How Did Russia Seize a U.S.-Supplied M2 Bradley in Ukraine 

Spin the wheel or buy a vowel, because I don't know what the f u talking about!

it's a fight against Russian orcs who impose their rule on everyone. and their war with the Ukrainians showed that their second army in the world, but at the bottom of the list.😂

@@pirate8847 You are wrong! US and NATO are criminals organisations: invade and millions of people in Iraque, Afeganistan, Siria... And stealing their resources. The major terrorists country in the world. Ask Noam Chomsky. Maybe you can learn something and not tell bullshit propaganda!

@@pirate8847 Russian orcs...? This is called Nazism!! You seem to be Ukrainian?

​@@pirate8847американский солдат обосрался от Талиба в сандалях

​@@PORSCHE_COUNTRY.Russians EMP glide drones scramble the digital battlefield and stay aloft for days on end. Not to much advanced tech is being used in Ukraine. Still just conventional weapons because of their integrity. You can build an EMP gun in your garage to better familiarize yourself with how easy the technology is to produce. If you have a fly-by-wire aircraft, Oof! But if it's a hydraulic controlled aircraft using independent pitot static instrumentation, non glass cockpit like the Soviet MiG-31, not much to worry about under an EMP threat.

EMP home kit? Does that mean I have to sacrifice my kitchen 1500 watt microwave oven?@@JustinStLouis-xz7ut

​@@PORSCHE_COUNTRY.u r watching too much terminators 😂

@@kerbrainbrain9174 maybe you read some books !!!

@@ph1785 and?

Абрамс хорош против пастухов в Ираке 😂

Первый Абрамс уже сгорел 😂

Nato ingat yang dia hadapi adalah peternak onta di timur tengah.. mereka lupa bahwa itu rusia😂😂

Capture is always a risk, but what's the point of having them if you don't use them.

Back order

In Kyiv just sitting pretty

Не подвезли еще😂

i guess US don't trust the Ukrainians yet for the Abrams tanks.

Сгорели уже ваши Абрамсы😂

The gas turbine on the Abram runs almost as efficiently on higher speed as the diesel while being lighter and quieter at longer distances, but horrible consumption at idling or low speed. Somethings are just not built equal.

It is still steel coffin, no amout of tech can save it

You misunderstood most tech been taken out just a bit of broken steel

Et aucun risque pour l'armée russe non plus mdrr

What are you talking about? Its 80's/90's technology will be a massive upgrade for the Russian military. It's now their most advanced battle tank, far beyond the Armata tank. The Bradley will spearhead their next offensive.

@@fx4g172 😂

Отличный комментарий! Всё по делу сказано!

@@user-os1kt2wb6k Спасибо товарищ)

Все верно!

One thing you forgot is that expensive stuff tend to be more safe for the crew. I know russia doesn't care of their soldiers, it's has been noted since ww1 and mastered in ww2 so they make them fast, cheat and weak. Yes russia produces a shitload of cheap stuff that kills their crews most of the time too. I would take quality over quantity everyday. But you are correct in that russian vehicles are better suited to fight in this kind of territory where land is wet and muddy as they don't sink in nearly as much. NATO vehicles are developed to use mostly for terrain found in central europe and USA and this shows as main battle tanks are not that good in open, muddy fields in Ukraine as they would be in forestry terrain of Europe,which hardens the use of drones. Armored vehicles overall in this senseless invasion has proved to have lived their best times as aerial attacks from drones and missiles eat them day by day from both sides.

you also believe in aliens I see

The video said this was the first "upgraded" Bradley captured. @@IgorSinitsky

@@IgorSinitsky Yes we've met them. They are working with us.

@@kimness7796 thats the thing even b4 they didn't, they captured a CV90, this is there first Bradley, but it doesn't matter tbh equipment is replaceable, human lives r not.

Any losses of supplied IVF's and current model tanks aren't a Russian state secret are they? Otherwise you lose armoured vehicles by shooting at them. Is that right?

This channel is so dramatic. Lol

Leopard was upgraded to 2A6 in 2005. This is definitely not an 80s design.

Things have changed. From "Russians will run at the sight..." to "Pfff it is an old junk". All this, while Abrams with all their advertising is nowhere to be seen and the German tanks with equal advertising have joined Bradleys on the fields that Russians have named "Bradley Alley".

@@ioDeveloper the hull was from the late 70s/early 80s, under all that extra armor is still a design from the late 70s. Which is still better than what most design philosophy Russia uses which is from the T-64/72 with their notoriously combustible autoloaders.

Их даже грязь и мороз выводят из строя !

A čo si myslíte že Američania pošlú to najnovšie.Budte radi že vám poslali aspoň to. Keby to bolo na mne nedostali by ani náboj.

Without the ATGMs.

🇷🇺🇷🇺

Ford thought the Pinto was great too when they designed, built, and sold it.

Мы и хорошие машины отправляем в ад😈

Too bad it’s weak rear armour . It wasn’t designed for a war with drones constantly flying around you with shaped charges . Hopefully Russia upgrade them .

@Ghosy01 I agree, but its competitor, the Bradley has similar issues with a minor rear armor advantage . The automatic loader of the BMP3, the large canon caliber, burst fire and missile launch capabilities i believe give it an advantage over the Bradley and can even pose serious threat to the M1. L

Man hahahaha, IFV cant stand any MBT

@@sinisadabic5371 That's the point of his comment.

weird how it isnt, and an IFV is a troop transport with TOW roof crushers to annhialate t90s

ЕСЛИ-БЫ У БАБУШКИ БЫЛ-БЫ ХУЙ, ОНА БЫЛА-БЫ ДЕДУШКОЙ...(В ДАННОМ СЛУЧАЕ ТАНКОМ)..

@@marco-ro6cl dude ODed on stupid juice

Только почему то украинцы их не показывают на видео, что говорит о их лжи, нет у них ничего! ВСУ отступает по всем фронтам и поле боя всегда за Россией, и как украинцы захватывают бмп-3 если поле боя всегда за Россией, мозги включи клоун!

Ты их видел, эксперт диванный

@@Polkovalski У них девиз, ври больше вдруг поверят..

the crew survived

​@@tingleblade4274and was disabled by an IFV 🤣

​@@corychallice7705even an American tank can be dissambled. Nothing superior about it.a lot were burnt in Iraq but your media is so strong to still push for it's superiority.whata desperate way of pushing your propaganda 😀😀😂

​@corychallice7705 the Bradley didn't disable the T-90M in the video you can see it driving under it's own power then it runs into a tree then a fpv drone knocks it out then the crew flees

ok buddy@@Nero-Caesar

This is why Russia is winning. Analyze the missile, Tank or any vehicle to intercept.

У Ребекки Клод из Pearl TV тоже очень красивые ноги.

@@Peter-xg5fq They are not winning. Russia is playing the old Stalingrad games.. sending young men into the grinder for a few meters. Nobody is winning.

​@@Peter-xg5fq😂😂 лол

It’s an IFV noy rocket science boys you don’t need to study it just use your common sense tops sides and backs of any tank are the vulnerable spots if you can hit the engine with a drone or rpg or artillery or tracks and immobilize it it will be a sitting duck not matter what it is then you finish it off with artillery direct hit on the catapula of any tank will knock it out with the crew if they would just use common sense they wouldn’t have to study anything lol

Why?

Напротив, очень даже радует 😁

Shouldn't it be more depressing that these machines were used to invade other countries, using trumped-up evidence, and destroy the lives of millions?

I should note that these shots greatly inspired our soldiers and citizens after Ukraine launched its widely publicized counteroffensive and the first attack ended in such an embarrassment... Ukrainians boasted that they were trained according to NATO standards, but NATO's "standards" envisage absolute air supremacy!!! And Russia has absolute air supremacy, so NATO tactics in this case are not only useless, but also deadly! Everyone understands this except modern Western politicians. However....

@@ViTeK9приятно радует глаз 🤣

Yeah with luxurious interior, including hot and cold feet under one thousand miles driven by my Granny.

It's perforated everywhere, wtf are you smoking...

Buddy, it ain't th Anglo-Saxons running this war

Zionist mate in every western country, anglo saxons are also opressed

they're wasting their time if theyre lookin for secrets . . . .

The only thing they can really get of value is its optics . I Can certainly see it being shipped to a Chinese lab .

@@Ghosy01 they can investigate the engine, and 25mm gun and see where they can make improvements.

Поверь,БМП лучше,знаю что говорю,у нас парни и по три раза были подбиты и все живые😅

Yes, it look like a refueling or resupply point where the artillery strike happened. Many times the enemies know when you are going to the rear to take care of logistics and maintenance.

Maybe it was an old school ex Soviet in charge

i wouldnt be surprise if china and north korea will soon to have theire own bradley replica...just like US drone it will be feature in theire parade...

@@paulwilson915 Like tanks, it is how you use it.

Stuck in a minefield where you can't go anywhere

We ignore that and only speak of doom and gloom, here. Nearly all Bradleys taken out have been hit by mines..... that's not a weakness, IMO.

The T-90 was alone in Stepove, without infantry or drones covering/guiding it, contrary to the 3 Bradleys being guided by a drone. The T-90 got hit by a drone first, and the stunned crew then got ambushed. Mind you the T-90 couldn't return effectively fire due to the constant strafing stunning the crew and the optics/turret ring being broken. The Bradleys just damaged the T-90 which then voluntarily crashes into a tree to jam its spinning broken turret to let the crew out. The T-90 is thus a highly survivable tank, and in a different setting would have most likely taken the W as all odds were stacked against it in this fight. It then got brown up by a drone

@@aled845 exactly, 2 Bradley on their own without TOW weaponry, can wipe out a tank just by firing their gun, that's not bad at all I would think

They didnt couse ran out of ammo.Just the reactive plate blows up.

@@MetalPanic sure, the Bradley only used the 25mm gun, it didn't have any TOW to use or the tank would have been toast with one single shot

На войне и Абрамсы горят от картонки, но это все таки исключение. Нужно помнить, что железо, это железо, а погибших ( ради чего?) украинцев уже ничто не вернёт...

lives

Yeah and middel finger to u cus i didnt care to redo it so what mr perfect? Did you take that name or did your mom spell it wrong too? 😂

Well they knew what to do - make their own vehicles better. They still didnt. This wont change anything.

@@NoName-md5zbthey dont Need the US scrap

@@NoName-md5zb Russia already better weapons

😂😂😂 yeah right.. Thats laughable ​@@ssaini5028

​@@NoName-md5zbRussia has the best weapons , it proved this in the war , and American technology fought only against shepherds and Indians

Right, like after they hit a mine and they were unable to move any further. We know this happened to a number of Bradleys during the initial Ukrainian counterattacks through the Russian minefields, a tactic which did not work too well.

The Bradley penetrated by a t80 while the 2 Bradley didn't penetrated a t90 lol

Остальные просто сгорели 😂😂😂

Because they destroyed the rest.

Они самоубились об российские снаряды )))​@@w.loczykij5354

@@user-ge2vw9pl5gSo hows taking Kiev in three days going recently 😂

You meant 2nd best army in Ukraine 😂

ngl patriot par was very very scare, ruSSia has said to capture Challengers and Leopards yet none r there

​@@ragincajun2446I have seen two videos of those in the military museum in Moscow and it's on display.

Ты хорошо учил историю. Кто к нам с мечом приходит, тот меч потом мы показываем в наших музеях вашим (european) детям

@@tekpic04 where

It’s funny that this technology is more than 20 years old, how backward Russia is, that for it it’s a meme of unknown technologies.

It was designed as US answer to BMP-1. Unlike M113, which is essentially just a troop carrier, M2 Bradley has 25mm auto cannon and AT TOW missiles.

Don't let these clowns fool you, that piece of crap just took out their best tank without using anti tank missile

Okay, Thanks. @@ivan200804

They did pretty well against T-72 in iraq and they have decent armor + ease of maintenance I don’t see how they don’t do well against a well funded adversary wouldnt that mean the same thing for other infantry fight vechiles none of them have something that makes them special from eachother

They are using the Bradley to very good effect in Ukraine, there are going to be losses, it's combat. It was designed for what it's being used for, not for insurgencies. That's the MRAPs.

Never heard anyone say that they are resistant to soviet weapons. It was always about improved capability and crew survival. A single soldier with an rpg can knock out the best tanks in the world under the right circumstances and a 203mm artillery shell leaves nothing but a crater.

@@TheDude50447 Before the counter offencive I was told this by one guy on the history legends channel, he believed that Western tanks could not be destroyed just because they were made in the WEST. I don’t know what propaganda they fed him, but I quoted him here verbatim.

Hey what do you feel is happening seeing my belly button move closer to then further away..closer/further over and over many times

@@VVV85650 Yeah some idiot is gonna believe something like that. And youll find idiots making videos like that since anyone can do it. But reputable sources wont

Send to China to copy

The survivability of the Bradley is significantly higher then any bmp. At least when a Bradley hits a mine the entire crew and infantry squad don't instantly die unlike the bmp lol. Russians started riding on top of BMP to increase survivability 😂😂

The bradley has incredible survivability I don't know what you're on about

BMP-T's are superior.

When you abandon a tank or IFV thats what you do (SOP), but sometimes since Russians and Ukraines are the same blood the prize can be used to negotiate a deal like the treatment of POWs.

Russian authorothys didn´t allow the international red cross to take contakt with ukrainians in russian captivity ; nobody know how the RF treats the UAF folks .@@tomcat6735

How do you know that? do you have source of information, if yes please provide it!

Likely Russia won't have to components to try to replicate them, unless washing machine controller chips can be converted to do the job.

The terminator is unequivocally better.

That's ok buddy, you just keep being DUMB with your beliefs lol

not really between the 2 one was designed for easy to use and can make a lot the other was made for crew survivability and quality, between the 2 BMP is a death trap we see soldiers riding on the top while the Bradleys can be inside which that alone shows us they have more trust in Bradleys than BMPs for crew survivability which is highly wanted due to the fact u can replace equipment not crew.

And in turn for being so short and light, it has paper thin armor that results in 50 BMG being capable of penetrating the sides and rear from a good distance away, and more importantly, artillery fragments from shells that land just 10 meters from the vehicle being able to penetrate the hull. That in and of itself more than quadruples the area of destruction for an artillery shell when compared to a Bradley that would require a direct hit. You also have zero survivability as having 48 small artillery shells and 500 autocannons in a vehicle with paper thin armor is just a recipe for disaster. You also don't have a thermal imager for the commander at all, and the thermal imager for the gunner is extremely lackluster. It doesn't matter how fast you can go on asphalt roads and how much firepower you have when in fields where most vehicles would be lucky to reach 40kph, and when that firepower cannot be effectively aimed at a target, and when their pathetic armor makes them susceptible to a strong gust of wind.

Including the helicopter that the Russian pilot defected. I'm sure it is going to be studied

@@zeusandathena4094That was Cold War piece which was studied a decade ago

Both sides realize Intel is always to be found.

Was Ukraine captured T-90 in kharkiv transfer to American spot in New Orleans..

Ukraine transferred the newest Russian T-90 tank to the United States at the beginning of the Russian invasion. And we did not make of these sensations the way the Russians do. The Ukrainians captured 450 Russian tanks, including the latest designs.

Russie grande merdé 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩

👍👍👍

That's CIA cope, there's a picture of an entire field of them but they're not merely take out by mines, they're entirely blasted apart and burned, and the proximity of the IFVs are way too close, maybe a few of them but the rest of them were definitely hit with ATGM fire and cooked. Don't buy the lies of that fat CIA paid queer McBeth. Also the BMP-T is superior regardless.

During the battle of the bulge, a M8 greyhound attacked a Tiger1 and won the engagement. The move was as stupid as the outcome was lucky...

then why can’t Ukraine win if they have such powerful weapons?)

@@evigrace8149 Ukraine is a poor 40 mln, former soviet republic country that facing former superpower right at its borders. the fact that they made it this far into almost a 2nd year without loosing a country amazes me. kudos to them

There is no doubt that Bradley is capable IFV. But against whom?! Taliban carrier with AK-47, in slippers?! Or some similar wars, in the invasions that the US and NATO carried out on various countries, against small and weak countries and armies with poor and outdated military training and military equipment. Against such countries, Bradley can be effective. In Ukraine, we saw that it is not quite so capable, when for the first time Western military equipment is at war against a serious military power, such as Russia. A direct hit from the T-72, Bradley certainly cannot withstand if it is APFSDS, even when it is the oldest variant of the old Soviet missiles, the kind used by Iraq at one time, and the penetration is about 350 mm of homogeneous steel.Bradley has better armor protection than the BMP-2, but it is much worse than the BMP3, and it is at least 3 times more expensive than the Russian IFV?! The problem with Bradley, like most western military equipment, is poor mobility, lack of agility, poorly solved track suspension not adequate for the terrain in Ukraine, as well as the weight of the vehicles themselves, especially when tanks are out of the question, as soon as the season of mud, later snow and ice begins in Ukraine, western tanks and IFVs can be thrown into the garbage by Ukrainians. Because they cannot, or can be used in limited numbers, in such conditions precisely because of the above-mentioned facts... Also on top of all that, poorly resolved complicated and expensive maintenance , for this type of conflict, overcrowding with,electronics and opto-electronics, which also proved to be very bad when it comes to durability and maintenance...Equipment that often breaks down and requires constant maintenance ... This applies to everything, Western self-propelled howitzers, tanks, IFV ... It really seems to me that this channel has been covered in detail with that topic... That's why the old Soviet or newer Russian towed, and self-propelled howitzers, and tanks than Western, so-called "game changer" tanks, and howitzers... Western military equipment is effective against the Taliban, various rebels... But not exactly in the first real war for them, and against military power such as Russia. Also to make matters worse, Western military equipment is more expensive, not twice but from 5 to 10 times for purchase and maintenance, and in Ukraine, the biggest conflict after World War II, it mostly proved to be bad. To make matters worse, this is the first real war for the US and NATO and their modern military equipment... Which leads to the fact that the military industrial complex of the US and NATO governs the US state first and foremost, and robs its citizens and the army, selling them military equipment that is the same or worse than Russian or, say, Chinese at a price 5 to 10 times higher than what the equipment is really worth?! While promoting in the media, which he also owns, the military industrial complex, as incredible "game changers, which are 100 times better than Russian or Chinese military equipment"?! Well, if someone believed in it until the war in Ukraine, they certainly don't believe in it anymore! Unlike the US, the Russians and Chinese get their military equipment at the most favorable possible prices for their army. Because neither in Russia nor in China, in the political sense, let alone in the media, does the military-industrial complex ask absolutely nothing, let alone set or change the presidents of the state or politicians in the country, as is the case in the US hegemony. But he can only sit in the corner and listen to what the political and military leaders order and do according to their orders.

Bravo!!!!

I like Swiss cheese.

Some how an IFV took out the best Russian tank. Russia should be embarrassed that such a piece of crap bested its best tank.

The are gamechangers for true! They had changed the war to russians favour. 😁😆

@@Chris-yg6lo Lancet and other FPV took out more than one Leopard tanks How about that?

"modern army" yeah ok you clearly huff russian copium properganda.

​@@Chris-yg6lohollywood propaganda..... awesome!!

😂Твой отец добивал уже полумертвых нацыстов, которых вовсю уничтожала красная армия а вы островитяне приткнулись в конце войны, позорища🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@AlexAndr-pb3uu Russian Ivan, this slogan was used by the OUN and UPA, who also fought against the Nazis. You can read about this in the documents of the Nuremberg Tribunal, and there is not a word there that they were Nazi collaborators. They fought for a free and independent Ukraine.

@@AlexAndr-pb3uu Neither Stepan Bandera, nor Roman Shukhevych personally, nor the OUN or UPA as organizations were convicted by the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg. The materials of the Nuremberg Tribunal provide an exhaustive list of individuals and organizations recognized as criminal.

@@AlexAndr-pb3uu Document 014-USSR - secret circular on Einsatzgruppe S-5, dated November 25, 1941. It stated as a reliably established fact that the “Bandera movement” (OUN(b)) was preparing an anti-German uprising in the occupied territories with the aim of creating an independent Ukrainian state. In this regard, the Einsatzgruppen was ordered to shoot all identified Banderaites after a thorough interrogation. And all interrogation protocols should be immediately sent to superiors.

@@AlexAndr-pb3uu Spring-autumn 1943 was the period of the most intense battles between the UPA and the Germans on Wolin (the main period of the “anti-German front”). The UPA secured settlements on the territory of Western Ukraine, creating a powerful administration (for example, the “Kolka Republic”), trying to protect the sovereign independence of the Germans, conducting defensive battles (anti-partisan actions of Eri) and von dem Bach-Zalewski and Hans Prützmann).

Those weapons are already being found in africa.

I'm sure you have a lot of stupid feelings

It was a bounty placed to humiliate the United States, the bounty was a year old already, there have been videos of plenty of Bradleys being completely smoked by Russian weapons.

Excuses 😅😅😅

The USA and Nato are not worried fron the capture of equipment. Remember how many veichle have been left in Afghanistan ? It is quite easy to buy a Bradley or any Nato veichle there. The problem is to copy them and to bild them . The Nato and Usa veichle are very expendive. That make them uncopiable. A T90 cost about 2 million an Abram 10 million. The Usa has the money . Russia not.

Il n’y a pas de vidéo car c’est de la propagande

Hello beautiful it's nice meeting you here how are you doing today hope you're having a blissful day so far today?

The optics were destroyed by the Bradley otherwise the t90 would have toasted to 2 Bradleys. Can't shoot what you can't see.

@@eddypan8 la óptica fue destruída primero por un dron...después los 2 Bradley atacaron posteriormente otro dron fue lanzado pero falló....el t 90 recuperado sin más daño que en la óptica

Yes from what I know, it a older Bradley and it doesn’t have a critical component

Ошибка выжившего. Почему не берёшь в пример остальные случаи когда танк спокойно взрывал Бредли. А точно неудобно пропаганда сыпется.

Ahahhaahhahaha pretend you are a tank operator and guess carefully if other vehicles come in front of u and shot what is wrong with your tank or you are a crazy ?

единственный случай. есть чем гордиться?

A greyhound also took out a tiger tank in ww2. Doesn’t mean you’d wanna be fighting tanks in a greyhound lol

And did absolutely nothing lol

завалите безымянным мясом как обычно, всегда воевали количеством