How did Luke Skywalker DIE in LEGENDS?  

Bruh

@@BrianRenardDavis indeed , not every ending has to be bombastic .

That's not true.

Lol

George Lucas told the writers not to kill Luke.

I fw it. Not everyone has to die miserably.

@@biingolewis7824Same Here

Wasnt yoda like 900 or smth i forgor

He already became one with the force when he fought Abeloth

Yoda was proud and content with the Jedi order? Ok causal lol There was no Jedi order when he died and the galaxy was in shambles cause his order let the reign of the sith come back!! I love yoda but C’mon

I can also see him having an heartfelt and emotional reunion with his uncle Owen, aunt Beru, his mother Padme, his grandmother Shmi, and the rest of their families.

Is he has a son in canon

They become a part of you

And they are just missing in action

Definitely a cool theory!

That's exactly what I was thinking before I looked in the comments... n I agree...

But what about ben

@@tyrellwhite4621 he didn’t suffer the same injuries as Luke. Luke was having problems with his injuries in Crucible, when he should have been pretty much fully healed by that point.

​@@dogloversrule8476 didn't even know about this book, it's not even old. Only 10 years, thanks friend

I agree. I don't even call it legends. It is the original canon vs Lucas canon vs Disney canon and it goes in that order for quality.

Legends'*

Wow. 😮

You can be certain he did. May the Force be with you.

Kathleen is not Allow Luke to have a Warrior/Martyr's Death, Only Strong Independent Women like Holdo get a Warrior/Martyr's Death.

The Yuzanvong war pushed the Galaxy to the breaking point so bad that the remnants of the Empire aligned with the Republic to end the war, culminating in the largest Space Battle ever in Star Wars. Luke had some epic moments in the Invasion series.

the way the most powerful Jedi that ever lived died was absolutely not a good moment. i guess seeing the sunset again was kinda cool in a very small way, but his actual death was the most underwhelming, disgraceful thing they couldve done.

Why would he want to see the twin sun again? He hated tattooine

Yeah after watching the sequels.

😄

Never met his mother, had a childhood with his sister robbed from him so he had to wait until he was 19 to meet her after birth, his aunt and uncle died, both his Jedi mentors died, bunch of his friends died fighting the empire, his dad died immediately after he was redeemed, he turned to the dark side and had to do horrible things as Sidious’s apprentice, a bunch of the Jedi he trained and befriended died in the Yuuzahn Vong War, his nephew died, his other nephew turned to the dark side and killed Luke’s wife, more of Luke’s friends and students died in the second galactic civil war, his dark side nephew died. After all that, dude’s heart is more unbreakable than Rey’s plot armour

Most powerful Jedi who ever lived in Legends was what I said, not in Canon.

The really weird thing is that Disney thought that showing an image of a disturbed looking uncle standing over a child's bed was a good image for a story where a celibate religious leader that was on a planet with only students and seemingly no other adults ended up with his former student despising him to his very core and the religious figure going into self imposed exile out of shame. If you replace Luke Skywalker with a catholic priest and kylo ren with an angry former alter boy it suddenly seems obvious what happened. Neither Luke nor Ben ever talked to leia about what happened and both of them lied to rey about what happened so I really question just wtf Disney was thinking when they authorized those story elements. I saw the movie in theaters with my niece who was an adult at the time and I considered sneaking into her room with a toy lightsaber as a joke but just the idea of doing that to a niece or nephew even as a joke was so creepy I could never do it. But Disney didn't see a problem with it. They ruined Luke more than most people realize. In Disney canon the only person he ever kissed was his sister and he died a virgin. Legends Luke is endlessly better than Disney Luke.

This false because am most powerful Jedi

They could’ve had Kylo or Rey defeat him in a duel, on their way to becoming a Dark Side team of immeasurable power, who even the Emperor is wiped out by, then Old Luke has to die pulling them into a force hole, in which he keeps them in a continuous duel with him, which never ends. 🤣 Just off the top of my head, trying to sound ridiculous, but I would’ve rather seen this happen than what we got.

It was perfect. It's adorable how you capitalise "Fans", as if the specific group that hated TLJ somehow owns the SW fandom.

That's funny because Legends and Disney canon brought back Palps with the same methods. Both transferred their essence to clone bodies. The only difference is that it happened in Legends on the Planet Byss while it was Exegol in canon Also, Anakin's sacrifice is supposed to "bring balance to the force". If Palps came back in Legends also, his sacrifice is still in vain. Yall are delusional asf. It isnt better than canon. It's the same bullshit. Even most Legends enjoyers hated Dark Empire for that. The fact you're justifying it while hating on the canon explanation despite them both invalidating Anakin's sacrifice is pure copium and bias

Yeah dark empire doesn't really have a leg to stand. It's the same shit as tros just better explained and written ish george shouldn't have interfered with that story.

@@willisstillhere8846 the dark empire came out before the prequels. that alone makes it valid and the sequels not

At least Dark Empire did it without invalidating Anakin's sacrifice. In that story Luke learns that he doesn't have to tackle the galaxies threats by himself, and he begins teaching his first group of students. Also Palpatine is depicted as being weak and dying in that trilogy. It's a poor premise executed very well. It has two of my favorite moments in all of Star Wars media too. The reason it didn't work in Disney's canon is because Luke is a failure. If Luke fails then Anakin died for nothing. What's worse is that Palpatine is the reason Luke fails in "canon". In Legends, Luke, Leia, and Luke's group of new students defeat Palpatine once and for all and prove that the Jedi Order can return to face any threat that comes their way. Anakin's sacrifice leads to the birth of the greatest iteration of the Jedi Order in Legends and its a sight to behold. Dark Empire is a hard sell, but I highly recommend it just to show how even Legends can take a bad idea, spin it into something cool, and run laps around Disney effortlessly.

​@@gabethebabe3337Dark Empure ruined Anakin's sacrifice. Stop coping. It's trash. Anything from Legends doesnt automatically equal good

I mean I'm not really sure, but my headcanon would be that there is another generation between them. Cade was born around 117 ABY as far as I'm aware, and with his mother being born around 97 ABY I'd assume his father Kol wasn't that much older so i'd place his birth at like 90 ABY or later. If Cade were Lukes great grandchild that meant Kol would be Bens child. But Ben Skywalker was born in 26 ABY, that would make him fathering a child in like his sixties, which i just don't really believe. But who knows :)

Nah cause he wasn’t a Jedi after long, he couldn’t do half the things like did, even Vader could’ve been smacked by Luke, only person who can beat Luke is fp anakin unfortunately he doesn’t exist

Anakin had the greatest potential of any force user ever but fell short of reaching it. Luke in Legends is confirmed to be the most powerful Jedi. He is what Anakin could have been. But it's possible that an Anakin that reached his full potential might be slightly higher than his son.

Outlander is weak compared to Prequel Era Jedi and Valkorian is a clown. Luke would oneshot them

@@masterofderp8373 What on earth gave you that idea? You can take a character like Unu'Thul, who had one of the best genocide drain feats, who can only ever be upscaled by Luke and Cadeus, and you realize that Valkorian has not only conducted this feat, but a superior version of it multiple times. Take Natheema, it required ritualistic preparation, however, the result was that the entire planet plus its population, including thousands of sith lords, as well as the most potent darkside Nexus in the galaxy, was added to Valkorian's essence. Then you have a similar feat, that he could conduct manually, via Ziost, that was boosted from the infighting he caused, as well as draining ANOTHER potent Nexus +8000 sith lords, all down to the last microbe. Unu'Thul's Killiks were in the Billions, but they're lower lifeforms by comparison to thousands of sith lords, plus ALL of the life on any single planet down to the microbe. You could take a world like earth, and apply the logic that there are also Billions of other fauna and lesser lifeforms at any one single point in time, and ziost was a lush world. Keep in mind, he did this while as an Astral entity, while also controlling multiple host bodies of comparable power. No other feat in scale even compares, not even Dark Empire Palpatine with his clone bodies, since he couldn't even maintain them for more than a few weeks, or split his essence and mind control abilities. If anything Valkorian and Outlander, based on their scaling to eachother, one shots Luke. Luke's development was hindered by his lack of knowledge until the library of Ossus was discovered, people completely overhyped his potential since he technically squandered it, and his best feat is barely planetary, in fact, it exhausted him.

@@DarkLordofTheRizz The Nathema ritual cannot be an accurate assessment to Vitiate/Valkorian’s power due to the ritualistic nature of the feat. There’s also the fact that by nature, the Sith and Jedi of the Old Republic era were far weaker than that of the Prequel era, meaning the boost of power granted by the draining is null compared to what it would have been had he done it in the modern era(Which would have been likely thwarted). It’s also extremely notable Vitiate has a really bad habit of getting clowned on by those weaker than him. While yes, for his era he was the strongest Sith Lord alive, that’s not really a masterful feat due to the overall scaling of the era. He got clowned on by a pre-outlander Hero of Tython(Who is still weaker than Vitiate due to the fact he needed help to face him), who by that point was a mere Jedi Knight and far weaker than he was prior, and Lord Scourge had to save his ass from Revan and Meetra Surik by betraying them. Also, regarding Dark Empire Palpatine, the reasoning as to why he couldn’t sustain his clone bodies is due to the amount of power he had. Palpatine was essentially a walking dark side force nexus, and the obscene amount of power Palpatine possessed made him unstable. He constantly had to rely on midichlorian manipulation to keep himself alive. Not to mention some of Palpatine’s feats far out-scale Vitiate’s, including the Lusankya feat, which is arguably the greatest display of force power outside of Abeloth’s bs. As for the draining as a whole, the feat was done by Nihilus during the KOTOR era without need of a ritual, which frankly imo is kinda embarrassing. Nihilus is fodder by modern era Sith standards, and even if he was weaker than Vitiate, the fact he was able to replicate something akin to Nathema without a ritual is embarrassing. Also Palpatine could create force storms and Luke not only managed to take on and “kill” Abeloth(Granted he had help from Krayt, but even then he was somewhat carrying the fight), he moved artificial black holes out of the crosshairs of planets. There is also a notable quote from one of the guides written a while back regarding Darth Maul: “It is clear from the duel that the Sith are very much alive and more powerful than ever.” Going off this quote and if we consider the whole Rule of Two scaling, it implies someone like TPM Maul would have been capable of taking down Vitiate. It’s also been stated TPM Maul outscales Plagueis in raw power, as unlike Plagueis, Maul was well trained/strong enough to take on the Jedi of the current era. Short Answer: Vitiate gets clowned on by Luke and Sidious, and by extent Caedus(Since Caedus had been stated to be near equal to Luke during the series run.) In fact, regarding the above evidence, it implies that someone like Maul would be able to defeat Vitiate, or as my friends and I like to call him: Failkorian.

Looks like Dave Filoni is doing tht

No