How did they actually take this picture? (Very Long Baseline Interferometry) 

That's what scares me, considering that these are composite images with some degree of subjectivity.

Movie being Interstellar !?

@@CS--SambitKar yeah, absolutely awesome movie

@@rodgunn2621 all versions of the photo showed the same general shape just the exact position of the brighter part of the "ring" was a bit different

What simulation theory? Does it matter? We’re living to us this is life. We are alive

You mean b-hole

Idk if you’ve seen kurzgesagts black hole videos but they’re very good!

Watch PBS Spacetime

I fking agree

Hi from Amravati🖐

Cool

Welcome to the Veritasium University, where black holes are feeding on hungry minds. ;)

Cool

@@BillAnt Or hungry minds feeding on black holes 😎

Cool

"Black Shield" sounds oddly racist

@@hunter133officialno it doesn’t…?

@@hunter133officialjust you pal

Interesting example of nominative determinism...

You'd be surprised what can appear from just black and white lines. Ever seen a JPEG? It is in fact three long tables of numbers, representing the brightness of pre-determined patterns of black and white lines. Adding them up with the black and white line images each weighted accordingly produces three slightly different images. Color one red, one green, and one blue, and after that overlapping them produces the original image. Now, as your brain doesn't care about very sharp and tiny changes as much as it does other changes, you can just drop the smallest black and white lines to achieve compression, at the expense of some data loss. This is roughly how it works, though in reality it's a bit more complex and involves macroblocks and stuff. Lots can come out of black and white lines.

In it's core, it's a Fourier transformation

Yeah, it's the physical hardware that's impressive about this, the final step was basically just data crunching. We've known how to do the software side of this for decades. Impressive visually, but very simple computer-science-wise. I recommend looking into the Fourier transform and its applications, your mind won't stop being blown.

The actual image taken by the telescope was 3 x 2 pixels. The image the 'scientists' (I use the term loosely) have presented us with is a cherry picked image taken from a set of tens of thousands of images which were output when the 2 x 3 pixel image was entered into the program. This is not science by any stretch of the imagination. Main stream cosmology is effectively a religion at this point in time.

@@streuthmonkey1 There was no image taken by the telescopes, they took light phase and timestamp data. That data was used to construct an image after the fact. The number of pixels in that final image can be however many or as few as you want, and it doesn't change the quality of the input data. What exactly are you referring to?

Gotta love the title tho

Yeah

in a very clear and understandable way? im so stupid then....

@ordinary name you have an excellent point. The materials my kids come home with now, seem confusing and convoluted.

@@sansanxaverius3436 It's ok, it just means you excell at different things, like a janitor or a plumber.

I don’t know what a ark second or minute is

Yeah me too

Same. Definitely helped me to understand the physics.

Same!!

Qawareta sail Lu kune kuse

Same here, I'm also 30 and I was also obsessed with black holes since 4th grade and always read the same thing and was so disheartened. I literally cried when the M83 image came out and I first saw it.

Hello 👋

I have to say that your science teacher was somewhat behind the times. Pretty strong evidence of the existence of black holes goes back to the late 1990s... see for example the famous 1974 bet on Cygnus X-1 between Kip Thorne and Stephen Hawking, conceded by Hawking in 1990 on the basis of evidence available then.

I’m still obsessed with space 😂😂

Totally feeling your excitement bro. I'm 45, and have been a space cadet since I was 5 years old. The same theory that predicted the theoretical existence of black holes (Einstein's General Theory of Relativity 1905) also predicts the theoretical existence of white holes. Basically the opposite of what a black hole is. I recommend looking them up if you haven't already. Very interesting insights from very profound astrophysicists on the topic and reasons why we haven't seen any yet, if the actually do exist.

Also the dreadful distances between things is nuts. Takes light 8m to get to earth too, then we have things that are thousands of light years away.

No. It's all within the Dome as God created, it's not far at all.

Phoenix A: lol, quite possibly lmao

@@olle12 Lol FLAT EARTHER ALERT

@@chosentonessournotes Prove me wrong, the scientists your citing, can't even measure the speed of light, so all the sh*t they are saying could be wrong.

It is dumbed down - that's why you can understand it.

Yep. Came here for a new "picture", left with better understanding, and actually a way to explain it to friends and family easier now.

@@andoletube it's good that it's dumbed down. not everyone can become a rocket/astro physicist. that's the point of science communication.

@@elck3 I agree, it must be dumbed down otherwise it's useless. I was just saying it shouldn't be stated that it isn't dumbed down, because it conceals the fact that it's extremely complicated and very much unresolved.

@@andoletube Yea, ofc it's dumbed down. I think what the original commenter meant was that Veritasium goes more in-depth conceptually than many other YTbers and pop-sci journalists.

I think it's the first explanation I've understood.

Ma'am, it was so nice to hear from you. I would also love to be like you one day, I love spacetime stuff.

Try pointing two students at the same time from different locations, to see what matches up in their homework. If you do this enough you can probably get a sense of what the video is actually teaching well.

Quran 56 - 75, 76 This is the verse which says that the place where the stars fall and. , 77-8 The part that says when the stars are extinguished) This part needs to be defined interprited(For those who mock Quran 109 -6 to you is your religion,and to me,,my religion)

Why is this so on point? Nooooooo😭😭💔

Read star maker by olaf stapledon, you will thank me later

@@michi-strichi what's it about?

You know what's crazy? We are the universe itself

it kinda was proofen also a few years ago, so before the first black hole was taken a picture of. We already watched the stars around and came to the conclusion, that there has to be 1 very massheavy thing, that is very dark (under the detection limit earlier data sets), since it makes big stars move a significant part of the speed of light.

It's been said for a long time (even when I was in school and I'm 33 now).

@@Rockyzach88 it bothers me a lot, that some articles are acting like this is ground breaking news. But this was discovered back in 1974. With the use of radio waves and high powered telescopes

Yah it’s been said for so long now I heard Albert Einstein say something abt this to bill gates in 1938 still blows my MiNd

@@aroTheKidd Bill Gates was born in 1955.

In the singularity the three dimensions are flat as they would be on a paper sheet

SCIENTISTS ARE SURPRISED THAT THE MILKY WAY RUNS WITH UBUNTU AND NOT WITH ARCH !

Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless them! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤

It's garbage mate ... unadulterated crap

@@allanroser1070 what is

Yeah, it's pretty genius to make an actual model in such a way. Great way to teach it to kids.

@@birbdad1842 I'm an adult and couldn't grasp it until this brilliant physical demonstration

It's just clips from the previous video on the topic though, right?

@@dickurkel6910 yeah, more like 80% of the previous video

The actual image taken by the telescope was 3 x 2 pixels. The image the 'scientists' (I use the term loosely) have presented us with is a cherry picked image taken from a set of tens of thousands of images which were output when the 2 x 3 pixel image was entered into the program. This is not science by any stretch of the imagination. Main stream cosmology is effectively a religion at this point in time.

Why is Donald Trump pretty and I am not? But why does he only have a wife but I have TWO HANDSOME GIRLFRIENDS who I show off in my masterpiece YT videos? Do you know the answer, dear qleis

@@AxxLAfriku I yearn for the day you give up and quit youtube

2 years later: We can see to the point of the Big Bang.

Hh

The double slit experiment is one of the most simple, yet also florid experiments, very intriguing!

the double slit experiment never considered phase shift

Yes and its only 10 sec starting at 10:30

JESUS KNOCKS ON YOUR HEART AND LONGS FOR YOU TO ANSWER! HE DOESN'T WANT TO SEE ANYONE PERISH INTO HELL. GOD LOVES YOU SO HE GIVES YOU FREE WILL AND A CHOICE TO ACCEPT HIM OR REJECT HIM. TO LOVE HIM OR TO LOVE SIN/THIS WORLD. CALL UPON JESUS & ASK HIM TO FORGIVE YOUR SINS! SURRENDER YOUR WILL & YOUR LIFE TO HIM & HE WILL GIVE YOU ETERNAL LIFE IN HEAVEN! PICTURE YOUR BEST DAY ON EARTH TIMES A BILLION FOR ETERNITY, THAT'S HEAVEN! NOW PICTURE YOUR WORST DAY ON EARTH TIMES A BILLION FOR ETERNITY, THAT'S HELL! HE WILL GIVE YOU WHAT YOU WANT SO IF YOU REJECT HIM YOU WILL BE SEPARATED FROM HIM & HIS BLESSINGS (LOVE, PEACE, JOY, HOPE, REST, ETC). IN HELL YOU WILL BE ALONE WITHOUT GOD OR PEOPLE... YOU WILL BE HOPELESS, IN DESPAIR & AGONY FOREVER! GOD'S STANDARD FOR HEAVEN IS PERFECTION AND ONLY JESUS (THE SON OF GOD/GOD IN THE FLESH) LIVED THAT PERFECT LIFE! HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE & TOOK THE WRATH OF THE FATHER ON THE CROSS FOR YOUR SINS! GOD IS JUST SO HE MUST PUNISH SIN & HE IS HOLY SO NO SIN CAN ENTER HIS KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. IF YOU ARE IN CHRIST ON JUDGEMENT DAY GOD WILL SEE YOU AS HIS PERFECT SON (SINLESS SINCE YOUR SINS ARE COVERED BY JESUS' OFFERING). YOU CAN ALSO CHOOSE TO REJECT JESUS' GIFT/SACRIFICE & PAY FOR YOUR OWN SIN WITH DEATH (HELL) BUT THAT SEEMS PRETTY FOOLISH! GOD SEES & HEARS EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SAID & DONE. YOU WONT WIN AN ARGUMENT WITH HIM & YOU CANT DEFEND ANY OF YOUR SINS TO HIM. YOU'RE NOT A GOOD PERSON, I'M NOT A GOOD PERSON... ONLY GOD IS GOOD! WE'RE ALL GUILTY WITHOUT ACCEPTING JESUS' SACRIFICE FOR OUR SINS! MUHAMMAD DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, BUDDHA DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, NO PASTOR/NO PRIEST/NO SAINT/NO ANCESTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, MARY DIDN'T, THE POPE DIDN'T EITHER, NO IDOLS OR FALSE gods DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO MUSICIAN OR CELEBRITY DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO INFLUENCER OR RU-vid STAR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO SCIENTIST OR POLITICIAN DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO ATHLETE OR ACTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS! STOP IDOLIZING & WORSHIPING THESE PEOPLE! JESUS CHRIST ALONE DIED FOR YOUR SINS & WAS RESURRECTED FROM THE GRAVE! HE IS ALIVE & COMING BACK VERY SOON WITH JUDGEMENT (THESE ARE END TIMES)! PREPARE YOURSELVES, TURN FROM SIN & RUN TO JESUS! HE KNOWS YOUR PAIN & TROUBLES, HE WANTS TO HEAL & RESTORE YOU! TALK TO HIM LIKE A BEST FRIEND! ASK HIM TO REVEAL HIMSELF TO YOU & HELP YOU TO BELIEVE IF YOU DOUBT! DON'T WAIT TO CRY OUT! NO ONE IS PROMISED TOMORROW! HE LONGS FOR YOU TO INVITE HIM IN, HE LOVES YOU MORE THAN ANY PERSON EVER COULD, HE CREATED YOU! Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."-John 14:6 "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."-Matthew 10:33 “For the wages of sin is death (hell), but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”-Romans 6:23

Agreed, that was shocking to see. I can't believe we have the technology to image something that far away and through so much intervening matter.

Agreed! That short animation covers the period of many years, so it would take lifetimes to get an hours-long clip.

You can literally see the advancement in technology as the video gets clearer as it plays.

Just so you know, that is all just CGI created to represent what we believe it appears as.

I love that clip. It blows my mind seeing how fast that one star whips around.

beautifully said

When hecker

@@shadowstuff7322 NEW FNAF GAME LEAK!!!1!1!1!!!!!!1111

9)0 If

And perhaps less electricity

black holes are the most fascinating topics in the space genere.

Derek the GOAT 🐐

That's actually cool to hear bro. I wish you great luck in your thesis!

Good luck with your thesis dude. I am a computer science student about to finish my bachelors myself so I hope you kill it and talk about Veritasium in your thesis.

Thanks for writing this, it’s brilliant to see someone really benefiting from the internet, that was its true purpose. I know millions of people have, we just don’t get to hear testimony of it. Good luck in your thesis and your future career, we have one life and you are spending yours wisely.

Hi, fellow stupid, unintelligent human and neighbor of yours here… just wanted to thank you for going into that field and helping advance science and our understanding of the cosmos. If I could go back and redo my life I would have chosen the same career path. I chose to mess around in school, do drugs, go to concerts, ect. Although I don’t regret my choices and I had a BLAST none of it helped humanity or the advancement of our species. It’s bigger folks like you that do that so I thank you, and Derek. ❤️

Only 8 likes?

Strange PC view change

Ok

How are you 52 years old? Isn't RU-vid significantly younger than that?

Remove double ads and unskippable ads

Wow, Mia Luxury Cars, this is indeed amazing, kudos for this one, i do hope your channel grows even more and what you commented is 100 percent real and true.

Yes, the info is very helpful, now I understand more about black holes. Your channel has many helpful information, too!

now I understand more about black holes. Your channel has many helpful information. Recommended !

Yeah, that's right.. It really makes me curious about those massive black holes.

Wow, so amazing i also never understood black holes this better in class like i do now.

The world is too busy watching morons on tik tok.

а... веришь в чёрную дыру? а она что есть?? ...как ты узнал что она есть?

Just don't let him teach you about the speed of electricity. If you know, you know...

I cant find the “mark as black hole reference” button. Only Like, Dislike, Watch Later.

100% agree with you 👍

Ew

@@zeo4391 ?

@@meee_5155 Ew

a bot here

if you reply using notifications then your reply is invalid

RIGHT?

If you are looking at that image in .jpeg format, it was split into similar patterns using Discrete Cosine Transform, and assembled back by your GPU.

@@igornoga5362 Underrated comment; more generally, fourier transforms are super cool!

@@aronsarmasi2368 I love how it the same maths and principles here that is behind stuff like X-ray crystallography, a technique we use to look at very tiny things in great detail.

it blew my mind... somwhow after following physics and cosmology videos for few years now. it still blew my mind that how humans imagined that putting that together will actuall return an image....

Thnx for explaining that. I didn't know that either! Still, it's an amazing image and fascinating to know that stars are dancing around like that somewhere in the universe.

Can you elaborate a bit?

@@anshjain8993 Helmut is saying that the footage at 1:50 is greatly sped up and was actually recorded over 20 years of real time

@@AhsanAtaa yeah i was confused which footage he was referring to and also what the friend misunderstood (coz it was kinda obvious), thanks!

Time being relative, would it even feel like 20 years on one of those stars or would it be significantly slowed down? Would experiencing being sucked into a black hole feel like an eternity because of the sheer speed you'll be going at?

SCIENCE !

Calculations

IKR

How old are black holes? The ancient people didn't draw black holes on the walls!

@@labbeaj how do you know? Hard to draw something you can't see! Maybe they drew them but they're so accurately drawn that they're just invisible!

truth

The technology involved with figuring this stuff out is so cool to me, like how many generations of scientists it takes to get to where we are now…. And then there is my mom “researching” on Facebook thinking she knows better! Haha

I wouldn't say we're that privileged. We are advanced enough to begin understanding the true nature of our universe but too primitive to explore it.

The power of the black hole...in the palm of our hand.

@Mike Studmuffin That's... not how a black hole works.

I agree.

Define spacetime. Space and time are not objects. They are concepts. You can't warp a concept.

Excelent but still nonsense. Black Holes are entirely hupothetical. There is no direct evidence for their existence. The actual image taken by the telescope was 3 x 2 pixels. The image the 'scientists' (I use the term loosely) have presented us with is a cherry picked image taken from a set of tens of thousands of images which were output when the 2 x 3 pixel image was entered into the program. This is not science by any stretch of the imagination. Main stream cosmology is effectively a religion at this point in time.

@@DegreesOfThree spacetime is a mathematical model that combines the three dimensions of space with one dimension of time. Thus creating one four-dimensional manifold

John 3:16 New International Version 16 For God so loved(A) the world that he gave(B) his one and only Son,(C) that whoever believes(D) in him shall not perish but have eternal life.(E) 🙏!!

It’s very difficult to see your own b-hole

"behind the scenes" -- I see what you did there!

Such complexity and intricacy, how can there not be an intelligent designer-creator? 💫

Well, it is no "optical" image, it is radio telescope data visualization - even cooler than just pointing an optical telescope at some point it the sky. (I ever wondered how they could get this resolution, now I have an idea of how it works - simple in theory, hard to achieve in practice.)

@@c.augustin Seems like just having clocks that accurate sync'd around the planet (10^-15 second accuracy) must have been a technical limit. If that clock is off by just one order of magnitude the resolution would also drop.

INSANITY: Pseudoscience has a Growth-Spurt right-now cause the Conservatives funneled Money into it to harm LGBT? Yeah, this is happening: A massive Slander-Campaign against Trans People that Professor Dave Explains and Planarwalk try to oppose, but thats hard. Please inform yourself and choose the not-hateful side in a giant War on Trans-People, led by a guy who politely requests a re-classification of an entire Minoritygroup as ‚mentally-ill-by-default’ (!!?!!) and is at War with Professor Dave now.

I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume that they made a backup ;) TSA would be interesting "What's this suspicious box you're carrying on the plane?" "It's a hard drive RAID" "What's it for?" "It contains a fraction of the data we will assemble to get a radioimage of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way"

"Today, I am Sneakernet."

Imagine a plane crash lmao

Kudos to the presenter. Simply brilliant. Can't thank him enough.

Its so easy to understand, im not even good at english, i love this guy

Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless them! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤

Because it is easy to make up lies and sell them to the fools....

@@Triggernlfrl too easy

Ikr! I hope they continue doing this!

Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless them! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤

@@Call_Upon_YAH no. According to your religion, there is only one god, and it was not Jesus.

@@Call_Upon_YAH There is only one God in the bible and Jesus is his only-begotten. God is spirit and is holy, the holy spirit is the manifestation of His power and it is not some separate entity that you can imagine. Do you even understand what the words "only-begotten son" means? Go read the Bible again brother. Don't complicate your mind with philosophical nonsense. There is no concept of trinity in that thing. The Greeks and Egyptians talk about three-in-ones but not Hebrew folks. Save yourself first by correctly understanding what you believe in. Read it slowly and with understanding. Yes, Jesus is the king of the heavenly kingdom/government but his Almighty Father is the God of the bible.

Not really. Does this guy even have a degree in Astrophysics? Highly doubt it.

Interstellar actually lead to 3 scientific papers being published. One of the executive producers was scientist Kip Thorne, a theoretical physicist. It's really fascinating to read about if you're curious. I saw Kip Thorne give a talk back in 2017, I think, about the LIGO experiments that detected gravitational waves, and he talked a bit about the science behind Interstellar. It made me appreciate the movie that much more.

Should be possible yeah. Essentially the image is just a sum of sinusoidal functions, ie. Fourier series. So if you determined the Fourier transform of any image, you can get its frequency components and from that generate the fringes that can make up the image.

​@@victorboesen3837 eh...I don't think that the combination here is just a sum of the images...also, Fourier transform, to my understanding, can only provide analysis following an axis that you set, for example the x axis of the Image, I don't think it could extract the diagonal stripes anyway, might be wrong tho

I once passed Kip Thorne on an opposing escalator back in the 90s at Sea-Tac airport. He was accompanied by two students carrying his luggage. I was in my twenties at the time and reading up on everything in the library and recognized him and I gave off a quiet reaction as they passed downward and myself upward. The two students noticed my reaction and they both looked at me like I was a crazy person.

They actually put a ton of real work into the field to get that image. There is a documentary or something I saw a while back. I'm sure you could find it if you wanted to. The reason it's so accurate is because it wasn't artistic license and that's awesome!

It was from a simulation and just happend to be looking awesome.

The consulting physicist for the film was able to publish more than one paper on that simulation

@@christophermcallister3033 He's none other than Kip Thorne

It being a film should be a clue to it being fantasy

This picture of said 'black hole' is a crock. When it was first claimed to have been a black hole by the woman said to have discovered it, I already had the same photo in my records from TEN years prier. I had filed it as 'the claim then' was - a photo of the planet Niburu which was claimed to be a Red Dwalph that was on it's way to circle our Sun - I trust perole like youself will not be fooled and will instead work to prove it to be what it is and that's NOT a black hole

Solid comment. Think a lot of people probably feel this way. I know nothing of physics so trying to find some form of line of understanding is sometimes hard when it comes to stuff like this.

I find extremely fascinating how such a deep understanding of physics and relativistic theories doesn’t make your comment sound any less gay. For instance, if I had witnessed your thorough yet brief explanation during a live conference, at the end I definitely would have farted loudly. All the secrets of the Universe don’t mean much when you carry around a tiny penis.

Just a note: all light you see is pointing directly at you or you wouldn’t be able to see it! Polarization is the direction light is oscillating (vertical, horizontal, or anything in between) which is perpendicular to the direction of motion!

@@d.mort. Yep.

But its a plasmoid not a fake black hole. Gravity model is broken and thats why the make up dark energy and matter to explain why their model is broken. turn your child onto the Electric Universe model!! This is real physics!! Scaleable and repeateable. Real science. Not fake news only in computer simulations science. Start with the Thunderbolts Project and the SAFFIRE Project to see whats up....

I'll bet WWE promotions on TV impress you as well.

History teachers ... hehahehahahahehe

TON 618 takes the crown there then, being one of the few Ultra Massive Blackholes and the biggest black hole we know of.

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious?

There are the hypothetical "Stupendously Large Black Holes". So far, no such monstrosity had been observed, but it might only be a matter of time.

Exactly!!!

@Dank Dank 🤡

@Dank Dank I think you misunderstand what radio waves are if that's your takeaway. Visible light and radio waves are the same thing, just at different wavelengths. Over long distances, the wavelengths of photons change due to the expansion of spacetime. The image they produced is just as real as any other image that would be produced by a camera.

@Dank Dank if it was cgi it would look like the Interstellar black hole. This is a blurry orang butthole

@@Dzia1ania don't bother explaining to Dank Dank, his brain is too small to comprehend what's going on here

Nothing bad ever happens to the camera man

20 minutes of explanation and here we are

@@Gsjsji_jwjsbs there is very simple and common sense message in that post. But a closed mind will prevent an exploration of all possibilities.

And no animals were harmed...

@@Gsjsji_jwjsbs theres always at LEAST one joker who posts stupid crap like this. it was funny.... once. now its just cliche' and stupid

well, i mean, you can't see that with your bare eyes, most likely not with any aid one can buy =P (i'm making fun of you, don't take it serious)

Yeah, it's super cool!

I may be wrong, but I think read somewhere that the star obits every 20 years.

Those cluster of stars are called nuclear star cluster. One of the important star that help studying the SMBH is S2. Just search for it. It is very interesting, isn't it?

@@AllMightSage they've been observing and mapping those star paths around black hole for 20 years to made this 10 sec animation)

what did you learn, though? The list of facts given by analogy in this video leave you wanting for everything. After watching this, I can't do anything new. I didn't learn anything I can apply. When you learned multiplication, you could multiply any number. When you learned to drive, you could drive anywhere. When I learned that light can't escape the one particular black hole except at 2.6 Schwarzschild radii of it's event horizon, the only new thing I can do is repeat that single sentence. He didn't teach us the math that he used to come to that number so we can't ever re-apply it elsewhere in our life or understanding, and he didn't teach us anything about relativity, telescopes, light, or anything else, that is, until the end, where he teaches us about his sponsor. Do you really feel educated after this video? If so, then tell me, what did you learn that you can use in your life or work?

And yet he got the singularity wrong, actually referring to the event horizon. I love him to bits, and whilst the overall videos he produces are fantastic there are elements that are incorrect. Which obviously leads to albeit minor, misinformation. I would still recommend him to people, but assuming he is 100% correct and brilliant in subjects he has not specialised in or sought expert advice on is silly.

So you are saying he should explain all the maths behind this image in a video... See I am also agreed that we should learn how to apply things in practical life ...but saying we learnt nothing seeing the video doesn't make sense... Not all scientists came up with the maths first... imagination is also a thing...🤷 And admiring one for their work isn't a bad thing I guess...🙏

@@Gypsophila_el I am simply saying that information that cannot be applied is useless. Your argument that it isn't meaningless fails to find an application of "what you learned", unlike other examples of learning where you develop a trade or skill or technique or formula which accomplishes something with the new knowledge. For example, can you use a telescope now? Having watched this, can you perform astronomy? Could you now operate any equipment related to the subject? Can you use what you learned to do anything? Anything at all!

@@RaisedBySheeps This is fake. I don't know any listener (not interpreter) who says that Beethoven's symphonies since, what can he do with that hearing? This is the observation and explanation of an extraordinary natural phenomenon. Of course it's at least as useful as listening to any Beethoven symphony (we know it does something but don't ask me to find a practical application for it).

The magic of ass loads of AI, supercomputer runtime, and really smart people

It's actual incredible.

Hence, petabytes of data

No satellites involved. All ground-based telescopes

See Katie Bouman " Imaging Black Hole with Event Horizon Telescope" 13/04/2019, The explanation of 29 years old Computer Scientist which have created the picture from all that data.

Came here to write the same thing

The essential and professional man endeavors to set sail across the waters to the enchanted land of Europe. He has in historic past, leisured in the exotic terrain, yet now, he has chartered a ferry for the long term, the quixotic adventurer sails to the topography of that of Europe to never return. Only replete with his knowledge procured over many a years, and bequeathed with the enlightenment one has when cobblestone displays it's beauty to that of a city with history equal to his own. We are creative people and shall our intrinsic value give extrinsic measurements of pecuniary worth. Shall the winds of history flow always in our favour.

simply amazing explaination and visualization of the phyical nature of a black hole.

Black Hole Deniers do still exist. Professor Dave Explains has videos on it. I warmly recommend it if yuo want to laugh at some Science-Denial.

We haven't proven that black holes (as described by General Relativity) exist. The fact that these stars orbiting Sagittarius A* display no gravitational lensing effects whatsoever goes to show that the GR explanation of gravity is false - gravity is not the bending of spacetime at all. The path of light is unaffected by gravity. Gravitational lensing is a myth. All the observations that are claimed to be examples of gravitational lensing are really just good old refractional lensing in the density gradient of a gas cloud or an atmosphere.

@@scowi3 So we shouldn't see the light ring on a full moon eclipse.

@@betswally That's got nothing to do with gravitational lensing (and I have never heard anyone claim it is anyway!).

ok

I just close my eyes , press my fingers on my eyelids putting pressure on my eyeballs and boom, I see the milky way galaxy with the black hole

@@mikebanks2176 😂

that is why going to the university makes no sense,

@@gabaktech People go to universities to make connections, grow their network. It's not always about state of the art education.

It's sometimes more about giving a potential employer some form of verifiable "proof" of your education, or even of your commitment to the subject itself.

Ah yes. The art of Programing!

Good luck my friend!

and your teacher should love it.

They conclude Sagittarius A exist in 2008/2009 I think

You should learn the difference between proof, and a very questionable composite image.

@@DegreesOfThree why is it questionable? We have tested these techniques on closer objects that also emit visible light and we know these techniques are sound and effective.

Yeah, that B-hole talk was nice

Pre-production, my friend.

I feel like he either somehow saw the pic before the public, or most likely produced the rest of the video before, hoping the discovery would in fact be the black hole's photo. Anyways amazing work

Isn’t this video a copy from his M87 Black Hole Photo

Dude it is called production. As a producer you need to gather the information relevant for the video. when we got the press release days ago we already knew about the findings. The only thing Veritas needed today was the picture.

@@vb2388 The black hole bits are. Remind me if I'm wrong, but he never actually covered the telescope array in nearly this deep a level of detail before. As for how he made the video, it's easy to anticipate this discovery years in the making, and easier still to make a video about the observation techniques for months, if not years, of study and preparation, and add in the discovery where it fits whenever it's out.

It’s crazy to think we went from playing with sticks and stones since that light was emitted to being able to see the light and understand it all in the time it took it to get here

I bet your new music videos won’t get as many likes as your comment here.

Yeah, the video just kept getting better. It was like five videos that would all be amazing on their own.