You just read my mind and many many more other Lewis Pott fans....like we all know , what we learn from Lewis Potts on the 9 minutes is more than what you'd have learnt in 4 years of film school.This.man is fabulous! I wish he was my teacher throughout my life.His clarity of expression and humor are top notch!
It's awful. One of the worst of the year so far. They had a great set up for the story and it's just terrible. Production wise is great, but the story is so boring and so slow and Tom Hardy is so wasting his talents in here. I had great hopes for this movie, though. Very sad it turned out like this.
Obviously there's a certain amount of subjectivity, but I didn't like the movie. I went into it with high hopes but I lost patience with it very quickly. I found it very derivative - and worse, the movies that it borrows from did the same stuff so much better.
It’s nice that Jeff Nichols still shoots on film and he doesn’t hide that. You can tell from frame one The Bikeriders was shot on film. Which fascinates me because Twisters which also came out this summer was shot on film and you’d never know it.
nah I think you can definitively still see Twisters was shot on film, especially when they are in nature, the green looks very good; but indeed it could have looked "better" ig but Dan Mindel has that weird thing where he shoots film but for some reason very low contrasty
I went to the theater to see this movie and I thoroughly enjoyed it. As an audience member, just taking it in for the first time, I didn't think that the movie looked "lit" at all, which I said to myself, I'm sure it is, but they did a great job of hiding it and really immersing the viewer in the story. Great video breakdown, too, I really learned a lot from watching this.
In my head, that last scene of Austin Butler coming out of the bar is lit different from Jodie Comer's perspective, so it serves a story purpose as well. Her gaze on Austin is different compared to the rest of the group of riders. I know some of the shots in this movie are recreations from the photo book it was based off of/took inspiration from.
Nice breakdown mate, thank you. Although, the top lights aren't balanced to tungsten - they're daylight! The warmth is just coming from the timber bounce and the tungsten practical behind the bar.
I love your Channel and your breakdowns! I was wondering if you could do a breakdown on the Superman and Lois show? I was pleasantly surprised by the cinematography in the show, and was interested how they achieve such a look on a television budget!
There's something they did during the color grading process that makes it look digital (despite being shot on 35mm). I've seen movies shot on digital that feel more 35mm-ish than this film.
What about exposure? Do they film with that light and then pull down a few stops to have less grain? In that bar scene, what a lot of light... interesting result.
It's an awesome vid with proper knowledge tips in it. loved it. I have only one question. How did You get shots from almost the whole film scenes? Where from?
Wow, I found that really interesting. I wonder if the shots in the bar where you pointed out the back of the jacket being lit in one angle and complete darkness on the other, that it might have been better with some lighted added on the dark one, so the differences wasn't so stark. I don't know the correct answer, but as a colorist, I think that would bother me a little. Great video though- well thought and delivered - Thank you for this
Almost every scene in movies has some discrepancy in continuity similar to these, you would run out of time in the day trying to make everything match perfectly. And it probably wouldn’t look as good
not gonna lie, the lighting looks very ugly imo, the exterior night shots outside of the bar looks so awful and flat, why are movies looking like this nowadays?
