I wonder if Adobe has thought about generating smaller images first giving you a chance to pick out the one you want to keep then generating that at full size. It seems a waste of computer time to make maybe 20 variations full size when you probably only need one at fill size. This workflow would save them a lot of money and make the service even faster.
The worst part is the credits not rolling over, if we paid for them we own them. This is like giving back your savings account interest each month to the bank, does not make sense. Adobe stock credits roll over, so why not Ai credits?
Gotta admit, compared to other design and rendering software subscriptions that I get screwed, blewed and tatooed paying for, the Adobe suite of world class programs is an actual bargain.
It’s a choice. For Adobe to make more money. There’s nothing standing in a way of this software running on your own hardware. You have enough processing power.
Wait, 1 credit every time you click? Some very difficult photos with water ripples i.e can take a lot of clicks. Am I missing something? I guess the old manual tools are still gonna be used a lot!
I believe that to be correct. I can definitely see where this would be frustrating! I often find that I have to regenerate a prompt several times before it gives me something worth using.
@@Mainstream_Multi_Media exactly, when I tried it even for small details I had to repeat so many times that I ended up doing it manually because the results were cleaner. I guess one's need to know for sure when to use it to avoid losing credits.
I don’t like to think about it negatively. I accept that it’s here and apart of the natural order of technological evolution. And so, I’ll continue to study and learn how I can incorporate it into my workflow to enhance our project’s efficiency.
Jus go old school and think for yourself? Too much reliance on AI now for laziness. Will only effect the non creatives who want to pretend to be creative and charge accordingly.
Thank you for expressing your point of view! I think it is important to maintain human elements in our work but unfortunately, we do not control the evolution of technology. I do think it is healthy to have an understanding of how to edit without AI however, successful businesses prioritize productivity. If you can optimize your workflow without compromising quality, why would you not? If editing without AI is a selling point for your business and you truly love the art of doing everything without the new tech, then by all means, it is your work. Once again, thank you for sharing your point of view!
