasted 20 years, that brings us to 280/year. However, I don't agree that rate of helicopter production in Russia would be significantly higher than that of the US, considering sanctions & loss of acccess to engines from Motor Sich

@@alfe4741 Russia, according to the latest data from the world bank is now the 5th most powerful economy in the world. They have an OVERabundance of raw materials of all kinds, that they can tap into to produce efficient tech for the battlefield at a fraction of the price we produce ours. The sanctions have never stopped them from importing chips from China. Anyone who thinks they're not is deluded and no amount of sanctions is going to stop that. Take also into account that vietnamese folks NEVER had access to the kind of tech Ukrainians have access to and still were shooting down choppers almost everyday during the conflict.(if you even out the number of downed choppers relative to days of conflict) Anyway you slice it Russia comes out looking good here. I'm not trying to shill here. Then again, it's horrible what's happening and I wish they weren't killing each other. But yeah, Russians are clearly doing much better than the common narrative would have you believe.

@@alfe4741 n Russia, helicopters have been produced and are still being produced, unlike the industry of the West, Russia focuses on its own forces.

Damn those washing machines are destroying Nato Wonder Weapons then 🤔

Don't forget about the showels and breast pumps.

Стираем танки потихоньку

Вы еще лопаты наши не видели…😏

powered by nutella

Probably they sacrifice other thing to produce it. Like stoping more modern airplane or helicopter to produce. But man 50 uncontroled drone swarm already terrifying

👏Polska pozdrawia. Stop Bandery SS

That was a star wars meme from russian authorities =) На самом деле, их изготовлено пара десятков тысяч. Уже неплохо, не так ли?

​@@bagusrestuaji222talks about creating swarms of 300 geran 2 (much bigger warhead/range than lancet) to overwhelm any air defense systems. Terrifying indeed

​@@rafasolak6885ruSSki naZisto z ciebie taki Polak jak z Putina Pop.

The days of the battle tank is over

@@johnmuloch8545 It's looking that way. The disparity in cost effectiveness is pretty alarming.

@@johnmuloch8545 So what type of war will fhs future hold for us if we don't have tanks and armored vehicles? I guess until they can come out with a laser defense system tanks and armored vehicles are going to be very useless.

@@johnmuloch8545 ya man one fast aerial drone can take out an entire tank.

Ability of small aerial vehicles to carry heavy warheads keep improving

There were 35 confirmed losses of Ka-52, vast majority of them being at start of the war. Each one is around 16,000,000$, so it's quite a hefty amount of money lost.

@@KGAnims на первый этап вообще пришлось больше всего потерь техники. Танки тоже со временем научились использовать в новой реальности. Не колоннами, а увешанных Динамической защитой и решетками от fpv

@@KGAnims Confirmed by whom? Source - Ukrainian media, you can't even imagine the level of lies in Ukrainian resources - everything is based on lies! Even their spokesmen are talking about it: "If we tell the truth-our country will simply collapse" Arestovich In Russia they lie, in the USA they lie, but in Ukraine it has become exactly "Black is white and white is black" everything is twisted, everything is twisted - that's how their elite tries to survive. there is zero constructive there

indeed, but you know Russians are fighting with shovels and using chips from washing machines :D :D :D

@@KGAnims 🤣Albo mniej słońca kolego. Albo mniej ukro propagandy , która bije wszelkie granice absurdu 😅

With the current rate of technology development, in a couple of years there will be swarm drones with artificial intelligence even among the pirates of Somalia and the Berbers in Africa ...

@@kanakubatov5508 but so far America does not have :)))

через 10 лет дроны станут не нужны ..потому что закончатся танки ..

Previous version was not bad either.

Helicopter launched lanced?

But the anti-tank missle which they use probably costs around the same as lancet... In larger conflict they can be more effective due to their range.

There is a video of a Russian tank crashing into a column of Ukrainian armored vehicles destroying 2 tanks and 6 MRAP Maxxpro , what courage to perform that feat.

Where's the vid of that

Both sides helicopters have been largely neutralized by air defense, tho Russia’s Ka 52s are getting back into action firing from within Russian held territory at attacking vehicles.

​@@royalgunsup25reee90Hindustan time's

They lost around 40. But in last year they manufactured 32 new ones.

closer to 10 000.

@@waliza001нет. Стоимость ланцета около 30000$ около 3000000₽

@@waliza001стоимость леопарда в десятки раз больше. Ланцету не нужно взрывать танк полностью,достаточно нанести повреждения не совместимые с дальнейшим движением. Больше уже в условиях боя ничего будет не сделать. Машину придется покинуть. А уже потом будет работать артиллерия. Все это осуществляется при втором беспилотнике который контролирует происходящее

@@djtrip5611 Я знаю это :)

If you are a Russian schizophrenic, then of course the Russian Federation is at war with NATO.

Egypt-Russia relations are stronger than earlier. Egypt's president is a great man

For what? you're not in a war rn

@@tyrtrolas What's RN? Royal Navy?

@@tyrtrolas We are not in war But this drone is a game changer 😁

@@MrAlexStoryteller it means right now

Друг откуда пошло это Лопата и Стиральные Машины? Это в новостях запада так говорят что Россия воюет ими?

@@Sl2ven sim, e ainda tem a história das cabras e abelhas que atacaram os soldados russos e os derrotaram no campo de batalha 😂😂 a imprensa ocidental já perdeu a noção do ridículo 😂😂😂

В точку

after 80,000 killed and 300,000 wounded yeah nice job 😂

​@@johnnywaffen4581If we are ready to fight, then we are ready to die

Oh Yes. Soviet Russia is coming back in 2023.

ya ~ KA-52's have destroyed all ukrina positions

Y’all must be only reading Russia news’s lol because it’s videos out! Y’all so funny

@@melvinmelvin8577 we're all watching Russian Telegram channels of war reporters. There are a lot of Ukrainian side videos there. So you cannot blame on us that we do not know the uncomfortable truth. But we know that Ukrainian and Western propaganda lie to such great extent that our own state propaganda sounds like truth compared to theirs.

@melvinmelvin8577 I watched DPA everyday and that is definitely not a Russian Channel. You need to stop watching them Ukrainian channel that have them video games and pass them off as real videos and people praise Ukraine

@@Nolefan1966 why Russia brings gn old tanks out if they not getting wrecked lol

Насколько я знаю, уже есть разные модификации - фугасная, кумулятивная и термобарическая. Они будут очень быстро развиваться и совершенствоваться.

нифигасе вы тут. а где вы про них информацию узнаете и что все эти слова значат...

Кассеты в дроне весом 12 кг? На мух чтоль охотиться? Все, что не может поднять больше 50 кг загружать кассетами бессмысленно.

@@RustedCroaker кто сказал что дрон должен быть 12кг? Я сказал сделать другой лансет даже 1 и 3 разные по весу что за тупая логика

​@@user-sv4ou5bz7mкассетную еще бы сделали

The zala lancet can not destroy the Leopard 2A6 tanks its armor is very thick can only immobilize them

@@overdrivelzma.9219 An immobilized tank is just as bad as destroyed. It cant move, it cant be used and it will cost time and money to recover and repair.

@@overdrivelzma.9219 An inmobilized tank is a destroyed tank. Once you know the tank can't move on, the artillery will strike that position to destroy it totally.

A helicopter is a multipurpose weapon. It can work at night and has multiple types of weapons against tanks, infantry, fortification, and enemy's aviation.

@@overdrivelzma.9219 Обездвиженный танк - лёгкая цель для арты + приманка для тех, кто захочет его забрать и попадёт уже под скорректированный огонь артиллерии на пристрелянном месте.

Atomic hearts

Посмотрели фильм терминатор сделали терминатора , посмотрели звёздные войны сделали ланцет 😀🤣

А что будет если мы русские сделаем эту хреновину в обратной стреловидностью крыла?)))) У американцев во всех фильмах где инопланетяне захватывают землю все корабли имеют обратную стреловидность крыльев как у самолёта су47 беркут. В общем нагоним жути на янки)))

так военно-космические силы называется в РФ структура. Да и удары из космоса это реальность.

They are just a fancy name only.

GPS не работает по причине воздействия РЭБ, соответственно Switch Blade не работает тоже!

All American weapons are obsolete! Even those samples of American weapons that are still under development are outdated shit!

you know what the Nato should invade Russia and let's see who hat the best weapons and technology. agree?

@@mineralwater6736 Согласен. Только пускай НАТО проконсультируются у шведского короля Карла 12, императора Франции Наполеона Бонапарта и фюрера 3-го рейха Адольфа Гитлера.

Yep, but I like the newer model much more

It is scarey looking on purpose.

When will we see a R/C version for hobbyists? :)

Does it look like a Dragonfly spaceship from "Lexx"?

Looks like a Jedi X-wing 😊

😳😨

Jep - Until a sophisticated anti drones systems render them obsolete and the circle of development begins again...

Future in "Interference Army"

@poulhenningsrensen3305 When there are cheap anti-drone drones, it moves from tech into manufacturing capability. It becomes an economic war. The one who can produce the most cheap drones win. This is a warning to the USA: don't start a war with China. You won't keep up in manufacturing capacity.

u need to send out loads of them to be effective against modern armour ... i mean with proper protection... they need to test it on merkavas ...

Thanks, Captain

Всему виной этого то что ка 52 начал использовать ракету вихрь у которого дальность 12 км

a bit over 100 may be right number ... out of thousands they used ... there are so dew videos about these hits ... some videos are even multiple hits on same target ... then add same hits but videos made by different drones

@@klaabu99 dude there are 20 to 30 videos daily .i watch both sides and lancets are used successfully on daily basis. Especially since beginning of june and ukranian offensive they are all over the place

@@klaabu99 There are many more, many more.. I think it's getting closer to 500 hits. Lately, they have been playing the role of a finisher on the battlefield. A caterpillar flies off the tank and a lancet flies to finish off, but they also smashed a lot of artillery. Every day, from 5 videos, telegram channels are definitely thrown out.

😨😳😰

interesting approach - this cheap assassin may be be nightmare used by terrorists/freedom-fighters

@@zachariasobenauf1895 This looks too sophisticated to proliferate in the hands of the typical cartel or paramilitary. There are plenty of NATO weap/ns in the black market I'm sure.

@@respekted agreed - not the pro-military versions - but the lancet-1-class or the shaheds are a really cheap weapons which may be operated with low-tech controls on "people" inside stationary - hitting them on entering or leaving ... not to mention the domestic drones with improvised handgrenades .... the 2-dimesional protection on gated communities may stand naked ... wasn´t Yemen attacking saudi-arabia with cheap homemade drones ? it may alter the way of the privileged - on a scale the longbow the colt or the first machine-guns had the obama drone-killing may get a payback by those who lived under the death from above -and no "terrorist" with wahtever insane agenda had to expose himself anymore

Палестина?

Lol really. Tanks using diesel, no tanks - no diesel.

только стоимость копья 6000-9000

For some reason russia doesn't want to be owned by wall street.

We’re running out of washing machines 😢 Using stolen Ukrainian microwaves and toasters now ✊

Gracies Che! Ganaremos pronto

@@njkt9o 👌❤️

Virou o jogo? Ucrânia nunca chegou perto nem de empatar esse "jogo" kkk

@@user-go8vt9lp7i verdade 👍

I dont think its too little of a warhead for tanks, it has taken out plenty of soviet tanks and even a t80BVM. And as seen in the video and others, it has disabled and penetrated even Leopards

The warhead still usually puts the Tank out of commission but usually can be repaired if the ammo magazine doesnt go off and its pulled back behind the lines and to a Repair facility.

Lancet 1 does moderate damage to tanks but Lancet 3 have better range and more penetration capability that allow to destroy tank or cause critical damage make it inoperatable.

Well new types are being produced with 10kg warhead soon to be used

@@MrZombiekiller23only if they hit the rear of the torret where the ammo are kept inside

You're wrong. They are lovers & have a penetration so often :)

havent seen challenger 2 "the British tank that's never been destroyed yet" on the front yet. dont want the same fate as leo2😂

Давайте уже всех сюда, что у вас там осталось

Yeah, I'm hyped

Can't wait to see them in action!

They seem to do some damage but they actually don´t take out the target.

@@usernwn7qe Russia needs to do the damage to those extreemly expensive machines without spending a fortune... That is the art of war.

u get it wrong ... russia tried with mass take ukraine: first tanks and armor they failed ... then artillery and infantry also failed ... now they try with drones ... why u think there is so few videos of drone hits if russia have produced so big number of drones(every hit does not destroy vechicle)

@@klaabu99 "Every hit does not destroy vehicle" well ask a T72 crew. (in case they´re alive)

@@klaabu99 so you think they destroyed only mentioned vehicles?

US military complex have no capacity to raise rapidly production. Its build to provide small numbers of expensive and overengeenered things which need to much manhours to be build. Russia military complex is build with idea of huge expansion in the time of war and they now used it and their toys are made to be simple and easy to build like AK47.

on year 2090?

@@klaabu99Through QA, waiting for first use. They will shock the world.

They say the new zala Lancet product 53 drone can be launched from helicopters such as the Kamov 52 or the Mi 8.

@@overdrivelzma.9219 I mean that is more interesting is making them as fast as helicopters and then using it as an anti-rocket defence system lol

They have enough power to destroy MRAP Maxxpro , IFV Bradley m2a2 tanks T 64, M 109, polish Krab, M 777 only lacked more power to destroy the Leopard 2A6 and Challenger II.

Shahed/Geran-2 really is a cruise missile, not anti tank missile. It doesn't even have camera or optic sensor.

Never doubt what Slavic Russians able to do when they are in dangerous, I’m going to sure something to you, this war give Russian military designer views for the future, next generation of Russian kamikaze drones will be very dangerous and game changer.

Lancet 3 has a 3kg warhead

One reason: cost-effectiveness (no overkilling). Besides, armored vehicles repairs are so expensive that Germany withdrew from running its repair stations in Poland. Hehe, German-Polish ties are strained as a result. Damaging the vehicles also stresses the resources of Ukraine, because they have to go and get them on the field - and what awais them there....

👉☦🙄

Peaceful land to you, above your head.

And you are the home of your favorite Russians. schizophrenics.

smrt rusiji

Russia is on its 3rd generation in 1 year. Bigger, faster, and cheaper ones are coming

And don’t forget, it’s not the size of the warhead but the type. The X wings are using penetrating darts to bypass the thick nato armor. These small darts can disable the armored vehicles or cause ammunition detonations.

​@@troysweeney8432Детонация бывает редко , экипаж в большинстве случаев остаётся жив а это плохо !....

НАТО передало Украине снаряды с объединенным ураном А если сделают точно такой же ланцет?😂😂😂

@@user-wn1ms2pz2nпрочитай, что такое БОПС, а потом уже пиши глупости.

Kalashnikov is a stolen german rifle, clown😂

Z ❤️🇷🇺

smrt rusiji

The X Wing was much more expensive than the Tie Fighter. So, actually, the Rebellion (the good guys), used a more complicated system than the Empire...

God is on the “good guys” side (aka Russia)

@@globalcitizen8321 it was a joke…

They have always been the bad guys, just ask any Pole, Fin or Romanian also there is no God, if there was a God why did he not kill Hitler, Stalin Marx, Lenin, Mussolini, Jesus, Abraham, Mohamend and the idiot Gavrilo Princip who shot Arch Duke Ferdinand, as babies,

@@troysweeney8432 I know... I wasn't talking seriously either... After all, Star Wars is just a story...

Or upload the video of Bradleys cemetery in Ukraine.

Bradley - deadly💀💀💀

lancet destroy leopard-2 : 1 lancet damaged ❎ 2 lancet finally burn ✅

Pay is $30k per year from US tax dollars.

There are many leopards that were attacked in small trenches and ditches the Leopard is too heavy for the territory of the dombas so the Soviet tanks are medium weight.

They are called Loitering Munitions

But the names you gave are lame

One way drones

We already have a term for unmanned, guided munitions with its own independent propulsion: missiles. The Lancet is a cheap and slow-flying missile.

Woke they/them army needs safe space.

Yes but if a Turkish Anka or Bayraktar strikes with it's missiles any tank is beyond repair condition.

Turkey most experienced on drone technology? 😂😂. Turkey doesn't produce innovative technology, never did and never will. A drone is not halva. Turkey's technology comes from nato

@@arimoff You need to be a consultant to governments of 28 countries. 25 having the Turkish drones and 3 non declared yet. They seem not to know what you know. If "Turkey's technology comes from nato" then why do NATO countries like Poland buy from Turkiye? And why do other NATO countries don't manufacture them? Do you have any clue of how many Chinese and Turkish electronics is within the drones and that Aselsan makes the cameras because "NATO Ally" Canada sanctioned exports of the previous Canadian camera producer?. You made yourself just laughable.

@tsar5501 The game changed... again! The problem with them was that they were expensive enough to use missiles against them. I think everyone now realizes that using expensive things against cheap things is a bad business.

Ukraine ran out of Bayraktars in spring of the last year.

Built in prisons

Yes, there are no such figures .. Where do you get about a million drones from? I watched the report, the guys collect it manually, without a conveyor. This means that there can be no such volumes, for the war they will print in general no more than 50k, and there already for export

a swarm of nuclear kamikaze drones with AI... and deliver them to the African rebels... then against the fleet of the US, Japan, Korea in the South China Sea...

They are called ICBMs

Один нормальный комментарий👍😂

not a clue. But looking cool

Just simple. better aerodynamics, stability in flight, maneuverability. the best aerodynamic properties allow you to save energy (charge) of batteries.

your leopards have been in the zoo for a long time, fascist